Expectant and End-of-Life Care in a Combat Zone


Robert M. Rush, Jr.

Chief, General Surgery and Trauma, 10th Combat Support Hospital, Tuzla, Bosnia-Herzegovina, 1999

General Surgeon, 250th Forward Surgical Team, Kandahar Airfield, Kandahar, Afghanistan, 2001–2002

Deputy Commander, 250th Forward Surgical Team, Kirkuk, Iraq, 2003

Deputy Commander Clin Services, Craig Joint Theater Hospital, Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan, 2009

Chief of Surgery, 256th Combat Support Hospital, Mosul, Iraq, 2011

General surgeon, 555th FST, Kandahar, Afghanistan, 2014-2015

Matthew J. Martin

Chief of Surgery, 47th Combat Support Hospital, Tikrit, Iraq, 2005–2006

Chief, General Surgery and Trauma, 28th Combat Support Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq, 2007–2008

Commander, 655th Forward Surgical Team, FOB Ghazni, Afghanistan, 2010

Chief of Surgery, 758th Forward Surgical Team, FOB Farah, Afghanistan, 2013




A severely wounded soldier arrives by helicopter at your Combat Support Hospital or Forward Surgical Team. Half of his abdominal wall is missing with exposed viscera and active bleeding. He arrests on arrival and you get him back with an emergency department thoracotomy and aortic cross-clamp. In the operating room, you start on his abdomen while anesthesia continues to resuscitate with blood products. He has so many injuries you don’t know where to begin, but you get to work and are finally gaining ground when the pagers go off again. Seven “urgent surgical” patients are inbound, and your anesthesiologist tells you he just hung the tenth unit of blood, which is half of your total blood supply. All eyes are on you – what are you going to do? Do you continue and exhaust your unit’s blood supply on this patient with a low probability of survival? Do you stop and make this patient “expectant,” allowing him to die so that you can tend to the other injured patients?

These are the types of decisions regarding the provision, withholding, and withdrawal of aggressive care that you are rarely faced with in civilian practice but will frequently encounter in the combat environment (Fig. 43.1). You are used to giving your all and doing everything possible for your patients until you have either won the battle or reached the point of futility. In the combat setting, you must also give equal weight to your situation, capabilities, and available resources. Are you dealing with a single casualty or are you in the middle of a mass casualty scenario? Is there another facility willing and able to provide the needed care? Do you have the medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) assets available to get that patient to a higher level of care? Do you have the required expertise, equipment, and training available at your facility to care for this patient? Is your facility at 10% occupancy or is it near capacity with already exhausted personnel? Will this patient require resources that you do not have available or resources that are scarce and needed for other patients? And finally, is this patient a US or allied service member who will be evacuated to a state-of-the-art medical facility, or is it a local national civilian who will have to rely on the scarce local health-care facilities and resources for any subsequent care? Not infrequently, the answer will be that you cannot provide aggressive care or need to cease aggressive care and manage the patient as an “expectant” casualty. The goal of this chapter is to familiarize you with the common situations and decisions you may face about the level of care to provide and some key concepts in providing compassionate and competent expectant care .

A186154_2_En_43_Fig1_HTML.gif


Fig. 43.1
Analysis of 150 in-hospital deaths at a Combat Support Hospital over 1 year. Note that 50% of these were managed as “expectant” and consisted of primarily head injury and burn patients


BLUF Box (Bottom Line Up Front)




  1. 1.


    There is no faster cure for the “God complex” than serving in an austere medical environment.

     

  2. 2.


    You will not have unlimited resources or transfer options available and will have to make some hard life and death decisions.

     

  3. 3.


    Severe head injuries and major burns (>50% body surface area) will be your two most common reasons for providing expectant care .

     

  4. 4.


    “Expectant” care does not mean “no” care. Don’t ignore or forget them.

     

  5. 5.


    Set aside a separate area for expectant care , with privacy but adequate access to health-care providers.

     

  6. 6.


    Comfort, compassion, and dignity should be the cornerstones of expectant care .

     

  7. 7.


    Remember to take care of your personnel also. Expectant care exacts a heavy emotional toll – particularly on the nursing staff.

     

  8. 8.


    Having a “group huddle” and discussion after a particularly difficult case can work wonders for individuals and the team.

     

  9. 9.


    If you have a scarce resource that could save multiple lives, do not waste it on a heroic but low probability attempt to save one life.

     

  10. 10.


    Expectant management or withdrawal of care for a pediatric patient will be the most difficult decision you can make and will be the hardest on your staff.

     


Combat Care and the “God Complex”


In the movie “Malice,” an arrogant surgeon is being sued for malpractice. When questioned about whether or not he has a God complex, he replies “If you’re looking for God, he was in operating room number two, on November 17, and he doesn’t like being second guessed. You want to know if I have a God complex? Let me tell you something – I AM GOD!” Although this is quite an advanced case, many of us have fallen into this type of thinking at one point or another. There is no faster cure for the God complex than to deploy to an austere environment. You will quickly realize how little your individual skills, talent, and dedication mean when you don’t have the level of support and infrastructure to which you are accustomed. It is a sobering moment, but it truly makes you appreciate how much everyone around you contributes and how dependent you are on the entire system to be able to deliver high-quality care.

Along these same lines, you may have no significant trauma experience or you may have spent your entire career at a level 1 trauma center. You may be right out of training or be a senior surgeon with decades of experience. Either way, you will have a lot to learn about combat trauma care in general and the specifics of your local facility – all in a very short time. There will likely be some established policies for all aspects of care, including expectant care , that have been developed by your predecessors based on experience and previous mistakes. Learn from those that came before you. There is often a temptation to ignore these “lessons learned” and think that you can somehow do it better than everyone who came before you. With personnel turning over every 3–12 months, this kind of thinking results in cycles of repeating the same mistakes rather than making continual progress and improvement. As a wise sergeant once said to me, “we’re not 6 years into our combat experience; we’re on our sixth 1-year experience.”


Determining Expectant Status


In general, those patients who have injuries that make them unlikely to survive given the available realities of care and resources are declared expectant. This definition depends on many factors in any environment but especially where far-forward combat surgical support is delivered. In Afghanistan and Iraq, those local national casualties who sustained burns of >50% body surface area, head injuries with an initial Glasgow Coma Score of <5, and those who sustain blunt traumatic arrest in the field or in the evacuation chain without an easily identifiable and correctable cause are classified as expectant. In fact, the NATO guidelines specifically classify any host nation casualty sustaining either of the former two injuries as expectant and not meeting the “medical rules of eligibility” or engagement. It is very important to review the theater medical rules of engagement (MROE) prior to initiating care of anyone on the battlefield. The MROE are designed to ensure that the maximal numbers of injured patients who can survive are treated based on the medical and logistical resources deployed in support of military operations in any given country. The MROE must also account for the status of the evacuation and medical capabilities of the host nation – whether it is during a response to support earthquake victims in Haiti or far-forward combat operations in Afghanistan. However, the MROE can never anticipate every particular situation that might arise and should never replace your judgment and ethical decision-making when faced with an injured patient in front of you or en route to your facility.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 11, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Expectant and End-of-Life Care in a Combat Zone

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access