Chapter 34
Dysphagia, oesophageal motility disorders and oesophagopharyngeal diverticula
Sanjay Asopa, Joseph Rahamim
1 |
What is dysphagia? |
• |
Dysphagia represents difficulty in swallowing and is subclassified into: |
a) |
oropharyngeal dysphagia; |
b) |
oesophageal dysphagia. |
• |
Dysphagia can also be classified according to whether the difficulty in swallowing relates to solids, liquids or both, as this may help identify the aetiology (neuromuscular or obstructive). |
• |
It is important to distinguish dysphagia from: |
a) |
odynophagia – which represents painful swallowing; |
b) |
globus – which represents the sensation of a lump in the throat but with no underlying organic defect. |
2 |
What are the common causes of oropharyngeal dysphagia? |
• |
Neuromuscular disease: |
a) |
central nervous system – cerebrovascular accident (CVA), Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis (MS); |
b) |
peripheral nervous system – peripheral neuropathy; |
c) |
skeletal muscle disease – polymyositis, cricopharyngeal achalasia; |
d) |
myasthenia gravis. |
• |
Obstructive lesions: |
a) |
internal structural lesion: |
i) |
malignant stricture; |
ii) |
benign stricture – post-surgical or traumatic inflammatory narrowing; |
Zenker’s diverticulum; | |
iv) |
oesophageal web. |
b) |
extrinsic compression: |
i) |
anterior mediastinal mass; |
ii) |
cervical spondylosis. |
3 |
What are the common causes of oesophageal dysphagia? |
• |
Oesophageal motility disorders: |
a) |
primary – achalasia, diffuse oesophageal spasm, hypertensive lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS), nutcracker oesophagus, ineffective oesophageal motility (IOM); |
b) |
secondary – scleroderma, diabetes, oesophageal carcinoma. |
• |
Obstructive lesions: |
a) |
internal structural lesion: |
i) |
malignant stricture; |
ii) |
benign stricture – secondary to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), radiation, corrosive agents, drugs (including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, doxycycline, trimethoprim); |
iii) |
oesophageal web; |
iv) |
oesophageal ring (Schatzki’s ring); |
v) |
foreign body; |
b) |
extrinsic compression: |
i) |
anterior mediastinal mass – thoracic goitre, lymphadenopathy; |
ii) |
vascular lesion – thoracic aorta, left atrium, aberrant vessel (dysphagia lusoria). |
4 |
Which diagnostic tests are performed to investigate a patient with dysphagia? |
• |
Barium swallow (Figure 1) – which can detect obstructive lesions and motility disorders. Double-contrast studies can also identify mucosal lesions. |
• |
Videofluoroscopy – which can identify neuromuscular causes of dysphagia. |
• |
Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) – which can best detect oesophageal mucosal abnormalities, including oesophagitis and infection (Figure 2). |
Nasopharyngoscopy – which can detect obstructive lesions and is indicated for patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. | |
• |
Chest radiograph (CXR) – which may detect an air-fluid level or identify evidence of aspiration pneumonia. |
• |
Manometry – which can detect oesophageal motility disorders. |
• |
pH monitoring – which can detect GORD. |
• |
Swallowing electromyography (EMG) – which can identify neuromuscular causes of oropharyngeal dysphagia. |
• |
Computed tomography (CT) imaging – which can detect structural lesions, including oesophageal carcinoma. |
Figure 1. Barium swallow demonstrating benign oesophageal strictures.
Figure 2. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy image demonstrating a benign oesophageal stricture.
5 |
What are the principles of management in a patient with dysphagia? |
• |
History, examination and investigations to identify and treat the underlying cause. |
• |
Reduce the risk of aspiration by dietary modification, with food introduced according to viscosity and texture, such as pureed foods. |
• |
Nutritional and fluid supplementation – to reduce the risk of malnutrition and dehydration, including calorie supplementation, intravenous fluids, nasogastric feeding, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and total parenteral nutrition (TPN). |
• |
Physiotherapy – exercises for patients with underlying neuromuscular aetiology of dysphagia to reduce the risk of aspiration and develop some neuromuscular pharyngeal tone. |
• |
Oesophageal dilation or stent placement. |
6 |
How are oesophageal motility disorders classified? |
• |
Primary oesophageal motility disorder: |
a) |
disorder of inhibitory innervation (relaxation) – which consists of vagal preganglionic neurons and myenteric plexus postganglionic neurons, which release nitric oxide and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP): |
i) |
achalasia (inadequate LOS relaxation); |
ii) |
diffuse oesophageal spasm (DOS); |
b) |
disorder of excitatory innervation (contraction) – which consists of vagal preganglionic neurons and postganglionic neurons, which release acetylcholine and substance P: |
hypotensive – hypotensive LOS or hypotensive peristalsis (ineffective oesophageal motility [IOM]); | |
ii) |
hypertensive – hypertensive LOS or hypertensive peristalsis (nutcracker oesophagus). |
• |
Secondary oesophageal motility disorder – which represents an oesophageal manifestation of a systemic disease: |
a) |
disorders of inhibitory innervation (relaxation): |
i) |
secondary achalasia – carcinoma, lymphoma, Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi); |
b) |
disorders of excitatory innervation (contraction): |
i) |
hypotensive – myotonic dystrophy, metabolic neuromyopathy (diabetes mellitus, alcohol), drugs (anticholinergics). |
• |
More recently, the Chicago classification of oesophageal motility disorders has been used, since the introduction of high-resolution oesophageal manometry (see Chapter 6 – Oesophageal function tests). |
7 |
What is achalasia? |
• |
Achalasia is an oesophageal motility disorder characterised by the absence of peristalsis in the oesophageal body (pathognomonic) and impaired relaxation of the LOS, in response to swallowing. |
• |
It is the commonest primary oesophageal motility disorder and is caused by degeneration of the postganglionic inhibitory neurons in Auerbach’s myenteric plexus, which release vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and nitric oxide. |
• |
Achalasia has an incidence of 5-10 per 1,000,000, primarily affecting adults between 25-50 years of age, with an equal male to female distribution. |
• |
Secondary achalasia can be caused by local infiltrative degeneration of the myenteric plexus in patients with oesophageal carcinoma, lymphoma or Chagas disease. |
• |
Pseudoachalasia is defined as the presence of clinical symptoms or radiographic evidence of achalasia in a patient with normal manometric findings. It can be caused by external compression of the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ). |
What are the clinical features of achalasia? | |
• |
Dysphagia is the presenting symptom in the majority of patients (65%), initially to solid food and then progressively to liquids. Some patients compensate for retrosternal fullness with deliberately slow swallowing. |
• |
Regurgitation of undigested food, which may also result in nocturnal coughing and pulmonary complications. |
• |
Chest pain and heartburn. |
• |
Weight loss in advanced disease. |
• |
Patients with achalasia have an increased risk (5%) of developing squamous cell carcinoma in the mid-oesophagus (with a mean 20-year interval between the onset of dysphagia and the malignant change). |
9 |
What are the investigative findings of a patient with achalasia? |
• |
Chest radiograph (CXR) (Figure 3) – which may demonstrate a mega-oesophagus with an air-fluid level in the posterior mediastinum and aspiration pneumonitis. |
Figure 3. Chest radiograph demonstrating a widened mediastinum (arrow) in a patient with a dilated oesophagus, secondary to achalasia.
Barium swallow (Figure 4) – which has a sensitivity of 75% and may demonstrate: | |
a) |
narrow tapering (‘bird’s beak’ appearance) in the distal oesophagus; |
b) |
dilation of the proximal oesophagus; |
c) |
absence of peristalsis; |
d) |
poor oesophageal emptying. |
Figure 4. Barium swallow demonstrating: A) a ‘bird’s beak’ appearance with tapering of the distal oesophagus, associated with dilation of the proximal oesophagus; and B) poor oesophageal emptying of the contrast, in a patient with achalasia.
• |
Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) – which is usually normal in patients with achalasia but should be performed to rule out distal oesophageal carcinoma. The endoscope should pass normally through the LOS without resistance. |
• |
Oesophageal manometry (Figure 5) – which is the gold standard for the diagnosis with characteristic features including: |
a) |
absence of peristalsis; |
b) |
weak simultaneous contractions, which may be present in the body of the oesophagus; |
c) |
incomplete relaxation of the LOS (<50% of baseline pressure) with high resting LOS pressure (>26mmHg). |
Figure 5. High-resolution oesophageal manometry traces demonstrating: A) the absence of peristalsis and a high baseline LOS pressure in a patient with achalasia in comparison to B) the presence of peristalsis and appropriate LOS relaxation during swallowing in a control patient.
10 |
What are the principles of managing a patient with achalasia? |
• |
Relieving the functional obstruction by relaxing the LOS. |
• |
Symptom control. |
• |
Prevention of the complications of achalasia. |
• |
The therapeutic options include: |
a) |
pharmacological therapy – using sublingual nitrates, calcium channel blockers, phosphodiesterase inhibitors and anticholinergic agents; |
b) |
endoscopic therapies: |
i) |
balloon dilation of the LOS; |
ii) |
botulinum toxin injection into the LOS; |
c) |
surgical myotomy. |
• |
Long-term medication has limited utility and is reserved for patients with debilitating comorbidities. |
What are the principles of endoscopic balloon dilation in a patient with achalasia (Figure 6)? | |
• |
A 30-50mm pneumatic balloon is fluoroscopically positioned and inflated to stretch the LOS forcibly enough to allow oesophageal emptying but not to cause oesophageal perforation or gastro-oesophageal reflux. |
• |
At 2 years, there is an 80% success rate when the LOS pressure is reduced to <10mmHg after dilation. |
• |
Endoscopic balloon dilation is usually an effective treatment in older patients, as compared to younger patients where the response is often poor. |
• |
Repeat dilation is required in approximately 20% of patients, with the effectiveness reducing with each repeat dilation. |
• |
Complications include perforation (1-3%), with a low mortality risk (0.3%). |
Figure 6. Endoscopic oesophageal pneumatic balloon dilator: A) deflated; and B) inflated.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

