Is intravascular ultrasound beneficial for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions? Evidence from a 4314-patient registry




Background


Coronary bifurcations remain a challenging lesion subset for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is unclear whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance can improve PCI results for these lesions. We aimed to compare IVUS-guided PCI vs. standard PCI in a large registry of patients undergoing PCI for bifurcations in the current era.




Methods


A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted enrolling consecutive patients undergoing bifurcation PCI between January 2002 and January 2006 at 22 centers. The primary end point was the long-term rate of major adverse cardiac events [MACE, i.e., death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization (TLR)].




Methods


A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted enrolling consecutive patients undergoing bifurcation PCI between January 2002 and January 2006 at 22 centers. The primary end point was the long-term rate of major adverse cardiac events [MACE, i.e., death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization (TLR)].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 16, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Is intravascular ultrasound beneficial for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions? Evidence from a 4314-patient registry

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access