Effective Discharge Planning




© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017
W. Frank Peacock (ed.)Short Stay Management of Acute Heart FailureContemporary Cardiology10.1007/978-3-319-44006-4_18


18. Effective Discharge Planning



Sudha P. Jaganathan , Ginger Conway  and Stephanie Dunlap 


(1)
Department of Cardiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

(2)
Division Cardiovascular Health and Disease, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

(3)
Advanced Heart Failure Program, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

 



 

Sudha P. Jaganathan



 

Ginger Conway



 

Stephanie Dunlap (Corresponding author)



Keywords
Outpatient managementFollow-upEducation


Discharge planning is the process of evaluating and planning for the patient’s needs post discharge. An effective discharge plan begins with the first encounter in the emergency department (ED), regardless of the disposition, and must be evaluated every step of the way during the treatment period [13]. The discharge period has been identified as an opportunity to have a positive impact on patient outcomes and needs to be a priority for the health-care team. An in-depth look into the causes of readmissions must influence discharge planning and drive a strategical approach to improve current methods.

Many studies focus on the clinicians’ impressions of readmissions, but few incorporate the patient and caregiver’s perspective [4]. Focusing on both and collaborating with all members of the health-care team at every level of the treatment period can give us the most effective results [47]. The majority of research has been in the area of discharge planning from the inpatient setting [8, 9]. Although limited, there is emerging data on improved patient outcomes and better allocation of health-care resources with targeted post-discharge interventions in the ED [10]. This is especially true in high-risk groups such as the elderly and those with inadequate support structure [10].

Nearly all patients with heart failure will experience acute symptoms at least once, necessitating evaluation in the ED [9]. With ED visits and hospital admissions being scrutinized at every level, hemodynamically stable heart failure patients will be stabilized in the ED and discharged home adding to the burden of the ED staff to provide a comprehensive discharge plan [11]. Failure to meet this responsibility results in repeated admissions.


Why Is Discharge Planning So Important for Heart Failure Patients?


Utilization of ED services is growing approximately twice the rate of population growth, and reimbursement penalties for readmissions force close attention on “preventable” admissions [10]. As a result, research is being conducted to identify gaps in the transition of care as well as to identify possible errors or mismanagement in a patient’s care [5, 12, 13]. Heart failure is the cause of nearly one million hospitalizations annually and accounts for over one million ED visits per annum [1418]. In the last decade, hospitalization for heart failure has significantly increased for people <65 years of age and >85 years of age [5]. Approximately 20 % of heart failure patients are readmitted within 1 month of discharge and 50 % within 6 months [16, 1921]. These readmissions also account for 70 % of the costs [6]. According to the Medicare database from 2003 to 2004, heart failure was the leading cause of recurrent hospitalizations [13]. These points reiterate the importance of exploring areas of improvement in the discharge process and coordination of care.

Patients with heart failure often have a high prevalence of comorbid conditions which may lead to polypharmacy and multiple health-care providers [2224]. This, in combination with low health-care literacy and other barriers to self-care [23], can make management of heart failure difficult and often necessitates a patient-specific discharge plan. Individualized discharge plans improve adherence and outcomes by empowering patients to manage their health problems [4, 5, 7, 8]. Fortunately, with the advent of electronic medical records (EMR) and health information exchange (HIE), most communication failures can be analyzed and addressed [25]. The increase in post-discharge health-care services alone may not be the only answer in decreasing readmissions [5]. The quality of the services as well as monitoring the delivery of best practices may be more important to the overall picture [5].


Effective Discharge Planning


The effective discharge plan starts with identifying the links between the cause of the current admission and what may lead to readmissions. It should start with the first encounter in the ED, regardless of the final disposition of the patient [2, 3]. Recent research focuses on patient engagement in delivery of high-quality care and encourages patients to engage in self-care after discharge as opposed to focusing on the provider’s perspective [7]. Frequent evaluation of the discharge plan throughout the treatment period will allow for revisions as needed. Annema et al. illustrated that health-care providers and patients along with their caregivers agreed on the reason for readmission a third of the time [6]. Overall, nonadherence to diet, fluid restriction, and medication were the most important factors related to a preventable HF readmission [6].


Contents of the Effective Discharge Plan



Assessment


Patients and their caregivers are often unprepared to care for themselves in the next care setting [25]. Causes for readmissions are multifactorial and include issues such as lack of adherence, inadequate discharge preparation, and education [3]. With the development of patient-reported measures to reflect the patient’s perceived needs at discharge, health-care providers can assess a patient’s “readiness” for discharge and concentrate efforts on quality improvements in discharge planning [12]. Tools such as brief prescriptions, ready to reenter community, education, placement, assurance of safety, realistic expectations, empowerment, and directed to appropriate services (B-PREPARED) and Care Transitions Measure 3 (CTM-3) can be used to assess a patient’s readiness [12].

Inadequate patient education and nonadherence to the medical plan alone may account for as many as 40 % of the readmissions [26]. Assessing a patient’s characteristics such as functional, cultural, and psychosocial aspects is also an important part of the transition of care process [5]. Most programs use eight specific characteristics in their post-discharge disease management, which are patient education; early assessment after hospital admission, including caregivers in the care plan; medication review; early post-discharge follow-up; telephone follow-up; home visits; medication review; and post-discharge handoff to outpatient providers [5]. It is difficult to identify which specific intervention carries the most weight since many institutions use the “bundled intervention approach,” but institutions most successful in reducing rehospitalizations were the ones that included home visits and/or follow-up telephone calls [5].

Barriers such as low health literacy, lack of preparedness on discharge, and a paucity of social support might be addressed with a more structured and individualized patient-centered education program and an increased awareness of outpatient resource availability [7]. As many as 90 million Americans have poor health literacy, and as many as 62 % of patients treated in the ED for heart failure are unable to read the label on a prescription bottle [23]. A more formal and detailed education on disease progression might alleviate anxiety and fear [7, 27, 28]. Discharge instructions should be legibly written and in a patient-friendly format [29]. It is recommended that they are written at the sixth grade reading level; however, most are written at a ninth to tenth grade level [8]. Older individuals may need materials that are written in larger print. In heart failure, teach-back methods were associated with increased patient compliance and knowledge retention as well as decreased hospital readmissions [5]. This method should be employed in all aspects of patient education.

Early identification of patient’s caregivers and their specific roles as well as the patient’s social support system is imperative. Adequate support has been shown to have a positive impact on the patient’s ability to adhere to a self-care program and increased capability of symptom management [5]. Assessing the need for a formal support system such as home care, nursing home, and hospice/palliative care might break several barriers to self-care [5, 30]. Particular attention should be paid to groups of individuals with a greater need for transition of care such as those with increased frailty, those who are non-English speakers, and those with cognitive deficits [5]. A better system for coordination of care in the form of EMR and HIE as well as addressing medication discrepancies and using a low-literacy friendly approach to medication understanding and symptom management are all areas needing improvement [7, 25, 27, 28].

Socioeconomic status is an independent risk factor for readmission with the highest risk for readmission being associated with the lowest income [31, 32]. The average number of medications taken by a patient is 10.5 and increases as the severity of symptoms increase [33]. With the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, health system outcome improvements have been established such as better coordination of care and post-discharge follow-up. Ongoing research focuses on patient-centered outcome interventions on functionality, symptoms, and quality of life (QOL) [5].


Medications


It is important that the discharge plan includes medications that are evidence based [34]. The preadmission medication list must be reconciled with the discharge list, and clear written instructions should be given to the patient about what to stop and what to continue or add. The medication plan for the treatment of heart failure can be challenging and complex which may lead to discrepancies, unwarranted side effects, and nonadherence, all of which may contribute to hospital readmissions. Patients with low health literacy and impaired cognition are at highest risk [27].

Loop diuretics were commonly cited as problematic and difficult to adhere to because of disturbing side effects and fear of adverse effects to other organs. New research suggests that a tailored, pharmacist-delivered intervention on medication reconciliation might have a positive impact especially for high-risk individuals [27]. This approach consists of patient-specific counseling specifically assessing the patient’s barriers to understanding and compliance, an illustrated medication schedule, and a pillbox to assist the patient at home [27]. The intervention would conclude with a follow-up telephone call after discharge, and if problems were detected, pharmacists would provide the needed assistance [27].

Another concern is the interaction between over-the-counter medications and herbal products. Patients seldom tell the health-care provider about the over-the-counter medications and herbal therapies they are taking. Because there are many possible drug-to-drug interactions, it is best to encourage patients to discuss all medications and supplements that they are taking and to maintain a written record of all.


Diet


Nonadherence to dietary restrictions can lead to worsening symptoms and subsequent readmissions [22, 34, 35]. Few patients have the knowledge of how to follow a low-sodium diet, and only 36 % report following dietary recommendations [23, 36]. New guidelines from the American Heart Association recommend limiting sodium to 1500 mg/day for patients with stages A and B heart failure because of the data linking its intake to heart failure risk factors such as hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, and other cardiovascular diseases. Currently, there is insufficient data to support definitive sodium restrictions in those with stages C and D heart failure [37]. Discharge instructions for the patient with heart failure should include a clear diet plan with examples of foods to avoid and how to read a food label. It has been reported that up to 42 % of patients with heart failure are poor at reading food labels [23].

Some patients also need to restrict fluids. Alarmingly, 38 % of patients with heart failure report thinking they are required to drink large quantities of fluids [38]. Those with persistent fluid retention or severe hyponatremia, despite a low-sodium diet and diuretics, may benefit from a fluid restriction [23]. These individuals will need instructions on how to measure fluid intake and ways to address the sensation of thirst.


Activity


The activity plan should be tailored to the individual [23]. Patients need to be reassured that activity is beneficial and receive instructions on how to monitor their tolerance and symptoms. Exercise has been shown to improve oxygen delivery, decrease inflammation, increase peak oxygen uptake, and decrease depression [23].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 1, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Effective Discharge Planning

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access