Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Stent With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Long Chronic Total Occlusions




The aim of the present study was the comparison of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) with the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in patients treated for long chronic total occlusions (CTOs). Previous randomized trials have shown the superiority of EESs over PESs. No data exist about the efficacy and safety of EESs in patients treated for complex CTOs requiring multiple stent implantation. We identified 258 patients treated for CTOs who received multiple EESs (n = 112) or PESs (n = 146), with a total stent length of ≥40 mm. The primary end point was in-segment restenosis, defined as >50% luminal narrowing at the segment site, including the stent and 5 mm proximal and distal to the stent edges of the target vessel, on the follow-up angiogram. The secondary end point was the 9-month composite of major adverse cardiovascular events. The 2 patient groups were similar in all baseline characteristics. The median lesion length was 48 mm in the EES group and 46 mm in the PES group (p = 0.793). The incidence of the primary end point of the study was 11.8% in the EES group and 31.4% in the PES group (p = 0.001). The major adverse cardiovascular event rate was lower in the EES group than in the PES group (8.9% and 22.6%, respectively, p = 0.003). Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 5 patients in the PES group (3.4%), with no stent thrombosis occurring in the EES group (p = 0.048). On multivariate analysis, EES was the only variable independently related to the risk of binary angiographic restenosis with an odds ratio of 0.29 (95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.62; p = 0.002). In conclusion, in patients treated for long CTOs and requiring multiple stent implantation, EESs performed better than PESs, with a >50% reduction in the risk of restenosis and major adverse cardiovascular events.


The randomized Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) trials and the Second Generation Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Real-Life Practice (COMPARE) trial have shown the superiority of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) over the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). In contrast to the SPIRIT trials, which used strict inclusion and exclusion criteria for patient randomization, the COMPARE trial included consecutive patients without restriction by the clinical presentation or coronary anatomy. However, the latter trial did not provide data on the efficacy of EES in chronic total occlusion (CTO). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EESs compared to PESs in patients treated for CTOs requiring multiple stent implantation (total stent length ≥40 mm).


Methods


The Florence CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a prospective, single-center registry started in 2003 that includes consecutive patients treated with drug-eluting stent-supported PCI for CTOs. From the database, we identified all patients who had received multiple EESs (either XIENCE V, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California or PROMUS, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) or PESs (either Taxus Express or Taxus Liberté, Boston Scientific) implantation for a total stent length of ≥40 mm. CTO was defined as a coronary obstruction with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0 and an estimated duration of >3 months. The duration of the occlusion was determined by the interval from the last episode of acute coronary syndrome or, in patients without a history of acute coronary syndrome, from the first episode of effort angina consistent with the location of the occlusion, as indicated by stress echocardiography or scintigraphy, or by previous coronary angiography. In patients without a history of angina who were admitted for acute coronary syndrome or ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction with a definite identification of the culprit vessel, associated total occlusion of a nonculprit vessel was considered chronic occlusion if angiographic evidence was found of filling of the vessel through collaterals. The indication for percutaneous treatment of the CTO was the demonstration of viable myocardium in the territory of the occluded vessel by echocardiographic or scintigraphic provocative tests. No CTO angiographic characteristic was considered an absolute contraindication to a PCI attempt. Thus, patients with long occlusions, extensive calcification, bridging collaterals, a nontapered stump, or a side branch at the occlusion site were included. The occlusion length was assessed from the beginning of the occlusion to the distal anterograde or retrograde vessel filling from the bridge collaterals or collaterals provided by a coronary artery other than the CTO vessel and using simultaneous contrast medium injection in both right and left coronary arteries. All treatment of the occlusions was attempted using the anterograde or retrograde approach and dedicated coronary wires (hydrophilic and nonhydrophilic) and devices. The stent type used was at discretion of the operator. Standard stent implantation techniques, including minimum overlap between stents and routine postdilation using final high balloon pressure (≥16 atm), were used. All patients were pretreated with aspirin (300 mg/day) and clopidogrel (loading dose 600 mg). Aspirin (300 mg/day) was continued indefinitely, and clopidogrel (75 mg/day) for ≥12 months. Other drugs such angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, β blockers, and statins were routinely prescribed according to the international guidelines.


All patients had scheduled clinical and electrocardiographic examinations at 6 months and at 1 and 2 years. All other possible information derived from hospital readmission records or by the referring physician, relatives, or municipality live registries were entered into a prospective database.


All patients gave written informed consent to data collection.


All eligible patients with successful PCI-treated CTOs were scheduled for angiographic follow-up at 6 to 9 months. Unscheduled angiography was allowed on the basis of clinical indications. Angiographic parameters were assessed using an automated edge-contour-detection computer analysis system (Innova 2100IQ, General Electric Healthcare Technologies, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom).


The primary end point of the present study was angiographic in-segment restenosis, defined as >50% luminal narrowing at the segment site, including the stent and 5 mm proximal and distal to the stent edges of the target vessel, on the follow-up angiogram. The secondary end point was the 9-month composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. All deaths were considered cardiac deaths, unless otherwise documented. Non–Q-wave myocardial infarction was defined as an increase in creatine kinase-MB fraction of 3 times the upper limit of normal or, for patients with elevated values on admission, as a re-elevation of the creatine kinase-MB values. The creatine kinase-MB fraction was routinely assessed 12 hours after PCI in all patients or ≥3 times every 6 hours in patients with recurrent chest pain. A Q-wave myocardial infarction was defined as a new Q wave in ≥2 contiguous leads, in addition to creatine kinase-MB elevation. Target vessel revascularization was defined as a repeat percutaneous or surgical revascularization procedure of the CTO vessel. The other clinical event collected was stent thrombosis, defined according to the Academic Research Consortium criteria.


From the results of a previous study, we assumed a restenosis rate and MACE rate with PESs of 30% and 24%, respectively, and a 50% reduction in both end points with EESs. To achieve a statistical power >80%, a sample size of ≥125 patients for each group was needed, considering an undeterminable primary end point in 20% of patients and an overall experimental type I error of 0.05.


Discrete data are summarized as frequencies, and continuous data as the mean ± SD or median and interquartile range. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison of categorical variables. Student’s t test or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate, was used to test for differences among the continuous variables. Cumulative survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference between curves was assessed using the log-rank test.


The multivariate analysis to evaluate the independent contribution of clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables to in-segment restenosis was performed by forward stepwise logistic regression analysis. The following variables were tested: age, gender, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia (>200 mg/dl), current smoker, diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, previous PCI, previous coronary surgery revascularization, acute coronary syndrome on admission, three-vessel disease, left anterior descending artery CTO vessel, CTO reference vessel <2.5 mm, CTO involving bifurcation, CTO with heavy calcification, drug-eluting stent type (EES or PES), CTO stent length, and complete coronary revascularization. A multivariate analysis using a forward stepwise Cox proportional hazards model was performed to evaluate the independent predictors of MACE. The odds ratio and hazards ratio and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.


All tests were 2-tailed. p Values <0.05 were considered significant. Analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois).




Results


From the database that included 840 CTO PCI procedures, we identified 258 patients who had received multiple EESs (n = 112) or PESs (n = 146), with a total stent length of ≥40 mm.


The study population had a mean age of 67.6 ± 10.7 years, most patients had a history of myocardial infarction, and 1/3 had diabetes mellitus. The 2 groups were similar in all baseline characteristics ( Table 1 ). The median lesion length was 48 mm in the EES group and 46 mm in the PES group (p = 0.793).



Table 1

Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics








































































































Variable PES Group
(n = 146)
EES Group
(n = 112)
p Value
Age (years) 67.4 ± 10.7 68.0 ± 10.7 0.633
Age >75 years 48 (33%) 34 (30%) 0.667
Men 130 (89%) 98 (87%) 0.702
Hypertension 83 (57%) 69 (62%) 0.441
Cholesterolemia >200 mg/dl 55 (51%) 62 (50%) 0.257
Current smokers 32 (22%) 17 (15%) 0.171
Diabetes mellitus 38 (26%) 29 (26%) 0.981
Previous myocardial infarction 81 (55%) 71 (63%) 0.200
Previous percutaneous coronary intervention 47 (32%) 45 (40%) 0.184
Previous coronary surgery 19 (13%) 13 (12%) 0.734
Acute coronary syndrome 52 (36%) 30 (27%) 0.131
Left ventricular ejection fraction 43 ± 12 45 ± 12 0.305
Left ventricular ejection fraction <40% 58 (40%) 37 (33%) 0.269
Multivessel coronary disease 124 (85%) 94 (84%) 0.825
Three-vessel disease 76 (52%) 56 (50%) 0.743
Chronic total occlusion artery 0.851
Left anterior descending 46 (31%) 39 (35%)
Left circumflex 20 (14%) 15 (13%)
Right 80 (55%) 58 (52%)

Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%).

Included unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.



The procedural characteristics are summarized in Table 2 . No difference was found between the 2 groups in all procedural characteristics, except for the final postdilation inflation pressure and fluoroscopic time, which were greater in the EES group. The mean number of stents per patient was 2.7 in the EES group and 2.6 in the PES group. The mean stent length was nonsignificantly longer in the EES group than in the PES group (72 ± 26 mm in the EES group and 69 ± 23 mm in the PES group, p = 0.356). The large majority of patients in both groups underwent multivessel PCI and complete revascularization. The clinical and angiographic outcomes at 9 months are summarized in Table 3 .



Table 2

Procedural characteristics


























































































































































Variable PES Group
(n = 146)
EES Group
(n = 112)
p Value
Occlusion length (mm)
Mean ± SD 49 ± 18 50 ± 19 0.758
Median 46 48 0.793
Interquartile range 35–60 36.5–60
Reference chronic total occlusion vessel diameter (mm) 2.76 ± 0.44 2.74 ± 0.48 0.872
Chronic total occlusion diameter ≤2.5 mm 24 (16%) 22 (20%) 0.505
Chronic total occlusion stent implanted (n) 381 303 0.345
Mean no. of stents/patient 2.61 2.71
Chronic total occlusion stent length (mm)
Mean ± SD 69 ± 23 72 ± 26 0.356
Median 64 66 0.544
Interquartile range 49.5–84.5 51–90.5
Postpercutaneous coronary intervention minimum lesion diameter (mm) 2.85 ± 0.40 2.92 ± 0.37 0.201
Postdilation pressure (atm) <0.001
Median 18 20
Interquartile range 16–20 18–22
Fluoroscopic time (minutes) <0.001
Median 26 34.5
Interquartile range 18–36 22–50
Contrast material (ml) 0.951
Median 350 350
Interquartile range 250–450 220–500
Multivessel PCI 97 (66%) 79 (71%) 0.484
Completeness of revascularization 117 (80%) 97 (87) 0.171
Periprocedural complications
Q-wave myocardial infarction 0 0
Non–Q-wave myocardial infarction 3 (2%) 2 (2%) 0.876
Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding 4 (3%) 5 (4%) 0.454
Contrast-induced nephropathy 6 (4%) 5 (4%) 0.889

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 22, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Stent With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Long Chronic Total Occlusions

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access