and Prafull Raheja2
(1)
Invasive and Interventional Cardiology and Peripheral Vascular Interventions, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, 550 South Jackson St., Ambulatory Care Building, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
(2)
Interventional Cardiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
Keywords
Critical limb ischemiaDiagnosisImagingAngiographyIschemic ulcersCritical Limb Ischemia
Critical limb ischemia (CLI) refers to a condition due to severe obstruction of the peripheral arteries which markedly reduces blood flow to the extremities characterized by chronic ischemic at-rest pain, ulcers, or gangrene in one or both extremities and objectively proven arterial occlusive disease. Critical limb ischemia implies chronicity and is to be distinguished from acute limb ischemia. The incidence of CLI is approximately 500–1000 per million years, with the highest rates among older subjects, smokers, and diabetics. The rate of primary amputation has been reported to be in the range of 10–40 % and was performed only when there were no distal vessels for grafting or in patients with neurologic impairment [1].
In a study with a population of age more than 65 years with intermittent claudication followed over 5 years, 5–10 % subjects developed CLI, out of which approximately 5 % required amputation [2].
CLI, the most severe form of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), does not always follow a systematic progression from asymptomatic phase to exercise pain to rest pain and finally to tissue damage. It can present anytime during these various clinical stages.
Patients with critical limb ischemia have an elevated risk of cardiovascular events, stroke, and vascular death. In a study comprising of patients with PAD from Mayo Clinic, survival rate was 75 % at 5 years and 50 % at 10 years, and three fourths of deaths were attributed to cardiovascular causes [3].
CLI is a major public health issue due to the significant impact it has on the quality of life and the grim prognosis it carries both in terms of limb salvage and survival.
Invasive Imaging Modalities in Critical Limb Ischemia
Angiography
Invasive angiography remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of critical limb ischemia. Noninvasive vascular imaging studies, e.g., duplex ultrasonography, computed tomographic angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography, are also frequently utilized. Angiography with concomitant potential for ad hoc endovascular intervention offers an attractive option with reduced morbidity, especially in high-risk patients with coexisting coronary artery disease. Endovascular intervention can restore antegrade flow and aids in the healing of ischemic ulcers . It can also move the level of amputations more distally resulting in less morbidity.
Invasive angiography can be performed using small 4–6 F catheters with adequate visualization. To assess the lower extremities, access can be obtained from contralateral common femoral artery (CFA) (Fig. 20.1), antegrade ipsilateral CFA, radial artery, brachial artery, and rarely axillary artery. Contralateral arterial access and crossover remains the most utilized technique. In CLI patients, depending on the site of obstruction, catheter should be placed proximal to the lesion in order to visualize the collaterals, followed by selective stepwise angiogram (Figs. 20.2 and 20.3). Contralateral 30° angle during angiography will help visualize the iliac bifurcations, and ipsilateral 30° will open up the vessel below the external iliac artery.
Fig. 20.1
Example of peripheral angiography in CLI: (a) Iliac occlusion, (b) sizing after first stent deployment, (c) final result after stent
Fig. 20.2
Example of peripheral angiography in CLI. (a, b) SFA long occlusion, (c) angioplasty/stenting with filter, (d) final result
Fig. 20.3
Example of peripheral angiography in CLI. (a) Tibioperoneal trunk occlusion, (b) angioplasty and, (c) final result after angioplasty
Access can usually be obtained by feeling the femoral pulsations against the femoral head. If the pulse is not palpable due to severe disease or morbid obesity, access can be achieved under fluoroscopy using the bony land marks. The use of ultrasound has also been suggested in identifying the femoral artery, especially for antegrade access. A recent study comparing the time for antegrade common femoral artery access and safety between the ultrasound-guided access versus fluoroscopy-guided access showed that ultrasound-directed common femoral artery access was faster and safer [4]. Also, in a recent multicenter randomized controlled trial, routine real-time ultrasound-guided access improved common femoral artery cannulation in patients with high CFA bifurcations and also showed reduced number of attempts, less time to access, decreased risk of venipunctures, and less vascular complications [5]. During antegrade CFA access, ultrasound-guided technique is faster and safer compared to fluoroscopic technique.
In addition to defining the arterial anatomy, angiography can usually distinguish between two most common causes for CLI, i.e., atherothrombosis and embolism. Thrombus usually appears as sharp or tapered but not a rounded cutoff on angiography. Diffuse atherosclerosis along with collateral circulation is generally visualized too. An embolus usually has a sharp cutoff with a rounded reverse meniscus sign. An embolus may also be visible as an intraluminal filling defect if the vessel is not completely occluded. The presence of otherwise normal vessels, the absence of collateral circulation, and the presence of multiple filling defects are also signs of embolic phenomenon.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2)-Mediated Angiography
Iodinated contrast is most commonly used for angiography. Carbon dioxide (CO2)-mediated angiography is utilized when there is coexistent chronic kidney disease in patients with PAD to decrease the risk of contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) . CO2 angiography can also be utilized in patients with iodine contrast allergy. Due to a risk of embolism related to CO2, it should be utilized with caution, especially if used for vessels above the diaphragm. In a recent prospective multicenter registry, the safety and efficacy of CO2 angiography-guided endovascular therapy for renal and iliofemoral artery disease was assessed. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <60 mL/min/ and stage 3 CKD were enrolled. Incomplete CO2 angiograms were supplemented by intravascular ultrasound, pressure wire, and/or minimal iodinated contrast media. The primary endpoint was a composite of freedom from renal events and freedom from major CO2 angiography-related complications. The study included 98 patients with 109 lesions. The mean eGFR at baseline was 35.2 ± 12.7 mL/min. The technical success rate was 97.9 %. The primary endpoint was achieved in 92.8 % (91/98) patients. Incidence of CIN was 5.1 %, and CO2 angiography-related total complications occurred in 17.3 % patients including leg pain, abdominal pain, and diarrhea, and two patients developed severe, fatal, nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia.