Blush 0
No appearance of blush or opacification of the myocardium
Blush 1
Presence of blush but no clearance of contrast (stain is present on the next injection)
Blush 2
Blush clears slowly—clears minimally or not at all during three cardiac cycles
Blush 3
Blush begins to washout and is only minimally persistent after three cardiac cycles
Although the TMPG is widely used to assess angiographic outcomes, it is limited by poor reproducibility and its semiquantitative and subjective nature. Furthermore, in addition to its subjective nature, the conventional flow-grading system is categorical, and no continuous angiographic index of coronary flow currently exists. In order to overcome these problems, the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count was developed as a more quantitative index of coronary artery flow [4] (Figs. 30.1, 30.2, 30.3, 30.4, 30.5, 30.6, and 30.7).
Fig. 30.1
Definitions of the first frame used for TIMI frame counting . TIMI thrombolysis in myocardial infarction
Fig. 30.2
Schematic representation of Doppler wire technique for CFR. The ratio of hyperemic average peak velocity to resting average peak velocity was calculated as the CFR. CFR coronary flow reserve
Fig. 30.3
Schematic representation of thermodilution technique for coronary flow reserve (CFR). The mean transit time at rest was 0.72 s (blue), and the mean transit time during hyperemia was 0.10 s (yellow). The CFR was 7.0
Fig. 30.4
Schematic representation of thermodilution technique for IMR. The mean transit time during hyperemia was 0.41 s (yellow). Distal pressure was 74 mmHg (green). The IMR was 31(= 0.41 × 74). In a simplified form, assuming coronary flow and myocardial flow are equal and that the contribution of collateral flow is negligible. IMR index of microcirculatory resistance
Fig. 30.5
A case of forty-eight year old female with anterior AMI. Although CFR was one point three seven relatively low, there are showed high baseline the average peak velocity (APV) and hyperemic APV and decreased hyperemic MVRI and have a favorable diastolic decelertion time (DDT) patterns with longer than six hundred miliseconds. Baseline APV 30 cm/s, systolic APV 17 cm/s, and DDT 712 msec; hyperemic APV 41 cm/s, systolic APV 18 cm/s, and DDT 764 msec
Fig. 30.6
Coronary wedge pressure (Pcw) : distal coronary pressure during balloon occlusion. Pressure derived collateral flow index (CFI): (Pcw − Pv)/(Pa − Pv), simplified by the ratio of Pcw and Pa. Pa aortic pressure
Fig. 30.7
Comparison of HMVRI –> in patients with and without MACEs. HMVRI hyperemic microvascular resistance index, MACE major adverse cardiovascular event (From Jin et al. [5])
30.2 Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Frame Count (TFC)
The TFC is a simple clinical tool for microcirculation assessment and was suggested by C. Michael Gibson [4]. It is defined as the number of cineframes required for contrast to reach a standardized distal coronary landmark in the culprit vessel. The first frame used for TFC is the first frame in which dye fully enters the artery (Fig. 30.1) [4]. The last frame counted is that in which contrast enters a distal landmark. Full opacification of the branch is not required. The number is expressed based upon a cinefilming rate of 30 frames/s. Therefore, a frame count of 30 would mean that 1 s was required for dye to traverse the artery. The TIMI frame count is counted using an electronic frame counter.
These landmarks are as follows: the distal bifurcation in the left anterior descending artery, the distal branch of the lateral left ventricular wall artery furthest from the coronary ostium in the circumflex system, and the first branch of the posterolateral artery in the right coronary artery [4]. In general, the TFC for the left anterior descending (LAD) and the circumflex arteries is assessed in a right anterior oblique projection with caudal angulation (RAO caudal view) and the TFC for the right coronary artery in a left anterior oblique projection with cranial angulation (LAO cranial view).
The TIMI frame count was not significantly affected by increasing the dye injection rate or by changing catheter size. However, the use of intracoronary nitrates significantly increased the TIMI frame count in normal and diseased coronary arteries. In addition, TIMI frame count varies with body size, systemic arterial pressure, age, or gender [6]. The impact of the mechanical force of injection may also impact on TIMI frame count although it was small and insignificant.
30.2.1 Corrected TIMI Frame Count (CTFC)
The frame count number after adjustment for vessel length is given the term “corrected TIMI frame count .” In the corrected TIMI frame count, a correction factor is needed to compensate for the longer length of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) compared with the circumflex and right coronary arteries. A 1.7 correction factor is used to correct the TIMI frame counts for the average greater length of the LAD. The CTFC is a simple, more objective continuous variable index of coronary blood flow that can be broadly and inexpensively applied. This technique is highly correlated with coronary flow reserve measurements obtained using the Doppler guidewire [7]. It is also correlated with volumetric flow and resting distal average peak velocity [8].
30.2.2 Converted TIMI Frame Count
A conversion factor of 2.4, 2, and 1.2 can be used to convert the frame rate values when filmed at 12.5, 15, and 25 frames/s, respectively, to adjust for the 30 frames/s acquisition speed used in the original cineangiographic studies.
30.3 Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR)
CFR is the magnitude of the increase in coronary flow that can be measured as the ratio of coronary flow during maximal microvascular dilation and basal coronary flow. CFR can be measured by intracoronary Doppler wire or thermodilution technique. Using intracoronary Doppler wire, CFR can be calculated as the ratio of hyperemic average peak velocity (hAPV) during maximal hyperemia induced by adenosine or others and baseline average peak velocity (bAPV) (hAPV/bAPV) (Fig. 30.2).
Besides, by thermodilution technique , it is possible to measure pressure and to estimate coronary artery flow simultaneously with a single pressure-temperature sensor-tipped coronary wire (PressureWire Certus, St. Jude Medical, MN, USA) [9, 10]. For measurement of CFR, coronary flow under basal conditions was determined by intracoronary administration of 3 ml of room-temperature saline three times in succession manually (3 ml/s). Maximal hyperemia was then induced, and three additional room temperature saline boluses of 3 ml were administered intracoronarily to determine peak coronary flow presented as peak mean transit time. In this method, the mean transit time (Tmn) of room-temperature saline injected down a coronary artery can be determined and has been shown to correlate inversely with absolute flow [11]. CFR was calculated based on the ratio of the mean transit times during hyperemia and at baseline (Fig. 30.3). A thermodilution-based CFR can be derived that has been shown to correlate well with Doppler velocity wire-derived CFR both in their experimental model and in humans [9, 10]. A CFR less than 2.5 was considered to be abnormal [12, 13].
CFR interrogates the entire coronary system, including the epicardial artery and microcirculation. A normal CFR indicates that epicardial and minimally achievable microvascular bed resistances are low and normal. However, CFR is unable to differentiate which component is affected when it is abnormal. Furthermore, CFR was largely affected by the baseline coronary flow velocity (CFV) associated with heart rate, preload, contractility, and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [14, 15]. Therefore, using a CFR to evaluate the microcirculation has a few limitations.
30.4 Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR)
With recent technological advances, coronary microcirculation can be measured simultaneously with the same pressure wire by calculating the IMR using this thermodilution technique . By using this wire and modified software, it is able to calculate the mean transit time (Tmn) of room-temperature saline injected down a coronary artery. The inverse of the hyperemic Tmn has been shown to correlate with absolute flow. For measure of IMR, a 0.014 coronary temperature and pressure-sensing guidewire (PressureWire Certus, St. Jude Medical, MN, USA) was calibrated for the pressure recording. It was then equalized with aortic pressure (Pa) in the guiding catheter. The tip pressure sensor was advanced across the stented segment and beyond the mid-to-distal portion of the culprit vessel. In a simplified form, assuming coronary flow and myocardial flow are equal and that the contribution of collateral flow is negligible, then IMR was calculated as mean distal coronary pressure multiplied by the thermodilution-derived hyperemic Tmn (Fig. 30.4) [11].