Bronchoalveolar Lavage as a Diagnostic and Research Tool




(1)
Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria

 



By bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) a proportion of inflammatory cells are washed out from the lung. The mechanism is still poorly understood. The normal composition of BAL cells is 80–85 % macrophages, up to 15 % lymphocytes, predominantly of T lineage with a balanced helper-suppressor ratio of 1:1, 1–3 % neutrophils, <1 % eosinophils, and <0,1 % mast cells. In children BAL composition is slightly different: normal lymphocyte count is around 10 %, mast cells can be higher (0.5 %), and the other cells are similar in number to adults [1]. Since there exists a macrophage alveolitis, it is necessary to study the phenotype of macrophages. Normally there will be a mixture of small, monocyte-like, and mature larger macrophages; multinucleated and giant cells are absent. In case of macrophage alveolitis, there will be a mixture of immature monocytoid, mature and large reactive cells, as well as multinucleated giant cells – as a response to different diseases, for example, respiratory bronchiolitis. In this chapter, we will not add figures, because BAL examples from different diseases have been added in the respective chapters.


15.1 Where and When Doing BAL?


BAL should be done in all interstitial lung diseases, in infectious pneumonias, and in pneumoconiosis. The method is, however, not very useful to diagnose malignancies, except in situ adenocarcinomas. BAL should be done in the affected segments. A routine BAL from the lingula is most often not diagnostic, unless the lingula is affected too – which is rarely the case!

BAL is a very useful tool to diagnose infectious organisms, as well as foreign substances in case of pneumoconiosis. Organisms can easily be identified on Giemsa stains, and if positive, additional stains such as Gram, Grocott methenamine silver, and Fite can be added; immunostains and in situ hybridization can be performed if necessary. Foreign substances can be seen in H&E stains, can be polarized for a refractile crystalline structure, or can be evaluated for an iron-protein incrustation as in asbestos fibers using Prussian blue stain. With respect to interstitial lung diseases, some show a characteristic pattern, whereas in others the pattern changes with disease activity or resolution.

A lymphocytic “alveolitis” is usually found in sarcoidosis, EAA, and tuberculosis. Whereas sarcoidosis and tuberculosis present as T-helper-dominated alveolitis, in EAA cytotoxic T lymphocytes predominate. But, there are exceptions: under therapy the composition of lymphocytes may change in EAA as well as in sarcoidosis and tuberculosis [2]. Antigen withdrawal in EAA changes the composition as well. And, when a patient with EAA inhales the antigen, the primary response is granulocytic. Especially in the pediatric population, a lymphocytic alveolitis is suggestive for a viral pneumonia [3, 4]. If hemorrhage is additionally present, and atypical looking pneumocytes are seen, viral pneumonia is nearly a firm diagnosis (adenovirus might be suspected).

Granulocytic “alveolitis” is found in UIP, neutrophils predominate, but up to 4 % eosinophils can be present. Eosinophilic alveolitis is seen in Langerhans cell histiocytosis (up to 15 %) and eosinophilic pneumonias, including chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, hypereosinophilic syndrome, and Churg-Strauss syndrome/eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (usually >30 %). In allergic asthma and allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis, mucoid impaction type and bronchocentric granulomatosis also eosinophils predominate; however, they will show a more specific pattern, namely, degranulation. This can be highlighted by a Congo red stain, which picks up major basic protein, a granule constituent [2, 5, 6].

At the moment there is no specific pattern known for NSIP, collagen vascular diseases, and most pneumoconiosis. The latter, however, can be diagnosed by the proof of foreign substances [1, 710]. But there is a caveat: finding asbestos bodies makes not asbestosis. For the diagnosis you will need the tissue reaction. Human usually inhale foreign substances, which then will show up in BAL. Only the tissue response will clarify, if these inhaled substances act toxic within the lung and causes inflammation with or without fibrosis. In most cases BAL is most useful in combination with histology. Therefore a strong recommendation is to insist on histology. BAL can also assist in evaluating disease activity, response to therapy, etc.

Alveolar proteinosis can be diagnosed in BAL without biopsy (one of the very few diseases!) by the proteinaceous “milky” fluid. By PAS the proteins are heavily stained. The remainder is paucicellular or even devoid of cells [11] (Table 15.1).


Table 15.1
Differential cell counts in BAL and diagnostic considerations; this is not a complete list, only the most frequent diseases are listed
















Lymphocytosis

Consider epithelioid granulomatosis, lymphoma, interstitial pneumonias, such as LIP, NSIP, etc.

CD4/8 ratio >1.5

Sarcoidosis, tuberculosis

Lymphocytosis

Consider viral or rickettsia pneumonia, epithelioid granulomatosis, lymphoma, interstitial pneumonias, such as LIP, NSIP, etc.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 26, 2017 | Posted by in RESPIRATORY | Comments Off on Bronchoalveolar Lavage as a Diagnostic and Research Tool

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access