20
How to Perform Ethanol Ablation of the Vein of Marshall
Miguel Valderrábano, MD
Introduction
The ligament of Marshall (LOM) is an embryological remnant of the left superior vena cava1 that has been shown to harbor pro-arrhythmogenic substrates that may play a role in atrial fibrillation (AF). As early as 1972, Scherlag et al. demonstrated that atrial tachycardia would originate from the LOM after stimulation of the extracardiac left sympathetic nerves.2 Later on, adrenergic atrial tachycardia after catecholamine stimulation was shown to arise from the LOM.3 Abundant sympathetic4 and parasympathetic5 innervation was shown to present in the LOM. The LOM can be patent as a vein of Marshall (VOM), which connects to the coronary sinus (CS) and can be cannulated in humans.6 High-frequency stimulation of the LOM during atrial refractoriness can trigger atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in animals,7 and AF in humans.8 For these mechanistic reasons, the VOM is a reasonable therapeutic target in the treatment in AF.9 Additionally, the VOM sits in the posterior mitral isthmus, in part of the reentrant circuit of perimitral flutter.10 We have shown that the VOM can be cannulated from the CS and that it is a vascular route to deliver ablative ethanol to the underlying myocardium and nerve contents of the VOM, with utility for AF,11,12 atrial tachycardias,13 and perimitral flutter.10 Herein follows a brief description of the technical steps required for this procedure.
Procedure
Ethanol injection in the VOM requires a blend of procedural skills belonging to both interventional cardiology and electrophysiology, which may intimidate the neophyte. However, it only requires a minor adaptation of workflow and tools commonly used for left ventricular lead delivery. Arguably, the biggest challenge is to understand the fluoroscopic anatomy of the VOM and its variants. It is critical however, to have some familiarity with the tools to be used. Figure 20.1 shows the materials required for a VOM ethanol infusion. Figure 20.2 shows the operator workspace. Figure 20.3 and Video 20.1 show an example of each of the procedural steps required. Carefully following these steps can lead to a success rate of up to 89%, and failures can be consistently attributed to anatomical absence of the VOM.