The inherited heart diseases with risk of sudden death discussed in this chapter are listed in Table 21.1 (Bayés de Luna and Baranchuk 2017). In describing each of these processes, we will emphasize the importance of the ECG in reaching a diagnosis and in determining the clinical implications. Molecular, genetics, and many aspects related to sudden death are not considered in depth in this book (Ackerman et al. 2011). In this chapter, we include the heart diseases that are deemed to be due to inherited changes. Other heart diseases that are occasionally inherited, such as dilated cardiomyopathy (DC) or Wolff–Parkinson–White (WPW) syndrome, are discussed in other chapters. For more information, consult the general references (page XII). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is usually a familial disease of genetic origin, characterized by alterations in proteins of the myocardial cells leading to myocardial fiber disarray, hypertrophy of the heart, and an increased incidence of sudden death. More than 500 mutations and 9 genes have been described. The more frequent mutations include troponin T (TNNTZ) and beta myosin heavy chain (MYH7). The diagnosis is suggested by family history and ECG and is confirmed by echocardiography and other imaging techniques (Figure 21.3) (Maron et al. 2006). The hypertrophy may cause a dynamic obstruction of the left ventricle outflow tract, and on some occasions it leads to DC and heart failure (HF). When the apex is preferentially involved in the cardiomyopathy, the ECG pattern shows typical features (Figure 21.2). Pathologic ECGs are observed in approximately 95% of cases, although there is no characteristic ECG alteration indicative of a specific mutation. In contrast to what is observed in the inherited long QT syndrome, in HCM, it is not possible to predict the different mutations based on the ECG changes, and vice versa, except for some types of predominantly apical HCM (Arad et al. 2005). However, there are some electrocardiographic patterns clearly indicative of HCM, in particular, a large negative and sharp T wave that is typical of apical HCM (Figure 21.2), as well as a narrow and deep Q wave associated with a positive T wave, suggestive of septal hypertrophy (Figure 21.1). In patients with HCM, especially apical HCM, RS morphology may be observed in V1. This may be diagnosed mistakenly as right ventricular hypertrophy, but is in fact caused by septal hypertrophy. Thanks to the relationships between ECG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it has become possible to locate the more hypertrophic areas with the ECG (Dumont et al. 2006). Patients frequently show ECG signs of left ventricular enlargement, which are in some cases very characteristic (Figure 21.2). However, sometimes are impossible to distinguish from those found in other heart diseases. In these cases, imaging techniques play a major role in establishing the correct diagnosis (Figure 21.3). The QRS voltage is usually increased with often clear criteria of LVH (Figure 21.2). However a low voltage associated with a higher incidence of DC during follow‐up may be seen (Ikeda et al. 1999) (Figure 21.4). Fragmentation of the QRS (fQRS) has been proved to be a predictor of poor evolution and arrhythmias in patients with HCM (Femenia et al. 2013). Table 21.1 Inherited heart diseases with risk of sudden death (Bayés de Luna and Baranchuk 2017). At times the ECG alterations are observed before the echocardiogram shows any change. Therefore, an abnormal ECG may be the only evidence suggesting the presence of HCM in a patient’s relatives, or may oblige us to rule it out when it is a casual finding. An increased interval T wave peak/T wave end may be a more significant risk marker of torsades de pointes ventricular tachycardia (VT) than the QT dispersion or even the corrected QT (QTc) (Yamaguchi et al. 2003). Often patients with HCM present with arrhythmias in the ECG. The most frequent supraventricular arrhythmia is atrial fibrillation (≈10% of patients) (Britton et al. 2017). The resulting loss of the atrial contribution to the filling of a hypertrophied and stiff left ventricle results in clinical deterioration. The presence of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) is also common; they are found in more than three‐quarters of patients wearing a Holter device. Runs of non‐sustained VT are found in one‐quarter of patients and its presence has prognostic implications. However, the presence of sustained VT is infrequent. Very often, different types of blocks, especially intraventricular blocks (left bundle branch block, LBBB), are present in advanced cases. Most patients with HCM will likely develop left ventricular outflow obstruction (Maron 2010), although a clear dynamic pressure gradient in the left ventricular outflow tract is only seen in ≈30%. Some patients with HCM present with predominant apical involvement, which is more frequently observed in Japan (Suzuki et al. 1993). Often, patients with HCM present with progressive dyspnea, especially after 40–50 years, due to diastolic dysfunction. Sometimes it is related to the appearance of atrial fibrillation. However, only about 10–15% of HCM patients will develop DC. The underlying physiopathologic mechanism that explains this evolution is not known with certainty. However, it has been shown that at 10‐year follow‐up, the incidence of HF is higher in patients with low‐voltage QRS complexes (SV1 + RV6 < 35 mm) (Figure 21.4). This is probably because the low voltage is a marker of increased fibrosis (Ikeda et al. 1999). The few cases with normal ECG have a better prognosis (McLeod et al. 2009), even though some exceptions have been found in patients with troponin T alterations, family history, and evidence of fibrosis by MRI (see below). The differential diagnosis with athlete’s heart constitutes an interesting challenge. There are clinical, ECG, and echocardiographic data on which we could base our differential diagnosis (Maron et al. 1981). If necessary, other techniques may be used to diminish the doubtful cases (gray zone in Figure 21.5) (Bayés de Luna et al. 2000; Zhang 2014). Sudden death is the most important risk in this patient population. The yearly mortality rate is around 1%. Sudden death usually occurs during exercise due to a sustained VT leading to ventricular fibrillation (VF). This is the most common cause of sudden death in athletes. However, based on the experience of Maron (2010), more than 30 years may elapse before another cardiac arrest occurs. The most useful main risk factors of sudden death (McKenna and Behr 2002; Maron 2003, 2010) are: The presence of two, or even one for some authors (Maron 2010), of the abovementioned factors, especially when accompanied with genetic alterations (especially troponin T mutations), is associated with an increased risk of sudden death and requires implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Meanwhile, the absence of the abovementioned risk factors, especially family history of sudden death in patients older than 50–60 years, is indicative of a better prognosis. In HCM, as happens in all other inherited heart diseases described in this chapter, the advantages of ICD implant always have to be balanced with the risk of complications (inappropriate shocks, infections, etc.) (Bayés de Luna and Baranchuk 2017). Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a familial disease of genetic origin, comprising both a recessive form and a dominant form. In 50% of cases, it is related to a mutation in the plakofilin gene. The disease is characterized by fatty infiltration and fibrosis localized especially in the right ventricle, leading to electrical instability and risk of sudden death. Frequently, left ventricle involvement exists as well. The diagnosis must be made according to the criteria of the Task Force for Cardiomyopathy (McKenna et al. 1994). Recently, revised Task Force Criteria (Marcus et al. 2010) have been published (Table 21.3). The following are the ECG signs most frequently observed in ARVC (Jain et al. 2009; de Alencar Neto et al. 2018): ARVC may lead to a sustained and generally monomorphic VT with LBBB morphology, eventually leading to aVF and sudden death. Table 21.2 ECG alterations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (Figures 21.1–21.4) It is important to remember that small repolarization changes (Figure 21.7A) are enough to suspect the condition and that the ECG may be normal in about 20% of cases, and may initially mimic myocarditis (Pieroni et al. 2009). When active arrhythmias of right ventricular origin are present (PVCs occurring frequently, above all during exercise, and runs of VT), and symptoms, such as syncope during exercise, are observed, a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) should be performed to confirm the ARVC. This technique is very useful in athletes to rule out or confirm this condition, and also HCM or an anomalous origin of the coronary arteries. Frequently (>80% of cases), left ventricle involvement exists as well, often developing before the right ventricle is involved. Isolated left ventricular involvement is detected by the presence of a negative T wave in left lateral leads, PVCs of left ventricle origin, and imaging signs (CMR) of left ventricular dysfunction, without the evidence of right ventricular abnormalities (ECG, CMR) (Coats et al. 2009). In the presence of sustained VT or frequent PVCs, ablation may be indicated, even though due to the presence of several foci frequent recurrences have been observed (Dalal et al. 2007) and for that its indication is controversial. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is considered the best treatment option, particularly in patients with a history of sustained VT/VF, patients with extensive left ventricular involvement, and those with a history of syncope (consult p. XI). Spongiform or non‐compacted cardiomyopathy is a rare familial cardiomyopathy of uncertain etiology, for which a genetic origin has been proposed (Murphy et al. 2005). From an anatomo‐pathologic point of view, it is characterized by an increase in the trabecular mass of the left ventricle (non‐compacted), contrasting with a thin and compacted epicardial layer that may be visualized with imaging techniques (echocardiography and, above all, CMR) that confirm the diagnosis. Initial diagnosis is based on the following surface ECG features (Steffel et al. 2009): Occasionally, the ECG is similar to that of some cases of ARVC (compare Figures 21.9 and. 21.7A). As the repolarization alteration disorder (negative T wave) is usually in the right precordial leads and not striking, it may be mistaken for normal ECG variations. Table 21.3 ARVC: Summary of revised task force criteria (Marcus et al. 2010) (Adapted from Marcus et al. 2010). ARVC: arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia cardiomyopathy; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; PVC: premature ventricular complex; RBBB: right bundle branch block; RV: right ventricle; VT: ventricular tachycardia. The patient may remain asymptomatic for many years, but this cardiomyopathy eventually evolves into DC and HF. Sometimes embolism and/or ventricular arrhythmias appear in the follow‐up. Ventricular arrhythmias may trigger sustained VT/VF and sudden death. Some cases need ablation, ICD, or even heart transplantation. Lenegre syndrome is a rare condition that consists of a progressive intraventricular conduction block without apparent heart disease. It appears in members of the same family at a relatively young age (Lenegre 1964). Table 21.4 QTc prolongation in different age groups, based on the Bazett formula: values within the normal interval, borderline values, and altered values From a genetic point of view, the Lenegre syndrome is caused by a Na channel dysfunction (decreased Na inflow into the cell). Histological studies show that a diffuse fibrotic degeneration of the whole intraventricular SCS exists, which may lead to an atrioventricular (AV) block without involvement of the sinus node and the fibrous skeleton of the heart. The presence of this evident pathologic involvement differentiates the Lenegre syndrome from channelopathies (see below). Lenegre syndrome should be distinguished from Lev syndrome (Lev 1964), which is found in older patients and is caused by a non‐inherited senile degeneration of the SCS and the fibrous skeleton of the heart. Usually, pacemaker implantation becomes necessary during the course of both Lenegre and Lev syndromes. Exclusive alterations of the ionic channels are observed in long and short QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, and catecholamine‐sensitive VT. They are also probably present in familial atrial fibrillation and other cases of sudden death due to other malignant ventricular arrhythmias, such as familial torsades de pointes VT and cases of VT that until now were considered idiopathic VF (Marbán 2002). Some of the best‐known channelopathies show a typical phenotypic ECG pattern, which frequently allows for a correct diagnosis and even identification of the involved gene. There are some evidences showing that although initially isolated ionic alterations exist (true channelopathies), some ultrastructural changes may be present in the follow‐up (see below) (Frustaci et al. 2009; Bayés de Luna and Baranchuk 2017). All channelopathies may increase the risk of developing different types of VT/VF, eventually leading to sudden death. We can only speak about long QT syndrome when a patient with apparent good health presents with a nonacquired long QT interval with syncopal attacks or recovered cardiac arrest due to torsades de pointes VT often leading to sudden death, or a family history of this syndrome. The long QT syndrome is genetic channelopathy characterized by QTc prolongation in ECG and propensity to ventricular tachyarrhythmias (TdPVT, VF) leading to syncopal episodes and/or SCD. In about 10–15% of cases, QTc might remain within normal limit and in about 50% of cases, it will be categorized as borderline (between 440 and 470 ms). Table 21.5 lists ECG changes observed in the LQTS (Moss et al. 1985; Moss and Kan 2005).
Chapter 21
Inherited Heart Diseases
Introduction
Cardiomyopathies
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (Figures 21.1–21.4)
Concept and diagnosis
ECG findings (Figures 21.1–21.4 and Table 21.2)
Clinical implications
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia cardiomyopathy (Tables 21.3 and 21.4, Figures 21.6 and 21.7)
Concept and diagnosis
ECG findings (see Table 21.3)
Clinical implications
Abnormal ECG
Abnormal in 95% of the cases. Sometimes with normal or slightly changed echocardiogram
Signs of left ventricular enlargement
Frequent. Sometimes characteristic repolarization alterations are observed (Figure 21.2) (Large negative T wave, frequently very symmetrical and sharp). The ECG is frequently not distinguished from other processes which involve left ventricular enlargement (aortic stenosis, hypertension) (Figure 21.3)
QRS voltage is usually increased. If it is relatively low (SV1 + RV6 < 35 mm), the patient is likely to suffer from heart failure in the future (Figure 21.4)
Pathological Q wave
Not very frequent
It is observed in leads where it is usually not seen
Narrow and sometimes very deep.
Generally the T wave is positive (Figure 21.1)
Repolarization alterations
Very frequent (see above), sometimes with large negative but sharp T waves (Figure 21.2)
Spongiform or non‐compacted cardiomyopathy (Figure 21.9)
Concept and diagnosis
ECG findings (Figure 21.9)
I Global or regional dysfunction and structural alterations
II Repolarization abnormalities
III Depolarization abnormalities
IV Arrhythmias
V Family history
Clinical implications
Specific conduction system involvement
Lenegre syndrome
Value
1–15 years old
Adult (men)
Adult (women)
Normal
<440 ms
<430 ms
<450 ms
Borderline
440–460 ms
430–450 ms
450–470 ms
Altered (prolonged)
>460 ms
>450 ms
>470 ms
Ionic channel disorders in the absence of apparent structural heart disease: channelopathies
Long QT syndrome (Figures 21.10–21.12)
Concept and diagnosis