Follow-Up of Heart Transplant Recipients with Serial Echocardiographic Coronary Flow Reserve and Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography to Detect Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy




Background


Implementation of reliable noninvasive testing for screening cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is of critical importance. The most widely used modality, dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), has moderate sensitivity and specificity. The aim of this study was to assess the potential role of serial coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessment together with DSE for predicting CAV.


Methods


A total of 90 studies were performed prospectively over 5 years in 23 consecutive heart transplant recipients who survived >1 year after transplantation. Assessment of CFR with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, DSE, coronary angiography, and endomyocardial biopsy was performed annually. Results of CFR assessment and DSE were compared with angiographic findings of CAV.


Results


Acute cellular rejections were excluded by endomyocardial biopsies. CAV was detected in 17 of 90 angiograms. Mean CFR was similarly lower in both mild (CAV grade 1) and more severe (CAV grades 2 and 3) vasculopathy, but wall motion score index became higher in parallel with increasing grades of vasculopathy. Any CAV by angiography was detected either simultaneously with or later than CFR impairment, yielding 100% sensitivity for CFR. The combination of CFR and DSE increased the specificity of the latter from 64.3% to 87.2% without compromising sensitivity (77.8%).


Conclusions


CFR is very sensitive for detecting CAV and increases the diagnostic accuracy of DSE, raising the potential for patient management tailored to risk modification and to avoid unnecessary angiographic procedures.


Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains one of the major causes of late mortality among cardiac allograft recipients. Because of cardiac denervation, CAV may produce severe manifestations without warning angina. CAV differs from typical atherosclerosis and is characterized by diffuse concentric myointimal thickening of both the distal epicardial and small endocardial vessels and by less common focal lesions in the proximal epicardial segments. Implementation of reliable noninvasive testing for screening CAV is of critical importance in the long-term management of patients who undergo heart transplantation (HTx). Annual coronary angiography (CA) remains the most common approach to monitor the development and progression of CAV despite several limitations. Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) has been the most widely used noninvasive diagnostic test, but it is of moderate sensitivity and modest negative predictive value, which can be somewhat higher in advanced stages of the coronary disease and in the left anterior descending coronary artery territory. Recently, the assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR) on transthoracic Doppler echocardiography as a means of determining both macrovascular and microvascular function has been proposed as an alternative method to detect CAV. However, data on the Doppler echocardiographic estimation of CFR are limited in HTx patients. Accordingly, we aimed to investigate the potential role of serial CFR assessment together with DSE to achieve a more accurate noninvasive diagnostic approach for predicting CAV in its early stages.


Methods


Twenty-four consecutive HTx patients aged >17 years who underwent transplantation >1 year previously were prospectively enrolled into the study. Our study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, the protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Baskent, and all patients gave informed consent consistent with this protocol. DSE, CFR assessment, CA, and endomyocardial biopsy were performed within 24 hours in all patients yearly. Coincident acute cellular rejection episodes were diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy performed concomitantly with CA. All patients underwent standard two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography conforming to the American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Echocardiography recommendations as part of routine follow-up. In addition, longitudinal myocardial systolic and diastolic velocities at the mitral annular level were measured using pulsed-wave tissue Doppler in the apical views. Measurements from six mitral annular sites were averaged. Left ventricular (LV) mass was calculated by using Devereux’s formula as 0.8 × {1.04[(LV internal dimension in diastole + posterior wall thickness in diastole + septal wall thickness in diastole) 3 − (LV internal dimension in diastole) 3 ]} + 0.6 g according to American Society of Echocardiography recommendations. We used the Sonos 7500 (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA) and Acuson Sequoia C256 and SC 2000 ultrasound machines (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc, Mountain View, CA) for echocardiographic studies.


DSE


Dobutamine infusion began at 5 μg/kg/min and was increased every 3 min to 10, 20, 40, and 50 μg/kg/min, with the addition of atropine as necessary to reach the predefined target heart rate ([220 − age] × 0.85). Two-dimensional image sequences were obtained from the parasternal long-axis and short-axis and apical two-chamber and four-chamber views examined at baseline, low dose, peak dose, and recovery. Before the angiographic data became available, regional wall motion abnormalities on digitally acquired cine loops were graded by two experienced observers as normal, hyperkinetic, hypokinetic, akinetic, or dyskinetic (scores 1–4) using the 17-segment model of the American Society of Echocardiography. Wall motion score index (WMSI) was calculated as the sum of the scores divided by the number of analyzed segments (1 = normal). Any deterioration of WMSI or persistence of baseline wall motion abnormality under dobutamine was considered abnormal.


Coronary Flow Measurement and CFR Determination


Coronary flow measurements were performed with the use of the 3V2c transducer of the Acuson Sequoia and the 4V1c transducer of the SC 2000, with second-harmonic capability. Harmonic 3.5-MHz and 4.3-MHz frequencies were chosen for visualization of left anterior descending coronary artery flow. For color Doppler coronary flow mapping, velocity ranges of ± 20 cm/sec were selected. Coronary flow in the middle to distal left anterior descending coronary artery was searched over the epicardial part of the distal anterior wall using a modified, foreshortened view obtained by slightly sliding the transducer upward and medially from an apical two-chamber view. The color Doppler frequency was set at 2.5 MHz, and the color priority was adjusted as needed. Blood flow velocity was measured using pulsed-wave Doppler, which displayed a characteristic biphasic flow pattern, with larger diastolic and smaller systolic components, from a sample volume of 3 mm placed on the color Doppler signal ( Figure 1 ). Peak systolic and peak diastolic velocities were recorded at baseline and under induced hyperemia by 0.56 mg/kg dipyridamole infusion over 4 min. If still negative, an additional 0.28 mg/kg over 2 min after 4 min of no dose was administered, as recommended by consensus statements. For each parameter, the three highest Doppler recordings were averaged. CFR was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to baseline peak diastolic velocity. The previously defined standard cut point of ≤2 for this ratio was used to define abnormal CFR.




Figure 1


Foreshortened apical two-chamber view with the display of coronary flow in the distal left anterior descending coronary artery ( arrows ) by color ( top ) and pulsed-wave ( bottom ) Doppler at baseline and during hyperemia. D , Diastolic; S , systolic.


CA and Endomyocardial Biopsies


CA was performed annually and whenever necessary on the basis of clinical findings. Cine angiograms of each major coronary artery and its side branches in two orthogonal planes were obtained using the Judkins technique and biplane cine fluoroscopy. Two interventional cardiologists performed visual qualitative assessment of the angiograms blinded to echocardiographic data. According to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation recommendations, coronary abnormalities were defined as follows: CAV grade 0, no detectable lesion; CAV grade 1, mild (left main <50%, or primary vessel with maximum lesion <70%, or any branch stenosis <70% [including diffuse narrowing]); CAV grade 2, moderate (left main <50%, a single primary vessel ≥70%, or isolated branch stenosis ≥70% in branches of two systems); and CAV grade 3, severe (left main ≥50%, or two or more primary vessels ≥70% stenosis, or isolated branch stenosis ≥70% in all three systems). Diagnostic endomyocardial biopsies were performed annually after the first year simultaneously with CA. Additional biopsies were also performed in high-risk patients or whenever rejection was suspected on the basis of clinical or echocardiographic findings. Rejection diagnosis was made according to the revised International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation cardiac biopsy grading.


Primary Outcome and Follow-Up


The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of noninvasive CFR assessment and DSE in the determination of subsequent progression of CAV. For this purpose, we used CFR and dobutamine stress echocardiographic measurements at each yearly follow-up visit, as well as CA. Patients were followed for 5 years after transplantation. Assessment of CFR, DSE, and CA was performed annually and standard transthoracic echocardiography every 3 months. Patients who survived ≥1 year after transplantation participated in the study.


Statistical Analysis


Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD. Differences between the groups were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Bonferroni’s correction was used in post hoc analyses. The potential confounding effect of different parameters on CFR was tested using binary logistic regression analysis. Differences between the two dependent groups were analyzed using McNemar’s test. Noninvasive test performance for detecting CAV was calculated by considering whether CAV was present at any point over the duration of the study. In analyses of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, noninvasive methods were censored after CA positivity, and to avoid double counting, positive results in CFR and dobutamine stress echocardiographic measurements were also excluded in subsequent follow-up once they became positive, if angiography had not shown positive results yet. This design is presented in Figure 2 . After determining the sensitivities and specificities of CFR and DSE at each time point separately, we calculated these values for CFR and DSE in combination in a serial design. This means that a result should be regarded as positive if both tests have positive findings. Sensitivity and specificity calculations were done for this combination according to the addition rules of probability:sensitiviy combined = sensitivity CFR × sensitivity DSE , and specificity combined = specificity CFR + specificity DSE − (specificity CFR × specificty DSE ).




Figure 2


Design of the study and results for each patient during the follow-up period. Gray shadowing indicates the test results that were not taken into consideration because they became positive after the angiographic evidence of CAV. Red bars indicate excluded noninvasive test results in subsequent follow-up once they became positive, to avoid double counting when calculating test positivity per patient for the overall accuracy of noninvasive tests to predict angiographic CAV.


Missing values were excluded, and analyses were performed only with available data. There were two patients with only one CFR value missing, one patient with only one dobutamine stress echocardiographic value missing, and one patient with the first-year assessments missing. P values < .05, on the basis of two-sided tests, were considered statistically significant. SPSS version 15.0 (SSPS, Inc, Chicago, IL) was used for the analyses in this study.




Results


This study included 24 consecutive HTx patients who survived ≥1 year after transplantation. One patient was prospectively excluded because of poor image quality for both DSE and CFR. Twenty-three patients were followed for a mean duration of 46 ± 17 months (range, 12–60 months). Five patients were women, and nine had ischemic cardiomyopathy before transplantation. At the time of enrollment, triple immunosuppressive therapy of the patients included mycophenolate mofetil ( n = 23), prednisone ( n = 23), and tacrolimus ( n = 17), cyclosporine ( n = 3), or sirolimus ( n = 3). In addition, statins were used in 19 patients, calcium channel blockers in six, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in nine, and β-blockers in 10. During follow-up, six acute cellular rejection episodes were diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy ≥1 year after transplantation, of which three were grade 2R. All patients recovered with antirejection treatment. During follow-up studies, three patients died (two because of severe CAV after the first and second years, one because of pulmonary aspergillosis after the fourth year).


A total of 90 coronary angiographic studies were performed (first year, n = 22; second year, n = 22; third year, n = 18; fourth year, n = 15; fifth year, n = 13), along with 88 CFR assessments and 89 dobutamine stress echocardiographic studies. Cumulative test positivity showed a consistent increase: positivity rates of CFR, DSE, and CA increased from 15%, 19%, and 5% in the first year to 36%, 34%, and 19% in the fifth year, respectively. In these measurements, nine patients were diagnosed with CAV by CA, 10 by DSE, and 14 by CFR. Characteristics of the patients with impaired CFR, dobutamine stress echocardiographic findings, and angiographic CAV at any time during follow-up are presented in comparison with those without in Table 1 . On the binary logistic regression analysis, none of the demographic characteristics appeared to have a significant impact on CFR, DSE, or CA ( P = NS for all), thus showing the homogeneity of the patients at enrollment.



Table 1

Comparison of risk factors according to results of CFR assessment, DSE, and CA
















































































































































Variable CFR DSE Angiography
>2
( n = 9)
≤2
( n = 14)
WMSI = 1
( n = 13)
WMSI > 1
( n = 10)
Negative
( n = 14)
Positive
( n = 9)
At enrollment
Donor age (y) 32 ± 17 34 ± 12 31 ± 16 35 ± 11 34 ± 16 32 ± 11
Left ventricular mass index (g/m 2 ) 84 ± 13 88 ± 18 77 ± 12 98 ± 13 85 ± 11 88 ± 23
Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 26 ± 7 25 ± 5 24 ± 4 28 ± 6 26 ± 6 24 ± 5
Hypertension 1 (11%) 3 (21%) 1 (8%) 3 (30%) 2 (14%) 2 (22%)
Smokers 1 (11%) 2 (14%) 1 (8%) 2 (20%) 1 (7%) 2 (22%)
Diabetes 1 (11%) 2 (14%) 1 (8%) 2 (20%) 2 (14%) 1 (11%)
Dyslipidemia 4 (44%) 2 (14%) 4 (31%) 2 (20%) 5 (36%) 1 (11%)
Chronic renal failure 1 (11%) 1 (7%) 0 2 (20%) 1 (7%) 1 (11%)
At follow-up
Hypertension 4 (44%) 4 (29%) 3 (23%) 5 (50%) 6 (43%) 2 (22%)
Diabetes 3 (33%) 4 (29%) 4 (31%) 3 (30%) 5 (36%) 2 (22%)
Dyslipidemia 5 (56%) 11 (79%) 7 (77%) 9 (90%) 8 (57%) 8 (89%)
Smoking 1 (11%) 2 (14%) 1 (8%) 2 (20%) 1 (7%) 2 (22%)
Chronic renal failure 3 (33%) 1 (7%) 2 (15%) 2 (20%) 3 (21%) 1 (11%)
Rejection episodes ≥ 2R 3 (33%) 5 (36%) 3 (23%) 5 (50%) 3 (21%) 5 (56%)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 31, 2018 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Follow-Up of Heart Transplant Recipients with Serial Echocardiographic Coronary Flow Reserve and Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography to Detect Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access