Summary
The development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by our group has been a 20-year odyssey. In 1993, postmortem studies validated the concept of intravalvular stenting in calcific aortic stenosis. The first prototypes of balloon-expandable valves were tested in an animal model in 2000. The first-in-man implantation was performed in Rouen in 2002, rapidly followed by two prospective series in compassionate cases in our centre. TAVI took flight in 2004 in the hands of Edwards Lifesciences, with major improvements in devices and approaches. At the same time, the self-expanding CoreValve was launched. Thousands of high-surgical-risk patients were enrolled in feasibility studies, leading to the Conformité Européenne (CE) mark being granted in 2007 for the two devices. A number of postmarketing registries have shown dramatic improvements in procedural and midterm results and decreased complication rates, with more experience and improved technology. The results of the randomized PARTNER study in the USA recently confirmed the important place of TAVI in non-operable and high-surgical-risk patients. To date, more than 50,000 patients have benefited from TAVI worldwide (2300 patients in 33 centres in France in 2011) and the number is consistently increasing. An optimal multidisciplinary collaboration and formally trained experienced physicians are the keys to success. An extension of indications to lower-risk patients might be expected in the coming years but should be cautiously investigated. Ten years after the first-in-man case, TAVI is here to stay and the future is promising.
Résumé
Le développement du Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) par notre groupe a été une odyssée de 20 ans. En 1993, une étude en postmortem a validé le concept de stenting intravalvulaire dans le rétrécissement aortique calcifié. Les premiers prototypes de valve expansible par ballonnet ont pu être testés sur l’animal en 2000. La première implantation chez l’homme a été réalisée à Rouen en 2002, rapidement suivie de deux études prospectives réalisées par notre groupe dans des situations compassionnelles. Le TAVI a pris réellement son essor entre les mains d’Edwards Lifesciences avec des améliorations majeures du matériel et des approches. À la même époque était lancée la valve autoexpansible CoreValve. Des milliers de patients à haut risque chirurgical ont été enrôlés dans des études de faisabilité aboutissant au marquage Conformité Européenne (CE) pour les deux modèles de valve en 2007. Un grand nombre de registres post-commercialisation ont montré une amélioration très importante des résultats immédiats et à moyen terme et une diminution du taux de complication liée à l’expérience des équipes et aux avancées technologiques. Les résultats de l’étude randomisée PARTNER aux États-Unis ont récemment confirmé la place importante du TAVI pour les patients inopérables ou à haut risque chirurgical. Aujourd’hui, plus de 50 000 patients ont bénéficié du TAVI dans le monde (2300 patients dans 33 centres en France pour l’année 2011) et le nombre ne cesse de croître. Une collaboration multidisciplinaire et un entraînement optimal des équipes sont la clef du succès. Une extension des indications aux patients à moindre risque est à prévoir dans les années qui viennent, sous réserve d’investigations contrôlées. Dix ans après le premier cas mondial, le TAVI est une technique bien établie et dont le futur est très prometteur.
Background
If the development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by our group in France can be considered a “success story” today, it is nothing short of a miracle, as the project appeared particularly challenging — not to say totally unrealistic — at its origin in the early 1990s. It is quite thrilling, therefore, to observe the current acceptance and expansion of this technology worldwide, 10 years after the “heroic” first-in-man TAVI procedure performed in Rouen on April 16th, 2002.
We report here the main phases of this 20-year odyssey and briefly consider future prospects, as TAVI remains in a process of continuous development.
Birth of a concept
The starting point of this adventure took place at the end of the 1980s, with the evidence of the limitations of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV), a technique that we had pioneered since 1985 for the treatment of non-operable calcific aortic stenosis (AS). The goal of BAV was to provide a therapeutic option for patients considered at that time to be inoperable, often because age more than 75 years per se was a customary contraindication to aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the 1980s. BAV was associated with midterm improvement in quality of life , explaining its rapid adoption and explosive growth worldwide. However, the lack of survival benefit and a recurrence rate of 80% at 1 year led to a dramatic decline in its use.
For us, addressing the issue of post-BAV valvular restenosis soon became an obsession. The idea of placing within the diseased valve a large-size stent containing a mounted prosthesis (stented valve) was rapidly considered an optimal potential option.
Actually, the concept of transcatheter heart valve implantation was not new. In the 1970s, several projects aimed at treating aortic regurgitation remained experimental. In 1989, Henning-Rud Andersen first implanted an original model of a balloon-expandable catheter-mounted stented valve within the aorta of pigs, using a handmade mesh containing a porcine valve. The results, published in 1992 , were not followed by human application. Other experimental concepts emerged thereafter . In 2000, Philip Bonhoeffer developed a stented valve made of a bovine jugular vein conduit inserted in a platinum-iridium stent, which was implanted in the pulmonary artery of lambs . Bonhoeffer performed the first human implantation of this device in a right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit in 2000 , followed by intense development of the technology in this indication. Simultaneously, we specifically addressed degenerative AS, a highly challenging indication, regarding the specificity of the calcific aortic valve and surrounding structures.
First observations, enthusiasm and frustration
In 1993 to 1994, we demonstrated in 12 fresh specimens of calcific AS that a Palmaz stent, 23 mm in diameter, could circularly open each native valve, regardless of the amount of calcification. The ideal height of the stent appeared to be 14 to 16 mm to avoid impinging on the coronary ostia, the intraventricular septum or the anterior mitral valve leaflet, thus duplicating the subcoronary position of any surgical bioprosthesis. The stents were well anchored within the aortic annulus, requiring a high traction force to be dislodged, thus limiting the risk of embolization. This study, which validated the concept of aortic valvular stenting in a model of human calcific AS, was a fundamental milestone. However, at that time, the type of valve prosthesis and its physical properties were still at the drawing stage.
Over a 4-year period, the search for a biomedical company that was interested in the project failed completely. A long list of engineering issues and potential complications was consistently pointed out, including coronary obstruction, aortic and mitral valve complication, early dislodgement of the device, stroke, mechanical complications, etc. The project was even considered “the most stupid ever heard”!
Percutaneous valve technologies: the end of the tunnel
To accomplish this venture, a start-up company, “Percutaneous Valve Technologies” (PVT, NJ, USA) was finally formed in 1999. Engineers from Israel were able to design the first models of balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV), which consisted of a stainless steel stent integrating a tri-leaflet polyurethane valve. Considerable laboratory work was done before obtaining the first frozen THV model.
Animal trials: first promising results
With the help of my collaborator Helene Eltchaninoff, animal experiments on the sheep model started in September 2000 at the Centre d’experimentation et de recherche appliquée (CERA; Institute Montsouris, Paris). Through the brachiocephalic trunk, the first successful implantation of a THV within the native aortic valve was achieved, with excellent results and no complications. After this case, we had the inkling that it was the start of an important story. The presentation of this case at various meetings aroused memorable and encouraging enthusiasm from the medical community! More than 100 implantations at different cardiac sites were subsequently performed by us. Soon, with experience, we switched to bovine pericardium for the valve prosthesis. We learned a lot from this experiment, with case after case contributing to substantial improvements in the THV and in the delivery systems and implantation techniques. We also conceived an original model for the chronic evaluation of the THV in the systemic circulation , which demonstrated the persistence of excellent valve function and the integrity of the THV on pathological examination at 5 months.
First-in-human implantation
April 16th, 2002 — the date of the first-in-human implantation — will remain a memorable day. A 57-year-old patient with severe AS presented in cardiogenic shock with major left ventricular dysfunction (the ejection fraction was 12%!) and multiple comorbidities contraindicating AVR. After failed emergent BAV, TAVI appeared to be the last-resort option for this young patient. The indication was particularly challenging in this critically ill patient who also had subacute leg ischaemia related to an aortofemoral bypass occlusion and severe contralateral atherosclerosis preventing the use of the transfemoral retrograde access. All information concerning this never-used therapeutic option was given to the patient’s relatives and the patient himself, all of whom gave their consent with no hesitation. The procedure was performed the following day with my collaborators Helene Eltchaninoff and Christophe Tron, using the antegrade transseptal approach. This unplanned approach added stress to the procedure, although we had experience of using it in a few BAV cases with no arterial access. Actually, each step of the procedure was amazingly straightforward. Stabilizing the THV across the native valve was quite challenging, but after some time, we succeeded and rapidly deployed it. Haemodynamic and echocardiographic results were incredibly improved, with no transvalvular gradient and a return of blood pressure to normal, allowing discontinuation of vasopressors. There was no impairment of the coronary ostia or the mitral valve, no atrioventricular block and only mild paravalvular aortic regurgitation. On transoesophageal echocardiography, valve function was excellent. No words can express the emotion felt by the whole team. We were witnessing a true resurrection. Despite an episode of pulmonary embolism, the patient continued his clinical recovery. Unfortunately, the perfusion of his leg continued to worsen and after an above-knee amputation that never healed properly, the patient passed away 4 months after TAVI.
This first case confirmed the feasibility of implanting a THV in a human on the beating heart using transcatheter techniques, with perfect subcoronary position and no interference with the surrounding structures, thus translating our postmortem observation of 1993.
The international reaction to this spectacular case defied imagination. The deafening silence during the video presentation of this case in meetings was testament to the degree of emotion and stupefaction of the medical community. Clearly, this first-in-man case can be considered a breakthrough in the history of interventional cardiology.