Clinical presentation and predictors of target vessel revascularization after drug-eluting stent implantation




Abstract


Background


Drug eluting stent (DES) failure including restenosis and stent thrombosis, or disease progression may result in target vessel revascularization (TVR) but the relative contribution of these mechanisms in the DES era is not well described. We sought to examine the predictors and presentations of patients with clinically driven TVR after DES.


Methods


Patients with all lesions treated with a DES in the Dynamic Registry from 2004 to 2006 were analyzed. Included were 2691 patients with 3401 lesions. Patients with and without incident clinically driven TVR at 2 years were compared according to baseline clinical, procedural, and angiographic characteristics and independent predictors of TVR and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were determined by multivariate analysis.


Results


By 2-years, TVR occurred in 7.2% of patients and TLR in 3.8%, with 71.6% and 82.5% of repeat revascularization events occurring in the first year, respectively. The indication for first TVR was myocardial infarction in 18.6% (n = 34), unstable angina in 42.6% (n = 78), stable coronary disease in 25.7% (n = 47) and other/unknown in 13.1% (n = 24). Disease progression was responsible for 47% of TVR. Among patients with TLR, restenosis was the mechanism in 86.6% and stent thrombosis in 13.4%. Independent predictors of TVR included younger age, diabetes, attempted graft lesion, lesion length > 30 mm and prior lesion intervention. Independent predictors of TVR and TLR were similar.


Conclusion


The incidence of clinically driven TVR is low in patients treated with DES and nearly half is attributable to disease progression, which along with the low rate of in-stent restenosis explains why the mode of presentation is often an acute coronary syndrome.


The effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) in reducing in-stent restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) has been demonstrated in many patient and lesion subsets . The reduction in restenosis has translated into fewer repeat revascularization procedures . Although several factors predict restenosis post DES implantation , DES failure may be due to several mechanisms including intimal hyperplasia within the stent, proximal or distal edge stenosis, or stent thrombosis. Disease progression of lesions remote from DES implantation also contributes to target vessel revascularization (TVR). Therefore, evaluating clinical and angiographic predictors of TVR may provide incremental value to assessing risk for restenosis alone and is the purpose of our analysis. Additionally, the clinical presentation of patients who experienced TVR after stenting with DES has not been well characterized and this was an additional aim of our study.



Methods



Study design and patient population


The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored (NHLBI) Dynamic Registry is a prospective observational study of consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at 23 clinical centers in North America during specified time intervals. The study design has been previously described . This analysis includes patients enrolled from 2004 to2006 that had all lesions treated with DES. Patients were excluded if procedure or lesion forms from the repeat procedure were missing (n = 173) or if the patient had no TVR and was referred for coronary bypass surgery (n = 92). In these patients, the reason for TVR could not be determined. In total, 2691 patients with 3401 lesions were analyzed.



Data collection and definitions


Demographic, clinical, angiographic, and procedural data during the index hospitalization and 2-year follow-up events were collected by trained research coordinators who used standardized report forms and were guided by a manual of operations. All information was site determined. Two-year follow-up data were available in 2783 (94.8%) of patients that consented to follow-up. Patients without 2 year follow-up that were alive were censored at the time of their last follow up. During follow-up, coronary angiography was obtained as clinically indicated by symptoms or documentation of myocardial ischemia. Planned staged PCI was not considered a repeat PCI. Lesion specific data were collected for repeat PCI to determine target vessel revascularization. TVR was defined as any repeat PCI in the target vessel. TLR was defined as repeat PCI within the index procedure stent or 5 mm edge. Only definite stent thrombosis, defined as angiographically confirmed cases, is reported in this study. All stent thrombosis events were independently adjudicated.



Statistical analysis


The proportion of patients that had a TVR by 2 years according to the presence or absence of each baseline characteristics was determined. All variables were analyzed as categorical using chi- square test and Fisher exact test as appropriate. Two-year cumulative incidence rates of TVR and TLR were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and tested by the log-rank statistic. Independent predictors of TVR and TLR were determined by logistic regression analysis. Variables previously shown to be associated with TVR or TLR and those biologically relevant were included in the model. The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit test was performed and the p-value for the TVR logistic regression model was p = 0.27 indicating a good fit. We also performed the logistic regression analysis for predictors of TVR and TLR excluding patient with stent thrombosis and found similar results (data not shown).





Results



Baseline characteristics and TVR rates


Baseline clinical characteristics among patients treated with DES and stratified by the need for subsequent TVR are presented in Table 1 . Among patients age 65 and younger, 8.1% went on to require TVR compared to 5.2% of those over age 65 (p = 0.003). A repeat procedure for TVR occurred more often in patients with prior history of PCI, prior coronary bypass surgery, or diabetes at baseline. With respect to procedural and angiographic characteristics, significant differences in patients treated for TVR were observed based on the indication for PCI and lesion location ( Table 2 ). In addition, TVR was significantly associated with the treatment of lesions with a stent prior to the index PCI compared to those not previously treated with a stent. Furthermore, TVR was associated with the treatment of an index lesion located in an ostial position compared to non ostial location. Among lesions treated with a paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), 5.6% experienced TVR and 94.4% did not. For sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) treated lesions, 7.4% experienced TVR and 92.6% did not (p = 0.05).



Table 1

Baseline clinical characteristics among patients treated with drug eluting stent(s) stratified by the need for subsequent target vessel revascularization.


































































































































































































































































































































Variable Total number No TVR % TVR % P value
Patients 2691 93.2 6.8
Age over 65 0.003
No 1463 91.9 8.1
Yes 1228 94.8 5.2
Female 0.11
No 1805 93.7 6.3
Yes 886 92.1 7.9
Prior Percutaneous Procedure(s) < .0001
No 1805 94.5 5.5
Yes 886 79.9 20.1
Prior brachytherapy < .0001
No 2657 93.4 6.6
Yes 34 76.5 23.5
Prior stent < .0001
No 1944 94.4 5.6
Yes 747 90.1 9.9
History of in-stent restenosis 0.002
No 583 91.8 8.2
Yes 165 83.6 16.4
Prior coronary bypass < .0001
No 2193 94.0 6.0
Yes 498 70.0 30.0
Prior myocardial infarction 0.04
No 1984 93.8 6.3
Yes 635 91.3 8.7
Diabetes < .0001
No 1775 94.6 5.4
Yes 913 90.5 9.5
History of congestive heart failure 0.33
No 2386 93.4 6.6
Yes 255 91.8 8.2
Hypertension 0.06
No 588 94.9 5.1
Yes 2079 92.7 7.3
Hypercholesterolemia 0.03
No 559 95.2 4.8
Yes 2059 92.6 7.4
Smoking 0.0003
Current 626 93.9 6.1
Never/Former 1907 85.6 14.4
Cerebrovascular disease 0.83
No 2491 93.2 6.8
Yes 195 92.8 7.2
Chronic kidney disease 0.13
No 2433 93.4 6.6
Yes 253 90.9 9.1
Peripheral vascular disease 0.08
No 2458 93.4 6.6
Yes 228 90.4 9.6
Pulmonary disease 0.69
No 2459 93.1 6.9
Yes 227 93.8 6.2

TVR: target vessel revascularization.


Table 2

Baseline procedural and angiographic characteristics among patients treated with drug eluting stent(s) stratified by the need for subsequent target vessel revascularization.




































































































































































































































































































Variable Total number No TVR % TVR % P value
Patients 2691 93.2 6.8
Primary reason for PCI 0.04
Acute myocardial infarction 754 95.1 4.9
Unstable angina 920 91.3 8.7
Stable angina 571 92.5 7.5
Asymptomatic CAD 361 94.7 5.3
Number of Lesions Attempted 0.44
1 2095 93.6 6.4
2 498 92.2 7.8
3 83 90.4 9.6
4 14 85.7 14.3
5 1 100.0 0.0
Ejection fraction 0.09
Less than 45 448 95.1 4.9
At least 45 1551 92.8 7.2
Lesions 3401 92.8 7.2
Lesion location < .0001
Right coronary 1060 93.5 6.5
Left main 43 95.3 4.7
Left anterior descending 1267 93.7 6.3
Left circumflex 813 93.2 6.8
Saphenous vein graft 218 82.6 17.4
Lesion previously stented < .0001
No 3180 93.5 6.5
Yes 216 83.3 16.7
Reference vessel size 0.46
Diameter less than 2.5 mm 132 90.2 9.8
Diameter between 2.5 mm and 3 mm 1926 92.9 7.1
Diameter more than 3 mm 1211 93.1 6.9
Total Occlusion 0.16
No 3093 92.6 7.4
Yes 308 94.8 5.2
Calcified 0.88
No 2347 92.8 7.2
Yes 1000 92.7 7.3
Bifurcation 0.66
No 3054 92.9 7.1
Yes 334 92.2 7.8
Ostial lesion 0.003
No 3124 93.2 6.8
Yes 277 88.4 11.6
Paclitaxel-eluting stent 0.09
No 1802 92.6 7.4
Yes 889 94.4 5.6
Sirolimus-eluting stent 0.05
No 824 94.7 5.3
Yes 1867 92.6 7.4

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 16, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Clinical presentation and predictors of target vessel revascularization after drug-eluting stent implantation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access