Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with a high bleeding risk after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but evidence on the efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in this population remains limited. This study aimed to compare the bleeding risk of DCB-based PCI with that of drug-eluting stent (DES)-only PCI in patients with CKD. We retrospectively enrolled 415 consecutive patients with CKD who underwent DCB-based PCI and propensity score-matched them (1:1) to 415 patients who underwent conventional PCI with second-generation DES (DES-only group). CKD was defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2. The primary end point was the incidence of major bleeding at 2 years, and the secondary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. In the DCB-based group, 65.1% of patients were treated with DCB-only. At 2-year, DCB-based PCI group showed a significantly lower incidence of major bleeding than DES-only group (2.3% vs 5.9%; hazard ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.92; p = 0.030), whereas the incidence of MACE was comparable between groups (10.7% vs 13.0%; hazard ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.50–1.18; p = 0.230). Five cases of target lesion thrombosis occurred in the DES-only group, but none in the DCB-based group. In multivariable analysis, DCB-based PCI was independently associated with a lower risk of 2-year major bleeding. In conclusion, among patients with CKD, DCB-based PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared with DES-only PCI, without a significant difference in MACE. These findings suggest that DCB-based PCI may be a viable strategy to reduce bleeding events in patients with CKD.
Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). , Patients with CKD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have a heightened risk of both ischemic and bleeding events, complicating the selection and duration of antiplatelet therapy. Contemporary observational data further indicate that early modification or discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) occurs more frequently in patients with impaired renal function, reflecting both heightened bleeding vulnerability and clinical uncertainty regarding optimal antithrombotic intensity. Despite the high prevalence of coronary artery disease in CKD, patients with advanced CKD have been under-represented in pivotal PCI trials. In the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial, an invasive strategy did not reduce death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) compared with conservative management, and bleeding outcomes were not comprehensively reported, despite their prognostic importance. Consequently, there is a need for revascularization strategies that minimize bleeding risk and antithrombotic exposure in patients with CKD undergoing PCI. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) deliver antiproliferative therapy without permanent intracoronary implants, potentially avoiding stent-related adverse events and allowing abbreviated DAPT of approximately 4 weeks in selected stable patients undergoing DCB-only PCI. , Emerging evidence supports the use of DCBs in specific de novo lesions and in patients at high bleeding risk. However, comparative data between DCB-based and drug-eluting stent (DES)–only strategies in patients with CKD remain limited. In BASKET‑SMALL 2, DCB and DES showed comparable 3-year ischemic outcomes with fewer major bleeding events observed in the DCB group, and real-world data from dialysis cohorts suggest comparable efficacy between the two strategies. Nevertheless, the applicability of these findings to broader CKD populations undergoing contemporary PCI remains uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to compare clinical outcomes of a DCB-based PCI strategy with those of a DES-only strategy in patients with CKD treated in the era of second-generation DES, with a particular focus on bleeding risk and long-term outcomes.
Methods
Patient population
The study population was derived from the multicenter REAL-DCB registry (Impact of Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in De Novo Coronary Lesion; NCT04619277), which includes five teaching hospitals in South Korea: Ulsan University Hospital, Kangwon National University Hospital, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University Guro Hospital, and Ulsan Medical Center. Between October 2010 and December 2023, we retrospectively identified 415 consecutive patients with CKD who underwent successful PCI using a DCB-based strategy, defined as either DCB-only treatment or a provisional hybrid approach with adjunctive DES implantation. The study enrollment process is illustrated in Supplementary Figure 1. Patients were excluded if they had a previous history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, presented with cardiogenic shock, had severely calcified lesions requiring rotational atherectomy, experienced failed PCI of the target lesion, required long-term oral anticoagulation, or were lost to follow-up.
The comparator group consisted of patients with CKD treated with a DES-only strategy, derived from the Platelet Function and Genotype-Related Long-Term Prognosis in DES-Treated Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (PTRG-DES; NCT04734028) consortium. The design and methodology of the PTRG-DES consortium have been described previously. Briefly, this consortium prospectively collected data from nine registries across 32 academic centers in South Korea between January 2013 and August 2018, enrolling patients treated with second-generation DES. Among 11,226 patients in the overall PTRG-DES cohort, 2,015 had an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m². After 1:1 propensity score matching, 415 patients with CKD treated with a DES-only strategy were selected and included in the final analysis. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of all participating centers, and the requirement for written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.
Procedural steps and patient management
In the DCB-based treatment group, PCI was performed in accordance with current consensus recommendations. , DCB-based PCI strategy was defined as an approach in which DCB was considered the default treatment modality, with the final device selection—DCB-only or adjunctive DES implantation—determined by the angiographic results after lesion preparation. DCB was applied when lesion preparation achieved an acceptable result based on consensus criteria, whereas DES implantation was reserved for cases requiring bailout or provisional stenting. This strategy aims to safely reduce overall stent burden while maintaining procedural safety by allowing stenting when necessary. , To minimize geographic mismatch, the DCB length was selected to be at least 2 to 3 mm longer on both proximal and distal margins than the predilatation balloon, and balloon inflation was maintained at nominal pressure for a minimum of 60 seconds. When flow-limiting dissections occurred after DCB inflation despite an initially acceptable lesion preparation result, additional PCI with DES implantation was performed. All DCBs used in this study were coated with paclitaxel at a dose density of 3.0 μg/mm² combined with iopromide as a drug carrier. After PCI, DAPT was recommended for 1 to 3 months in stable patients treated with DCB-only PCI and for 6 months in those treated with DES. In patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome, DAPT was recommended for 12 months irrespective of the device used. For procedures involving both DCB and DES, the recommended DAPT duration followed the DES-based strategy.
Clinical follow-up and endpoints
Patients were followed through scheduled outpatient clinic visits after the index procedure. When in-person follow-up was not feasible, clinical information was obtained through structured telephone interviews. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major bleeding at 2 years. The secondary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal MI, stroke, definite target lesion thrombosis, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Cardiac death was defined as any death not clearly attributed to noncardiac causes, in accordance with established guidelines. MI was defined as a significant elevation of cardiac biomarkers in the presence of ischemic symptoms or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia. Stroke was defined as a new focal neurological deficit lasting ≥24 hours with radiological confirmation; both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes were included, whereas transient ischemic attacks were excluded. TVR was defined as any clinically driven repeat revascularization, either PCI or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, of the target vessel occurring after discharge from the index hospitalization. Definite target lesion thrombosis was defined according to the criteria of the Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-2, and major bleeding was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 to 5 bleeding events. ,
Statistical analysis
Categorical variables are presented as counts and percentages, and continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons between groups were performed using the Pearson chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, and the Student’s t test for continuous variables, as appropriate. Time-to-event clinical outcomes, including major bleeding, MACE and other endpoints, were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between groups using the log-rank test.
To adjust for baseline imbalances and reduce the impact of potential confounding, propensity score matching was performed. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression incorporating clinical, medication-related, and lesion-related variables, including age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, current smoking, previous MI, previous PCI, previous stroke, end-stage renal disease, clinical presentation, left ventricular ejection fraction, use of aspirin, clopidogrel, statins, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, presence of left main disease, target vessels, lesion characteristics, bifurcation lesions, chronic total occlusion, and multivessel disease. Patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio using nearest-neighbor matching without replacement, with a caliper width of 0.2 of the standard deviation of the logit of the propensity score. The adequacy of matching was assessed using absolute standardized mean differences for each covariate, with values <0.1 indicating negligible imbalance. All p values were two-sided, and a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses performed using R software version 4.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
A total of 830 patients with CKD who had de novo coronary lesions and an indication for PCI were included in the analysis. Patients were treated with either a DCB-based PCI strategy (n = 415) or a second-generation DES-only strategy (n = 415) and were followed for 2 years. Baseline clinical characteristics and medication profiles were well balanced between the two groups after propensity score matching ( Table 1 ). The mean age of the study population was approximately 70 years, and nearly 60% of patients were men. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous MI, previous PCI, previous stroke, and end-stage renal disease, did not differ significantly between groups, with all absolute standardized mean differences below 0.1. Clinical presentation at the index procedure was comparable between the two groups, including stable angina, unstable angina, non–ST-segment elevation MI, and ST-segment elevation MI. Left ventricular ejection fraction was also similar between groups.
Table 1
Patient clinical characteristics and medication profiles
|
DCB-based PCI
(n = 415) |
DES-only PCI
(n = 415) |
p Value | ASMD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 70.5 ± 10.2 | 70.5 ± 9.5 | 0.955 | 0.004 |
| Men | 245 (59.0) | 247 (59.5) | 0.944 | 0.010 |
| BMI, kg/m 2 | 24.4 ± 3.7 | 24.5 ± 3.2 | 0.636 | 0.032 |
| Hypertension | 353 (85.1) | 349 (84.1) | 0.773 | 0.027 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 270 (65.1) | 271 (65.3) | >0.999 | 0.005 |
| Current smoker | 77 (18.6) | 78 (18.8) | >0.999 | 0.006 |
| Prior MI | 57 (13.7) | 51 (12.3) | 0.606 | 0.043 |
| Prior PCI | 135 (32.5) | 120 (28.9) | 0.292 | 0.078 |
| Prior stroke | 73 (17.6) | 69 (16.6) | 0.782 | 0.026 |
| End-stage renal disease | 93 (22.4) | 81 (19.5) | 0.348 | 0.071 |
| Clinical presentation | 0.999 | <0.001 | ||
| Stable angina | 146 (35.2) | 145 (34.9) | ||
| Unstable angina | 153 (36.9) | 155 (37.3) | ||
| NSTEMI | 85 (20.5) | 84 (20.2) | ||
| STEMI | 31 (7.5) | 31 (7.5) | ||
| LVEF, % | 54.7 ± 12.4 | 54.9 ± 11.9 | 0.805 | 0.017 |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m 2 | 37.4 ± 19.2 | 38.1 ± 18.7 | 0.600 | 0.036 |
| <30 | 132 (31.8) | 112 (27.0) | 0.148 | 0.105 |
| Antiplatelet at discharge | ||||
| Aspirin | 414 (99.8) | 413 (99.5) | 0.479 | 0.098 |
| Clopidogrel | 415 (100.0) | 415 (100.0) | >0.999 | <0.001 |
| Medication at discharge | ||||
| DAPT | 414 (99.8) | 413 (99.5) | >0.999 | <0.001 |
| Statin | 397 (95.7) | 401 (96.6) | 0.589 | 0.050 |
| Beta blockers | 243 (58.6) | 235 (56.6) | 0.623 | 0.039 |
| Calcium channel blockers | 163 (39.3) | 151 (36.4) | 0.431 | 0.060 |
| ACEI/ARB | 234 (56.4) | 234 (56.4) | >0.999 | <0.001 |
| DAPT duration, months | 0.132 | 0.129 | ||
| ≦6 | 124 (29.9) | 123 (29.6) | ||
| 6 < duration ≦12 | 112 (27.0) | 139 (33.5) | ||
| >12m | 179 (43.1) | 153 (36.9) |
Values are mean ± SD or n (%).
ACEI = angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; ASMD = absolute standardized mean difference; BMI = body mass index; DAPT = dual antiplatelet duration; DCB = drug-coated balloon; DES = drug-eluting stent; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; MI = myocardial infarction; NSTEMI = non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Table 2 summarizes the lesion- and procedure-related characteristics of the two groups. Target vessels, including the left main coronary artery, were evenly distributed between groups. Lesion characteristics, including lesion complexity (ACC/AHA type B2 or C), were comparable, as were the prevalences of bifurcation lesions, chronic total occlusions, and multivessel disease. In the DCB-based PCI group, 270 patients (65.1%) were treated with a DCB-only strategy, whereas 145 patients (34.9%) underwent a hybrid approach involving both DCB and DES implantation. Bailout stenting was required in 4 patients (1.0%) in the DCB-based PCI group. The number of devices used per patient was slightly higher in the DCB-based PCI group, and the total device length was significantly greater compared with the DES-only PCI group (48.6 ± 29.4 mm vs 38.5 ± 23.9 mm; p < 0.001). The mean device diameter was larger in the DES-only PCI group (3.0 ± 0.4 mm vs 2.8 ± 0.4 mm; p < 0.001). Conversely, among patients receiving DES, the mean DES diameter was greater in the DCB-based PCI group (3.1 ± 0.5 mm vs 3.0 ± 0.4 mm; p < 0.001). Consistent with the treatment strategy, the number of DES used was significantly lower in the DCB-based PCI group (0.5 ± 0.7 vs 1.7 ± 0.8; p < 0.001), and the total DES length was markedly shorter (12.6 ± 20.9 mm vs 38.5 ± 23.9 mm; p < 0.001). In addition, the use of small-diameter DES (≤2.5 mm) was significantly less frequent in the DCB-based PCI group than in the DES-only PCI group (14.5% vs 28.7%; p = 0.001).
Table 2
Lesion and procedure-related characteristics
|
DCB-based PCI
(n = 415) |
DES-only PCI
(n = 415) |
p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Target vessel | |||
| Left main | 45 (10.8) | 47 (11.3) | 0.912 |
| Left anterior descending artery | 240 (57.8) | 228 (54.9) | 0.441 |
| Left circumflex artery | 173 (41.7) | 172 (41.4) | >0.999 |
| Right coronary artery | 176 (42.4) | 171 (41.2) | 0.778 |
| Lesion characteristics (ACC/AHA) | 0.871 | ||
| Type A, B1 | 99 (23.9) | 102 (24.6) | |
| Type B2, C | 316 (76.1) | 313 (75.4) | |
| Bifurcation | 141 (34.0) | 145 (34.9) | 0.827 |
| Chronic total occlusion | 39 (9.4) | 45 (10.8) | 0.565 |
| Multivessel disease | 289 (69.6) | 290 (69.9) | >0.999 |
| Number of treated vessel | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 0.413 |
| DCB-only treatment | 270 (65.1) | 0 | – |
| Number of device used | 1.9 ± 1.0 | 1.7 ± 0.8 | 0.003 |
| Total device length, mm | 48.6 ± 29.4 | 38.5 ± 23.9 | <0.001 |
| Mean device diameter, mm | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 3.0 ± 0.4 | <0.001 |
| Number of DCB used | 1.4 ± 0.8 | 0 | – |
| Total DCB length, mm | 36.1 ± 22.7 | 0 | – |
| Mean DCB diameter, mm | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 0 | – |
| Number of DES used | 0.5 ± 0.7 | 1.7 ± 0.8 | <0.001 |
| Total DES length, mm | 12.6 ± 20.9 | 38.5 ± 23.9 | <0.001 |
| Mean DES diameter, mm | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.4 | <0.001 |
| Small DES used (≦2.5 mm) | 21/145 (14.5) | 119/415 (28.7) | 0.001 |
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree