Below Knee Revascularization
Rishi Panchal, DO
Key Points
Below knee disease gives rise to critical limb ischemia with rest pain or ulcers.
Below knee disease is often combined with inflow disease of the iliac and femoropopliteal segments.
Contralateral femoral, ipsilateral femoral, and pedal access can be undertaken for infrapopliteal interventions.
Balloon angioplasty is the main stay of treatment. Drug-coated balloon therapy and drug-eluting stents so far have not proven to be significantly beneficial in below knee disease.
I. Indications and Considerations
A. Chronic Limb Ischemia
1. Chronic limb ischemia (CLI) is defined as limb pain that occurs “at rest or impending limb loss that is caused by severe compromise of blood flow to the affected extremity.”1 In CLI, a cascade of pathophysiologic events results from a chronic lack of blood supply over several weeks to months, ultimately leading to rest pain and/or trophic lesions in the legs.18 Rutherford and Fontaine’s classification criteria place CLI at the end of the spectrum of chronic peripheral arterial disease (Table 11.1).
2. Classic symptoms and clinical manifestations of CLI include the following: lower extremity rest pain, nonhealing ulcers, tissue loss, gangrene, pallor of the foot, and rubor dependency.1 CLI places patients at a significant risk for amputation and cardiovascular events, thereby making it the most important clinical indication for below-the-knee revascularization.16 Risk factors of CLI are the same as that of general atherosclerosis and include cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, metabolic syndrome, hyperhomocysteinemia, increased fibrinogen, and high levels of C-reactive protein. The diagnosis of CLI is made based on clinical manifestations and objective data including the following hemodynamic parameters: ankle-brachial index of 0.4 or less, ankle systolic pressure of 50 mm Hg or less, toe systolic pressure of 30 mm Hg or less,1 and transcutaneous oxygen less than 20 mm Hg.12 The goal of revascularization in CLI, whether surgical or endovascular, is to provide in-line blood flow to the foot through at least 1 patent artery, in an effort to preserve a functional limb, while decreasing ischemic pain, minimizing tissue loss, facilitating wound healing,9 improving patient function and quality of life, and prolonging survival.18
Table 11.1. Fontaine and Rutherford Classifications of Chronic Peripheral Arterial Disease Severity
Fontaine Classification
Rutherford Classification
Stage
Clinical Symptoms
Grade
Category
Clinical Symptoms
I
Asymptomatic
0
0
Asymptomatic
IIa
Mild claudication
(symptoms with walking >200 m)
I
1
Mild claudication
IIb
Moderate to severe claudication
(symptoms with walking <200 m)
2
3
Moderate claudication
Severe claudication
III
Ischemic rest pain
II
4
Ischemic rest pain
Critical limb ischemia
IV
Ulceration or gangrene
III
5
Minor tissue loss
6
Major tissue loss
3. The gold standard for revascularization for CLI has long included open surgical revascularization, endartectomy, and surgical infrainguinal bypass.1
With advancements in techniques, devices, and research demonstrating the safety, efficacy, and lower cost of endovascular treatment of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease, there has been a paradigm shift over the recent years to an endovascular-first approach.16 The endovascular-first approach to the treatment of CLI is currently considered to be the standard treatment for symptomatic infrainguinal atherosclerotic disease, with regard to good technical and clinical outcomes.11 Endovascular revascularization is preferred over surgical revascularization in patients with comorbidities including coronary ischemia, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, severe lung disease, and chronic kidney disease, which all increase risk of perioperative surgical complications.
Endovascular revascularization is also indicated in patients without suitable autologous vein for bypass grafts, in patients with rest pain and disease at multiple levels who can undergo a staged intervention,9 and in patients with severe infection near the site of planned surgical anastomosis, previously failed bypass, and short lesions. Not only does endovascular revascularization offer a less invasive and cost-effective option for the treatment of CLI but is also associated with faster recovery time, fewer complications, and shorter length of hospital stay.16 As illustrated by the BASIL (Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischemia of the Leg) study, endovascular intervention is an effective option for treating CLI, when compared with surgical intervention, as the amputation-free survival rates were similar9 (Fig. 11.1).Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree