Chronic Venous Disorders: Classification, Severity Assessment, and Nomenclature


Clinical class

Description

C0

No visible or palpable signs of venous disease

C1

Telangiectases or reticular veins

C2

Varicose veins

C3

Edema

C4

Changes in the skin and subcutaneous tissue
 
C4a Pigmentation and/or eczema

C4b Lipodermatosclerosis and/or atrophie blanche

C5

Healed venous ulcer

C6

Active venous ulcer


Adapted from Kistner and Eklof [2]

Each clinical class is further qualified by a subscript “S” if symptomatic and “A” if asymptomatic

The symptoms include aching, pain, tightness, skin irritation, heaviness, muscle cramps, and other symptoms relating to venous disorders





CEAP: Etiological Classification [1, 2]


Three causes are identified under etiological classification:



  • Congenital – refers to conditions where the vessels are deformed from birth as, for example, Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome.


  • Primary – refers to degenerative conditions of the vein wall with reflux as in varicose veins.


  • Secondary – commonest cause is post-thrombotic syndrome.

The revised CEAP has included a fourth group, “No venous etiology identified” with the superscriptn” (Table 4.2).


Table 4.2
Etiological classification


















E c

Congenital

E p

Primary

E s

Secondary (post-thrombotic)

E n

No venous etiology identified


Adapted from Kistner and Eklof [2]


CEAP: Anatomical Classification [1, 2]


This has primarily three components based on the location of the disease: superficial veins (s), perforator veins (p), and deep vein (d). The revised document has incorporated a fourth category, “n”, when no venous location could be identified (Table 4.3).


Table 4.3
Anatomical classification


















A s

Superficial veins

A p

Perforating veins

A d

Deep veins

A n

No venous location identified


Adapted from Kistner and Eklof [2]

When an abnormality is identified, to further localize the disease, 18 venous segments from the infradiaphragmatic IVC to the crural veins are recognized (refer later).


CEAP: Pathophysiological Classification [1, 2]


The basic changes here are reflux(r), obstruction (o), and combination of both reflux and obstruction (r,o). The descriptor “n” is employed when no pathology could be identified (Table 4.4).


Table 4.4
Pathophysiological classification


















P r

Reflux

P o

Obstruction

P r,o

Reflux and obstruction

P n

No venous pathology identifiable


Adapted from Kistner and Eklof [2]

When reflux or obstruction is detected, further anatomical localization of the pathophysiology can be done by considering venous anatomical segment classification [2] (Table 4.5).


Table 4.5
Venous anatomical segment classification















































Superficial veins

1. Telangiectases/reticular veins

2. GSV above knee

3. GSV below knee

4. SSV

5. Nonsaphenous veins

Deep veins

6. Inferior vena cava

7. Common Iliac vein

8. Internal iliac vein

9. External iliac vein

10. Pelvic: gonadal, broad ligament veins, etc.

11. Common femoral vein

12. Deep femoral vein

13. Femoral vein

14. Popliteal vein

15. Crural veins: anterior tibial, posterior tibial, peroneal veins

16. Muscular veins: gastrocnemius, soleus, etc.

Perforating veins

17. Thigh perforating veins

18. Calf perforating veins


Adapted from Kistner and Eklof [2]




  • CVD are progressive and not static problems. Serial CEAP classification is necessary to understand the progression of the disease. The revised document has suggested inclusion of the date of CEAP classification and the level of investigation to make it more dynamic [1]. Three levels of investigations are recognized.



    • Level I Investigation – office visit with history and clinical examination; includes use of handheld Doppler (HHD)


    • Level II Investigations – noninvasive studies (duplex color scanning along with some form of plethysmographic studies if needed)


    • Level III Investigations – invasive studies (Ascending/descending venogram, ambulatory venous pressure studies, CT/MR venograms)


Full/Advanced CEAP and Basic CEAP


It is essential that the CEAP classification should be simple enough for routine clinical use. At the same time, it should be comprehensive for research and publication purposes. To achieve these twin goals, the revision committee has recommended a basic CEAP and an advanced/full CEAP classification.

For basic CEAP, two simplifications are suggested [1]:



  • The single highest descriptor can be used for clinical classification.


  • After duplex scan, in basic CEAP, the E, A, and P factors are also to be documented. But the complex 18 venous anatomical segment classification can be avoided.

For advanced CEAP classification, the full spectrum is to be used [1].



  • The clinical classification should include the full range of descriptors (see example below).


  • Venous anatomical segments are also to be included.

The following example would clarify the issue.

A patient has varicose veins with pain and lipodermatosclerosis. Duplex scan on 02/02/2014 confirmed primary reflux of GSV and incompetent perforators in the calf.

The basic CEAP of this patient would be C4b s; E p; A s p; P r; Level II; 02/02/2014.

The advanced CEAP for this patient would be C2,3,4b s; Ep; A s p; P r 2,3,18; Level II; 02/02/2014.

The advanced CEAP looks a little intimidating, but it is relevant for standardization and cohort study. The revision of the CEAP is an ongoing program of the American Venous Forum and further modifications are likely to emerge.



Outcome Assessment



Venous Severity Scoring (VSS) Systems: Problems and Issues


Any system aimed at evaluating the severity of disease and outcome of therapy should contain objective and quantifiable elements. Further, these elements should reflect positive or negative impact to specific interventions and treatments. Venous diseases, unlike peripheral arterial diseases, do not have well-defined measurable end points. Again, there is no noninvasive test on the venous side, which will provide a quantifiable data on the outcome of therapy. On the arterial side, the ankle brachial pressure index is a very simple noninvasive test, which has all the required criteria for outcome measurement. These issues make severity scoring and outcome assessment more complicated on the venous system [3]. The CEAP is an excellent system for classifying CVD. But when it comes to using CEAP for severity and outcome assessment, problems arise. The CEAP in its current form is basically a static system. For example, in C4 lesions, lipodermatosclerosis is unlikely to change with treatment [4]. An ad hoc committee of the American Venous Forum, under the leadership of Dr. Rutherford, arrived at three severity scoring systems based on the elements of the CEAP [4]. The “E” component of the CEAP was not incorporated since it is a fixed entity [3]. The scoring systems evolved are [4] as follows:
Oct 14, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Chronic Venous Disorders: Classification, Severity Assessment, and Nomenclature

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access