Illustration and aortogram of an aneurysm of the ascending aorta. From Milewicz [5], reprinted with permission from Springer Nature
Aortic valve insufficiency often occurs as the aorta dilates. The risk of the proximal aorta rupturing increases as the size of the aortic root increases. Consideration of prophylactic aortic root replacement is recommended when the diameter reaches 5.0 cm [6, 7]. Once an aneurysm is larger than 6 cm, there is a fourfold increase in the cumulative risk of aortic rupture or dissection [6]. In some cases, surgery may be performed when the aortic diameter is less than 5.0 cm, such as when the aortic diameter increases rapidly (>1 cm/year), when the patient has a family history of premature aortic dissection (dissection occurring when the diameter is <5 cm), and when the patient has moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation.
Composite valve graft replacement is achieved by mobilizing buttons of aortic tissue around the coronary arteries for anastomosis to the aortic graft. These patients are maintained on beta blockers, and bacterial prophylaxis is recommended. The most common causes of late death after composite valve graft repair are undergoing dental work or invasive diagnostic or surgical procedures and dissection or rupture of the residual distal aorta. Approximately 10% of the patients who undergo composite valve graft repair subsequently require distal aortic surgery.
Other surgical procedures have been developed that preserve the patient’s native aortic valve; these are called “valve-sparing” aortic root replacement procedures [8, 9]. The Yacoub procedure is referred to as the “remodeling” technique and the David procedure is considered the “reimplantation” technique [10, 11]. Both procedures are options for almost all patients with aortic root aneurysms, as long as the aortic valve is structurally normal. In addition, for both techniques, patient survival is excellent, and complications are rare.
Some patients with MFS develop a dissection through the medial layer of the aortic wall. Most of these are type I dissections (DeBakey classification), which also involve the descending thoracic aorta. Dissections involving the ascending aorta can occur in patients who have minimal to no enlargement of the ascending aorta. Most of these dissections occur in the absence of systemic hypertension. Angiography, transesophageal echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging are useful techniques for diagnosing aortic dissections. Beta blockers, when tolerated, are used for treatment.
Mitral valve prolapse is present in 70–90% of patients with MFS. Associated mitral regurgitation occurs in up to half of these patients, but serious mitral regurgitation is rare. Mitral valve prolapse can be associated with chest pain and palpitations.
Skeletal and Ocular Manifestations
The skeletal features of the disorder include increased height and arm span; anterior chest wall deformities (pectus excavatum or carinatum); long fingers and toes (arachnodactyly); mild-to-moderate joint laxity; a narrow, highly arched palate and crowding of the frontal teeth; pes planus (flat feet); protrusio acetabuli; and vertebral column abnormalities (scoliosis and thoracic lordosis). The skeletal manifestations of MFS are the most outwardly striking features of the disorder and are often the features that trigger the initial evaluation. Patients usually have a tall stature, primarily due to having long, thin legs, which is reflected in a decreased ratio of the upper body segment (height minus the lower segment) to the lower body segment (top of pubic ramus to the floor). They also generally have an arm span that is greater than their height. The reduced upper-to-lower segment ratio can be further exaggerated by scoliosis and kyphosis.
Marfan syndrome can also affect the eyes. In approximately 50% of the people with MFS, the lenses of the eyes are dislocated (ectopia lentis). Myopia is also common in patients with MFS, but retinal detachment is a rare complication.
Diagnosis
Revised Ghent criteria for diagnosing Marfan syndrome and related conditions
In the absence of family history: |
1. Ao (Z ≥ 2) AND EL = MFSa |
2. Ao (Z ≥ 2) AND FBN1 = MFS |
3. Ao (Z ≥ 2) AND Syst (≥7 pts) = MFSa |
4. EL AND FBN1 with known Ao = MFS |
EL with or without Syst AND with an FBN1 not known with Ao or no FBN1 = ELS |
Ao (Z < 2) AND Syst (≥5 with at least one skeletal feature) without EL = MASS |
MVP AND Ao (Z < 2) AND Syst (<5) without EL = MVPS |
In the presence of family history (FH): |
5. EL AND FH of MFS (as defined above) = MFS |
6. Syst (≥7 pts) AND FH of MFS (as defined above) = MFSa |
7. Ao (Z ≥ 2 above 20 years old, ≥3 below 20 years) + FH of MFS (as defined above) = MFSa |
Scoring of systemic features of Marfan syndrome
• Wrist AND thumb sign—3 (wrist OR thumb sign—1) |
• Pectus carinatum deformity—2 (pectus excavatum or chest asymmetry—1) |
• Hindfoot deformity—2 (plain pes planus—1) |
• Pneumothorax—2 |
• Dural ectasia—2 |
• Protrusio acetabuli—2 |
• Reduced US/LS AND increased arm/height AND no severe scoliosis—1 |
• Scoliosis or thoracolumbar kyphosis—1 |
• Reduced elbow extension—1 |
• Facial features (3/5)—1 (dolichocephaly, enophthalmos, downslanting palpebral fissures, malar hypoplasia, retrognathia) |
• Skin striae |
• Myopia >3 diopters—1 |
• Mitral valve prolapse (all types)—1 |
Genetic Mutations
It has been clearly established that MFS can be caused by defects in the fibrillin gene (FBN1) on chromosome 15. A number of mutations in FBN1 have been identified in affected individuals and families. An analysis of FBN1 mutations responsible for MFS has indicated that in almost every case, the mutations are private—that is, every family or sporadically affected individual has a different mutation [14]. The majority of mutations are missense mutations that alter a single amino acid. In addition, a second locus for MFS, called the MFS2 locus, has been mapped to 3p24-25 [15]. Furthermore, mutations in transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) receptor type II (TGFBR2) have recently been described in patients with MFS [16].
Future Therapies
One direction for future therapies will be to prevent the steps that lead from a deficiency in fibrillin-1-containing microfibrils to the aortic wall pathology observed in MFS patients (fragmentation and degradation of the elastic fibers and loss of the smooth muscle cells in the medial layer). Another possible avenue for therapy is based on the findings that fibrillin-1 and microfibrils regulate the TGF-β family of growth factors (cytokines), which influence many aspects of cellular performance, including differentiation, proliferation, protein production, and survival [17].
Relapsing Polychondritis
The treatment used depends on the disease severity and the organs involved. Corticosteroids are usually required. Immunosuppressive agents may be effective in patients with steroid resistance or intolerance. Cardiac valve replacement is sometimes necessary [22].
Seronegative Spondyloarthritis
Seronegative spondyloarthritis is a group of diseases that includes ankylosing spondylitis, reactive arthritis (formerly called Reiter’s disease), psoriatic arthritis, and the arthritis associated with the idiopathic inflammatory bowel diseases ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease [23]. These chronic arthritides are now known to be clinically, epidemiologically, and genetically separate entities; moreover, patients with these conditions do not have rheumatoid factor or antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) .
Joint and Ocular Manifestation
Cardiac Manifestations
In approximately 5% of ankylosing spondylitis cases and in rare cases of reactive arthritis, the patient develops spondylitic heart disease [30, 33, 34]. In the reported cases of spondylitic heart disease, HLA-B27 positivity is usually found. This complication usually occurs after many years of having arthritis. First-degree atrioventricular block and aortic regurgitation have been reported in the early stages of the disease [35–37], even before the appearance of arthritis symptoms [35, 37]. Clinically inapparent aortic involvement may be found with echocardiography. Using two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography, LaBresh et al. [38] found subaortic fibrous ridging or marked valvular leaflet thickening in 11 of 36 men with ankylosing spondylitis or chronic reactive arthritis, but not in any of the 29 normal, age-matched control men. In a study by Arnason et al. [39], transesophageal echocardiography showed aortic valve insufficiency in 10 of 29 men with ankylosing spondylitis, as well as the aortic and valvular thickening seen pathologically. Studies of men who required cardiac pacemakers for complete heart block have shown that these men had high frequencies of underlying spondyloarthritis (often occult) or HLA-B27 positivity. Bergfeldt and colleagues [40, 41] found clinical or radiographic evidence of spondyloarthritis in 28 (12.6%) of 223 men with permanent cardiac pacemakers, 85% of whom were HLA-B27 positive. They also showed that of 83 pacemaker recipients who had no clinical or radiographic stigmata of spondylitis, 17% were HLA-B27 positive, which was a significantly higher frequency than in normal controls (6%) [42]. In another group comprising 91 patients with aortic regurgitation, 15–20% of the patients were found to have B27-associated arthritis [25]. Furthermore, 88% of the male patients who had aortic regurgitation combined with severe conduction system abnormalities were HLA-B27 positive.
Aortic regurgitation and, less often, mitral regurgitation progress relatively rapidly. In most patients with these conditions, prosthetic valve replacement is required in less than 5 years [26, 27, 31, 40]. Patients with complete heart block should receive permanent cardiac pacemakers. There is no evidence that traditional anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs alter the course of spondylitic heart disease [43].
Rare cardiac features of ankylosing spondylitis and reactive arthritis include pericarditis, myocarditis, and giant cell valvulitis [34, 44]. Several echocardiographic studies have shown global ventricular dysfunction in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, reactive arthritis, or psoriatic arthritis, but the clinical significance of these finding is unclear [45, 46]. However, subtle aortic valve dysfunction may lead to left ventricular dysfunction in these patients [47–49].
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disease characterized by inflammatory lesions in many organs [50]. The disease occurs in people of any age or race, but young women in the childbearing years are most susceptible, especially Africans, Hispanics, and Asians [51]. Although the etiology of SLE is unknown, SLE is believed to be a complex and heterogeneous disease in which multiple genes (each with modest effects) [52–56] interact with various environment stimuli (e.g., ultraviolet light or viral infections), resulting in apoptosis [55] and acceleration of autoantigen presentation to the immune system [53, 57]. The strongest genetic effects appear to be related to hereditary deficiencies in the complement system and to certain class II HLA genes (HLA-DR2, -DR3, and -DR8 haplotypes) [52, 58].
Autoantibodies
Autoantibodies to intracellular nuclear constituents, such as double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), ribonucleoproteins (including Smith [Sm], RNP, Ro/SSA, and La/SSB), and histones, are characteristically found in SLE patients and account for the positive ANA tests in more than 98% of these patients [52, 59]. Autoantibodies to dsDNA, Sm, and ribosomal P are the most specific for this disease, but they are found in only a minority of the patients. Additional autoantibodies are also common, including those to cellular elements (e.g., red blood cells, lymphocytes, platelets, neurons, and endothelial cells) and plasma components (e.g., IgG, phospholipids, and clotting factors) [59]. Individual patients with SLE have their own distinctive autoantibody profiles, which remain relatively constant over time. Many of these autoantibodies are associated with and probably are the cause of specific clinical manifestations resulting from either the deposition of antigen-antibody immune complexes or antibody-mediated tissue damage. Associations or causal relationships have been established between specific autoantibodies and certain cardiac manifestations. Examples include associations between anti-Ro (SS-A) and La (SS-B) antibodies and congenital heart block [60] and between antiphospholipid antibodies and valvular heart disease (Libman-Sacks endocarditis), other cardiac lesions, and intravascular thromboses [61–63].
Prognosis
The spectrum of SLE effects, including the cardiac manifestations and prognosis of the disease, has changed considerably over the last 50 years [64]. With the advent of more sophisticated serologic tests, it is now possible to diagnose milder cases and those at earlier stages. Treatment with corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents, as well as the use of antibiotics, antihypertensives, and other drugs, when appropriate, has improved patient survival from less than 50% at 5 years in the 1950s to more than 90% at 10 years currently [51, 65]. Concomitantly, the prevalence of lupus carditis has decreased markedly; in the precorticosteroid era, lupus carditis was nearly universally present in patients with SLE, especially at autopsy, but the prevalence decreased to 55% in 1954, to 38% in 1971, and to 18% in 1978 [64].
Pathology
Cardiac complications of systemic lupus erythematosus
Pericardium | Endocardium | Coronary artery disease | Other |
---|---|---|---|
Acute pericarditis supraventricular arrhythmias | Libman-Sacks endocarditis | Premature atherosclerosis | Pulmonary hypertension |
Pericardial effusions | Valvular thickening, regurgitation, and/or stenosis | Arteritis | Congenital heart block in fetuses |
Pericardial tamponade | Intrachamber thrombi | Thrombosis | |
Constrictive pericarditis | Aortic arch syndrome | ||
Myocarditis Focal inflammatory lesions (immune complexes) Cardiac “myositis” Diffuse, small-vessel thromboses |
Cardiovascular Manifestations
Pericardial fluid from SLE patients shows a mild to moderate inflammatory exudate, is occasionally bloody, has white blood cell counts usually in the 2000–5000/mm3 range, and has a mildly elevated protein level but normal glucose levels. Lupus erythematosus (LE) cells or ANAs may be found in the pericardial fluid of seropositive patients, but these cannot be used to discriminate lupus effusions from those due to other causes. Complement levels are typically low in these patients, and immune complexes have been found [64, 78, 79]. Prompt removal of pericardial fluid may be lifesaving when cardiac tamponade occurs and may be diagnostically necessary when infectious pericarditis is suspected.
The therapy for lupus pericarditis should be determined on the basis of its severity. For mild symptomatic pericarditis, especially that without significant pericardial effusion or other serious disease manifestations, indomethacin (75–150 mg/day, divided into three doses) may be effective. Alternatively, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be used at doses recommended for arthritis. Some patients, however, require corticosteroids at a low-to-moderate dose (10–40 mg prednisone equivalent per day) to relieve the symptoms or resolve the effusions. Large effusions or pericardial tamponade should result in the prompt administration of high-dose intravenous corticosteroids (60–80 mg prednisone equivalent per day in two divided doses) (Fig. 4.9).
Myocardial involvement is clinically evident in 8–25% of reported series [64, 79, 80]. Several pathologic forms have been recognized, including diffuse small-vessel obliteration and myocyte destruction. They are probably the result of immune complex deposition [64, 81], myocardial cell degeneration and lymphocyte infiltration associated with skeletal myositis, anti-RNP antibodies [82], and global myocardial ischemia and dysfunction or acute myocardial infarction due to coronary artery thrombi associated with antiphospholipid antibodies [62, 83–85].
The earliest clinical manifestations of myocarditis include resting tachycardia, atypical chest discomfort, a third heart sound, and nonspecific ST-T wave changes on ECG. More overt signs include cardiomegaly in the absence of pericardial fluid or other causes of cardiac enlargement, congestive heart failure, and arrhythmias. Troponin levels are elevated. Echocardiography usually reveals multichamber enlargement, global myocardial dyskinesis, and a reduced ejection fraction. Transendocardial biopsy of the myocardium may be necessary to make the diagnosis and to determine the type and activity of the disease process [81]. The differential diagnosis should include secondary causes of myocardial dysfunction, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, premature atherosclerotic heart disease, and a rare form of vacuolar cardiomyopathy associated with the use of chloroquine and other antimalarials for treating SLE [86]. Active myocarditis requires aggressive corticosteroid therapy, along with appropriate measures to control arrhythmias and congestive heart failure [62, 66, 79, 80]. Prednisone (60–100 mg/day in two divided doses) should be given immediately, and the patient’s cardiac status should be closely monitored clinically. Congestive heart failure should be treated as necessary with appropriate drugs. Serious atrial and ventricular arrhythmias should be suppressed pharmacologically. Anticoagulation should be used to prevent mural thrombi, especially when antiphospholipid antibodies, which promote intravascular thrombosis, are present. Once the signs of active myocarditis have resolved, the prednisone dose should be tapered slowly over weeks to months, and the patient should be closely monitored (as above) for clinical recurrences.
Premature atherosclerosis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in SLE patients [76]. There are well-documented cases of SLE patients in their twenties having a myocardial infarction ; often this is seen when the disease onset occurred in childhood [87, 88]. The prevalence of myocardial infarction in SLE patients has ranged from 4% to 45% in multiple series [32, 89–92]. In a case-control study that used electron beam computed tomography to detect coronary artery calcifications, calcifications were found in 33% of the patients younger than 50 years [93].
It has been recognized that SLE patients can have spontaneous coronary artery thrombosis secondary to the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies [96, 97]. As with the atheromatous disease, the patient may have no other symptoms of active SLE. A positive test for antiphospholipid antibodies should raise clinical suspicion. Agents to lyse the coronary thrombus should be given promptly, followed by appropriate anticoagulation.