Purpose
To analyze the clinical characteristics, natural history, and genetics of Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) early-onset severe retinal dystrophy (EOSRD) associated with uncommon genes.
Design
Single tertiary referral center, retrospective case series.
Methods
Review of clinical notes, ophthalmic images, and genetic testing results of 19 patients with disease-causing variants in genes that represent an unknown or <1% of all LCA/EOSRD cases: ALMS1, CABP4, KCNJ13, and OTX2 .
Results
Six patients were included with ALMS1 -LCA, 7 patients with CABP4 , and 3 patients with OTX2 and KCNJ13, respectively. Nine previously unreported variants were identified. Disease and symptom onset were during early infancy in all patients, photophobia was seen in patients with ALMS1 and CABP4 , and nyctalopia was observed in KCNJ13 and OTX2. Across all groups, using the World Health Organization visual impairment criteria, most patients (68%) were severely sight impaired at presentation and progressed to blindness during follow-up. Poorer vision was seen earliest in patients with ALMS1 and KCNJ13 , with mean visual acuities of 2.2 and 2.8 logMAR in the second decade of life. Macular atrophy was present in all patients with KCNJ13 variants, and peripheral retinal pigment deposits were also densest in KCNJ13 , followed by OTX2 . Patients with ALMS1 and CABP4 had minimal retinal deposits, and adult patients with CABP4 had a foveal hyporeflective zone combined with generalized retinal involvement.
Conclusions
The detailed genetic and phenotypic characteristics of patients with LCA due to four rare genes are described. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis contribute to our understanding of these rare diseases, aiming at improving patient diagnosis, prognostication, and management.
L eber congenital amaurosis (LCA) and early -onset severe retinal dystrophy (EOSRD) are part of a group of monogenic inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) associated with early vision loss. , Severe visual impairment is usually noticed at birth—in the first year of life in LCA and in the first 5 years of life for patients with EOSRD. , The estimated prevalence of LCA is 2 to 3 per 100 000 births, representing approximately 5% of all IRDs. Damaging variants generally occur in genes responsible for photoreceptor function or structure, leading to eventual death of outer retinal cells. Clinically, it is suspected in a young child with decreased vision, nystagmus, and rotary eye movements. Although the majority of people with LCA have non-syndromic disease that only affects the retina, a subset have syndromic disease, including experiencing olfactory, auditory, cardiac, renal, or hepatic dysfunction.
Clinical diagnosis of LCA can be supported by electroretinography (ERG) and retinal imaging, including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus imaging at different wavelengths. Typical changes include (1) reduced to non-detectable ERG responses; (2) changes to fundus appearance ranging from maculopathy to generalized retinal dystrophy; and (3) decreased autofluorescence and disrupted outer retinal layers. An important part of the diagnosis is genetic testing. To date, variants in 25 genes have been found in individuals with LCA ( https://retnet.org/ , accessed September 2024), 22 of which are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. The most common genes associated with LCA include CEP290, CRB1, GUCY2D, RDH12, RPE65, and RPGRIP1 . , There have been comprehensive studies analyzing the disease natural history and genotype-phenotype correlations for the former genes; however, little is known about rarer genes associated with LCA as one of their phenotypic presentations, such as CABP4, ALMS1, KCNJ13 , and OTX2 . An approved gene therapy is available for RPE65 -associated retinal dystrophy, whereas promising results, which have resulted in approvals being sought, have been presented for arguably the most severe LCA that is associated with AIPL1 .
CABP4 is involved in the synaptic regulation of calcium influx and neurotransmitter release in photoreceptor synaptic terminals. Variants in this gene are also associated with autosomal recessive congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB). ALMS1 codes for a protein involved in basal body and centromere-associated proteins found in ciliated cells. Pathogenic variants in this gene are associated with Alstrom syndrome; however, it can also rarely present as an isolated retinal dystrophy. , KCNJ13 encodes an ion pore that allows potassium to enter into cells. When affected, vitreoretinal degeneration occurs, possibly through impaired phagocytosis repair of the photoreceptor outer segment. OTX2 codes a transcription factor involved in brain, craniofacial, and sensory organ development. Variants in this gene commonly cause syndromic microphthalmia and may be combined with pituitary hormone deficiency.
Double null variants in CABP4 were reported in a family in whom patients had flat ERG, nystagmus, congenital poor vision, minimal fundus changes, and normal night vision. The authors proposed that given the normal fundus appearance, the condition should not be named LCA, but “congenital cone-rod synaptic disorder.” , Double null variants in ALMS1 have been associated with LCA and early-onset cone-rod dystrophy in Indian and Chinese patients. , Some patients presented with isolated disease, whereas others were subsequently found to have mild uncommon features of Alstrom syndrome that developed through childhood and adolescence (acanthosis nigricans, heart disease, diabetes mellitus). For KCNJ13 , both missense and null variants have been seen in individuals with LCA, characterized by large pigment clumps in the posterior pole and peripapillary region. , OTX2 -related cases of LCA are rare, and mostly relate to the regulatory function OTX2 has over CRX. , They can appear isolated or combined with microphthalmia, coloboma, or optic nerve hypoplasia.
In this report, we characterize individuals with LCA secondary to damaging variants in the above four rare genes in detail.
METHODS
PATIENT SELECTION AND GENETICS
The inclusion criterion for the study was to have molecularly confirmed LCA/EOSRD secondary to rare genes that represent an unknown or <1% of all LCA/EOSRD cases: ALMS1, CABP4, KCNJ13, and OTX2. The patients were identified by reviewing the genetics database of Moorfields Eye Hospital (London, United Kingdom). Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study protocol adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethics committee.
Genetic testing was performed with various available methods such as direct Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing-based retinal dystrophy gene panels, whole exome sequencing, and whole genome sequencing. Pathogenicity of each variant was classified according to the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Damaging variants in more common genes were excluded.
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT AND RETINAL IMAGING
Clinical notes were reviewed, including family, medical, and ophthalmic history, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy findings, and fundoscopy. Patients were categorized using the World Health Organization visual impairment criteria, which defines no or mild visual impairment as BCVA <0.48 (6/18, 20/60), moderate impairment as BCVA >0.48 and <1.0 (6/60, 20/200), severe as BCVA >1.0 and <1.3 (3/60, 20/400), and blindness as BCVA >1.3.
Clinical assessments consisted of spectral-domain OCT (Heidelberg Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Inc.), fundus autofluorescence (Heidelberg Spectralis and Optos PLC), and ultrawide field fundus color photography (Optos PLC). Ellipsoid zone width and outer nuclear layer thickness were measured at the foveal horizontal scans.
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
Pattern and full-field electroretinography was performed in a subset of patients, incorporating the standards of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision.
RESULTS
Nineteen patients with LCA/EOSRD were included in this cohort and ascertained for phenotyping ( Table 1 ). Seven patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in CABP4 , 6 in ALMS1 , 3 in KCNJ13 , and 3 in OTX2 ( Table 2 ).
1) CABP4
Characteristic | ALMS1 (n = 6) | CABP4 (n = 7) | KCNJ13 (n = 3) | OTX2 (n = 3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age at baseline, y, mean ± SD | 9.8 ± 11.5 | 19.1 ± 15.8 | 26 ± 5.0 | 13.7 ± 9.7 |
Age at follow-up, y, mean ± SD | 22.5 ± 12.7 | 23.4 ± 17.6 | 43 ± 1.7 | 46 ± 26.7 |
Gender, n (%) | ||||
Male | 3 (50) | 3 (43) | 3 (100) | 2 (66) |
Female | 3 (50) | 4 (57) | 0 | 1 (33) |
Age of onset, y, mean ± SD | 1.3 ± 1.3 | 0.6 ± 0.4 | 1 ± 0.8 | 4.7 ± 5.9 |
Infancy (birth to 2 y) | 5 (83) | 7 (100) | 3 (100) | 2 (67) |
Childhood (3-11 y) | 1 (17) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Adolescence (12-16 y) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (33) |
Adulthood (>16 y) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline BCVA, logMAR, mean ± SD (OD and OS) | 1.2 ± 0.8 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.7 ± 0.3 OD, 1.9 ± 0.1 OS | 1.0 ± 0.4 OD, 1.7 ± 1.1 OS |
Final BCVA, logMAR, mean ± SD (OD and OS) | 2.2 ± 0.9 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 1.6 ± 0.9 |
Average annual loss of BCVA, logMAR | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
Baseline World Health Organization visual impairment category, n (%) | ||||
No or mild impairment | 1 (17) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Moderate impairment | 2 (33) | 2 (29) | 0 | 1 (33) |
Severe impairment | 0 | 3 (43) | 1 (33) | 1 (33) |
Blindness | 3 (50) | 2 (29) | 2 (67) | 1 (33) |
Presenting symptoms, n (%) | ||||
Photophobia | 6 (100) | 5 (71) | 0 | 0 |
Nystagmus | 5 (83) | 7 (100) | 1 (33) | 1 (33) |
Nyctalopia | 0 | 0 | 3 (100) | 2 (66) |
Poor vision | 4 (67) | 5 (71) | 3 (100) | 3 (100) |
Gene | Variant c. | Amino Acid Change | ACMG Classification | Allele Frequency (gnomAD) | Functional Prediction | ClinVar ID | Comment | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Verdict | Criteria | REVEL | MutationTaster | Conser vation | SpliceAI | |||||||||||||||||
Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 | Factor 5 | Allele n° | Latino | African | Asian | Euro pean (Non- Finnish) | Total | Predi ction | Rank score | Predi ction | Score | PhyloP 100wa y | |||||||
ALMS1 | c.9001C>T | p.Gln3001 * | Likely pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | PP5 | 13 | Absent | Absent | Absent | 0.000 0117 | 8.89E-06 | NA | NA | Uncer tain | 1 | 0.317 | NA | 1457897 | 1X Patho genic | ||
*c.284del | p.Pro95Argfs * | Likely pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.19 | Benign (0) | NA | |||||
c.10483C>T | p.Gln3495 * | Likely pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | PP5 | 99 | Absent | Absent | Absent | 8.83 E-05 | 6.79 E-05 | NA | NA | Unce rtain | 1 | 2.231 | NA | 210 122 | 9X Patho genic | |||
*c.2822T>A | p.Leu941 * | Likely pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | NA | NA | Unce rtain | 1 | 0.241 | NA | NA | |||||
*c.4568dup | p.Tyr1523 * | Likely pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.42 | Benign (0) | NA | |||||
*c.2958_ 2959ins CTATTC TGGACTG | p.Thr987Leufs * | Likely pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | NA | NA | NA | NA | -0.226 | NA | NA | |||||
*c.4148C>G | p.Ser1383X * | Likely pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | 1 | Absent | Absent | Absent | 8.99 E-07 | 6.84 E-07 | NA | NA | Delet erious | 1 | 0.225 | Benign (0) | NA | |||||
c.1793del | p.Glu598Glyfs * | Likely pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | NA | NA | NA | NA | -1.075 | NA | NA | |||||
*c.6590del | p.Lys2197Serfs * | Likely pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | NA | NA | Delet erious | 1 | 0.93 | NA | NA | |||||
c.10972C>T | p.Arg3658 * | Likely pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | PP5 | 26 | Absent | Absent | Absent | 0.000 0216 | 0.000 0178 | NA | NA | Unce rtain | 1 | 1.32 | NA | 977 960 | 3X Patho genic | |||
c.10775del | p.Thr3592Lysfs * | Likely pathogenic | PM1 | PM2 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Delet erious | 0.91 | Delet erious | 1 | 0.932 | Benign (0.03) | NA | |||||
CABP4 | g.67226212- 67226422 | NA | Likely pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | NA | NA | NA | NA | 8.53 | NA | |||||
c.673C>T | p.Arg225Ter | Pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | PP5 | 14 | 0.000 0224 | 0.000 0299 | Absent | 0.000 0108 | 9.59 E-06 | NA | NA | Delet erious | 1 | -0.384 | Benign (0.02) | 438047 | 4X Patho genic, 1X Likely pathogenic | |||
KCNJ13 | c.496C>T | p.Arg166Ter | Likely pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Bening | 0.26 | Delet erious | 1 | 2.453 | Benign (0.03) | 30331 | 2X Path ogenic | |||
c.722T>C | p.Leu241Pro | Likely pathogenic | PM2 | PM3 | PP3 | PP5 | 1 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | 6.84 E-07 | Delet erious | 0.94 | Delet erious | 1 | 9.29 | Benign (0.01) | 30332 | 1X Path ogenic | ||
OTX2 | *c.819del | p.Trp274Glyfs*28 | Likely pathogenic | PVS1 | PM2 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | NA | NA | NA | NA | 9.76 | Benign (0) | NA | ||||
*c.271C>A | p.Gln91Lys | Likely pathogenic | PM2 | PM5 | PP2 | PP3 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Delet erious | 0.78 | Delet erious | 1 | 9.985 | Benign (0) | NA | |||
*c.235G>C | p.Glu79Gln | Likely pathogenic | PM2 | PM5 | PP2 | PP3 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Delet erious | 0.83 | Delet erious | 1 | 7.892 | Benign (0) | NA |

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree


