Author |
No. |
Measurement |
Echocardiographic Technique |
LV Dyssynchrony Cutoff Value and Outcomes |
Pitzalis et al.1 |
20 |
Septal-to-posterior wall motion delay |
M-mode |
A cutoff value of ≥130 ms predicted response to CRT with a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 63%, respectively. Subsequent studies have demonstrated this measurement less feasible and accurate, particularly in patients with ischemic heart failure. |
Penicka et al.2 |
49 |
Sum of LV and VV dyssynchrony (pulsed-wave systolic velocities) |
Pulsed-wave TDI |
A cutoff value of >102 ms predicted response to CRT with a sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 77%, respectively |
Bax et al.3 |
85 |
Delay in peak systolic velocities (four segments: basal septum, lateral, anterior and inferior walls) |
Color-coded TDI |
A cutoff value of ≥65 ms predicted response to CRT with a sensitivity and specificity of 92% for both. |
Yu et al.4 |
56 |
Standard deviation of time to peak systolic velocities (12 LV segments) |
Color-coded TDI |
A cutoff value of ≥31.4 ms predicted response to CRT with a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 81%, respectively |
Delgado et al.5 |
161 |
Delay in peak radial strain (anteroseptal to posterior wall) |
2D radial strain speckle tracking |
A cutoff value ≥130 ms predicted the response to CRT (≥15% reduction in LVESV) with a sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 80%, respectively |
Lim et al.6 |
65 |
Strain delay index (sum of wasted energy calculated as the difference between endsystolic and peak longitudinal strain for 16 segments) |
2D longitudinal speckle tracking |
A cutoff value of ≥25% predicted response to CRT with a sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 92%, respectively |
Kapetanakis et al.7 |
187 |
Systolic dyssynchrony index (standard deviation of time to minimum volume of 16 subvolumes) |
Real-time 3D echocardiography |
A cutoff value of >10.4% predicted response to CRT (≥15% reduction in LVESV) with a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 67%, respectively |
Kleijn et al.8 |
600 |
Systolic dyssynchrony index (standard deviation of time to minimum volume of 16 subvolumes) |
Real-time 3D echocardiography |
A cutoff value of >9.8% yielded a sensitivity of 93% with a specificity of 75% to predict CRT response |
LV, left ventricular; No., number of patients; TDI, tissue Doppler imaging; VV, interventricular. |
1 Pitzalis MV, Iacoviello M, Romito R, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy tailored by echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular asynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1615-1622.
2 Penicka M, Bartunek J, De B Bruyne B, et al. Improvement of left ventricular function after cardiac resynchronization therapy is predicted by tissue Doppler imaging echocardiography. Circulation. 2004;109:978-983.
3 Bax JJ, Bleeker GB, Marwick TH, et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1834-1840.
4 Yu CM, Fung WH, Lin H, et al. Predictors of left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:684-688.
5 Delgado V, Ypenburg C, Van Bommel RJ, et al. Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony by speckle tracking strain imaging comparison between longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain in cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1944-1952.
6 Lim P, Buakhamsri A, Popovic ZB, et al. Longitudinal strain delay index by speckle tracking imaging: a new marker of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2008;118:1130-1137.
7 Kapetanakis S, Bhan A, Murgatroyd F, et al. Real-time 3D echo in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:16-26.
8 Kleijn SA, Aly MF, Knol DL, et al. A meta-analysis of left ventricular dyssynchrony assessment and prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy by three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13:763-775. |