Comparison of Long-Term Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Living Alone Versus Not Living Alone at the Time of Hospitalization




Living alone was reported to be associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. There are, however, limited data on the relation between living alone and all-cause mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The Coronary REvascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto (CREDO-Kyoto) AMI registry was a cohort study of patients with AMI enrolled in 26 hospitals in Japan from 2005 through 2007. For the current analysis, we included those patients who underwent PCI within 24 hours of symptom onset, and we assessed their living status to determine if living alone would be an independent prognostic risk factor. Among 4,109 patients eligible for the current analysis of 5,429 patients enrolled in the CREDO-Kyoto AMI registry, 515 patients (12.5%) were living alone at the time of hospital admission. The cumulative 5-year incidence of all-cause death was 18.3% in the living alone group and 20.1% in the not living alone group (log-rank p = 0.77). After adjusting for potential confounders, risk of the living alone group relative to the not living alone group for all-cause death was not significantly different (adjusted hazard ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 1.02, p = 0.08). In a subgroup analysis stratified by age, the adjusted risk for all-cause death was also not different between the living alone group and the not living alone group both in the older population (aged ≥75 years) and the younger population (aged <75 years). In conclusion, living alone was not associated with higher long-term mortality in patients with AMI who underwent PCI.


Living alone was reported to be associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and poorer clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the proportion of patients who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was small in these studies. Indeed, some of the recent studies reported no significant association between living alone and mortality after AMI. Therefore, the association between living alone and long-term mortality in patients with AMI undergoing PCI in the current real-world clinical practice is controversial. Additionally, living alone in older patients is an important welfare issue in rapidly aging societies. However, little is known about the influence of living alone in older patients on clinical outcomes after AMI. The aim of this study was to determine whether living alone is an independent prognostic risk factor for long-term mortality in patients with AMI who underwent PCI within 24 hours of symptom onset in the real-world clinical practice.


Methods


The Coronary REvascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto AMI registry is a physician-initiated non–company-sponsored multicenter registry that enrolled consecutive patients with AMI who underwent coronary revascularization within 7 days of the onset of symptoms from January 2005 to December 2007 at 26 tertiary hospitals in Japan ( Supplementary Appendix A ). The relevant review boards or ethics committees at all 26 participating hospitals approved the study protocol. Obtaining written informed consent from the patients was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study; however, we excluded those patients who refused participation in the study when contacted at follow-up. This strategy is concordant with the guidelines of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.


The details on the design and patient enrollment of this registry have been described previously. Of 5,429 patients enrolled in this registry, we excluded 9 patients who refused to participate in the study, 195 patients treated by coronary artery bypass grafting, 689 patients who underwent PCI beyond 24 hours after symptom onset, 30 patients whose symptom onset was unknown, 331 patients for whom the data on living arrangements was not available, and 66 patients who had previous coronary artery bypass grafting. Therefore, the study population for the current analysis consisted of 4,109 patients with AMI who underwent PCI within 24 hours of symptom onset and for whom the data on living arrangements were available (ST-segment elevation AMI: n = 3,615, non–ST-segment elevation AMI: n = 494).


Experienced clinical research coordinators from an independent clinical research organization (Research Institute for Production Development, Kyoto, Japan; Supplementary Appendix B ) collected baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics including living arrangement from hospital charts or hospital databases according to prespecified definitions. Collection of follow-up information was mainly conducted through review of inpatient and outpatient hospital charts by the clinical research coordinators, and additional follow-up information was collected through contact with patients, relatives, and/or referring physicians by sending mail with questions regarding vital status, subsequent hospitalizations, and status of antiplatelet therapy. Death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke were adjudicated by the clinical event committee ( Supplementary Appendix C ). Median follow-up duration for the surviving patients was 1,844 days (interquartile range 1,508 to 2,163). Complete 1- and 3-year follow-up information was obtained in 98.3% and 96.2% of patients, respectively.


We defined the living alone group as comprising patients who did not live with their family or others, at the time of hospital admission. The detailed definitions of baseline clinical characteristics were described previously. The primary outcome measure for the current analysis was all-cause death. The secondary outcome measures included cardiac death, MI, stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and any coronary revascularization. Death was regarded as cardiac in origin unless obvious noncardiac causes could be identified. Any death during hospitalization for the index AMI was regarded as cardiac death. MI was defined according to the definition in the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study. Stroke was defined as ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke either occurring during the index hospitalization or requiring hospitalization with symptoms lasting >24 hours. Hospitalization for congestive heart failure was regarded as present when intravenous drug treatment was required for worsening heart failure. Any coronary revascularization was defined as either PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting for any reasons. Scheduled staged coronary revascularization procedures performed within 3 months of the initial procedure were not regarded as follow-up events but were included in the index procedure.


We present continuous variables as mean ± SD or median with interquartile range and categorical variables as numbers and percentages. We compared categorical variables with the chi-square test when appropriate; otherwise, we used Fisher’s exact test. We compared continuous variables with the Student t test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test on the basis of the distributions.


We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate cumulative incidences of clinical event rates and assessed differences with the log-rank test. The effects of the living alone group relative to the not living alone group for individual end points were expressed as hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals by multivariable Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for the 40 clinically relevant factors indicated in Tables 1, 2 , and 3 . Consistent with our previous reports, continuous variables were dichotomized using clinically meaningful reference values or median values. A subgroup analysis stratified by patients’ age (≥75 years or <75 years) was also conducted. Statistical analyses were conducted using JMP 10.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina). All the statistical analyses were 2-tailed. We regarded p values <0.05 as statistically significant.



Table 1

Baseline clinical characteristics according to living arrangements































































































































Variable Living Alone Not Living Alone p Value
(n = 515) (n = 3594)
Age (years) 68.5 ± 13.0 67.6 ± 12.1 0.11
Age ≥75 years 196 (38%) 1097 (31%) 0.001
Men 322 (63%) 2701 (75%) <0.001
Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) <25.0 390 (76%) 2586 (72%) 0.07
Hypertension 407 (79%) 2826 (79%) 0.84
Diabetes mellitus 159 (31%) 1157 (32%) 0.55
On insulin therapy 19 (3.7%) 160 (4.5%) 0.43
Current smoker 206 (40%) 1430 (40%) 0.93
Heart failure 188 (37%) 1093 (30%) 0.005
Multivessel coronary disease 243 (47%) 1884 (52%) 0.03
Mitral regurgitation grade 3/4 13 (2.5%) 115 (3.2%) 0.41
Prior myocardial infarction 44 (8.5%) 307 (8.5%) 0.99
Prior percutaneous coronary intervention 40 (7.8%) 316 (8.8%) 0.44
Prior stroke (symptomatic) 50 (9.7%) 331 (9.2%) 0.72
Peripheral vascular disease 17 (3.3%) 119 (3.3%) 0.99
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) <30, without hemodialysis 27 (5.2%) 150 (4.2%) 0.26
Hemodialysis 11 (2.1%) 52 (1.5%) 0.23
Atrial fibrillation 53 (10%) 333 (9.3%) 0.46
Anemia (hemoglobin <11.0 g/dl) 62 (12%) 338 (9.4%) 0.06
Thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000) 11 (2.1%) 65 (1.8%) 0.61
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 23 (4.5%) 113 (3.1%) 0.12
Liver cirrhosis 20 (3.9%) 76 (2.1%) 0.02
Malignancy 34 (6.6%) 293 (8.2%) 0.22

Categorical variables are expressed as number (%) unless otherwise indicated. Continuous variables are shown as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range).

eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; SD = standard deviation.

Potential independent variables selected for Cox proportional hazard models.



Table 2

Presentation and angiographic characteristics according to living arrangements









































































































































Variable Living Alone Not Living Alone p Value
(n = 515) (n = 3594)
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction 453 (88%) 3162 (88%) 0.99
Hours from onset to presentation 3.1 (1.3–6.4) 2.4 (1.2–5.3) 0.001
≤2 hours 189 (39%) 1541 (45%) 0.01
Minutes from door to balloon 90 (60–138) 96 (66–138) 0.16
Hemodynamics:
Killip class 1 365 (71%) 2682 (75%) 0.04
Killip class 2 59 (11%) 279 (7.8%)
Killip class 3 14 (2.7%) 105 (2.9%)
Killip class 4 77 (15%) 528 (15%)
Duration of hospitalization (days) 15 (10–22) 15 (10–23) 0.06
Infarct related coronary artery
Left anterior descending 249 (48%) 1602 (45%) 0.32
Left circumflex 69 (13%) 471 (13%)
Right 180 (35%) 1419 (40%)
Left main 13 (2.5%) 85 (2.4%)
Number of target coronary narrowings 1 (1–2) 1 (1–2) 0.76
Target of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery 286 (56%) 1909 (53%) 0.30
Target of unprotected left main coronary artery 19 (3.7%) 131 (3.6%) 0.96
Target of chronic total occlusion 17 (3.3%) 122 (3.4%) 0.91
Target of bifurcation 146 (28%) 956 (27%) 0.40
Side-branch stenting 14 (2.7%) 122 (3.4%) 0.42
Total number of stents 1 (1–2) 1 (1–2) 0.97
Total stent length >28 mm 207 (44%) 1422 (43%) 0.79
Minimum stent size <3.0 mm 175 (37%) 1105 (34%) 0.13
Drug eluting stent use (culprit or other lesions) 151 (32%) 1092 (33%) 0.60

Categorical variables are expressed as number (%) unless otherwise indicated. Continuous variables are shown as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range).

SD = standard deviation.

Potential independent variables selected for Cox proportional hazard models.



Table 3

Medications at discharge according to living arrangements




























































































Variable Living Alone Not Living Alone p Value
(n = 515) (n = 3594)
Antiplatelet therapy
Thienopyridine 495 (96%) 3427 (95%) 0.44
Ticlopidine 443 (90%) 3164 (92%) 0.03
Clopidogrel 51 (10%) 259 (7.6%) 0.03
Aspirin 508 (99%) 3545 (99%) 0.99
Cilostazol 158 (31%) 1266 (35%) 0.04
Other medications
Statins 260 (50%) 1930 (54%) 0.17
Beta-blockers 238 (46%) 1465 (41%) 0.02
ACE-I/ARB 368 (71%) 2622 (73%) 0.47
Nitrates 168 (33%) 1081 (30%) 0.24
Calcium channel blockers 103 (20%) 769 (21%) 0.47
Nicorandil 148 (29%) 1002 (28%) 0.69
Warfarin 45 (8.7%) 385 (11%) 0.17
Proton pump inhibitors 185 (36%) 1259 (35%) 0.69
H2-blockers 167 (32%) 1155 (32%) 0.90

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 1, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Comparison of Long-Term Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Living Alone Versus Not Living Alone at the Time of Hospitalization

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access