Comparison of same-sitting robotic hybrid coronary revascularization with standard, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease




Objective


Comparative study of same-sitting, robotic hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) vs. standard sternotomy, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD). HCR is a relatively novel procedure introduced as an alternative to traditional CABG incorporating surgical and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with MVCAD. Although there is some data on staged HCR, the data on same-sitting robotic HCR is meager.




Methods


We conducted a single-center, prospective analysis comparing same-sitting HCR patients ( n =10) to a group of consecutive, OPCAB patients ( n =23) by a single surgeon during a similar time period. HCR patients underwent robotic-assisted, left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to left anterior descending artery (LAD) (±diagonal) off-pump bypass via mini-anterior thoracotomy. After confirmation of LIMA patency by angiogram, HCR patients underwent immediate PCI utilizing either bare metal or drug-eluting stents. Aspirin was administered preoperatively and clopidogrel was administered immediately following PCI in all HCR patients.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 16, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Comparison of same-sitting robotic hybrid coronary revascularization with standard, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access