Early outcome of high energy Laser (Excimer) facilitated coronary angioplasty ON hARD and complex calcified and balloOn-resistant coronary lesions: LEONARDO Study




Abstract


Aim


An innovative xenon–chlorine (excimer) pulsed laser catheter (ELCA X80) has been recently used for the treatment of complex coronary lesions, as calcified stenosis, chronic total occlusions and non-compliant plaques. Such complex lesions are difficult to adequately treat with balloon angioplasty and/or intracoronary stenting. The aim of this study was to examine the acute outcome of this approach on a cohort of patients with coronary lesions.


Methods and Results


Eighty patients with 100 lesions were enrolled through four centers, and excimer laser coronary angioplasty was performed on 96 lesions (96%). Safety and effectiveness data were compared between patients treated with standard laser therapy and those treated with increased laser therapy. Laser success was obtained in 90 lesions (93.7%), procedural success was reached in 88 lesions (91.7%), and clinical success in was obtained in 87 lesions (90.6%). There was no perforation, major side branch occlusion, spasm, no-reflow phenomenon, dissection nor acute vessel closure. Increased laser parameters were used successfully for 49 resistant lesions without complications.


Conclusions


This study suggests that laser-facilitated coronary angioplasty is a simple, safe and effective device for the management of complex coronary lesions. Furthermore, higher laser energy levels delivered by this catheter improved the device performance without increasing complications.


Highlights





  • We planned this multicenter study to examine the acute outcome of an innovative xenon–chlorine (excimer) pulsed laser catheter (ELCA X80) for treatment of complex coronary lesions.



  • We enrolled 80 patients with 100 lesions and performed excimer laser coronary angioplasty in 96 lesions (96%).



  • Laser success was obtained in 90 lesions (93.7%), procedural success was reached in 88 lesions (91.7%), and clinical success was obtained in 87 lesions (90.6%).



  • Increased laser parameters were used successfully for 49 resistant lesions, without increase laser-induced complications.



  • This study suggests that laser-facilitated coronary angioplasty is a simple, safe and effective device for management of hard lesions.




Introduction


Despite the increasing use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and intracoronary stent placement for the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease, a large subset of coronary lesions cannot be adequately treated with balloon angioplasty and/or intracoronary stenting alone. Such lesions are often heavily calcified or fibrotic, and undilatable with the present balloon technology. The attempts to treat them with balloon angioplasty or intracoronary stent placement can lead to vessel dissection or incomplete stent deployment with adverse outcomes. Currently, the increase in life expectancy has forced interventional cardiologists to treat patient populations that are getting older with coronary lesions becoming progressively more complex. Among some of these hard lesions, calcified stenosis, chronic total occlusions, and non-compliant plaques remain major technical challenges. Despite advances in technology and technique, these lesions may be resistant or untreatable by percutaneous techniques restricting therapeutic options. Description of recent non-selective cohorts of patients requiring coronary angioplasty included 12% of severely calcified lesions , 10% of chronically occluded arteries , and 1.5% of non-resilient plaques to balloon angioplasty (non-dilatable or uncrossable) .


An innovative xenon–chlorine (excimer) pulsed laser catheter (ELCA X80; Spectranetics, Colorado Springs, CO) capable of delivering higher energy density with lower heat production (smaller area of ablation) has been recently used for treatment of these complex lesions . This instrument is a 6 Fr-compatible catheter that incorporates 65 concentric 50 m fibers with the potential of delivering excimer energy (wavelength 308 nm, pulse length 185 nanoseconds) from 30 to 80 mJ/mm2 (fluences) at pulse repetition rates (frequency) from 25 to 80 hertz, using a 10-s on and 5-s off lasing cycle. This innovative laser was developed in the style of the existing excimer catheter technology (0.9, 1.4, 1.7, and 2.0 mm catheters) delivering 30–60 mJ/mm 2 at 25–40 hertz using a 5-s on and 10-s off lasing cycle, but it potentially doubles the device’s penetration rate while offering the possibility of targeting harder tissue. The reducing of catheter size was done to maximize tissue penetration while keeping photomechanical and photothermal damages within acceptable limits. The catheter functions like high optical fibers, which require increased packing density to maximize the cutting area at the distal tip. Since the early days of coronary laser use, it has been well documented that highly fibrocalcific plaques are laser-resistant and that higher energy could overcome these limitations .


Therefore, we performed a self-controlled study to examine the acute outcome of laser-facilitated coronary angioplasty on a cohort of patients presenting chronic total occlusion, calcified plaques and/or balloon-resistant lesions. Furthermore, we evaluated if higher energy levels delivered by laser catheter could improve procedural and clinical success without increasing complications.





Material and methods


Eighty patients referred to four centers experienced in excimer laser angioplasty from January to November 2012 were screened for enrollment in this multicenter study. Each patient had diagnostic coronary angiography, before interventional procedure. Safety and effectiveness data were compared between two groups: 41 patients treated with standard laser therapy (SLT) defined by laser energy at 60 fluence and 40 hertz and 39 patients treated with increased laser therapy (ILT) defined by laser energy at 60 fluence and 80 hertz or 80 fluence and 80 hertz ( Fig. 1 ). The treatment scheme mandated use of the X80 catheter at standard laser parameters on all patients and increase of these parameters to higher levels in stepwise increments if deemed necessary to cross the target lesion. Proceeding as described, all patients treated with increased laser parameters had to present lesions refractory to treatment with standard laser parameters.




Fig. 1


Flow chat: patients enrolled in the study, divided in two groups.


The primary endpoint was the ability of the X80 catheter to cross the lesion. The secondary endpoints included A) procedural success defined as reduction of the target lesion to < 50% residual diameter stenosis after adjunctive therapy, as measured by quantitative coronary analysis, and B) clinical success, defined as reduction of the target lesion to < 50% residual diameter stenosis after adjunctive therapy as measured by quantitative coronary analysis with absence of major adverse cardiac events at hospital discharge.


All eligible patients for coronary revascularization > 18 years old presenting at least a primary or restenotic lesion in a native coronary artery or a saphenous vein bypass graft were screened. To be included in the study, the target lesion had to be severely stenotic (≥ 80% diameter stenosis as assessed by visual estimation) with angiographic evidence of calcification or a chronic total occlusion with absence of acute coronary syndrome 3 months prior to index procedure. Vessels with reference diameter smaller than 2.0 mm were also excluded, such angulated lesions and extreme tortuosity were allowed to be included. Patients with acute ischemic events, shock (cardiogenic or not cardiogenic), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 25%, previous coronary angioplasty within 6 months, and contraindication to aspirin or heparin were excluded from the study ( Fig. 2 ). During a single hospitalization only one lesion was allowed to be treated. In patients presenting more than one stenosis suitable for inclusion/exclusion criteria of the study, the lesion more severe at angiographic examination was treated during first hospitalization, while other lesions were treated after at least three months. All participants gave written informed consent before enrollment in the study that was approved by the institutional ethics committees of all the involved centers.




Fig. 2


Characteristics of patients enrolled in the study.



Study protocol


Patients were pretreated with ≥ 80 mg of aspirin daily for > 24 h, and intravenous heparin was administered during the index procedure to maintain an activated clotting time > 250 s. All anti IIb/IIIa agents use were left to the operator’s discretion with proper heparin dosage adjustments. Intracoronary nitroglycerine (> 100 μg) was given before intervention and at the end of index procedure prior to final angiogram. Patients falling within inclusion criteria were treated with the X80 laser catheter starting at 60 fluence and 40 hertz laser parameters (SLT). After the successful laser passage, adjunctive balloon angioplasty and stenting were performed to complete treatment according to the standard procedure. When the laser catheter failed to cross target lesion completely, laser parameters were increased to 60 fluence and 80 hertz and then to 80 fluence and 80 hertz (ILT) in an attempt to traverse the lesion. If still unsuccessful, the laser catheter was withdrawn, recalibrated, and reinserted, and three more laser sequences were attempted. Three successive laser sequences without catheter tip progression had to be experienced before increasing laser parameters. At least 12 laser trains were attempted before failure was declared (3 × 60 fluence/40 hertz, 3 × 60/80, 3 × 80/80, and 3 × 80/80 postrecalibration). After the procedure, sheaths were removed immediately (radial approach) or 6 h later. Creatinine kinase measurements and electrocardiogram were obtained on all patients prior to and 24 h after index procedure. No clinical follow-up was recorded after hospital discharge.



Laser procedure


The excimer laser is a pulsed xenon–chlorine-based mid ultraviolet wave length (308 nm) laser relying on absorption in the nonaqueous components of the atherosclerotic plaque, such as proteins and nucleic acids, for debulking . The new X80 catheter measures 0.9 mm in diameter with concentric fibers. It was built to deliver energy up to 80 mJ/mm 2 at 80 hertz with a lasing cycle characterized by 10 s of active firing and 5 s of silence. The laser system requires a 5-min warm-up period to turn on. The catheter is prepared by flushing the central guidewire lumen and connecting the proximal end to the laser console. Calibration of the catheter is then performed, and the desired energy level is set up. The catheter is then passed over the guidewire just proximal to the lesion. The flush-and-bathe technique for blood and dye clearance from the entire system by saline infusion is mandatory prior to each lasing train. Lasing is performed by applying gentle forward pressure to the catheter in order to cross the lesion under fluoroscopy while energy is emitted from the catheter distal tip with foot pedal activation. The procedure is then finalized by laser catheter removal and the additional balloon and stent use according to the standard practice. Repeat arteriography after intracoronary nitroglycerine was recorded after laser use, before any adjunctive therapy and at the end of the procedure.



Definitions


Laser technical success was defined as the laser catheter crossing the entire length of the stenotic lesion determined by angiographic evidence of the catheter tip in the artery distal to the stenosis. Procedural success was defined as < 50% residual stenosis after laser and adjunctive therapy. Clinical success requested procedural success with absence of major adverse cardiac events at hospital discharge. Major adverse cardiac events included death of all causes, non-Q-wave and Q-wave myocardial infarction, need for target lesion revascularization, tamponade, and life-threatening arrhythmias. Q-wave myocardial infarction was defined as elevation of creatinine kinase levels > 3 times above laboratory normal values with any abnormal MB fraction and the development of new pathology Q-waves on the electrocardiogram. A non-Q-wave myocardial infarction was defined as the development of similar creatinine kinase elevation without Q-waves.


Anterograde flow was assessed by the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) scale . Lesion morphology was characterized by the modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) score . Laser complications included dissection type C or worse according to the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute classification , coronary spasm, thrombus formation, no reflow, embolization, perforation, loss of major side branch (> 2 mm in diameter), and acute closure. Spasm was defined as transient reduction in blood flow with vessel caliber narrowing relieved either spontaneously or by nitroglycerine. Thrombus formation was defined as the new appearance of an intraluminal filling defect, lucency, or haziness refractory to intracoronary nitroglycerine. No reflow was determined by reduction of ≥ 1 TIMI flow grade without angiographic demonstration of embolization, whereas embolization was characterized by new appearance of a distal intraluminal filling defect or loss of a distal branch. Perforation requested demonstration of a persistent extravascular collection of contrast medium beyond the vessel wall. Finally, acute closure was defined as sustained TIMI 0 to 1 flow grade caused by obstruction of the target lesion.



Data collection and analysis


Detailed in-hospital case report forms were prospectively completed for each patient. A study monitor traveled to each site for independent verification of case report form accuracy. Angiograms were evaluated by individual operators using local online quantitative coronary analysis software and visual assessment. However, all the angiograms were evaluated at the independent QCA Core Laboratory. No significant discrepancies between the online and offline analyses were seen.


Data were entered into a SAS database (software version 7.2, SAS Institute). Statistical calculations used Wilcoxon scores (rank sums) and McNemar analysis for frequency tables. A P value < 0.05 was required for statistical significance.





Material and methods


Eighty patients referred to four centers experienced in excimer laser angioplasty from January to November 2012 were screened for enrollment in this multicenter study. Each patient had diagnostic coronary angiography, before interventional procedure. Safety and effectiveness data were compared between two groups: 41 patients treated with standard laser therapy (SLT) defined by laser energy at 60 fluence and 40 hertz and 39 patients treated with increased laser therapy (ILT) defined by laser energy at 60 fluence and 80 hertz or 80 fluence and 80 hertz ( Fig. 1 ). The treatment scheme mandated use of the X80 catheter at standard laser parameters on all patients and increase of these parameters to higher levels in stepwise increments if deemed necessary to cross the target lesion. Proceeding as described, all patients treated with increased laser parameters had to present lesions refractory to treatment with standard laser parameters.




Fig. 1


Flow chat: patients enrolled in the study, divided in two groups.


The primary endpoint was the ability of the X80 catheter to cross the lesion. The secondary endpoints included A) procedural success defined as reduction of the target lesion to < 50% residual diameter stenosis after adjunctive therapy, as measured by quantitative coronary analysis, and B) clinical success, defined as reduction of the target lesion to < 50% residual diameter stenosis after adjunctive therapy as measured by quantitative coronary analysis with absence of major adverse cardiac events at hospital discharge.


All eligible patients for coronary revascularization > 18 years old presenting at least a primary or restenotic lesion in a native coronary artery or a saphenous vein bypass graft were screened. To be included in the study, the target lesion had to be severely stenotic (≥ 80% diameter stenosis as assessed by visual estimation) with angiographic evidence of calcification or a chronic total occlusion with absence of acute coronary syndrome 3 months prior to index procedure. Vessels with reference diameter smaller than 2.0 mm were also excluded, such angulated lesions and extreme tortuosity were allowed to be included. Patients with acute ischemic events, shock (cardiogenic or not cardiogenic), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 25%, previous coronary angioplasty within 6 months, and contraindication to aspirin or heparin were excluded from the study ( Fig. 2 ). During a single hospitalization only one lesion was allowed to be treated. In patients presenting more than one stenosis suitable for inclusion/exclusion criteria of the study, the lesion more severe at angiographic examination was treated during first hospitalization, while other lesions were treated after at least three months. All participants gave written informed consent before enrollment in the study that was approved by the institutional ethics committees of all the involved centers.


Nov 14, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Early outcome of high energy Laser (Excimer) facilitated coronary angioplasty ON hARD and complex calcified and balloOn-resistant coronary lesions: LEONARDO Study

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access