Summary
Background
Thrombus aspiration is applicable in a large majority of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and results in better reperfusion and clinical outcomes compared with percutaneous coronary intervention alone. Some aspiration procedures are, however, ineffective. To date, few clinical data are available on the predictors of successful thrombectomy in the acute phase of myocardial infarction.
Aims
To determine the baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics associated with successful thrombectomy.
Methods
Consecutive patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction with a baseline TIMI flow of 0 or 1, who underwent thrombus aspiration and primary or rescue angioplasty, were included. The main criterion for evaluation was an effective or ineffective aspiration defined, respectively, by the presence or absence of atherothrombotic material in the aspirate samples.
Results
Among the 180 patients included, material was collected in 155 patients (86%). Patients with the presence of material were younger (61 vs 74 years, P = 0.015), less frequently hypertensive (41% vs 68%, P = 0.023) and had a lower systolic blood pressure at admission (135 vs 148 mmHg, P = 0.031). No difference was observed between the two groups for angiographic parameters except for visible thrombus (61% vs 28%, P = 0.005) and calcification (37% vs 60%, P = 0.048). In multivariable analysis, the ability to remove the clot was affected by: age greater than 70 years (odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.06–0.51; P = 0.001), admission systolic blood pressure (0.97, 0.95–0.99; P = 0.003) and thrombus seen on angiography (4.54, 1.54–13.45, P = 0.006).
Conclusion
The present study showed that manual thrombus aspiration is effective in most, but not all, patients. Further studies are needed to develop more efficient aspiration techniques and other aspiration devices to improve the results of such procedures.
Résumé
Introduction
La thrombectomie est le plus souvent possible lors des procédures interventionnelles chez les patients atteints d’infarctus aigu du myocarde avec sus-décalage du segment-ST (IDM ST+), avec pour résultat une amélioration des critères de reperfusion et des événements cliniques quand on la compare aux procédures d’angioplastie n’utilisant pas cette technique. Cependant, certaines procédures d’aspiration sont inefficaces. À ce jour, peu de données cliniques sont disponibles sur les facteurs prédictifs de succès de la thrombectomie à la phase aiguë de l’infarctus du myocarde.
Objectifs
Déterminer les caractéristiques cliniques et angiographiques associées à un succès de la thrombectomie.
Méthodes
Tous les patients consécutifs avec un diagnostic d’IDM ST+ pris en charge pour angioplastie primaire ou de sauvetage, et qui ont subi une thrombectomie ont été inclus. Le critère primaire d’évaluation a été le succès ou l’échec de la procédure défini respectivement par la présence ou l’absence de matériel athérothrombotique dans les échantillons aspirés.
Résultats
Parmi les 180 patients consécutifs inclus, la thrombectomie a permis le retrait de matériel chez 155 malades (86 %) (groupe T+). Ces patients étaient plus jeunes (61 vs 74 ans, p = 0,015), moins souvent hypertendus (41 % versus 68 %, p = 0,023) et avaient une pression artérielle systolique inférieure à l’admission (135 contre 148 mmHg, p = 0,031). Aucune différence n’a été observée entre les deux groupes pour les paramètres angiographiques à l’exception des thrombus visibles et des calcifications (respectivement, 61 % contre 28 %, p = 0,005 et 37 % contre 60 %, p = 0,048). L’analyse statistique multivariée met en évidence que l’âge supérieur à 70 ans [OR (IC 95 %): 0,18 (0,06 à 0,51); p = 0,001], la pression artérielle systolique à l’admission (0,97; 0,95 à 0,99, p = 0,003) et la présence d’un thrombus visible sur l’angiographie (4,54; 1,54 à 13,45, p = 0,006) sont des facteurs prédictifs indépendants de succès de la thrombectomie.
Conclusion
Ce travail met en évidence que la thrombectomie est efficace dans la plupart des cas, mais pas chez tous les patients. D’autres études sont maintenant nécessaires pour développer des techniques d’aspiration plus efficace et d’autres dispositifs d’aspiration pour améliorer les résultats de ces procédures.
Background
Primary angioplasty is the established treatment for recanalization of coronary arteries during AMI. Rapid restoration of TIMI grade 3 flow is closely associated with improved survival . Distal embolization in patients treated with primary PCI occurs in about 10% of patients and remains a serious problem . Dislodgement of the thrombus leads to distal thromboembolization, which frequently results in diminished microcirculatory perfusion or microvascular obstruction, increased infarct size and reduced survival . In addition to the pharmacological approaches, several thrombectomy devices have been investigated to reduce the risk of embolization. In 2008, Vlaar et al. randomly assigned 1071 patients to initial thromboaspiration (Export Medtronic [EM], Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) with stenting or conventional primary PCI with the use of a balloon and stent. Cardiac death at 1 year was significantly lower in the thrombus aspiration group when compared with the conventional PCI group (respectively, 3.6% vs 6.7%; P = 0.020) . These data were further confirmed by three meta-analyses , before publication of the article by Mongeon et al., which concluded that adjunctive thrombectomy had no clinical benefit . Nevertheless, there are many thromboaspiration devices, with very different technical characteristics, and the interventional cardiologist has to make choices. The decision to attempt a coronary thrombectomy and the choice of catheter could be targeted according to the clinical characteristics of the patient, the anatomical characteristics of the coronary bed and the angiographic characteristics of the culprit lesion. Furthermore, around 30% of thrombectomy attempts are unsuccessful (where success is defined as recovery of atherothrombotic material either macroscopically or after histopathological analysis). Based on this clinical observation, we designed this study to assess the role of clinical and angiographic findings on admission in predicting successful thrombectomy in patients with AMI.
Methods
Patient population
The participants in this study were recruited from the RICO survey, a French regional survey of AMI. Details on the survey have been published previously . Our study cohort consisted of all primary and rescue PCI procedures, in the 12 hours after symptom onset, using the Export ® catheter between the 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2009. We then performed a retrospective analysis for patients who met the criteria to select the study population, meaning that all patients with a baseline TIMI flow greater than 1 or those who underwent a PCI procedure without the Export ® catheter were excluded. Three-hundred and eighty eligible patients admitted for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were excluded from the analysis. The main criterion for evaluation was successful thrombectomy, defined as a visible atherothrombotic clot in the filtered, aspirated material (group T+). Otherwise, thrombectomy was deemed to have failed (group T−). Myocardial infarction was diagnosed according to European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology criteria .
Data collection
The following patient characteristics were collected prospectively: age, sex and cardiovascular risk factors (history of or treated hypertension, known history of diabetes, treated hypercholesterolaemia, current smoker [defined as active cigarette smoking within the 3 months prior to this admission]). Anthropometric parameters (i.e., body mass index in kg/m 2 ) were measured within 48 hours of admission. Haemodynamic parameters on admission (heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures) and Killip class were also gathered. Ischaemic time was determined by the delay between symptom onset and crossing the lesion with the floppy guide wire. Patients were diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction when they had new or presumed new ST-segment elevation greater than 1 mm seen in any location or new left bundle branch block on the index or subsequent electrocardiogram. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by echocardiography at 3 ± 1 days after admission using the Simpson method. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events in-hospital to 6-month risk score was calculated with the published variables. Data on chronic and acute treatments administered within 48 hours of admission to hospital were also collected. Coronary angiograms were reviewed by two experienced interventionists not involved with the procedure. Data on the following items were collected: infarct wall location; final TIMI 3 flow; number of diseased vessels; characteristics of the culprit artery and multivessel disease; presence of thrombus or calcifications; eccentric nature of the lesion; presence of 0, 1, ≥ 2 angles of 70° before the lesion; lesion level (ostial, proximal, middle, distal, bifurcation); diameter of the artery at the level of the culprit lesion; lesion type according the American Heart Association classification (A, B1, B2 or C); and distal embolization or no-reflow. Stent thrombosis was defined as follows: evidence of any myocardial infarction, with angiographic confirmation of in-stent thrombus or unexplained death within 30 days after the procedure. Interobserver and intraobserver coefficients of variation assessed in 15 non-selected patients were 5% and 4%, respectively.
This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, was approved by the ethics committee of University Hospital of Dijon, and each patient gave written consent before participation.
Laboratory analysis
Blood samples to assess NT-pro-BNP, C-reactive protein, glucose and creatinine concentrations were taken on admission. Median time from symptom onset to blood sampling was 190 min (85–498). Blood samples to assess NT-pro-BNP concentrations were collected in EDTA-containing tubes and stored at –20 °C before analysis (< 3 days). Plasma NT-pro-BNP was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using Elecsys NT-pro-BNP sandwich immunoassay on Elecsys 2010 (Roche Diagnostics). The inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation were both less than 3.1%. The sensitivity of the assay was found to be 0.6 pg/L. Cross-reactivity with other natriuretic peptides, atrial natriuretic peptide and C-type natriuretic peptide was less than 0.01%. C-reactive protein was measured on Dimension Xpand (Dade Behring, Newark, NE) and creatinine on a Vittos 950 analyzer (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics Rochester, NY). Serum creatinine clearance was estimated using the Cockcroft–Gault formula . Peak plasma creatine kinase was assessed by sampling every 8 hours during the first 2 days after admission (Dimension Vista Intelligent Lab System, Siemens).
Procedural treatment
For all patients, the first procedural step was the passing of a floppy, steerable guide wire through the target lesion. The usual pharmacological treatments were used before and during PCI, including intracoronary nitrates, aspirin (500-mg loading dose), either weight-adjusted unfractionated heparin or heparin (5000 IU), and clopidogrel (300- or 600-mg loading dose). The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab was used at the interventionist’s discretion. Administration of a high-dose (50 μg) intracoronary bolus of adenosine was used in most patients with AMI in whom a primary PCI was performed. Stents implanted were either bare metal or drug eluting. Standard therapies after PCI according to current guidelines were continued at hospital discharge, including aspirin (> 81 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg).
Statistical analysis
The dichotomous data are expressed as numbers (%) and the continuous data are expressed as medians (25th to 75th percentiles). Comparisons between the groups were performed either with the unpaired Student’s t test, or with the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test as appropriate. The Chi 2 test was used for qualitative variables and Fisher’s exact test for small numbers of patients. Logistic regression was performed using the backward stepwise technique to determine the independent predictors of successful thrombectomy. Results are expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All variables listed in Tables 1 and 2 were tested by univariate analysis and only the variables with a P < 0.10 were examined in the multivariable models. The criteria used for the backward logistic regression were the following: entry in the model with a threshold at 0.05 and exit of the model with a threshold at 0.10. A P -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and two-sided tests were used. All the analyses were performed using the SPSS 13.0 software package (SPSS Inc, Illinois, USA).
Group T− | Group T+ | P | |
---|---|---|---|
( n = 25) | ( n = 155) | ||
Men | 20 (80) | 125 (69) | 0.84 |
Age (years) | 74 (57–83) | 61 (53–74) | 0.015 |
BMI (kg/m 2 ) | 27 (24–29) | 27 (25–30) | 0.81 |
Hypertension | 17 (68) | 64 (41) | 0.023 |
Hypercholesterolaemia | 11 (44) | 59 (38) | 0.73 |
Diabetes mellitus | 3 (12) | 13 (8) | 0.83 |
Family history of coronary artery disease | 7 (28) | 39 (25) | 0.96 |
Smoker | 7 (28) | 63 (41) | 0.33 |
History of TIA or stroke | 2 (8) | 4 (3) | 0.42 |
Heart rate (beats/min) | 78 (65–91) | 74 (61–85) | 0.18 |
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 148 (130–160) | 135 (120–149) | 0.031 |
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 85 (70–100) | 80 (70–92) | 0.39 |
ST-elevation myocardial infarction | 19 (76) | 122 (79) | 0.97 |
Anterior location | 12 (48) | 56 (36) | 0.36 |
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 45 (32–55) | 50 (40–60) | 0.039 |
Lysis | 2 (8) | 25 (16) | 0.45 |
Ischaemic time (min) | 226 (136–570) | 210 (137–596) | 0.996 |
Cardiogenic shock | 1 (4) | 6 (4) | 0.60 |
GRACE risk score | 156 (130–172) | 139 (118–159) | 0.094 |
Cardiovascular death at 30 days | 4 (16) | 8 (5) | 0.11 |
Biological data | |||
Peak creatine kinase (UI/l) | 1301 (948–2535) | 1511 (463–2963) | 0.99 |
Creatinine clearance (mL/min) | 66.10 (43.80–87.40) | 81.00 (60.25–104.80) | 0.019 |
Total cholesterol (g/l) | 2.01 (1.61–2.44) | 2.03 (1.75–2.25) | 0.95 |
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (g/L) | 1.37 (1.08–1.61) | 1.31 (1.08–1.53) | 0.87 |
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (g/L) | 0.45 (0.38–0.56) | 0.45 (0.38–0.53) | 0.62 |
Triglycerides (g/L) | 0.91 (0.72–1.53) | 1.28 (0.90–1.82) | 0.13 |
C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 2.99 (2.90–7.25) | 4.56 (2.90–10.60) | 0.15 |
Glycaemia on admission (mmol/L) | 7.04 (5.98–9.00) | 7.07 (5.90–9.09) | 0.92 |
NT-pro-BNP (pg/mL) | 638 (138–2864) | 606 (96–1394) | 0.39 |
Chronic treatment | |||
Aspirin | 2 (8) | 11 (7) | 0.80 |
Clopidogrel | 2 (8) | 7 (5) | 0.81 |
Statin | 8 (32) | 25 (16) | 0.10 |
Vitamin K antagonist | 4 (16) | 5 (3) | 0.026 |
Acute phase | |||
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor | 18 (72) | 112 (72) | 0.83 |
Aspirin | 24 (96) | 150 (97) | 0.69 |
Beta-blocker | 22 (88) | 129 (83) | 0.76 |
Clopidogrel | 25 (100) | 150 (97) | 0.80 |
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor | 20 (80) | 108 (70) | 0.41 |
Insulin | 8 (32) | 29 (19) | 0.21 |
Low-molecular-weight heparin | 13 (52) | 99 (64) | 0.36 |
Statin | 21 (84) | 139 (90) | 0.62 |
Unfractionated heparin | 11 (44) | 52 (34) | 0.43 |