, Benjamin Hohlfelder2 and Samuel Z. Goldhaber3
(1)
Cardiovascular Division, Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
(2)
Department of Pharmacy Services, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
(3)
Thrombosis Research Group, Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Abstract
Like deep vein thrombosis (DVT), a high clinical suspicion is required, especially in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk factors, to make a timely diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). Diagnosis of acute PE is often challenging because the disease presents as a variety of clinical syndromes, ranging from pleuritic pain to cardiac arrest. A diagnostic algorithm that integrates an assessment of clinical probability with appropriate laboratory testing and imaging modalities is critical. Contrast-enhanced chest computed tomogram (CT) is the predominant imaging test used to diagnosis PE.
Keywords
Chest CTD-dimerDiagnosisPulmonary embolismSelf-Assessment Questions
1.
In which of the following clinical scenarios would D-dimer testing be an appropriate step in the evaluation of suspected acute PE?
(a)
A 23-year-old woman who recently started a combination oral contraceptive pill and presents to Urgent Care Clinic with acute dyspnea and pleuritic pain
(b)
A 68-year-old man with history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admitted to the Intensive Care Unit with severe community-acquired pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation and progressive hypoxemia and new asymmetric left lower extremity edema
(c)
A 72-year-old woman with breast cancer status post mastectomy who recently started tamoxifen and now presents to the Emergency Department with hemoptysis and dyspnea
(d)
A 33-year-old man with recent Achilles tendon rupture status post recent repair who presents to his Primary Care Physician with pleuritic pain and dyspnea
2.
Which of the following statements about imaging studies for evaluation of suspected acute PE is false?
(a)
Ventilation-perfusion lung scanning is generally reserved for patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast or ionizing radiation.
(b)
Advances in chest CT technology have increased the detection rate of subsegmental PE and have reduced the frequency of nondiagnostic studies.
(c)
Contrast pulmonary angiography is reserved for the circumstance in which noninvasive imaging modalities are nondiagnostic and a high clinical suspicion persists.
(d)
Bedside transthoracic echocardiography is sensitive for the diagnosis of acute PE in critically-ill patients who are unstable for transportation to the CT scanner.
3.
Based on the results of the Christopher Study and Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) II, what would be the most appropriate next step in a 45-year-old woman with suspected PE, a Wells score of 6, and a negative contrast-enhanced chest CT?
(a)
No further action is needed because the contrast-enhanced chest CT is negative.
(b)
Check a D-dimer test and perform additional imaging if positive.
(c)
Perform a transthoracic echocardiogram to evaluate for RV dysfunction as a surrogate for the diagnosis of PE.
(d)
Order a contrast pulmonary angiogram because a high suspicion for PE persists despite the negative chest CT.
Clinical Vignette
A 54-year-old obese woman with diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia presented to the Emergency Department with sudden onset dyspnea and chest pain. She denied any recent major surgery, trauma, or immobility. Upon physical examination, she was noted to have a heart rate of 96 beats per minute, blood pressure of 124/72 mmHg, and room air oxygen saturation of 85 %. Her electrocardiogram and chest X-ray were unremarkable. Her initial laboratory evaluation was normal except for an increased D-dimer result. Given her symptoms and positive D-dimer, she underwent a contrast-enhanced chest CT which demonstrated bilateral PE (Fig. 5.1).
Fig. 5.1
Contrast-enhanced chest computed tomogram (CT) demonstrating bilateral pulmonary embolism (PE) (arrows) in a 54-year-old woman with dyspnea and chest pain
Clinical Clues
Acute PE can present with a wide spectrum of symptoms and signs. Dyspnea is the most frequently reported symptom. Severe dyspnea, cyanosis, or syncope suggests a massive PE, whereas pleuritic pain, cough, or hemoptysis may indicate a smaller peripherally located PE. Because acute coronary syndromes are so common and clinical suspicion is often high, clinicians may overlook the possibility of a life-threatening acute PE and inadvertently discharge these patients from the hospital after the exclusion of myocardial infarction with serial cardiac biomarkers and electrocardiograms.
On physical examination, tachypnea is the most common sign. Patients without underlying cardiopulmonary disease may appear anxious but well compensated, even with an anatomically extensive PE. Patients with massive PE may present with systemic arterial hypotension, cardiogenic shock, or cardiac arrest. Submassive PE describes patients who have preserved systolic blood pressure but exhibit evidence of RV failure such as tachycardia, distended neck veins, tricuspid regurgitation, and an accentuated sound of pulmonic closure (P2).
Alternative diagnoses to PE include acute coronary syndromes, exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aortic dissection, pneumonia, acute bronchitis, decompensated heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, pericardial disease, musculoskeletal pain, pneumothorax, and hepatobiliary or splenic pathology, which may lead to referred pleuritic discomfort (Table 5.1).
Table 5.1
Alternative diagnoses to acute pulmonary embolism (PE)
Acute coronary syndromes |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation |
Aortic dissection |
Pneumonia |
Acute bronchitis |
Decompensated heart failure |
Pulmonary hypertension |
Pericardial disease |
Intrathoracic malignancy |
Musculoskeletal pain |
Pneumothorax |
Anxiety |
Hepatobiliary or splenic pathology |
Laboratory Evaluation
The laboratory evaluation of suspected acute PE should focus on the use of D-dimer testing in appropriately selected patients. Although it is nonspecific, D-dimer, as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), has utility in the evaluation of patients with suspected PE, especially in the Emergency Department setting. A study of patients with suspected acute PE in a high-volume Emergency Department demonstrated that the D-dimer ELISA had a sensitivity of 96.4 % and negative predictive value of 99.6 % [1]. Because of its high negative predictive value, the D-dimer ELISA can be used to exclude PE in outpatients with low to moderate pretest probability, without need for costly imaging and radiation exposure [2]. Most inpatients should proceed directly to an imaging study without D-dimer testing for PE because it is likely they will already have elevated D-dimers due to comorbid conditions.
Electrocardiogram
The electrocardiogram may reveal the presence of RV strain or may suggest concomitant or alternative diagnoses such as myocardial infarction or pericarditis (Fig. 5.2). Signs of RV strain secondary to PE include incomplete or complete right bundle branch block (RBBB), T wave inversions in the anterior precordium, as well as an S wave in lead I and a Q wave and T wave inversion in lead III (S1Q3T3) (Table 5.2). Some patients may only demonstrate signs of increased adrenergic tone, with a resting sinus tachycardia. Furthermore, the electrocardiogram may be entirely normal, especially in young, previously healthy patients.
Fig. 5.2
12-lead electrocardiogram in a patient with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) demonstrating a deep S wave in Lead I, a deep Q wave in Lead III, and a T wave inversion in Lead III (S1Q3T3) consistent with right ventricular (RV) strain. The electrocardiogram also demonstrates sinus tachycardia, a common finding in patients with acute PE
Table 5.2
Electrocardiographic findings in acute pulmonary embolism (PE)
Sinus Tachycardia
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |