Evaluation of Prosthetic Valves



Evaluation of Prosthetic Valves


Jose A. Madrazo








  • The echocardiographic evaluation of prosthetic valves is a challenging task as there are many different types of prostheses and they frequently impart imaging artifacts and shadowing (Fig. 13-1).


  • Understanding the types of valves available helps determine the expected appearance, gradients, and physiologic regurgitation.


  • Valves are generally divided into bioprosthetic or mechanical.



    • Bioprosthetic valves may be stented (higher profile), stentless, homografts, or heterografts.


    • Mechanical valves may be ball-cage or tilting disk (single or double).


Regurgitation



  • Most mechanical valves will have some built in “physiologic” regurgitation (Fig. 13-2). Knowing the type of valve will help determine the expected pattern of regurgitation. Some common examples:



    • Bileaflet tilting disk valves will have two small lateral (and one small central for St. Jude’s) jets of regurgitation that are angled inward.


    • Single tilting disk valves will have a central area of regurgitation around the hinge-point (that is larger than what is seen in bileaflet valves).


  • Perivalvular leak (typically unilateral, eccentric, turbulent jet) is in contrast pathologic (Fig. 13-3) and occurs most often in redo valve replacement surgery or when extensive calcium debridement is required prior to valve implantation (newer percutaneously inserted valves will not uncommonly have a small perivalvular regurgitant jet).


  • Start your evaluation by identifying the valve and confirming the expected appearance. Look for stability of the valve and ring. Excessive movement of the entire prosthesis (“rocking”) suggests dehiscence. Evaluate leaflet/disk motion when they are visible. Pay attention to the presence of calcifications, thrombi, or vegetations.


  • Prosthetic valves will cause shadowing distal to the ultrasound beam and make those areas difficult to inspect visually. Standard and off-axis views should be selected to interrogate areas of interest first and then the prosthesis to minimize shadowing (e.g., for evaluating MR for a mitral prosthesis the PLAX and subcostal images can visualize the LA without significant artifact compared to the apical four-chamber view). TEE is often necessary when clinical suspicion of prosthetic valve dysfunction is high especially when multiple prostheses are present (Fig. 13-4).







    Figure 13-1. TEE images of prosthetic valve types and transesophageal images during diastole and systole. A: Bioprosthesis in the mitral position. Note the prominent struts (arrows). B: Edwards SAPIEN transcathether aortic valve. (From Baim DS, Grossman’s Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography, and Intervention, Seventh Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.) C: Single tilting disk valve. (From Weyman AE. Principles and Practice of Echocardiography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1994.) D: Bileaflet tilting disk valve. E: Ball and cage valve.







    Figure 13-2. TEE images of normal “physiologic” regurgitation. A and B: Small peripheral regurgitant jets in bileaflet tilting disk valve (arrows). C: Larger central jet in single tilting disk valve (arrow). D: Mild paravalvular regurgitation in Edwards SAPIEN percutaneously implanted valve (arrow).








    Figure 13-3. Pathologic paravalvular regurgitation. A: TEE images at 60 degrees of a bioprosthetic valve in the mitral position demonstrating severe perialvular regurgitation (black arrow) and mild “physiologic” central regurgitation (open white arrow). Note the area of flow convergence (PISA) on the ventricular side (solid white arrow). B: Suture dehiscence clearly seen (white arrows).

    Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

    Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 20, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Evaluation of Prosthetic Valves

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access