Fig. 18.1
Stages of embryological development of the lower limb arterial system (Adapted from McMurrich’s [23])
PES is classified into six types based on the embryologic origin with type VI now considered functional PES. Type I occurs most commonly, in approximately 50 % of cases, and involves deviation of the popliteal artery medially to the medial head of gastrocnemius. The adult artery either forms later or the medial head of the gastrocnemius migrates early to its normal position on the medial femoral epicondyle. Type I accounts for approximately 50 % of cases of PES. Type II PES occurs when the medial head of gastrocnemius abnormally migrates to a lateral position, compressing the popliteal artery and it accounts for 25 % of all cases of PES. Type III PES involves an accessory slip of gastrocnemius muscle that compresses a normally situated popliteal artery. This likely represents embryologic remnants that mature from the migrating muscle and accounts for 6 % of cases. Type IV PES represents persistence of the fetal axial artery and lies below the popliteus muscle, causing compression of the artery. Type V includes any of type I-IV in addition to the popliteal vein (Fig. 18.2) [3].
Fig. 18.2
Diagram of the types of popliteal artery entrapment (Reprinted from Rich et al. [24]. With permission from American Medical Association)
The 6th type of PES is also known as functional popliteal entrapment, was first described by Rignault, et al. in 1985 [6]. Arterial occlusion occurs when the popliteal artery runs in its proper anatomic course, as does the medial head of the gastrocnemius, but the artery is compressed between the heads of a hypertrophied gastrocnemius/soleus muscle complex, especially during exercise. This type is commonly seen in professional athletes and military personnel.
The clinical classification of PES is based on symptoms. Class 0 are patients with anatomic PES diagnosed incidentally who are asymptomatic. Class 1 patients complain of pain, paresthesia, and cold feet after physical training or vigorous physical labor. Class 2 patients experience claudication while walking more than 100 m, and class 3 patients experience claudication in less than 100 m. Class 4 patients have rest pain, and class 5 patients have evidence of pedal necrosis [2].
Search Strategy
A literature search of English language publications from 2000 to 2013 was used to identify published data on popliteal entrapment syndrome using the PICO outline (Table 18.1). Databases searched were PubMed, Science Direct, Ovid, Medline, and Cochrane. Terms used in the search were “popliteal entrapment,” “functional popliteal entrapment,” “popliteal entrapment syndrome.” Articles were excluded if they were single case studies. The data was classified using the GRADE system.
Table 18.1
PICO table for surgical intervention for popliteal entrapment syndrome
P (patients) | I (intervention) | C (comparator group) | O (outcomes measured) |
---|---|---|---|
Patients with popliteal entrapment syndrome | Surgical intervention (myotomy, interposition graft) | No surgical correction | Quality of life, follow-up symptoms, complications, re-interventions, return to prior level of activity |
Results
As with any rare clinical entity, prospective data regarding management and outcomes of popliteal entrapment syndrome are sparse. Since the original clinical description and treatment in 1959, the published body of work consists of retrospective single-institution series detailing patient presenting symptoms, operative management, and surgical outcomes. There is limited information on improved patient quality of life; however there are a multitude of studies that address long-term follow up and patency. One must infer from the long-term data regarding return to activity and rates of re-intervention some idea of impact on quality of life. Here we will review the literature, including diagnosis, surgical management and outcomes, as well as what has been stated regarding follow-up satisfaction in these patients.
Presentation and Diagnosis
The most common presenting symptom as seen in Table 18.2 was intermittent claudication [14–22]. Eight patients in were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. In a systematic review of 30 studies on PES by Sinha, et al. in 2012, 22 of the 30 papers reported IC as the most common presenting symptom, acute ischemia was reported in a median of 11 % of patients, and approximately 18 % of patients diagnosed were asymptomatic [7]. Twenty-four of 30 studies had a median prevalence of 24 % of patients who presented with popliteal artery occlusion, and 15 of 30 studies had a median 13.5 % prevalence of post-stenotic dilatation or aneurysm formation of the popliteal artery at the time of presentation. In 3 studies, the duration of symptoms was described, and was anywhere from 4 h to 10 years, with a median of 12 months, however there was no correlation between symptom duration and degree of arterial damage [7].
Table 18.2
Presenting symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of PES
Author (year) | N | Study type | Symptoms | Diagnostic methods | Diagnosis | Operation performed | Outcome | Mean follow up | Recurrence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zayed (2014) [14] | 30 | RS | IC | CTA provocation, ABI | Functional PES | MTS | 100 % resolution at 9 months | 9 months | 20 %, 53 % returned to competition level |
Liu (2014) [8] | 27 | RS | IC (100 %) Ischemia (69 %) Paresthesia (38 %) | DUS, CTA MRI, DSA for FPES | Anatomic and functional PES | MT (27) ± vein patch (13) MT+ long bypass (2), MT + IP graft (6) | 22/24 patients had complete resolution. | 26 months | DUS surveillance, none |
Igari (2014) [15] | 29 | RS | IC (22) Rest pain (2) Foot ulcer (1) Asymptomatic (4) | ABI, DUS, CT, MRI | PAES (NOS) | MT (4) MT + IP graft (24) MT + bypass (1) | No early complications, ABI normalized. No mention of symptoms. | 68 months | 3 re-operative – stenosis or occlusion of interposition graft |
Radowsky (2013) [16] | 5 | RS | IC | ABI (5) DUS (1) MRA + CTA (3) CTA (2) DSA (2) | Type 1 Type II Type III Type IV Functional | MT + IP graft (2) MT (2) MTS (1) | Wound seroma (1) Calf numbness (1) | 0–3 years | Normal ABI, symptom free (4) Not reported (1) |
Kim (2012) [17] | 22 | RS | IC (18) Rest pain (3), Necrosis (1) | DUS + CTA, MRI, or DSA | PAES NOS | MT + IP graft (14) Fem-pop bypass (5) Fem-PT bypass (1) Pop-PT bypass (2) | 81 % patency at 1 year, 6 total occluded. 1 common peroneal nerve palsy | 74 months | No mention of resolution of symptoms |
Lane (2012) [10] | 55 | PS | IC (100 %) | ABI, DUS provocation, DSA | FPES | MT + posterior fasciotomy | 8/44 with symptoms 7/44 with re-intervention | Not reported | 4 abnormal DUS post-op without symptoms. |
Turnipseed (2009) [12] | 57 | RS | IC (50) Ischemia (6) Calf swelling (2) Paresthesia (19) | MRI provocation | FPES (43) PAES (14) | MT | Infection/seroma, develop CRECS complaints (38 %), no reoperation required, no recurrence | 46 months | Not reported |
Bustabad (2006) [18] | 12 | RS | IC (5) Ischemia (3) Asymptomatic (4) | ABI, DUS, MRA, DSA | 7 PAES 1 PVES 3 FPES | Pop-pop IP graft (7), Fem-pop (1) Pop-TP truck (1), Angioplasty/patch (1) | 8/11 asymptomatic 3/11 with IC 1/11 with IC during exercise. | 3.6 years | Anti-platelet agents indicated |
Turnipseed (2002) [19] | 37 | RS | IC (33) Paresthesia (14) Calf swelling (3) Ischemia (3)
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |