© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017
Andrea Montalto, Antonio Loforte, Francesco Musumeci, Thomas Krabatsch and Mark S. Slaughter (eds.)Mechanical Circulatory Support in End-Stage Heart Failure10.1007/978-3-319-43383-7_4646. Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke
(1)
Center for Circulatory Support, Cardiac Surgical Research, Texas Heart Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
(2)
Texas Heart Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
46.1 Introduction
One of the most potentially devastating complications in the period following ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation is the incidence of stroke or major thromboembolic events. Patients on mechanical circulatory support, as with the general population, may be afflicted by either embolic or hemorrhagic strokes. In the postimplantation period, different circumstances may make the individual patient more susceptible to either form of stroke. The inherent thrombogenicity of the mechanical support device surfaces; patient comorbidities, such as diabetes, prior history of stroke, and hypertension; and secondary complications that may develop in relation to implantation and the need for and use of anticoagulation in the postsurgical period all have the potential to increase an individual’s proclivity toward suffering an adverse neurological event.
The physician, clinician, and other members of the medical team contributing to and advancing the care of the patient on mechanical circulatory support must be ever aware of the incidence of stroke, its effects on the long-term patient care goals, and prognostic value, as well as the possible prophylactic strategy and points of intervention in order to minimize the occurrence and effects of stroke in the preoperative and postoperative period.
46.2 Incidence
The overall incidence of stroke in patients on mechanical circulatory support ranges from 8–17%. The Backes et al. review showed a stroke and transient ischemic attack rate of 20% across nearly 2000 patients with either HeartMate II (HMII) or and Novacor devices [1]. As the HeartMate II is the most commonly implanted device, most of the larger research series are focused on this particular subpopulation. Morgan et al. and Tsiouris et al. have both reported overall stroke incidence rate of 12% in their overall study populations [2, 3], while Kato et al. and Trachtenberg et al. have reported similar rates of 12.9% and 13% [4, 5]; this is compared to 17% reported in the Harvey et al. series of 230 HMII patients [6]. These rates of stroke represent a greater risk for adverse neurological events than when compared with heart failure patients in the medical management arm of head-to-head studies [7]. A stroke risk of 6.4% per patient-year was significantly elevated when compared to patients with advanced heart failure who were treated with medical management [6]. As such, physicians and practitioners working with the mechanical circulatory support patient population must be in tune with the unique risk profile of patients in the vigilant attempt to prevent patients from experiencing this devastating complication.
Stroke risk on mechanical circulatory support can further be broken down between bridge-to-transplant (BTT) and destination therapy (DT) patients. Owing to the fact that the destination therapy population is more sick and thus less likely to be a candidate for future transplantation, one might expect this group to not only suffer from more advanced heart failure but also more extensive comorbidities. It would be expected that destination therapy patients may suffer from a greater number of adverse neurological events. This has been recorded in the literature as such. When overall stroke incidence is investigated between these two cohorts, it is demonstrated that this is the case. In the study by Morgan et al. (2014) reporting an overall 12% stroke rate, the incidence of stroke in BTT patients was 10.8% versus 14.3% for DT [2]. In larger BTT studies, stroke rates have been recorded as 8% in series conducted by Pagani et al. and by Miller et al. [2–8] and 11% in the Starling series which investigated 281, 133, and 169 enrolled HeartMate II patients, respectively. Katz et al. (2015) report a stroke rate of 4% for BTT patients and 6% for DT patients [9]. Lushaj et al. report a nearly 2.5× increased risk of stroke for DT patients as compared to BTT [10]. The 14.3% stroke incidence in destination therapy patients reported by Morgan et al. is similar to other DT series, 4 with an 18% incidence of stroke (8% embolic and 11% hemorrhagic) in 134 patients who underwent HMII implantation as DT [2].
Komoda et al. report higher body surface area (BSA) as a protective variable; a patient with a larger BSA had a 1-year mortality freedom from death due to stroke or bleeding of 82.7% as opposed to 49.1% for those of a lower BSA [11]. Women whose heart failure was treated with LVAD implantation were at a twofold risk for ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes than men after controlling for these differences in body size [12]. Morris et al. found a threefold increased risk in women but no differences in patient mortality [13]. Boyle et al., in an analysis of 900 HMII patients, supported this higher stroke rate for women while also finding younger women at higher risk for hemorrhagic stroke with older women experiencing ischemic stroke [14]. The propensity for women to suffer stroke events in significantly greater numbers than men warrants a greater investigation to elucidate what mechanisms increase the proclivity for cohort-matched women on MCS to experience this adverse postimplantation effect as it may indicate lower quality of life and perhaps less future opportunity to receive cardiac transplantation in this subset of patients.
In the Morgan et al. study, the median duration of support until time of stroke was 340.5 days with embolic strokes occurring earlier than hemorrhagic (281 versus 380.5 days) [2]. This was similar in the Harvey et al. study where embolic strokes occurred at median 146 days versus 240 days for hemorrhagic [6]. Time from implantation to stroke can show a predilection for one stroke subtype over another and may potentially be useful in understanding the mechanisms behind these subsets in the MCS population.
46.2.1 Embolic Versus Hemorrhagic Stroke
Some studies have found a relatively balanced percentage of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes [5, 6, 14]. Both Kato et al. and Katz et al. had an ischemic stroke occurrence in 80% of their study population [4, 9, 15]. In contrast, Morgan et al. and Tsiouris et al. reported a greater percentage of patients suffering from hemorrhagic stroke [2, 3]. These differences in stroke etiology may reflect the individual patient cohort and preoperative risk factors. Each patient and their individual risk profiles should be considered preoperatively in order to gear management strategy toward their inherent proclivity toward hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke as best as possible.
46.2.2 Pathogenesis of Hemorrhagic Stroke in the LVAD Population
The incidence of embolic strokes has many possible causes. As blood travels through the artificial circulatory system, it can be expected that upon contact with foreign surface material platelets and the coagulation cascade may become activated. Goldstein et al. (2013) describe blood-surface contact, platelet activation due to shear stress, and thrombus formation at cannulation or migrated cannula sites as potential causes for thrombus formation [16]. Endothelial cell adherence and activation of coagulation system (such as tissue factor VII) also can contribute to the development of coagulopathy. These factors as a function of the unique VAD position and its inherent functionality and interaction with blood cells and tissue sites can all predispose the VAD patient to development of thrombus and ischemic stroke.
Thus, the inherent thrombogenicity of the device will have an independent effect on the risk profile of a particular patient. The HMII is reported to be less thrombogenic than the previous generation HMI. Thromboembolic events may occur in 25% of patients on LVAD support [17]. Each available device would carry its own set of thrombogenic risk due to the nature of the materials used in its manufacture. However, as most large trials are conducted with the use of the HMII, not enough studies are available to compare adequately due to the large differences in patient enrollment numbers and power of the studies. Several emulation methods and models are being design to test and evaluate the thrombogenic potential and thromboresistance of devices [18–20]. The ability to calculate or accurately numerically quantify the thrombogenicity of any one device remains theoretical as such effects would present an enormous challenge that would require not only a superb ability to control for confounding factors but would also remain a qualitative assessment of one device in comparison to its peers, and it may therefore be impossible to isolate the intrinsic thrombogenic effect and stroke risk profile of any one particular device in a quantitative, predictive manner.
In comparing pulsatile flow devices with continuous flow devices, Yuan et al. demonstrated that the incidence of stroke was not significantly higher for one patient cohort in comparison with the other; however, comparing the pulsatile HMI with the continuous flow HMII, the median postoperative day of stroke occurrence was 19 days compared to 363 days for the HMII device [21]. In demonstrating a better outcome for later-occurring strokes with the HMII device, one can predict that the time frame in which the stroke occurs is likely to have a significant influence on patient recovery and long-term prognosis rather than only the device flow itself.
46.2.3 Pathogenesis of Hemorrhagic Stroke in the LVAD Population
Many factors may play a role in the development of hemorrhagic stroke in LVAD patients. In addition to the inherent risks of bleeding secondary to cardiopulmonary bypass for on-pump VAD placement, VAD physiology itself can pose increased risk for bleeding and as such stroke. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome can develop in the post-implant period due to the shearing forces created on platelets as they pass through the pump structure; these forces can cause the platelet surfaces to be disrupted, destroy cells, and lead to a decreased amount of available von Willebrand factor, a platelet factor that contributes to the adherence of platelets to disrupted endothelial surfaces. Reduced von Willebrand factor leads to pathologic bleeding and may play a role in the development of hemorrhagic strokes.
The pathogenesis of hemorrhagic stroke in the LVAD patient has not been fully elucidated. Of course, the occurrence of supratherapeutic anticoagulation leading to adverse cerebral bleeding events is a readily discernible cause; however, other cases of its etiology may not be as clear. Aggarwal et al. (2012) describe the rate of intracranial hemorrhage in LVAD patients to 13–14% and describe the current hypotheses to be broken down into three categories. In the first category, hemorrhagic transformation from angiogenesis and reperfusion at the site of a previous infarct is attributed to the migration of prior emboli fragments [22]. The second hypothesis relates to the advent of rupture and bleeding from bloodstream infection seeding that leads to formation of cerebral mycotic aneurysms. Trachtenberg et al. describes the incidence of mycotic aneurysm formation in patient who suffered from hemorrhagic stroke and bacteremia likening the pathology to that of cererbrovascular accidents (CVA) related to embolization and bacterial seeding that occur in patients with infective endocarditis [5]. Aggarwal et al. also purports that infectious vasculitis can also weaken microvasculature in the brain leading to bleeding [22]. Hence, the main themes surrounding the postulations as to the mechanism of hemorrhagic stroke development can be divided into etiologies based on anticoagulation level abnormalities, consequences of pump characteristics, hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic stroke, and the predisposition of infection to increase susceptibility to intracranial hemorrhage.
46.2.4 Sidedness of Strokes
LVAD studies that have examined the sidedness of strokes suffered by LVAD study participants have showed a greater incidence of right-sided over left-sided strokes. In the Kato et al. study, 58.7% of strokes occurred in the right hemisphere as compared to 28.2% in the left [4]. With no difference in patient anticoagulation profiles, 59.3% of right-sided strokes occurred in patients with either sepsis or LVAD-related infections as compared to 23.1% of those who suffered left-sided strokes. Harvey et al. study concurs with this analysis and gives support to the increased incidence of right-sided strokes and its correlation with patients afflicted by concurrent infection at the time of stroke [6]. The introduction of an LVAD and its related postoperative position of the outflow cannula works along with anatomical positioning of the innominate such that embolic fragments are more frequently directed into the right-sided cerebral vasculature.
46.2.5 Effect of Stroke on Mortality and Morbidity
Adverse neurological events can have a significant effect on patient mortality, future ability to receive cardiac transplant, and prolong the patient recovery period.
Mortality after stroke is increased twofold and is reported to be as high as 20–25% within 30 days and 30–43% at 1 year. [2, 6, 23] Survival rate at 24 months is reported to be 53.9% in contrast to 74.7% in stroke-free patients [6]. Of those surviving after stroke, 67% remained on ongoing mechanical support [2]. In particular, hemorrhagic stroke and the need for tracheostomy are significant predictors of patient survival [3]. Although some studies have found no significant differences in mortality related to ischemic versus hemorrhagic stroke [6], the mortality rate is reported to be increased 1.5× after hemorrhagic stroke and has been reported with 100% mortality [5–22]. Patient mortality is significantly augmented after the advent of a stroke with evidence for an even more devastating patient course after occurrence of a hemorrhagic subtype.
Aside from effects on patient survival and mortality, patients suffering from strokes on mechanical circulatory support can experience significant quality of life changes or rehabilitation setbacks. In addition, strokes are responsible for upward of 8% of hospital readmissions after implantation [24]. Nearly 56% of patients surviving stroke spend time in a skilled nursing or rehabilitation facility [23]. Stroke is associated with significant decreased rate of nearly threefold less cardiac transplantations per person-year [6].