Atrial Fibrillation on Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Undergoing Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome


CKD stage

Description

GFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2)

1

Kidney damage with normal or increased GFR

≥90

2

Kidney damage with mild decreased GFR

60–89

3

Moderate decreased GFR

30–59

4

Severe decreased GFR

15–29

5

Kidney failure

<15 (or dialysis)


GFR glomerular filtration rate



A334935_1_En_4_Fig1_HTML.jpg


Fig. 4.1
Electrocardiogram (ECG) on admission



Table 4.2
GRACE score calculation [2]












































































































































Background

Findings at the time of admission

Findings during hospital stay

1. Age (years)

Points

4. Heart rate at Admission (bpm)

Points

7. Serum creatinine At admission (ml/min)

Points

≤ 29

0

≤ 49.9

0

0.0–0.39

1

30–39

0

50–69.9

3

0.4–0.79

3

40–49

18

70–89.9

9

0.8–1.19

5

50–59

36

90–109.9

14

1.2–1.59

7

60–69

55

110–149.9

23

1.6–1.99

9

70–79

73

150–199.9

35

2.0–3.99

15

80–89

91

≥ 200

43

≥ 4.0

20

≥ 90

100
       
   
5. SAP at admission (mmHg)
 
8. Elevated enzymes or markers

15

2. History of heart failure

24

≤ 79.9

24
   
   
80–99.9

22

9. No percutaneous revascularization

14

3. History of myocardial infarction

12

100–119.9

18
   
   
120–139.9

14
   
   
140–159.9

10
   
   
160–199.9

4
   
   
≥ 200

0
   
   
6. Depressed STsegment

11
   


SAP systolic arterial pressure



Table 4.3
CHA2DS2-VASc score and associated risk of stroke/year [3]








































































 
Condition

Points

Total score

Stroke risk/year (%)

C

Congestive heart failure (or left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35 %)

1

0

0

H

Hypertension: blood pressure consistently above 140/90 mmHg (or treated hypertension on medication)

1

2

1.3

A2

Age ≥ 75 years

2

2

2.2

D

Diabetes mellitus

1

3

3.2

S2

Prior stroke or TIA or thromboembolism

2

4

4.0

V

Vascular disease (e.g., peripheral artery disease, myocardial infarction, aortic plaque)

1

5

6.7

A

Age 65–74 years

1

6

9.8

Sc

Sex category (i.e., female sex)

1

7

9.6
   
8

6.7
 
9

15.2


TIA transient ischemic attack



Table 4.4
CRUSADE bleeding risk score [2]





















































































































































































































 
Points

Bleeding risk category

In-hospital bleeding rate (%)

Baseline hematocrit, %
 
Very low, ≤20

3.0

 <31

9

Low, 21–30

5.5

 31–33.9

7

Moderate, 31–40

9.0

 34–36.9

3

High, 41–50

12.0

 37–39.9

2

Very high, >50

19.0

 ≥40

0
   

Creatinine clearance, a mL/min
     

 ≤15

39
   

 >15–30

35
   

 >30–60

28
   

 >60–90

17
   

 >90–120

7
   

 >120

0
   

Heart rate (bpm)
     

 ≤70

0
   

 71–80

1
   

 81–90

3
   

 91–100

6
   

 101–110

8
   

 111–120

10
   

 ≥121

11
   

Sex
     

 Male

0
   

 Female

8
   

Signs of CHF at presentation
     

 No

0
   

 Yes

7
   

Prior vascular disease
     

 No

0
   

 Yes

6
   

Diabetes mellitus
     

 No

0
   

 Yes

6
   

Systolic pressure, mmHg
     

 ≤90

10
   

 91–100

8
   

 101–120

5
   

 121–180

1
   

 181–200

3
   

 ≥201

5
   


CHF congestive heart failure

aAccording to Cockroft-Gault formula

History of peripheral artery disease or prior stroke



Table 4.5
HAS-BLED score and associated risk of major bleeding/year [3]

























































 
Condition

Points

Total score

Risk of major bleeding/year (%)

H

Hypertension (uncontrolled blood pressure above 160/90 mmHg)

1

0

<1

A

Renal (dialysis, transplant, creatinine > 2.6 mg/dL or >200 μmol/L) and/or liver (cirrhosis, bilirubin > 2× normal or AST/ALT/AP > 3× normal) disease

1 or 2

1–2

2–3

S

Stroke

1

≥3

4–12

B

Bleeding (previous or predisposition to)

1
   

L

Labile INR (unstable/high or TTR < 60 %)

1
   

E

Elderly (i.e., age > 65 years)

1
   

D

Drug usage predisposing to bleeding (antiplatelet agents, NSAIDs) and/or alcohol (≥8 drinks a week)

1 or 2
   


INR international normalized ratio, TTR time in therapeutic range, NSAID nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, AST aspartate aminotranspherase, ALT alanine aminotranspherase, AP alkaline phosphatase



Table 4.6
Patient’s risk profile





























































CHA2DS2-VASc

GRACE

HAS-BLED

CRUSADE

Congestive heart failure

0

Age

Hypertension

1

Baseline hematocrit

3

Hypertension

1

Heart rate

Abnormal liver or renal function

1

Creatinine clearance

28

Age > 75 years

2

Systolic blood pressure

Stroke

0

Heart rate

3

Diabetes mellitus

1

Creatinine

Bleeding

0

Sex

8

Previous stroke/TIA

0

Congestive heart failure

Labile INR

0

Signs of congestive heart failure

0

Vascular disease

1

Cardiac arrest on admission

Elderly > 65 years

1

Prior vascular disease

0

Age 65–75

0

ST segment deviation

Drugs or alcohol

0

Diabetes mellitus

6

Sex (female gender)

1

Elevated cardiac enzymes
 
Systolic blood pressure

3

Total score

6 = high risk

145 = high risk

3 = high risk

51 = very high risk





4.2 Periprocedural Issues


There are a number of considerations on timing of CORO/PCI, vascular access site, and management of antithrombotic therapy in a patient undergoing CORO/PCI on aggressive antithrombotic therapy, including OAC and concomitant administration of antiplatelet agents, because of the increased risk of bleeding and/or vascular complications.

The current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on the management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) [2] recommend early angiography within 24 h after admission in patients with at least one of the following high-risk criteria (Table 4.7): a) rise or fall in cardiac troponin, compatible with myocardial infarction (MI), b) dynamic ST- or T-wave changes (symptomatic or silent), and c) GRACE score > 140.


Table 4.7
Risk criteria mandating for, and recommended timing of, invasive strategy in NSTE-ACS [2]















































Very highrisk criteria (within 2 h when at least one is present)

Hemodynamic instability or cardiogenic shock

Recurrent or ongoing chest pain refractory to medical treatment

Life-threatening arrhythmias or cardiac arrest

Mechanical complications of myocardial infarction

Acute heart failure

Recurrent dynamic ST- or T-wave changes, particularly with intermittent ST-elevation

Highrisk criteria (within 24 h when at least one is present)

Rise or fall in cardiac troponin compatible with myocardial infarction

Dynamic ST- or T-wave changes (symptomatic or silent)

GRACE score >140

Intermediaterisk criteria (within 72 h when at least one is present)

Diabetes mellitus

Renal insufficiency (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2)

LVEF <40 % or congestive heart failure

Early postinfarction angina

Prior PCI

Prior CABG

GRACE risk score >109 and <140

Lowrisk criteria

Any characteristics not mentioned above


NSTE-ACS non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, CABG coronary artery bypass grafting

Regarding periprocedural anticoagulation, it should be noted that rivaroxaban (and all other NOACs on average) has a half-life of 5–9 h and 7–13 h in elderly patients (Table 4.8) [4]. Whereas mild impairment of renal function is not expected to substantially prolong the elimination of (and the exposure to) rivaroxaban (and other NOACs), moderate renal impairment (i.e., creatinine clearance 30-50 ml/min) has been shown to prolong half-life (Table 4.8). In this latter situation, the recommended dose of rivaroxaban is 15 mg once daily. Periprocedural recommendations on the management of rivaroxaban should therefore be considered the same for both the settings above (Table 4.9) [5]. Also, such consideration likely applies to other NOACs, including the other factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and edoxaban, as well as the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. Controversial, but apparently limited, is the value of laboratory tests to determine the level of anticoagulation in patients treated with NOACs [4]. A specific anti-Xa level can be determined for factor Xa inhibitors, whereas specific tests may be used for the thrombin inhibitor, but the clinical consequence for the given patient (i.e., that for adjusting the dose of an intravenous anticoagulant during PCI) is currently undefined. So far, no strong correlations have been shown between the anti-Xa level and the risk for embolic, ischemic, or bleeding complications [5].
Jul 1, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Atrial Fibrillation on Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Undergoing Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access