Integrated Imaging Modalities in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
Michael S. Kim, MD
Robert A. Quaife, MD
INTRODUCTION
Over the last decade, there has been an exponential growth in the number of transcatheter therapies designed to treat both congenital and acquired structural heart disease (SHD) pathologies. Along with this growth have come major advances in image guidance including three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE), cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), and magnetic resonance imaging and angiography (MRI/MRA). In contemporary practice, catheter-based treatments of various structural heart and valve diseases have become increasingly reliant on accurate preprocedural imaging assessment and intraprocedural guidance to maximize outcomes and minimize complications.1 For example, CCTA has become the “gold standard” in aortic annulus analysis in preplanning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures.2,3 Similarly, 3D TEE has become a mainstay in both preprocedure evaluation and intraprocedural guidance for transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip device.4,5
A major challenge facing all SHD interventionalists and imaging specialists, however, centers on the importance of integrating efficiently multiple imaging modalities so as to prevent “sensory imaging overload.” Oftentimes, many operators also struggle with “mentally translating” two-dimensional (2D) imaging sequences (eg, CCTA, 2D echocardiography) into accurate and useful 3D spatial images in their own minds to both effectively preplan and efficiently perform complex SHD procedures. To overcome these barriers, imaging manufacturers are actively developing new software tools that are designed to take the complexities of multimodality imaging integration out of the hands of the operators, while simultaneously giving back to the operator a simplified and efficient mechanism by which to manipulate and analyze the processed images.6,7,8
This chapter, through several clinical examples, will highlight how both high-quality preprocedure imaging and intraprocedural imaging using novel multimodality image integration tools can be effectively used to guide complex SHD interventions.
CASE 1 Right Ventricular to Left Atrium Fistula Repair
A 55-year-old male with a history of an endocardial cushion defect that was surgically repaired at age 7 years with a patch at the septum primum and inlet ventricular septal defect (VSD) was referred to evaluate and treat a residual right ventricular (RV) to left atrial (LA) fistula. He had a recent biventricular pacemaker/internal cardiac defibrillator (ICD) placed for asymptomatic complete heart block in the setting of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. After device implantation, he began complaining of new visual symptoms (intermittent vision loss in his left eye) concerning for transient ischemic attacks (TIAs); a brain MRI could not be obtained owing the presence of
his ICD. A transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was performed demonstrating a residual defect/fistula between the RV and LA with at least moderate right to left shunting following injection of agitated saline contrast (FIGURE 1.1; Video 1.1). Given the concern that the patient would be at risk for forming small thrombi on his ICD leads that both may have and could in the future embolize paradoxically, the decision was made to proceed with transcatheter closure of the residual fistula.
his ICD. A transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was performed demonstrating a residual defect/fistula between the RV and LA with at least moderate right to left shunting following injection of agitated saline contrast (FIGURE 1.1; Video 1.1). Given the concern that the patient would be at risk for forming small thrombi on his ICD leads that both may have and could in the future embolize paradoxically, the decision was made to proceed with transcatheter closure of the residual fistula.
As part of his preprocedure evaluation, the patient underwent a CCTA to better elucidate the size and location of the fistula (FIGURE 1.2; Video 1.2). The CCTA demonstrated a clear communication between the RV and LA with a tract diameter of approximately 5 to 7 mm (depending on timing within the cardiac cycle) and a length of approximately 6 mm. Intraprocedure 3D TEE was used as image guidance (FIGURE 1.3). Using an antegrade approach (transvenous access with transseptal puncture and defect crossing from the LA), the patient underwent an uncomplicated fistula closure using a 6 × 6 Amplatzer Duct Occluder II device (FIGURE 1.4). Postprocedure TEE and TTE demonstrated no residual flow across the device. The patient was discharged on postprocedure day 1 and remains in good condition.
FIGURE 1.1 TTE agitated saline contrast (“bubble”) study through a peripheral vein demonstrating a communication between the RV and LA (arrow) with right to left shunting. |
FIGURE 1.4 Fluoroscopic images of RV to LA fistula closure. A, With the steerable guide catheter (arrowheads, positioned guide catheter) pointed into the LA side of the fistula, a Magic Torque wire is advanced across the defect and out the LV outflow tract across the aortic valve into the ascending aorta (Ao). B, A 5 French diagnostic catheter is advanced over the wire into the ascending Ao, and the wire is removed. C, Amplatzer Duct Occluder II device (arrow, showing deployed device) is fully deployed across the fistula. D, Final angiography demonstrating stable placement of the occluder device.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |