Functional coronary angiogram findings in angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries patients with coronary slow flow

Highlights

  • The Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon (CSFP) is characterized by the slow passage of angiographic contrast in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), and is considered a marker for a coronary microvascular disorder.

  • The CSFP is usually defined by a prolonged corrected TIMI Frame Count (cTFC; >25 frames), a semi-quantitative marker of coronary microvascular function; although this has been recently questioned.

  • In ANOCA patients undergoing functional coronary angiography, those with CSFP are more often male and exhibit lower resting coronary blood flow and higher resting/hyperemic coronary resistance, compared to those without the CSFP, despite a similar CFR.

  • Although CFR (the conventional marker of coronary microvascular dysfunction) was abnormal in less than half of the patients with the CSFP, cTFC was prolonged in all patients (by definition) and showed a consistent inverse correlation with resting blood flow and a positive correlation with resting coronary resistance.

  • cTFC can identify the CSFP, an endotype within ANOCA that reflects impaired resting microvascular function. This established clinical measure provides incremental diagnostic data to conventional functional coronary angiography, which primarily assesses hyperemic microvascular dysfunction, thereby facilitating comprehensive assessment for patients with ANOCA.

ABSTRACT

Background

The Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon (CSFP) is considered a coronary microvascular disorder and has been defined as a corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (cTFC) ≥25 frames. Recent invasive physiology studies have reported that cTFC is not a surrogate marker for coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), defined by an abnormal Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR), questioning the integrity of CSFP. This study evaluates the Functional Coronary Angiography (FCA) findings of patients with and without CSFP, as well as the relationship between cTFC and invasive coronary functional measures.

Methods

FCA utilizing a pressure-Doppler flow wire during adenosine infusion, and acetylcholine provocation, was undertaken in 103 patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (<50% stenosis; ANOCA).

Results

The FCA findings revealed CMD (i.e. CFR<2) in 43%, inducible coronary artery spasm (58%) and microvascular spasm (13%) in patients with the CSFP ( n = 69), which was similar to those without CSFP ( n = 34). However, the CSFP patients had a lower resting coronary blood flow velocity (19 ± 7 vs 23 ± 7cm/s, P =. 009) with higher resting microvascular resistance (5.8 ± 1.9 vs 4.4 ± 1.7mmHg/cm/s, P =. 006) and higher hyperemic microvascular resistance (2.35 ± 1.09 vs 1.94 ± 0.93, P =. 049), despite a similar hyperemic CFR (2.25 ± 0.84 vs 2.26 ± 0.58, P =. 971) compared to those without CSFP. Furthermore, the cTFC as a continuous measure, correlated with resting coronary blood flow, resting/hyperemic resistance but not CFR.

Conclusion

The conventional marker of CMD (i.e. CFR <2) was similar in patients with/without the CSFP. However alternative hemodynamic markers of impaired coronary microvascular function were abnormal in patients with the CSFP, including resting/hyperemic coronary microvascular resistance. Moreover, cTFC is a simple semi-quantitative marker correlated with coronary microvascular resistance and thus has clinical utility in the diagnosis of the CSFP.

Introduction

The Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon (CSFP) is an angiographic phenomenon characterized by delayed passage of radiographic contrast through the epicardial coronary arteries, despite the absence of obstructive lesions The CSFP has conventionally been attributed to an elevated resting microvascular resistance, ,,,, and thus considered angiographic evidence of coronary microvascular impairment in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA). , Although several diagnostic criteria have been used to define the CSFP, the most common entails assessment of the corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (cTFC); a technique involving counting the cine frames required for angiographic contrast to fill a coronary vessel to pre-specified landmarks International guidelines have used a delayed cTFC as a diagnostic marker of impaired coronary microvascular function, , however there is limited and conflicting data of cTFC as a coronary hemodynamic measure. ,,,

Invasive physiological testing utilizing an intracoronary guidewire, measuring distal coronary pressure and blood flow velocity during adenosine-induced hyperemia are considered key measures of coronary microvascular function Resultant coronary hemodynamic indices include Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) and Hyperemic Microvascular Resistance (hMR), which are clinically used to respectively identify an impaired hyperemic flow reserve and elevated microvascular resistance. The abnormal threshold for these indices varies between studies and the assessment method used, with an impaired CFR considered < 2 or < 2.5, and hMR > 1.9 or >2.5. , An impaired CFR has been associated with an increased risk of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE, death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary revascularization). ,, Whilst evidence on the prognostic value of coronary microvascular resistance is conflicting, recent studies have demonstrated that hMR may predict future MACE and ongoing angina at 1 month follow-up

Recent studies involving ANOCA patients with/without the CSFP demonstrate that cTFC is not correlated with CFR, thus concluding that cTFC is not a surrogate for coronary physiology assessment and that comprehensive invasive Functional Coronary Angiography (FCA) should be undertaken. ,,, The comprehensive FCA provides detailed physiological data beyond CFR including fractional flow reserve, resting/hyperemic coronary blood flow/resistance, and inducible epicardial/microvascular spasm While the focus of these recent studies has been on an impaired CFR, a comprehensive FCA evaluation provides more insights. Thus, the primary objective of the current study was to compare the FCA findings of ANOCA patients with and without the CSFP. A secondary objective was to evaluate the relationship between cTFC and coronary hemodynamic measures.

Methods

Study population

This is a retrospective study evaluating consecutive patients with ANOCA who underwent comprehensive FCA between 2013 and 2022 at 2 tertiary hospital sites, including the use of a dual sensor-tipped pressure and doppler-flow wire (ComboWire, Philips, CA) with intravenous adenosine (140mg/kg over 2 minutes) to induce hyperemia. Patients underwent FCA and were included in the study if they had (1) a clinical diagnosis of persistent angina, and (2) coronary angiography demonstrating no obstructive coronary artery disease (≤50% diameter stenosis in major coronary arteries). Persistent angina was defined as ongoing angina episodes despite prior/current use of calcium channel blockers and nitrates, with beta-blockers not routinely initiated until coronary artery spasm had been excluded by FCA. Exclusion criteria were: (1) acute coronary syndrome admission within the past month, (2) prior coronary artery bypass surgery, (3) impaired left ventricular systolic function (EF <50%), (4) severe renal or liver impairment, (5) known intolerance to adenosine or acetylcholine (ACh), (6) known cardiomyopathy. The referring cardiologist endorsed the temporary suspension of calcium channel blockers and/or nitrates for at least 24 hours prior to diagnostic angiography thereby minimizing drug effects on the physiological test results. Baseline patient demographic and clinical characteristics data were collected through hospital administrative records. The study was approved by the Central Adelaide Local Health Network Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Functional coronary angiography

Routine coronary angiography was performed via radial or femoral artery access, with intravenous heparin (50-70 U/kg) anticoagulation during coronary instrumentation. Diagnostic angiography confirmed the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease, whereafter FCA was performed utilizing a previously described protocol In brief, the left coronary artery (LCA) was engaged and a ComboWire (dual pressure-Doppler blood flow velocity sensory guide wide) was calibrated and advanced to the mid-segment of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Continuous measurements of distal coronary pressure and average peak flow velocity (APV) were recorded using the ComboMap system (Volcano Corporation San Diego, CA, USA) during intravenous adenosine-induced hyperemia (140μg/kg/min), for the assessment of coronary microvascular function. CFR was defined as the ratio of maximal hyperemic coronary blood flow (hyperemic APV; hAPV) to resting coronary blood flow (basal APV; bAPV). Basal microvascular resistance (bMR) was calculated as distal coronary pressure/bAPV, whereas hMR was calculated as the distal coronary pressure/hAPV. For the purposes of this study, impaired coronary microvascular function was defined as an abnormal CFR (i.e. ≤ 2) and/or hMR (i.e. ≥1.9mmHg/cm/s), acknowledging that alternative thresholds have been used in other studies. ,

Following this, all patients underwent provocative spasm testing involving administration of intracoronary bolus doses of ACh into the LCA (25, 50, 100μg). Coronary artery spasm (CAS) was defined as epicardial spasm where occlusive/sub-occlusive spasm (≥90% vasoconstriction) occurred in response to intracoronary ACh associated with ischemic ECG changes and reproducible chest pain symptoms, and microvascular spasm where reproducible chest pain symptoms and ECG changes occurred in the absence of epicardial constriction.

Calculation of corrected TIMI frame count

Diagnostic angiograms were retrospectively analyzed by 2 independent observers blinded to patient details, diagnoses, and physiological data to calculate cTFC as previously described In brief, the number of frames were counted (at the cine acquired speed of 7.5 or 15 frames/second) for contrast transit between standardized proximal and distal landmarks in the LAD artery. This value was multiplied by 4- or 2-fold (respectively) to obtain cTFC equivalent to 30 frames/second acquisition speed described in the original paper. Furthermore, the LAD TIMI frame count (cTFC-LAD) was corrected for the length of the LAD by a factor of 1.7. As per international guidelines, , the CSFP was defined as a cTFC ≥ 25 frames.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are reported as mean ± SD and analyzed using independent samples t-test. Categorical variables are reported as n (%) and analyzed using Chi-squared test. Pearson’s correlation was used to assess the relationship between cTFC-LAD and coronary hemodynamic parameters, as continuous variables. P values were calculated as 2-tailed, with <0.05 considered statistically significant. Data analysis was undertaken using SPSS Software Version 23 (IBM, NY).

Results

Study population

Comprehensive FCA, including microcirculatory assessment and provocative spasm testing, was undertaken in 103 patients with ANOCA included in the final analysis. Baseline demographics, physiological and angiographic characteristics are shown in Table 1 . The patient cohort was predominantly females (77%) aged 57 ± 11 years with significant cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension in 54%, hypercholesterolemia in 61% and active smoking in 17%). At the time of procedure, 95% of patients had angina symptoms within the past month, with 70% experiencing episodes at least once a week despite anti-anginal therapy.

Table 1

Patient demographics and clinical characteristics

Characteristics Total cohort ( n = 103)
Demographics characteristics
Age (years) 57 ± 11
Women 79 (77%)
Hypertension 56 (54%)
Diabetes 12 (12%)
Hypercholesterolemia 63 (61%)
Current Smokers 18 (17%)
Invasive physiology indices
CFR 2.25 ± 0.76
hMR 2.18 ± 1.04
Coronary Microvascular Impairment
(i.e. CFR < 2.0, hMR >1.9, or microvascular spasm) 70 (68%)
Angiographic indices
cTFC (frames) 31 ± 13
CSFP (cTFC > 25 frames) 69 (67%)

CFR, coronary flow reserve; hMR, hyperemic microvascular resistance; cTFC, corrected TIMI frame count; CSFP, coronary slow flow phenomenon.

Data expressed as Mean ± SD or count (%).

Clinical and hemodynamic characteristics of the CSFP

Of 103 patients, 69 (67%) met the cTFC criteria for the CSFP (mean cTFC 37 ± 10 frames). Clinically, cardiovascular risk factors were similar in those with/without the CSFP, although there was a reduced prevalence amongst women ( Table 2 ). Comparison of FCA findings ( Table 2 ) revealed that those with the CSFP were (1) more likely to have a lower basal coronary blood flow velocity (bAPV) and thus correspondingly higher basal microvascular resistance (bMR), (2) more likely to have a higher hMR, which was abnormal in almost two-thirds of patients, and (3) had a high prevalence of an impaired coronary microvascular function marker (i.e. abnormal CFR, hMR or microvascular spasm in almost 3-quarters of CSFP patients), but (4) there was no difference in mean CFR between groups nor ACh-inducible epicardial/microvascular spasm. Overall, 63 of the 69 (91%) patients with the CSFP had evidence of a coronary vasomotor disorder (ACh-induced spasm or abnormal hyperemic microvascular index) on FCA.

Table 2

Characteristics of patients with the CSFP (CTFC ≥ 25)

Clinical/Hemodynamic Feature CSFP ( n = 69) No-CSFP ( n = 34) P -value
Demographic characteristics
Age (years) 57 ± 11 59 ± 11 .368
Women 48 (70%) 31 (91%) .015
Hypertension 38 (55%) 18 (53%) 1.000
Diabetes 10 (15%) 2 (6%) .328
Hypercholesterolemia 39 (57%) 24 (71%) .201
Current smokers 12(45%) 6(55%) 1.000
Resting Coronary Hemodynamic Measures
Heart Rate (bpm) 72 ± 13 75 ± 16 .379
Systolic BP (mmHg) 127 ± 24 126 ± 20 .841
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 72 ± 12 65 ± 11 .003
cTFC (frames) 37±10 18 ± 4 <.001
Opacification rate (beats to fill vessel) 2.4 ± 0.8 1.3 ± 0.4 <.001
bAPV (cm/sec) 19 ± 7 23 ± 7 .009
bMR 5.8 ± 1.9 4.4 ± 1.7 .006
Functional Coronary Angiography Findings
ACh-induced epicardial spasm 40 (58%) 21 (62%) .832
ACh-induced microvascular spasm 9 (13%) 5 (15%) 1.000
Mean CFR 2.25 ± 0.84 2.26 ± 0.58 .971
Mean hMR (mmHg/cm/s) 2.37 ± 1.08 1.79 ± 0.85 .007
Abnormal CFR < 2.0 29 (43%) 11 (32%) .391
Abnormal hMR >1.9 44 (64%) 11 (32%) .003
Coronary microvascular impairment(either abnormal CFR, hMR or microvascular spasm) 51 (71%) 19 (48%) .076
Any abnormality on FCA 63 (91%) 29 (85%) .498

CSFP, coronary slow flow phenomenon; cTFC, corrected TIMI frame count; bMR, basal microvascular resistance; bAPV, basal blood flow velocity; CFR, coronary flow reserve; hMR, hyperemic microvascular resistance; FCA, functional coronary angiogram; CMD, coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Data expressed as Mean ± SD or count (%).

Relationship of cTFC to invasive microvascular function measures

Considering cTFC as a continuous measure, this study confirms an inverse relationship between cTFC and resting blood flow velocity (bAPV) ( r =−0.289, P =. 004; Figure 1A ). Furthermore, there is a modest correlation between cTFC and microvascular resistance, both at rest (bMR: r = 0.384, P =. 002; Figure 1B ) and during hyperemia (hMR: r = 0.258, P =. 008; Figure 1C ). Not surprisingly, the cTFC was poorly associated with CFR ( r = 0.058, P =. 564; Figure 1D ).

Figure 1

Correlation of corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (cTFC) with resting blood flow velocity (bAPV) and microvascular resistance (bMR) (B), and hyperemic microvascular resistance (hMR) (C) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) (D).

Corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame (cTFC) count had a moderately strong, positive correlation with both resting microvascular resistance and coronary blood flow velocity ( n = 65, r = 0.384, P =. 002; n = 97 r = −0.289, P =. 004, respectively) as well as hyperemic microvascular resistance ( r = 0.258, P =.008). cTFC was not associated with coronary flow reserve ( r = −0.058, P =.564). Patients with coronary slow flow phenomenon (corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count ≥25) are within the red box. bMR indicates resting microvascular resistance (calculated as distal coronary pressure/APV); bAPV, resting average coronary blood flow velocity; hMR, hyperemic microvascular resistance measured in the left anterior descending artery; CFR, coronary flow reserve measured in the left anterior descending artery; cTFC, corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 27, 2026 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Functional coronary angiogram findings in angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries patients with coronary slow flow

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access