Genomics to Predict Risk of Coronary Artery Disease




Abstract


It has long been known that there is a heritable component to coronary artery disease (CAD). However, identifying the actual genetic loci influencing CAD risk was not possible prior to recent advances in molecular biology that have facilitated the identification of genomic loci with statistically very strong, i.e., genome-wide significant, associations with CAD. Several previously unrecognized pathophysiological mechanisms have been discovered with high-throughput genotyping and the emergent exome and whole genome sequencing. Most of the novel genetic variants that modulate CAD risk do so by completely new mechanisms. However, the identification of the underlying pathophysiology is just beginning. Using the genetic variants affecting risk as a starting point, further investigations can help to identify druggable targets and thus improve prevention and therapy of the disease. Our goal is to aid in the fast evolution of this field of research. Using recent examples, we want to point to the opportunities in prevention and therapy due to the novel knowledge of genetic risk.




Keywords

Coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, genome-wide association studies, atherosclerosis, next-generation sequencing, risk genes, systems medicine, personalized medicine

 






  • Chapter Outline



  • Introduction 127



  • Genome-Wide Association Studies 129



  • Identification of Rare Variants 137



  • Risk Prediction 139



  • Sequencing Families 141



  • Conclusion 141



  • Acknowledgments 142



  • Conflicts of Interest 142



  • Funding 142



  • References




Introduction


Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in western countries. Bearing in mind that acute myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure range nearly behind, the importance of coronary atherosclerosis gets even more evident.


Modifiable risk factors of atherosclerosis can be distinguished from nonmodifiable risk factors, whereas risk factors as smoking, arterial hypertension, and diabetes can be favorably affected by lifestyle modification or pharmacological interventions , age and gender are not modifiable ( Fig. 8.1 ). Lipid metabolism disorders represent somehow idiosyncrasies as they are on one hand modifiable by pharmacological therapies, but on the other hand, often caused by an in-principle nonmodifiable genetic basis, e.g., familial hypercholesterolemia.




Figure 8.1


Modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors increasing risk of coronary artery disease.


Positive family history, which is also expression of the genetic burden an individual carries, is another nonmodifiable risk factor. Individuals with a near relative suffering from myocardial infarction at young age have themselves an increased risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) which is depending on the degree of kinship ( Fig. 8.2 ). In the last years, the results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have shown that this genetic basis goes far beyond just a positive family history and cannot be reduced to just one affected gene. In fact, each individual, independent of a positive family history, carries a large number of genetic risk alleles. The sum (or interactive effects) of these risk alleles rather constitutes the genetic risk of a person.




Figure 8.2


Influence of different degrees of kinship regarding family history of coronary artery disease on individual risk.

Modified after Mayer B, Erdmann J, Schunkert H. Genetics and heritability of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. Clin Res Cardiol. 2007;96(1):1–7 .


The search for genetic variants causing CAD began with a limited number of candidate genes and then moved on to a search throughout the genome as technology improved. Initially, genes encoding for proteins known to modulate traditional risk factors were the main targets of the search for genetic risk factors which was due to the limited technical possibilities. Causal involvement in the disease process could indeed be shown for the genes encoding the low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol receptor and lipoprotein (a), LDLR and LPA , respectively. In many cases, however, no relationship was found between genetic polymorphisms and the manifestation of CAD. A hypothesis-free approach that queried variants across the entire genome proved to be more effective. With deciphering of the human genome and the annotation of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the search for variants associated with coronary disease risk throughout the whole genome became possible by GWAS.




Genome-Wide Association Studies


GWAS effectively represent all common [minor allele frequency (MAF)>1%–5%] variants throughout the genome. They have strict statistical procedures for analysis and interpretation, which reduces the propensity for false genetic findings (for further information on GWAS, please see , http://www.nchpeg.org , or http://www.genome.gov ). While large studies of complex traits have identified hundreds of genetic variants that are associated with genome-wide significance, the effect sizes of these variants tend to be very small. Additionally, GWAS hit tag a genomic region as opposed to identifying a specific causal variant, and identifying the causal variant once a genomic region has been identified has proved to be a daunting task for most studied traits.


To date, more than 60 genomic loci have been identified to be genome-wide significantly associated with CAD ( Table 8.1 ). The association is only proven for SNPs. Hence, the genes that are annotated to each of these loci are usually those that are situated most closely to the SNP. As most of the SNPs are not located in coding regions, it is not sure whether these genes are actually underlying the association signal or whether the SNP might influence another gene. However, only a few of these genes had been previously implicated to play a pathophysiological role in CAD, e.g., the gene encoding the LDLR . As a matter of fact, a just little larger number of the identified genes in this list of genome-wide significantly associated genes is associated with traditional risk factors as lipid levels, e.g., the already mentioned LDLR and LPA loci, or arterial hypertension.



Table 8.1

The 64 to date identified loci genome-wide significantly associated with coronary artery disease (CAD)
































































































































































































































































































































































































































Chromosome Lead SNP RAF OR Gene(s) at Chromosomal Locus Refs.
1 rs11206510 T (0.82) 1.08 PCSK9
rs17114036 A (0.91) 1.17 PPAP2B
rs17465637 C (0.74) 1.14 MIA3
rs599839 A (0.78) 1.11 SORT1
rs4845625 T (0.47) 1.06 IL6R
2 rs6544713 T (0.30) 1.06 ABCG5/ABCG8
rs6725887 C (0.15) 1.14 WDR12
rs515135 G (0.83) 1.07 APOB
rs2252641 G (0.46) 1.06 ZEB2
rs1561198 A (0.45) 1.06 VAMP5-VAMP8-GGCX
rs1801251 A (0.35) 1.05 KCNJ13-GIGYF2
3 rs2306374 C (0.18) 1.12 MRAS
4 rs7692387 G (0.81) 1.08 GUCY1A3
rs1878406 T (0.15) 1.10 EDNRA
rs17087335 T (0.21) 1.06 REST-NOA1
5 rs2706399 G (0.51) 1.07 IL5
rs273909 C (0.14) 1.07 SLC22A4-A5
6 rs12526453 C (0.67) 1.10 PHACTR1
rs17609940 G (0.75) 1.07 ANKS1A
rs12190287 C (0.62) 1.08 TCF21
rs3798220 C (0.02) 1.51 LPA, SLC22A3, LPAL2
rs10947789 T (0.76) 1.07 KCNK5
rs4252120 T (0.73) 1.07 PLG
rs3130683 T (0.86) 1.09 C2
7 rs10953541 C (0.80) 1.08 BCAP29
rs11556924 C (0.62) 1.09 ZC3HC1
rs2023938 G (0.10) 1.08 HDAC9
rs3918226 T (0.06) 1.14 NOS3
8 rs2954029 A (0.55) 1.06 TRIB1
rs264 G (0.86) 1.11 LPL
9 rs4977574 G (0.46) 1.29 9p21.3
rs579459 C (0.21) 1.10 ABO
rs111245230 C (0.04) 1.14 SVEP1
10 rs2505083 C (0.38) 1.07 KIAA1462
rs1746048 C (0.87) 1.09 CXCL12
rs1412444 T (0.42) 1.09 LIPA
rs12413409 G (0.89) 1.12 CYP17A1, NT5C2
11 rs974819 T (0.32) 1.07 PDGFD
rs964184 G (0.13) 1.13 APOA1-C3-A4-A5
rs11042937 T (0.49) 1.04 MRVI1-CTR9
12 rs10840293 A (0.55) 1.06 SWAP70
rs3184504 T (0.44) 1.07 SH2B3, HNF1A
rs11830157 G (0.36) 1.12 KSR2
rs11172113 C (0.41) 1.06 LRP1
rs11057830 A (0.15) 1.08 SCARB1
13 rs4773144 G (0.44) 1.07 COL4A1, COL4A2
rs9319428 A (0.32) 1.06 FLT1
14 rs2895811 C (0.43) 1.07 HHIPL1
15 rs3825807 A (0.57) 1.08 ADAMTS7
rs17514846 A (0.44) 1.07 FURIN-FES
rs56062135 C (0.79) 1.07 SMAD3
rs8042271 G (0.9) 1.10 MFGE8-ABHD2
16 rs1800775 C (0.51) 1.04 CETP
17 rs216172 C (0.37) 1.07 SMG6-SRR
rs12936587 G (0.56) 1.07 PEMT, RASD1, SMCR3
rs46522 T (0.53) 1.06 UBE2Z, GIP, ATP5G1
rs7212798 C (0.15) 1.08 BCAS3
18 rs663129 A (0.26) 1.06 PMAIP1-MC4R
19 rs116843064 G (0.98) 1.14 ANGTPL4
rs1122608 G (0.77) 1.14 LDLR
rs2075650 G (0.14) 1.14 APOE
rs12976411 A (0.91) 1.33 ZNF507-LOC400684
21 rs9982601 T (0.15) 1.18 MRPS6, SLC5A3, KCNE2
22 rs180803 G (0.97) 1.20 POM121L9P-ADORA2A

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 19, 2019 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Genomics to Predict Risk of Coronary Artery Disease

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access