Fig. 22.1
Panel (a) balloon sizing the persistent foramen ovale (PFO) at the first procedure. The waist on the balloon (arrow) is situated at the defect and was used to measure the length and diameter of the PFO tunnel. The ICE catheter is seen in the right atrium (arrowhead). Panel (b) The Helex Septal Occluder after release. Note the mobile aneurysmal intra-atrial septum. Online video
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) on the next day was interpreted as successful device closure with small residual shunt. The patient was discharged but after a few days was readmitted for leg pain and numbness, especially in the left leg. Clinical examination was noted as normal, and she was discharged without additional imaging.
At follow-up visit after 1 year, TTE and fluoroscopy showed that the device had embolized, and contrast computer tomography (CT) scan revealed the device positioned in the iliac bifurcation. Catheterization was performed with venous and arterial access. There was evidence of local dissection of the distal aorta extending from the renal arteries to the bifurcation, where an organized thrombus was located with reduced flow into the left common iliac artery, but with good collateral flow (Figs. 22.2a, b and 22.3a, b). The invasive blood pressure difference from the distal aorta to the common iliac artery was 35 mmHg. An attempt was made to retrieve the device with a snare from the right femoral artery, but the device could not be mobilized probably due to endothelialization. The PFO was crossed from the right femoral vein using a 25-mm PTS sizing balloon resized to a stretched diameter of 18 mm (Fig. 22.4a). A 21-mm Occlutech Figulla ASD Occluder (Occlutech International, Helsingborg, Sweden) was implanted without complications (Fig. 22.4b).
Fig. 22.2
Panel (a) fluoroscopy showing device (arrow) at iliac bifurcation. Panel (b) Angiography showing dissection in the distal abdominal aorta (arrows) and reduced flow to particularly the left common iliac artery (arrowhead)
Fig. 22.3
Contrast computer tomography images. Panel (a) axial image. Device (arrow) at aortic bifurcation. Panel (b) sagittal reconstruction showing dissection (arrowheads) of the distal abdominal aorta
Fig. 22.4
Panel (a) balloon sizing the persistent foramen ovale at the second procedure. The waist on the balloon (arrow) is situated at the defect. Panel (b) Occlutech Figulla ASD occluder in position (arrow)
In collaboration with the vascular surgery team, initial conservative treatment was recommended with the option for open surgical repair of the distal aorta and proximal iliac arteries in case of symptom progression. During the following 4 years, CT findings have been unchanged, and the patient has reported low degree of claudication and declined open surgery due to the low intensity of symptoms.
22.2 Discussion
This case demonstrates the occurrence of device embolization after PFO occlusion, which was diagnosed late and resulted in the permanent settling of the device in the distal aorta. The reason for the embolization was probably undersizing of the device. Furthermore, the late diagnosis prevented easy catheter-based retrieval presumably due to tissue overgrowth and the development of chronic dissection.