Hybrid Approach (OPCAB+PCI/TAVI/Debranching TEVAR)



Fig. 27.1
Preoperative enhanced 3-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) shows the precise course of both internal mammary artery and a left anterior descending artery





27.3.2 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention


In single-stage hybrid procedure, the PCI is performed immediately after surgical procedure in collaboration with the interventional cardiology team. Angiographic patency and quality of the LIMA to LAD graft are assessed, and then PCI for the non-LAD lesion is performed with either a bare metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES). A 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel is administered through a nasogastric tube before the PCI procedure.

After the procedure, it is recommended that patients of DES implantation receive dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for at least 1 year.



27.4 Single-Stage or Two-Stage Procedure?


The indication for single- or two-stage procedure still remain controvertial. In the ACC/AHA guideline for PCI, it is mentioned that hybrid coronary revascularization may be performed in a hybrid suite in one operative setting or as a staged procedure. This guideline also recommends that bypass surgery before PCI is preferred in the staged procedure, because this approach allows the interventional cardiologist to (1) verify the patency of the LIMA to LAD artery graft before attempting PCI of other vessels and (2) minimize the risk of perioperative bleeding that would occur if CABG were performed after PCI. The two-stage procedure was performed in the initial reports of hybrid procedure, and the benefits of this procedure are an avoidance of potentially postoperative breeding caused by longer operation time and administration of antiplatelets as in single-stage approach. However, a single-stage procedure has been performed widespread in many recent reports because of increasing facilities of the integrated hybrid operating rooms. The hybrid operation rooms can minimize the transference of the patients and also anesthesia time. Recent reports of the single-stage procedure described lower bleeding and blood requirements despite continuous use of dual aspirin and clopidogrel. If a hybrid operating room is set, the single-stage hybrid procedure is recommended for the advantages of maximal availability and minimum risk.


27.5 Outcomes of Hybrid Procedure



27.5.1 Midterm Outcomes


To date, no randomized control trials involving HCR have been published. Several retrospective series with midterm follow-up outcomes of HCR have reported survival rates of 84–93 % at 3–5 years and MACCE-free survival rates of 75–91 % at 3–5 years of follow-up in Table 27.1 [812, 15].


Table 27.1
Systematic review of studies evaluating hybrid revascularization

















































































Author (reference)

Date

N

Age

Follow-up (months)

Strategy

Surgical procedure

MACCE-free survival (%)

Mortality (%)

PCI

Halkos et al. [9]

2011

147

64.3 ± 12.8

38.4 (median)

Mainly staged

Endo-ACAB

86

0.7

DES

Bonatti et al. [10]

2012

226

61 (31–90)
 
Mainly staged

Arrested-heart TECAB

75.2

0

DES/BMS/PTCA

Repossini et al. [15]

2013

166

65.8 ± 10.3

54 ± 27.6

Staged

MIDCAB

83

1.2

BMS/DES

Adams et al. [12]

2013

 96

64 ± 12

65.5 ± 8.4

Simultaneous

Robotic MIDCAB

NR

0

DES/BMS

Shen et al. [11]

2013

141

62.0 ± 9.9

36 (mean)

Simultaneous

MIDCAB

93.6
 
DES


Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation

N number, MACCE major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, Endo-ACAB endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass, TECAB totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass, MIDCAB minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, DES drug-eluting stent, BMS bare metal stent, PTCA percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, NR not reported


27.5.2 Hybrid Procedure vs. OPCAB


Only three studies which compared HCR with OPCAB were reported (Table 27.2) [8, 9, 16]. In these studies, blood transfusion requirements were reduced and intubation time and ICU stay were shorter in the HCR groups compared with the OPCAB groups. Furthermore, in-hospital MACCE rates were lower in the HCR groups. The HCR procedure may shorten hospital stay with less postoperative complications.


Table 27.2
Postoperative outcomes: hybrid vs. OPCAB




































































Outcome

Halkos et al. [9]

Hu et al. [8]

Bachinsky et al. [16]

Hybrid (n = 147)

OPCAB (n = 588)

Hybrid (n = 104)

OPCAB (n = 104)

Hybrid (n = 25)

OPCAB (n = 27)

Age (years)

64.3 ± 12.5

64.3 ± 12.8

61.8 ± 10.2

62.4 ± 8.0

63.2 ± 10.5

66.8 ± 10.7

Hospital stay (days)

6.6 ± 6.7

6.1 ± 4.7

8.2 ± 2.6*

9.5 ± 4.5*

5.1 ± 2.8*

8.19 ± 5.4*

ICU stay (hours)

57.4 ± 145.0

52.7 ± 87.8

34.5 ± 35.6**

55.3 ± 46.4**

28.5 ± 13.9

57.89 ± 84.7

Intubation time (hours)

17.0 ± 30.8

22.7 ± 89.5

11.6 ± 6.3*

13.8 ± 6.8*

NR

NR

Blood transfusion

52(34.4)**

329(56.0)**

30(28.8)**

54(51.9)**

3(12)**

18(67)**

In-hospital MACCE

3(2.0)

12(2.0)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 15, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Hybrid Approach (OPCAB+PCI/TAVI/Debranching TEVAR)

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access