Chronic Kidney Disease


Markers of kidney damage (one or more)

Albuminuria

Urine sediment abnormalities

Electrolyte and other abnormalities due to tubular disorders

Abnormalities detected by histology

Structural abnormalities detected by imaging

History of kidney transplantation

Decreased GFR (GFR categories G3a–G5)


Adapted from KDIGO 2012 [3]

Abbreviations: CKD chronic kidney disease, GFR glomerular filtration rate




Table 5.2
Likelihood of chronic kidney disease, based on cause, glomerular filtration rate, and albuminuria

























































Cause

Category

eGFR

Albuminuria (proteinuria)

Glomerular disease

1

≥90

A1 (<30)

A2 (30–300)

A3 (>300)

Tubulointerstitial disease

2

60–89


+

++

Vascular disease

3a

45–59

+

++

+++

3b

30–45

++

+++

+++

Congenital disease

4

15–29

+++

+++

+++

Cystic disease

5

<15

+++

+++

+++


Adapted from KDIGO 2012 [3]


Both albuminuria and eGFR are useful markers of CKD progression and are synergistic; thus, they should be used to monitor the disease, especially in patients with lower eGFR and higher albumin values (1–3 months), as they are more prone to worsening of the disease; they should be also used when clinical events occur that might have impact in renal function. The frequency of these measurements should be individualized, based on the patient’s history and underlying cause of kidney disease. The regular monitoring of stable patients may include more frequent monitoring than annually, according to the underlying cause, history, eGFR, and albumin/creatinine ratio previously estimated.



Newer Biomarkers of Chronic Kidney Disease


The early identification of individuals at risk for CKD progression is very important, as it may delay or avoid its progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Besides albuminuria and eGFR, there are several biomarkers that have been included in clinical studies to evaluate its potential as markers for CKD progression.

The CaNPREDDICT, a Canadian study for prediction of risk and evaluation to dialysis, death, and interim cardiovascular events over time, is testing biomarkers 6 monthly in 2,500 prevalent patients with eGFR 15–45 ml/min in 50 centers across Canada over 36 months. After 1 year of follow-up, this group has recently reported [4] that most of the newer biomarkers did not improve the prediction of renal replacement therapy, when added to conventional risk factors such as eGFR, urine albumin to creatinine ratio, hemoglobin, phosphate, and albumin; however, N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), fibroblast growth factor (FGF23), high-sensitivity (hs) CRP, and cystatin C significantly improved the prediction of death within 1 year.

The Spanish NEFRONA project is a prospective observational study involving 2,661 patients that aims to study the usefulness of imaging techniques and novel biomarkers in the prediction of cardiovascular risk in patients with CKD [5]. Other studies including the MMKD (Mild to Moderate Kidney Disease) [6], the CRIC (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort), and the CRIB (Chronic Renal Impairment in Birmingham) evaluated a wide range of traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk biomarkers in CKD [7].

From these and other studies, several promising biomarkers have been proposed for CKD progression and for its associated comorbidities and mortality. These markers may also provide valuable data about the underlying pathophysiology of the disease [1], as they may be biomarkers of kidney function, glomerular injury, or tubulointerstitial injury.


Biomarkers of Kidney Function


Several molecules involved in kidney function, signaling, and structure have been evaluated as potential markers for CKD. The biomarkers currently used in clinical practice for the diagnosis and prognosis of CKD are markers of loss of kidney function. The most widely used are the eGFR, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and albuminuria or proteinuria. These markers indicate impaired renal function but have no disease specificity, and detectable changes in their concentration only appear after the biological changes in the organ causing the functional impairment.

The most important new biomarkers for kidney function include cystatin C [8], a small protein filtered and metabolized after tubular absorption, and the beta-trace protein [9], a lipocalin glycoprotein, which is a sensitive marker of glomerular filtration. According to the MMKD study, both are good markers of CKD progression; however, cystatin C seems to be more sensitive. Uric acid has also emerged as a novel and potentially modifiable risk factor for the development and progression of CKD; however, it is not currently clear whether hyperuricemia plays a causative role in CKD progression or is merely a biomarker of reduced kidney function [10].


Biomarkers of Tubulointerstitial Injury


Markers of renal tubular injury are not used routinely to describe kidney function and little is known about the risk of cardiovascular events and death associated with these biomarkers. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP), tenascin, and the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) have emerged as potential biomarkers of tubulointerstitial injury.

According to the CRIC study [11], involving 3,386 participants, urine levels of NGAL were associated independently with future ischemic atherosclerotic events, but not with heart failure events or deaths. The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), involving 686 participants, evaluated both NGAL and KIM-1 as markers of tubular injury and found that urinary KIM-1 level was associated with future risk of kidney disease independent of albuminuria and that both biomarkers are a promising tool for identifying persons at risk of CKD [12].

KIM-1 is a transmembrane tubular protein that is not found in healthy people, emerging therefore as a potential biomarker of kidney disease. It has been reported that KIM-1 is upregulated in patients with renal cell carcinoma, urate nephropathy, acute and chronic tubular injury, allograft nephropathy, and acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Actually, KIM-1 has been also reported as an independent predictor of graft loss in renal transplant recipients [13] and as a good marker to monitor potentially nephrotoxic therapies.

NAG is a lysosomal enzyme that is present in proximal tubular cells and is widely used to evaluate tubular renal function. NAG has a high molecular weight, which does not permit its filtration through the glomerular basal membrane and is rapidly cleared from the circulation by the liver. Thus, urinary NAG originates primarily from the proximal tubule, and increased urinary excretion is a consequence of renal tubular cell breakdown; its urinary excretion is, therefore, almost constant with minimal diurnal changes. The urinary NAG values should be expressed as a ratio to urinary creatinine concentration, as this relationship shows less variability than the urinary enzyme excretions related to volume or time.

NGAL is another biomarker of renal tubular injury that belongs to the superfamily of lipocalins, a group of iron-carrying proteins [13]. It was firstly reported to be produced by neutrophils, but it is also expressed in other tissues, such as kidney, liver, epithelial cells, and vascular cells in atherosclerotic plaques [14]. When tubular injury occurs, the expression of NGAL rises and is rapidly secreted; urine and plasma concentrations increase proportionally to severity and duration of renal injury and its concentration rapidly decreases with attenuation of renal injury.

There are different commercially available ELISA kits to evaluate NGAL. As it was found that NGAL is ultrafiltered and absorbed by polysulfone membranes, the NGAL blood levels may be reduced in patients under therapeutic hemodialysis using such type of membranes for the hemodialysis procedure; a moderate to severe inflammatory condition, coexisting with kidney injury, may be also a confounding factor in NGAL measurement, as the activation of neutrophils will contribute to increase the NGAL blood levels.

Several clinical studies and systematic reviews proposed NGAL as a reliable diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for kidney injury. A multicenter analysis of pooled data [15], including 2,322 critically ill children and adults, evaluated the prognostic value of acute kidney injury detected by NGAL and found that about 20 % of the patients presented an early increase in the concentration of NGAL, in the absence of diagnostic increases in serum creatinine. The increase in NGAL levels, usually, occurs 24–72 h before the increase in creatinine to diagnosis values. Thus, NGAL evaluation seems to be a useful early biomarker of kidney injury. Moreover, this study group showed that NGAL is also a useful prognostic biomarker, as patients with increased NGAL were at greater risk of adverse outcomes, including death, renal replacement therapy, and hospitalization, both in the presence and absence of an increase in serum creatinine levels. However, future prospective studies are needed to confirm histopathological agreement of NGAL with tubular injury, already shown in animal models; further studies are also needed to test whether NGAL-based early diagnosis of kidney injury leads to more successful and prompt therapeutic intervention and to improve the outcome of the patients. Indeed, in the absence of an early detection of kidney injury, the therapeutic intervention could only be delivered late in the course of AKI, with worsening of the disease and of its outcome.

L-FABP is a newly emerging biomarker that has antioxidant properties and is expressed in the cytoplasm of human renal proximal tubules. Its expression is upregulated and its urinary excretion is increased by various stressors, including urinary protein, hyperglycemia, tubular ischemia, toxins, and salt-sensitive hypertension, which lead to the progression of kidney disease [16]. Urinary L-FABP levels accurately reflect the degree of tubulointerstitial damage and are strongly correlated with the prognosis of CKD patients [17]. Concerning AKI, urinary L-FABP seems to be able to detect kidney injury before an increase in serum creatinine occurs. Urinary L-FABP may be also useful for the early detection of diabetic nephropathy, the leading cause of CKD. In a longitudinal study, a higher level of urinary L-FABP was found to be a risk factor for the progression of diabetic nephropathy. A recent single-center, prospective observational study reported that urinary L-FABP may be also a useful predictor of adverse long-term outcomes in kidney transplant patients [18].

Tenascin and TIMP-1 have also been proposed as biomarkers of tubulointerstitial injury; however, there are still few studies supporting their value. Tenascin has emerged as an important extracellular matrix, playing an important role in nephrogenesis and in several pathological processes in glomerulus and tubulointerstitial renal cells. TIMP-1 is a physiological inhibitor of matrix-degrading enzymes, namely, collagenase, gelatinase, and stromelysin. Patients with CKD present elevated serum and urinary levels of both tenascin and TIMP-1; however, the urinary levels did not correlate with the degree of proteinuria [19].

These biomarkers of tubulointerstitial injury may be used as earlier markers of AKI, as markers of the underlying predominant kidney injury in CKD, as well as markers of progression and outcome.


Biomarkers of Glomerular Injury


Proteinuria is widely used as a marker of glomerular function. More recently, new biomarkers of kidney podocyte injury, including urinary nephrin, podocin, and podocalyxin, have emerged as biomarkers of glomerular injury.

Podocytes are differentiated epithelial cells covering the outer surface of the glomerular capillaries, presenting interdigitating foot processes and forming narrow slits to provide a pathway for glomerular filtration. They act as a size and charge barrier to anionic proteins, due to the presence of podocalyxin, a negatively charged apical membrane protein. The injury of podocytes may lead to a reduced foot process and proteinuria, while the detachment of podocytes from the glomerular basement membrane leads to progression of glomerular diseases. Podocyte injury might be induced by angiotensin II, hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, infections, deposition of antigen-antibody complexes, mechanical stretch, and drugs. In these conditions, urinary levels of nephrin, podocin, and podocalyxin are increased and, therefore, may be used in a noninvasive way, as useful markers of glomerular function. Moreover, the evaluation of the number of urinary podocytes can provide real-time data about the number of podocytes detached in a certain period of time; thus, urinary podocyte count may be also used as a marker of ongoing glomerular injuries. According to Hanamura et al. [20] a decrease in the number of glomerular podocytes is associated with glomerulosclerosis, decline in renal function, and impaired selectivity of proteinuria, suggesting a causative relationship between detachment and loss of podocytes and progression of renal dysfunction. Urinary podocyte excretion was associated with proteinuria and active histological lesions. These biomarkers are promising and more specific of glomerular injury; however, further studies are needed to assess their values in clinical practice.


Biomarkers of Endothelial Dysfunction


Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is a naturally occurring amino acid found in tissues and cells, acting as an endogenous inhibitor of the nitric oxide synthase, impairing the ability of nitric oxide for vasodilation, and is excreted in urine. Several studies have suggested that plasma concentration of ADMA provides a marker of risk for endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease. ADMA blood levels are increased in patients with CKD (stages 1–5 with or without proteinuria) [21] and seem to provide a biomarker for CKD progression [22]; furthermore, it has been associated with CVD complications [23]. Thus, ADMA concentration has been proposed as a biomarker for endothelial dysfunction and for increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, as well as a prognostic marker for the loss of renal function.

A recent prospective controlled 1-year follow-up study [24] on the effects of ADMA and other variables related to ADMA metabolism on the progression of kidney dysfunction, in 181 patients with CKD stages 3–5, showed that elevated ADMA was a strong predictor of progression only for patients with eGFR between 25 and 40 mL/min/1.73 m2 (the borderline of CKD stages 3–4).

To evaluate ADMA blood levels, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays have been mostly used; however, a recent study showed that these measurements overestimated ADMA levels in eGFR < 30 mL/min, as compared to the gold-standard liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry.


Inflammation in Chronic Kidney Disease


A persistent low-grade inflammation is a common feature in CKD patients [25], which is usually enhanced in ESKD patients and even more enhanced in case of resistance to therapy with erythropoietic stimulating agents [26]. Emerging evidence also suggests that low-grade persistent inflammation magnifies other common features of the uremic phenotype, such as atherosclerosis, depression, protein-energy wasting, and vascular calcification, acting as a catalyst of the vicious circle of risk factors for ESKD.

The increased urinary proteins per se seem to induce proinflammatory and profibrotic changes, leading to tubulointerstitial damage through several pathways, namely, by inducing tubular cytokine expression and complement activation, which will induce infiltration of inflammatory cells in the interstitium and fibrinogenesis [25].

Inflammation is a major driving force of the uremic phenotype and circulating inflammatory biomarkers seem to be sensitive predictors for the outcome of CKD patients. Actually, several studies have demonstrated an association between biomarkers of systemic inflammation, namely, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [2729], and fibrinogen [30], with lower kidney function. Moreover, several inflammatory markers have been shown to be associated with a higher risk for cardiovascular events and for mortality [31, 32]. CKD is accepted as an independent risk factor for CVD. Actually, most of the mild to moderate CKD patients die from CVD events, even before they need kidney replacement treatment [33].

The Framingham Offspring cohort study [34] involving 3,294 patients who attended the seventh examination cycle (1998–2001) evaluated several inflammatory markers, such as CRP, TNF-α, IL-6, TNF-α receptor 2 (TNFR2), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), P-selectin, CD-40 ligand, osteoprotegerin, urinary isoprostanes, myeloperoxidase, and fibrinogen, and showed that TNF-α, IL-6, TNFR2, MCP-1, osteoprotegerin, myeloperoxidase, and fibrinogen were higher in CKD patients.

The role of persistent inflammation as a potential cause for this high mortality rate triggered an increasing interest in inflammatory biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of CKD, as well as possible therapeutic targets.


C-Reactive Protein


CRP is a member of the family of pentraxins, which are small pentameric innate immunity effector proteins that are absent or weakly expressed in healthy conditions. Its synthesis by hepatocytes is induced by proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α. The plasmatic levels of CRP are widely used by clinicians to assess infectious or noninfectious types of systemic inflammation, and nephrologists recognize CRP levels as a useful biomarker for the outcome of CKD and ESKD patients. Several studies, such as the Jackson Heart study and the CARE (Cholesterol and Recurrent Events) trial, showed that plasma concentrations of CRP were associated with the presence of CKD and with a higher rate of kidney function decline, respectively [1].

CRP values show time-dependent variability, as they might be influenced by intercurrent clinical events, including comorbidities, infections, and changes in blood volume. Therefore, the motorization of CRP value is especially important when using CRP as a biomarker for the evolution of the disease and for the outcome of the patient. The persistence of high CRP values (from 3 to 6 months) marks a worst survival in CKD and in ESKD patients.

The prevalence of the utilization of CRP measurement varies across countries and dialysis facilities; however, according to the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) III, there has been an increasing use of CRP measurement in nearly all countries [35]. This study hypothesized that the evaluation of CRP as a marker of underlying infection/inflammation in dialysis facilities could lead to lower adverse outcomes for the dialyzed patients. It was found that the measurement of CRP in the majority of patients within a dialysis facility (vs. less than 50 % of patients) was significantly related to a lower cardiovascular mortality, for facilities measuring CRP in at least 50 % of its patients. This finding strongly suggests that a more prevalent measurement of CRP may influence patient outcomes. Indeed, the use of a CRP screening for inflammation would trigger the evaluation of the possible underlying causes, when a rise in CRP value occurs, allowing a rapid clinical intervention and, therefore, an effective improvement in patient outcome. Moreover, this study confirmed that higher CRP values are associated with all-cause mortality and showed that this relationship with mortality was independent of the correlation with other common inflammatory markers.


Interleukin-6


Of all the acute-phase proteins and plasma biomarkers of inflammation, CRP is the most widely used. CRP is rapidly synthesized in hepatocytes, following an inflammatory stimulus by IL-6 during the acute phase of inflammation. Il-6 is a proinflammatory cytokine released by a variety of activated cell types, which has multiple cell targets and regulates the hepatic acute-phase response, promoting the synthesis of positive acute-phase reactants and inhibiting that of negative acute-phase reactants. IL-6 also controls several homeostatic functions including glucose metabolism, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, affecting mood, fatigue and depression, and hematopoiesis. A systemic increase in IL-6 causes hyperthermia and leads to a general loss of activity and appetite.
< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 8, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Chronic Kidney Disease

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access