ABSTRACT
Purpose
In patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome, invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is performed to determine which patients need revascularization. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) offers a widely available, non-invasive alternative that could reduce patient discomfort, procedural risks, and healthcare costs. The current trial aims to determine whether CCTA is noninferior to ICA in determining the interventional strategy for patients admitted with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS)( Central Illustration ).
Methods
TRACTION (Team-based Interventional Triage in Acute Coronary Syndrome Based on Noninvasive Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Invasive Coronary Angiography) is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial enrolling 2,300 patients. Patients hospitalized with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina with ischemic changes on ECG will be randomized 1:1 to CCTA vs ICA (standard of care). In the CCTA group, a Coronary Team reviews the CCTA and clinical information to determine the interventional strategy. The primary composite endpoint is major adverse cardiac events at 1 year, comprised of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization due to refractory angina, or hospitalization due to heart failure. Secondary outcomes include cardiovascular death, revascularization, symptom status, procedure-related adverse events, and resource utilization. The trial is designed to demonstrate noninferiority if the 95% confidence interval excludes an absolute risk difference of the primary endpoint larger than 5%.
Perspectives
If CCTA is shown to be noninferior to ICA in patients admitted with NSTE-ACS, CCTA could become the preferred management in a large group of patients. This could result in fewer patients exposed to invasive procedures and improved resource utilization.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06101862
Background
Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) has been the standard diagnostic approach for patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) since landmark studies ,, established the superiority of routine vs selective angiography in patients with high-risk characteristics. ICA enables direct visualization of the coronary arteries to identify lesions that may require revascularization as well as the possibility to do physiological and intravascular imaging assessments. Despite improvements in technique, ICA remains an invasive procedure with risks of bleeding, vascular damage, and arrhythmias. Revascularization is performed in only about 50% of patients with NSTE-ACS, implying that a large subset of patients with NSTE-ACS do not need invasive treatment. Moreover, only select hospitals perform ICA, leading to delayed care and hospital transfers. Given these limitations, an alternative noninvasive diagnostic method could provide a more accessible, safer, and faster care for patients with NSTE-ACS.
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive imaging modality that offers an alternative diagnostic approach. In post-hoc studies on data from the VERDICT trial, CCTA was found to have a high level of agreement with ICA in a high-risk NSTE-ACS population, and the prognostic capability of CCTA was comparable to that of ICA In a small, randomized trial, CCTA was a safe gatekeeper for ICA in patients with NSTEMI. In the RAPID-CTCA trial, 1,748 patients with acute chest pain were randomized to early use of CCTA + routine management vs routine management alone. CCTA did not impact the primary endpoint (mortality or myocardial infarction), but it led to longer hospital stays and increased radiation exposure. The use of ICA was only slightly reduced in the CCTA-group (54% vs 61%, P =.001). Based on these data, the current guidelines from the European society of cardiology advice against (recommendation class IIIB) the use of routine early CCTA in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. However, no trial powered for clinical outcomes has directly compared the use of contemporary CCTA against ICA for patients with NSTE-ACS.
The TRACTION trial aims to test whether CCTA can be used as an alternative to ICA to determine interventional strategy in NSTE-ACS patients without increasing the risk of major adverse cardiac events. If noninferiority is demonstrated, the use of CCTA could offer a safer, quicker, and more widely available alternative.
Materials and methods
Trial design
TRACTION is an investigator-driven, prospective, parallel-group, randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded (PROBE), multicenter, noninferiority trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06101862 ). A total of 2,300 patients with a working diagnosis of NSTE-ACS (inclusion criteria of elevated troponins and/or ischemic ECG changes) will be randomized to CCTA and team-based interventional triage vs standard of care with ICA (control group). Primary exclusion criteria include high risk clinical features requiring immediate ICA (including persistent chest pain and hemodynamic instability ), history of PCI or CABG, or probable type 2 acute myocardial infarction. Patients are currently recruited from all cardiology departments in the eastern part of Denmark (The Capital Region of Copenhagen and Region Zealand). Both sites with and without invasive capabilities participate. Sites are encouraged to recruit patients throughout the week, provided that randomization to CCTA does not cause a substantial delay due to limited CCTA availability. Figure 1 shows the trial flowchart and Table 1 the full list of inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Trial flowchart. NSTE-ACS, non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.
Table 1
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
|---|---|
|
|
In the intervention group, patients will undergo CCTA as soon as possible during hospitalization. The CCTA will be reviewed by a multidisciplinary Coronary Team consisting of interventional and CT specialized cardiologists taking clinical presentation and patient characteristics into account to determine the need for revascularization.
In the control group, patients will undergo standard of care with conventional ICA as soon as possible during hospitalization (preferably within 24 to 48 hours), with treatment decisions based on the ICA findings.
Endpoints
The primary endpoint is major adverse cardiac events at 1 year (all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization with refractory angina, or hospitalization with heart failure), from the time of randomization.
Definition of the composites of the primary endpoint
All-cause mortality: Death from any cause.
Nonfatal myocardial infarction: Nonfatal myocardial infarction is defined according to the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction which require detection of a rise and/or fall of troponin values with at least 1 value above the 99th percentile URL and with at least 1 of the following : (1) symptoms of acute myocardial ischemia, (2) new ischemic ECG changes, (3) development of pathological Q waves, (4) imaging evidence of a new loss of myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality in a pattern consistent with an ischemic etiology, or (5) identification of a coronary thrombus by angiography including intracoronary imaging or by autopsy. Nonfatal myocardial infarction includes peri‑procedural myocardial infarction, defined as: A rise in cardiac troponin levels to ≥35 times the upper reference limit within 48 hours after PCI or CABG and at least 1 of the following: ECG with new significant Q-waves or equivalent, flow-limiting angiographic complications, or new loss of myocardial contractility on imaging. This definition is applicable in both patients with normal or elevated (stable or falling) baseline cardiac troponin levels.
Hospitalization with refractory angina: Acute hospitalization due to chest pain not associated with myocardial infarction and a clinical suspicion of myocardial ischemia resulting in invasive coronary angiography.
Hospitalization for heart failure: Presentation to an acute care facility requiring at least 6 hours hospitalization with an exacerbation of heart failure requiring treatment—meeting the following criteria (at least 1 from each group of criteria): (1) Symptoms of heart failure: Worsening of dyspnea, worsening of orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, increasing fatigue/worsening exercise tolerance, (2) Signs of heart failure: rapid weight gain, pulmonary edema or rales, elevated jugular venous pressure, radiologic/clinical signs of heart failure, peripheral oedema, increasing abdominal distension or ascites, 3 gallop, hepatojugular reflux, elevated BNP or N-terminal pro-BNP and (3) Treatment: Intravenous diuretics, initiation, or intensification (doubling) of maintenance diuretics, intravenous vasodilators, intravenous inotropes, dialysis or ultrafiltration, intra-aortic balloon pump.
Secondary and exploratory endpoints are shown in Table 2 .
Table 2
Endpoints
Primary endpoint
|
Randomization and blinding
As soon as a working diagnosis of NSTE-ACS is established with a usual indication for ICA, and when informed written consent has been obtained, patients will be randomized 1:1 using a web-based central randomization system (REDCap). Block randomization with random block sizes of 2, 4, and 6 will be used. The trial is open-labelled with blinded outcome assessment (see later section).
Study procedures
Intervention group- CCTA and team-based triage
Patients randomized to the intervention group will undergo local CCTA at the site of randomization as quickly as possible after randomization. An ECG-gated calcium score and contrast enhanced CCTA will be performed in all cases, regardless of calcium score. The CCTA will be conducted with contemporary, local available scanners and scan protocols. All sites have been instructed to prioritize scan quality (ie, scanning at a wider RR-interval or a higher tube voltage) even at the cost of total radiation dose. Heart rate will be reduced using beta-blockers or other rate-reducing drugs if needed according to local protocols, and sublingual nitroglycerin will be used.
CCTAs will be reported according to the Society of Cardiovascular CT guidelines and the American Heart Association coronary artery segment model. , Severity of coronary atherosclerotic disease will be characterized as no obstructive disease (diameter stenosis <50%), 50% to 69% stenosis, 70% to 99% stenosis, total occlusion, or total occlusion-presumed chronic. Analysis will be performed by a cardiologist specialized in CCTA shortly after the scan has been completed.
After the CCTA has been analyzed, an ad hoc Coronary Team conference will be conducted to review the imaging results and determine further treatment strategy. The Coronary Team consists of the local CCTA specialist, and an interventional cardiologist and a CCTA specialist from the invasive center. Locally acquired CCTA imaging data will be transferred digitally to be available for 3D-reconstructive analysis at the invasive center, and screen sharing during the conference will allow discussion of imaging findings. The Coronary team will have access to all relevant patient information. To determine further management, both CCTA findings and patient-specific clinical information will be considered. The conference decision for preferred management will be either medical treatment, PCI, or CABG.
If the CCTA shows obstructive disease in 1 or more important coronary arteries or branches (generally defined as vessels with diameter ≥2.5 mm), the Coronary Team will determine whether PCI is indicated, also considering technical suitability, clinical, and paraclinical findings. If PCI is recommended by the Coronary Team, the patient will be transferred to the invasive center. CCTA images are used by the interventional cardiologist to plan and guide the procedure. Invasive angiography of arteries conclusively without significant disease on CCTA is not mandatory. PCI is performed according to best practice, using the same techniques, anticoagulants, and intravascular imaging in complex cases as in the control group. In case CABG is expected to be the best treatment, ICA will be performed and subsequently Heart Team conference with cardiac surgeons, to discuss the option of surgical revascularization.
In patients with obstructive disease on the CCTA but where revascularization is considered not indicated or not feasible, or in patients with nonobstructive disease, the Coronary Team will recommend guideline-directed medical treatment. In patients with no coronary disease, the Team may recommend additional diagnostic tests. If the CCTA findings are inconclusive, the patient will undergo ICA at an invasive center to clarify the diagnosis and guide treatment.
Both CCTA and ICA involve ionizing radiation with comparable overall exposure levels (approximately 3 mSv for CCTA and 3.5 mSv for ICA). Participants randomized to CCTA who subsequently require revascularization may receive an additional average dose of about 3 mSv compared to those randomized to ICA.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree