ABSTRACT
Background
Invasive coronary function testing (ICFT) is the gold standard for diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and is predominantly performed in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). However, it is unclear whether multivessel testing has additional diagnostic yield.
Methods
We analyzed a prospective registry of 231 patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) who underwent consecutive ICFT using the Doppler method in both the proximal LAD and the left circumflex (LCx) arteries for assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR).
Results
231 ANOCA patients with a median age of 59 (49,67) years were included in this analysis. ICFT with multivessel CFR assessment that included the LCx in addition to the LAD identified an additional 10% of patients with CMD (CFR ≤ 2.5) that would have been missed by LAD assessment only. Patients with multivessel CMD had statistically significant lower CFR in the LAD (1.9 vs 2.7, P <.001) and the LCx (1.9 vs 2.4, P <.001) compared to patients with single vessel CMD.
Conclusion
Among ANOCA patients ICFT with multivessel CFR assessment identified an additional 10% of patients with CMD only seen in the LCx. Future studies are needed to elucidate the role of multivessel CMD assessment in the management of patients with ANOCA.
Background
Between 30% to 70% of patients with stable angina referred for routine coronary angiography will have no evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), classified as Angina with No Obstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA). In ANOCA, coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common pathophysiological mechanism and diagnosed as a failure to augment coronary flow reserve (CFR) during hyperemia. Diagnosis of CMD and vasomotor disorders in ANOCA patients has a class IB recommendation in the 2024 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes and a class IIA recommendation in the 2021 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain. , Unlike stress positron emission tomography (PET) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) which assess global and regional CMD regionally, the majority of ICFT protocols evaluate CMD in a single vessel, most commonly in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery.
This study aims to assess the added diagnostic value of CFR assessment in the left circumflex (LCx) in the diagnosis of CMD using the Doppler-tipped guidewire method. We also examined differences in ANOCA patients with single (abnormal CFR in LAD or LCx) vs multivessel (abnormal CFR in both LAD and LCx) CMD.
Methods
Study population
This study leveraged the prospective Coronary Microvascular and Vasomotor Dysfunction (CMVD) registry at The Christ Hospital (TCH) in Cincinnati, Ohio, which operates under the approval of the TCH Institutional Review Board. Consecutive ANOCA patients who had ICFT performed between October 2020 and December 2023 with CFR assessment in both the proximal LAD and the proximal LCx were included in this analysis. Exclusion criteria were obstructive epicardial CAD (>50% stenosis or positive fractional flow reserve (FFR) <0.80), need for PCI at the time of procedure, or prior history of CABG. Of 289 patients screened, 17 were excluded due to obstructive CAD, 2 due to history of CABG, and 39 due to missing CFR in one or both vessels, resulting in 231 ANOCA patients in the final cohort.
Invasive coronary functional testing
All ICFT procedures at THC have been previously described in detail in a methods manuscript. All were performed as scheduled procedures and none were performed in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). After a diagnostic coronary angiogram, a Doppler-tipped guidewire (ComboWire XT TM or Flowire, Philips Volcano Corporation, San Diago, CA, USA) was advanced into the target vessel to assess CMD. The multivessel CFR assessment protocol was standard for all the ICFT procedures at TCH during the study years. The Doppler protocol included: 1) CMD assessment of CFR in the proximal LCx followed by the proximal LAD with intracoronary (IC) adenosine; 2) coronary endothelial dysfunction and epicardial spasm with IC acetylcholine (ACH); 3) followed by intracoronary nitroglycerin. ,, Nitroglycerin was intentionally not given until after ACH testing to avoid impacting the assessment of epicardial spasm. In the very rare case of severe baseline epicardial spasm or severe catheter or wire induced spasm, IC nitroglycerin was administered and ACH testing was not performed.
For adenosine testing once the Doppler wire was positioned in the proximal target vessel and optimal flow signals achieved, the baseline average peak velocity (APV) was recorded. Steady-state hyperemia was achieved with intracoronary adenosine using 18 mcg and 100 mcg doses and hyperemia average peak velocity (APV) was recorded. After each adenosine administration there was adequate time for washout and return of APV to baseline prior to sequential adenosine test. CFR was calculated for each adenosine dose (18 mcg and 100 mcg) at each location (LCx and LAD). The highest CFR measured for each vessel was used as it represented true hyperemia. A CFR (≤ 2.5) in the LCx and/or LAD was diagnostic for CMD.
For ACH testing, IC infusions were delivered into the left main artery via the six French guide catheter using a micro-infusion pump and performed at different doses: safety-dose (5mcg infused at 0.75ml/min for 2.5min), mid‐dose (44mcg infused at 0.75 ml/min for 2.5 min), and high dose (108 mcg infused at 1.875 ml/min for 2.5 min) as previously described in detail. Baseline and peak APV were recorded for mid and high dose ACH in the proximal LAD. Following the procedure, coronary diameter change by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed in the proximal LAD, 5 mm from the tip of the guidewire at the same position at baseline and mid-dose ACH cine images. Coronary blood flow (CBF) was calculated based on the equation at baseline and mid-dose ACH: CBF = 0.5 x APV x (diameter 2 x π)/4.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were summarized using means and standard deviations or median (Interquartile range (IQR)), and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons used t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables, and Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. McNemar’s test assessed the diagnostic performance of the multivessel (LAD and LCx) CMD assessment against the LAD assessment.
Disclosures
No extramural funding was used to support this work. The authors are solely responsible for the design and conduct of this study, all study analyses, the drafting and editing of the paper and its final contents.
Results
ICFT with CFR assessment performed in both LAD and LCX was completed in 231 ANOCA patients. The total procedural time to complete our comprehensive ICFT protocol ranged between 30 and 40 minutes, with LCx CFR assessment requiring an additional 1-2 minutes. There were no complications associated with our multivessel protocol . The median age was 59 (49, 67) and 89% of patients were women. Among the 231 ANOCA patients, 177 (77%) had a CFR abnormality in the LAD and/or LCx, 154 (67%) had coronary endothelial dysfunction, 52 (23%) had epicardial spasm, and 18 (8%) had no ICFT abnormality. Among the 231 ANOCA patients, CFR abnormalities were present in LAD alone in 16 (7%), LCx alone in 24 (10%), LAD and LCx (multivessel CMD) in 137 (60%) and no CFR abnormality in 54 (23%) patients as demonstrated in Figure 1 . Among the 54 patients with no CFR abnormalities in the LAD and the LCx, the prevalence of coronary endothelial dysfunction and epicardial spasm were 32 (62%) and 13 (26%), respectively.
Coronary flow reserve abnormality by coronary vessel in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease. CFR , coronary flow reserve; LAD , left anterior descending artery; LCx , left circumflex artery.
Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics and angina characteristics in single vs multivessel CFR abnormalities are summarized in Table 1 . Patients with multivessel CFR abnormality were older compared to single-vessel CFR abnormality (61 vs 50, P =.002). The prevalence of common CAD risk factors, other cardiac conditions, angina, quality of life and distribution across CCS angina class was similar between the two groups. Single vessel LAD vs LCx abnormalities are summarized in Supplemental Table I.
Table 1
Demographics, clinical, and anginal characteristics in single compared to multivessel coronary flow reserve abnormality
|
Overall Cohort with CFR abnormalities
N = 177 |
Single-vessel CFR abnormality
N = 40 |
Multivessel CFR abnormality
N = 137 |
P -value |
No CFR abnormalities
N = 54 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | |||||
| Age, median (IQR) | 59 (50, 68) | 50 (43, 62) | 61 (52, 68) | .02 | 54 (45, 67) |
| Sex, n (%) | .12 | ||||
| Males | 19 (11) | 7 (18) | 12 (9) | 5 (9) | |
| Females | 156 (89) | 33 (83) | 123 (91) | 49 (91) | |
| Race/ethnicity, n (%) | 1.00 | ||||
| White | 148 (85) | 34 (85) | 114 (85) | 44 (83) | |
| Black | 18 (10) | 4 (10) | 14 (10) | 8 (15) | |
| Other | 8 (5) | 2 (5) | 6 (4) | 1 (2) | |
| Clinical characteristics | |||||
| Hypertension, n (%) | 112 (63) | 26 (65) | 86 (63) | .80 | 29 (54) |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | 145 (82) | 34 (85) | 111 (81) | .57 | 45 (83) |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 26 (15) | 6 (15) | 20 (16) | .95 | 6 (11) |
| Tobacco use, n (%) | .72 | ||||
| Never | 107 (62) | 23 (59) | 84 (63) | 34 (63) | |
| Former | 54 (31) | 14 (36) | 40 (30) | 15 (28) | |
| Current | 12 (7) | 2 (5) | 10 (7) | 5 (9) | |
| OSA, n (%) | 57 (32) | 14 (35) | 43 (31) | .67 | 16 (30) |
| BMI, median (IQR) | 29 (26, 35) | 32 (27, 36) | 29 (25, 34) | .10 | 30 (27, 37) |
| MINOCA, n (%) | 18 (10) | 3 (8) | 15 (11) | .77 | 6 (11) |
| CVA, n (%) | 13 (7) | 3 (8) | 10 (7) | 1.00 | 5 (9) |
| HFpEF, n (%) | 9 (5) | 2 (5) | 7 (5) | 1.00 | 3 (6) |
| HFrEF, n (%) | 3 (2) | 0 (0) | 3 (2) | 1.00 | 0 |
| Atrial fibrillation, n (%) | 17 (9) | 4 (10) | 13 (9) | 1.00 | 4 (7) |
| Patient reported outcomes | |||||
| SAQ-7, overall, mean ± SD | 55.9 ± 21.8 | 52.0 ± 22.7 | 57.1 ± 21.5 | .23 | 59.8 ± 20.4 |
| SAQ-7 subscale, median (IQR) | |||||
| Angina limitation | 58 (42, 83) | 58 (33, 83) | 58 (50, 83) | .40 | 75 (50, 92) |
| Angina frequency | 70 (50, 80) | 60 (50, 70) | 70 (50, 80) | .23 | 70 (60, 70) |
| DASI, mean ± SD | 32.3 ± 13.0 | 34.3 ± 13.4 | 31.8 ± 13.0 | .36 | 36.7 ± 13.3 |
| UCSD SOB, median (IQR) | 40 (23, 58) | 41 (23, 67) | 38 (24, 55) | .48 | 31 (15, 50) |
| Anginal characteristics | |||||
| Angina, n (%) | .40 | ||||
| Exertional angina | 45 (25) | 7 (18) | 38 (28) | 13 (24) | |
| Rest angina | 29 (16) | 9 (23) | 20 (15) | 9 (17) | |
|
Exertional and
rest angina |
101 (57) | 24 (60) | 77 (56) | 32 (59) | |
| Clinician-assigned functional class | |||||
| CCS angina class, n (%) | .85 | ||||
| I | 10 (7) | 2 (7) | 8 (7) | 6 (13) | |
| II | 13 (9) | 2 (7) | 11 (9) | 7 (15) | |
| III | 84 (57) | 15 (53) | 69 (58) | 24 (52) | |
| IV | 41 (28) | 10 (34) | 31 (27) | 9 (20) | |
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree