Left Ventricular Global Systolic Longitudinal Deformation and Prognosis 1 Year after Femoral and Apical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation




Background


Aortic valve replacement is the recommended therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis who have symptoms or decreased left ventricular (LV) function. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a treatment alternative in surgically high-risk or inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis. The objective of this study was to analyze LV function assessed by global LV longitudinal systolic strain (GLS) and relation to prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with femoral or apical TAVI.


Methods


Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed before and 1 year after TAVI. Ejection fraction (EF) was retrospectively measured using the biplane Simpson’s method, and GLS was obtained as an average of 16 segments in the three standard apical views by speckle-tracking. GE Vivid 7 and Vivid 9 machines were used for echocardiography, and speckle-tracking analysis was performed using EchoPAC PC ’08 version 7.0.1.


Results


The total population consisted of 100 TAVI patients. Eighty-one patients survived to 1-year follow-up, with a mean age of 81 ± 7 years (range, 64–93 years) and a mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score of 9.6 ± 2.7. Nineteen patients died before 1-year follow-up (12 women), with a mean age of 82 ± 7 years (range, 66–92 years) and a mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score of 10.5 ± 2.8. No differences were found between the 19 patients who died before follow-up and the 81 patients who survived to 1-year follow-up. GLS was increased significantly 1 year after TAVI. In 34 patients with EFs > 50%, GLS increased from −15.3 ± 3.4 to −17.1 ± 3.6 ( P = .04). In these patients, the mean EF increased numerically from 57.9 ± 5.3% to 60 ± 7.7% ( P = .19). In 74 patients with EFs ≤ 50%, mean GLS and EF improved significantly from −10 ± 2.8 to −13.8 ± 3.8 ( P < .0001) and 39 ± 9.4% to 52 ± 12.5% ( P < .0001), respectively. The 1-year gain in EF was the same after femoral TAVI (9.7 ± 10.1%) and after apical TAVI (8 ± 10.8%) ( P = .52). Furthermore, GLS did not differ significantly after femoral and apical TAVI (−3.8 ± 3.3 and −2.6 ± 3.7, respectively, P = .21). There was no difference in causes of death according to approach. In the total population ( n = 100), 35 deaths occurred, 19 before 1-year follow-up and 16 afterward. The median follow-up time was 30 months. Twenty-five patients (71%) died from cardiac causes. Overall 1-year mortality was 19%, and overall 2-year mortality was 28%. In the patients who died, the median survival time in the apical group was 28.5 ± 15.4 months, compared with 31.6 ± 19 months in the femoral group ( P = .47). There was no impact on prognosis according to high (≥47.5%) versus low (<47.5%) baseline EF or high (≥11.95%) versus low (<11.95%) baseline GLS. However, the magnitude of changes in GLS seemed to have a prognostic impact.


Conclusions


LV EF and longitudinal systolic deformation were improved in TAVI independent of technical approach using the Edwards SAPIEN valve prosthesis during 1-year follow-up. The mortality rate was comparable between technical approaches and independent of baseline LV function. However, patients with the greatest improvement in LV systolic longitudinal deformation after TAVI had a lower mortality rate.


Surgical aortic valve replacement is the recommended therapy for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who have symptoms or decreased left ventricular (LV) function. The development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) offers an alternative and “less invasive” treatment option for patients with AS with high surgical risk. TAVI may be performed by retrograde passage of the aortic valve, using the femoral approach, or transapically through a thoracotomy and direct puncture of the left ventricle at the apex. AS induces LV remodeling, with progressive myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis due to increased afterload, and myocardial deformation analysis has been proposed as a reliable tool for the detection of clinical and subclinical regional LV dysfunction. The assessment of global longitudinal LV systolic strain (GLS) may elucidate the pathologic mechanisms of AS. It has been demonstrated that indices of longitudinal regional myocardial deformation are significantly reduced in patients with AS, particularly in association with coexisting coronary artery disease.


The conventional measurement of LV function, LV ejection fraction (EF), reflects primarily radial function, but this function is load dependent and therefore less useful in AS. In contrast, GLS focus on the longitudinal myocardial fibers and may add more information to LV function than the conventional EF.


Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze LV function assessed by GLS, regional LV longitudinal systolic strain and LV mass in patients with severe AS treated with femoral or apical TAVI. Furthermore, we investigated if baseline and/or changes in LV function after TAVI had any impact on prognosis.


Methods


Patients


In our retrospectively conducted study, a total of 131 symptomatic patients with isolated AS not amenable to conventional aortic valve replacement because of severe comorbidities were suitable for enrollment. At least two surgeons and one cardiologist had to agree that a patient was not a suitable candidate for surgery. Nineteen patients died before 1 year of follow-up, 14 patients underwent echocardiography on an ultrasound machine produced by a different manufacturer, and 17 patients had poor echocardiographic quality or missing follow-up echocardiograms. Thus, the final study population consisted of 81 patients who survived for 1 year after TAVI with Edwards SAPIEN valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) inserted using either the femoral or the apical approach. The recruitment period was from February 2006 through September 2010. The study was approved by the local ethics committee and the Danish Data Protection Agency.


Echocardiography


Transthoracic echocardiography was performed immediately before and 1 year after TAVI using a commercially available ultrasound system (Vivid 7 or Vivid 9; GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS, Horten, Norway). All images were stored digitally and analyzed randomly and offline by a single investigator blinded to all clinical data. All measurements were analyzed using EchoPAC version 7.0.1.


LV EF was calculated from conventional apical two-chamber and four-chamber images using the biplane Simpson’s technique. For the assessment of wall motion score index (WMSI), the left ventricle was divided into 16 segments. A semiquantitative scoring system was used. Global WMSI was calculated as the sum of the segmental scores divided by the number of segments scored. From standard chamber projections, LV EF and WMSI were measured.


LV dimensions were obtained from the parasternal long-axis view, with measurement of end-diastolic interventricular septal thickness, LV posterior wall thickness, and LV end-diastolic diameter just below the tips of the anterior mitral leaflet. LV mass was calculated using the Devereux formula and indexed to body surface area to obtain the LV mass index (LVMI). LV hypertrophy was defined as an LVMI > 115 g/m 2 for men and an LVMI > 95 g/m 2 for women. Relative wall thickness (RWT) was calculated as 2 × (LV posterior wall thickness/LV end-diastolic diameter) and considered abnormal when >0.42. RWT and LVMI were used to assess LV geometry. Patients were categorized as having normal geometry (normal RWT and normal LVMI), concentric remodeling (increased RWT and normal LVMI), eccentric hypertrophy (normal RWT and increased LVMI), or concentric hypertrophy (increased RWT and increased LVMI). LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were obtained from the apical view and indexed to body surface area.


GLS


GLS was assessed using the Automated Function Imaging technique (GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS) on the basis of two-dimensional longitudinal strain imaging. This was obtained from two-dimensional grayscale images of the apical four-chamber, two-chamber, and long-axis view with an optimized frame rate (50–90 frames/sec). Aortic valve closure timing was marked (to determine the end of systole) in the selected views, and three points were anchored inside the myocardial tissue, two placed at the basal segments along the mitral valve annulus and one at the apex. These points triggered the automatic process, which analyzed myocardial motion by tracking features (natural acoustic tags). Longitudinal strain, defined as the physiologic change in the length ( L ) of the region of interest from end-diastole to end-systole and expressed as a percentage (longitudinal strain [%] = [ L end-systole L end-diastole ]/ L end-diastole × 100%), was automatically determined in 16 LV segments. Thus, during contraction, strain attains negative values as the length of the region of interest decreases relative to the resting value. The percentages of wall lengthening and shortening were displayed for each plane, representing longitudinal strain. Segments that failed to be tracked by the software were manually adjusted by the operator. Any segments that subsequently failed to be tracked were automatically discarded for the calculation of global strain. Analysis was feasible in 94% of the segments. For GLS analysis, digital cine loops were processed offline using commercially available software.


Intraobserver and interobserver variability was assessed in 25 randomly selected patients. The intraobserver repeatability analysis showed a mean absolute difference of 0.6% (95% confidence interval, −0.4% to 0.8%) for GLS. The interobserver repeatability analysis showed a mean absolute difference of 1.3% (95% confidence interval, −0.9% to 1.6%) for GLS.


Follow-Up Data and End Points


The survival status of all patients was obtained from the Danish Civil Registration System on July 27, 2012. The median follow-up period was 30 months (range, 0–61 months). The definition of cardiac death required documentation of significant arrhythmias and/or cardiac arrest or death attributable to congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction in the absence of any other precipitating factors. In case of death out of the hospital for which no autopsy was performed, sudden unexpected death was attributed to a cardiac cause. All events were confirmed by hospital recordings or autopsy reports.


Statistical Analysis


All results are expressed as mean ± SD. Differences between groups were tested using Student’s t tests for unpaired data once a normal distribution was demonstrated; otherwise, nonparametric Mann-Whitney tests were used. Categorical variables were analyzed using χ 2 tests or Fisher’s exact tests as necessary. Correlations between variables were determined using Spearman’s rank correlation tests by multivariate regression analysis. P values < .05 were considered significant.




Results


Baseline Characteristics of the 81 Patients Surviving to 1-Year Follow-Up


We studied 81 patients (44 women) with a mean age of 81 ± 7 years (range, 64–93 years) and a mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) score of 9.6 ± 2.7. The mean systolic blood pressure was 140 ± 23.7 mm Hg, and the mean diastolic blood pressure was 67 ± 15.1 mm Hg. The mean body mass index was 25.3 ± 4.7 kg/m 2 , and the mean creatinine level was 101 ± 39 μmol/L.


By echocardiography, all patients had significant AS ( Table 1 ). Baseline echocardiographic measurements are shown in Table 1 .



Table 1

LV function, dimensions, mass, and geometry at baseline and at 1-year follow-up


















































































































Variable Baseline ( n = 81) 1-year follow-up ( n = 81) P
Aortic valve
Aortic valve area (cm 2 ) 0.66 ± 0.22 1.55 ± 0.26 <.0001
Peak gradients (mm Hg) 76.1 ± 27.9 36.3 ± 6.2 <.0001
LV function
EF (%) 46.9 ± 12.2 55.4 ± 11.4 <.0001
WMSI 1.39 ± 0.39 1.19 ± 0.3 .0004
End-diastolic volume (mL) 124.8 ± 46 122 ± 40.6 .69
End-systolic volume (mL) 71.4 ± 39.7 60.4 ± 33.3 .06
LV dimensions
Interventricular septum (mm) 12.5 ± 3 11.7 ± 2.5 .07
Posterior wall (mm) 11.8 ± 2.4 11.2 ± 2.5 .11
End-diastolic diameter (mm) 48.6 ± 9.1 48.8 ± 8.8 .88
LV mass (g) 233.2 ± 83.7 216.4 ± 84.5 .20
LVMI (g/m 2 ) 129.9 ± 45 120.3 ± 41 .16
LV hypertrophy 61 (75.3%) 54 (66.7%) .23
RWT 0.51 ± 0.16 0.48 ± 0.16 .24
RWT > 0.42 57 (70.4%) 49 (60.5%) .31
Normal geometry 7 (8.6%) 12 (14.8%) .22
Concentric remodeling 16 (19.8%) 18 (22.2%) .68
Eccentric hypertrophy 17 (21%) 20 (24.7%) .57
Concentric hypertrophy 41 (50.6%) 31 (38.3%) .12

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or as number (percentage).

LVMI > 115 g/m 2 in men, LVMI > 95 g/m 2 in women.



All patients were symptomatic, with 39 patients (48.1%) in New York Heart Association functional class II, 33 patients (40.8%) in class III, and nine patients (11.1%) in class IV. Diabetes mellitus was present in nine patients (11.1%), and treatment for hypertension before valve insertion was present in 43 patients (53.1%). Six patients (7.4%) had undergone prior coronary artery bypass grafting, 19 (23.5%) had had myocardial infarctions, and 21 (25.9%) had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. Finally, 19 patients (23.5%) had three-vessel disease, 10 (12.3%) had two-vessel disease, 23 (28.4%) had one-vessel disease, and 29 (35.8%) had no evidence of coronary artery disease. After TAVI, all patients were treated with clopidogrel for 3 to 12 months. No other systematic changes in medication were made after TAVI.


Baseline Characteristics of the 19 Patients Who Died before 1-Year Follow-Up


These patients (12 women) had a mean age of 82 ± 7 years (range, 66–92 years) and a mean EuroSCORE of 10.5 ± 2.8. The mean systolic blood pressure was 135 ± 27 mm Hg, and the mean diastolic blood pressure was 68 ± 16.3 mm Hg. The mean body mass index was 24.8 ± 5 kg/m 2 , and the mean creatinine level was 117 ± 44 μmol/L.


Four patients were in New York Heart Association class II, and 15 were in class III. Diabetes mellitus was present in four patients (21.1%), and treatment for hypertension before valve insertion was present in 14 patients (73.7%). Two patients (10.5%) had undergone prior coronary artery bypass grafting, 10 (52.6%) had had myocardial infarctions, and seven (36.8%) had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. Finally, five patients (26.3%) had three-vessel disease, three (15.8%) had two-vessel disease, two (10.5%) had one-vessel disease, and nine (47.4%) had no evidence of coronary artery disease.


Baseline echocardiographic measurements are shown in Table 1 . No differences were found between 19 patients who died before follow-up and the 81 patients who survived to 1-year follow-up, except for WMSI, which was better in the 19 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement but died before 1 year of follow-up was completed.


Regional and Global LV Function after TAVI


Echocardiographic valve gradient and area as well as LV function, dimensions, mass, and geometry at baseline and at 1-year follow-up are shown in Table 1 . Aortic valve area increased significantly, while WMSI and aortic valve gradient decreased. There were no alterations in end-diastolic volume, but we observed an almost significant decrease in end-systolic volume.


GLS measured by speckle-tracking increased significantly after TAVI ( Table 2 ). The changes in each myocardial segment, by longitudinal regional strain, demonstrated a significant change in all basal and mid segments. None of the apical segment changed at 1-year follow-up ( Table 2 ). In 34 patients with EFs > 50%, mean GLS increased from −15.3 ± 3.4 to −17.1 ± 3.6 ( P = .04). In these patients, mean EF increased numerically from 57.9 ± 5.3% to 60 ± 7.7% ( P = .19). In 74 patients with EFs ≤ 50%, mean GLS and EF improved significantly from −10 ± 2.8 to −13.8 ± 3.8 ( P < .0001) and 39 ± 9.4% to 52 ± 12.5% ( P < .0001), respectively.


Jun 2, 2018 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Left Ventricular Global Systolic Longitudinal Deformation and Prognosis 1 Year after Femoral and Apical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access