Atrial Abnormalities


Chapter 9
Atrial Abnormalities


Introduction


This chapter examines the electrocardiographic abnormalities seen in atrial depolarization (P wave) caused by atrial enlargement and/or atrial conduction disturbances, including the rare cases of atrial dissociation. ECG changes due atrial infarction and abnormal atrial repolarization are also discussed (Zimmerman 1968; Bayés de Luna 2012).


The following issues should be taken into consideration:



  • The normal P wave is produced by the depolarization of the right atrium, followed by the left atrium, with an interval in which both atria are depolarized (Figure 9.1A).

In fact, left atrial enlargement (LAE) and interatrial blocks (IAB) present some similar ECG criteria, especially the increase in the duration of P wave. However (see Tables 9.1 and 9.2), the sensitivity of the criteria for the diagnosis of atrial enlargement is usually very low, as has been demonstrated by correlations of the ECG with imaging techniques. Due to that, the AHA/ACC/HRA published in 2009 a consensus paper (Hancock et al. 2009) giving the recommendation, that all abnormal P waves should usually be referred as “atrial abnormalities” rather than atrial enlargement, overload, hypertrophy, or block.


However, just three years later in 2012, the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology (ISHNE) published a consensus paper (Bayés de Luna et al. 2012) establishing that interatrial block was an independent and separate entity than left atrial enlargement. This was based especially on the fact that the pattern of interatrial block: (i) may be reproduced experimentally (Waldo et al. 1971; Guerra et al. 2020); (ii) may be transient (Bayés de Luna et al. 1985, 2018a); and (iii) may be recorded in the absence of atrial enlargement or necrosis (Bayés de Luna et al. 1985).


We consider that ongoing studies will probably increase in the near future the capacity of ECG to diagnose more accurately right and left atrial enlargement. The same that has happened as we will see later with the ECG criteria for different types of interatrial block that are already well established.


Therefore, although we consider that the “umbrella” term of “atrial abnormalities” may be used to encompass globally all pathological changes of P wave that include IAB and atrial enlargement, hypertrophy or dilation, we prefer in this chapter, in spite of all limitations that exist, due to low sensitivity that currently exist, to diagnose right and left atrial enlargement using these criteria, although emphasizing his low sensitivity. We hope that we can in the future increase the accuracy of this diagnosis. Later, we will comment the well‐established diagnostic criteria of all types of interatrial block (IAB).


New concepts on P wave


Along the last 10–15 years, to study the P wave has been considered very important to recognize that there are two aspects of the atria that have grant relevance for the diagnosis of P wave abnormalities. We have referring to: (i) the concept of P wave indices, that we have exposed already in Chapter 7 and (ii) the importance that has the abnormal ultrastructure of left atrium (LA) to explain the association of P wave abnormalities especially duration and morphology (A‐IAB) with atrial arrhythmias, stroke and even dementia and death (Bayés de Luna et al. 2020a, b). We will comment all that along the chapter.


Atrial enlargement


As we have commented before, due to similarities of the ECG criteria for the diagnosis of LAE and IAB, the consensus paper of AHA and HR (Hancock et al. 2009) propose the term “left atrial abnormalities” to encompass all abnormal P wave anomalies found in both processes. However, as we have said (see before), we decided to follow in this book to comment separately on the ECG criteria of LAE and IAB although having in mind that it is necessary to follow doing the research that will allow us clearly to identify the ECG criteria that assure us the diagnosis of LAE with higher sensitivity, in the presence of P wave ≥ 120 ms and if possible even with P wave <120 ms.

Schematic illustration of (Above) diagram of atrial depolarization in a normal P wave (A), right atrial enlargement (RAE) (B), and left atrial enlargement (LAE) (C). (Below) examples of the three types of P wave.

Figure 9.1 Above: diagram of atrial depolarization in a normal P wave (A), right atrial enlargement (RAE) (B), and left atrial enlargement (LAE) (C). Below: examples of the three types of P wave.


Table 9.1 Right atrial enlargement. ECG criteria with high specificity and lower sensitivity (see text)
















































ECG criteria SE% SP%
QRS criteria

  • QR or qR in V1
    Sodi‐Pallares 1956; Reeves et al. 1981*
≈15* > 95*
QRS V1 ≤ 4 mm + QRS V2/V1 ≥ 5Reeves et al. 1981* 46* 93*


  • R/S > 1 in V1
    Kaplan et al. 1994*
≈25* > 95*


  • ÂQRS > 90°
    Kaplan et al. 1994*
34* > 95*
P criteria

  • P wave in inferior leads > 2.5 mm
    Kaplan et al. 1994*
6* 100*
Tsao et al. 2008** 7** 100**


  • Positive part of P wave V1 > 1.5 mm

Kaplan et al. 1994*
17* 100*
Tsao et al. 2008** 10** 96**


  • Positive part of P wave V2 > 1.5 mm
    Kaplan et al. 1994*
33* 100*
Combined

  • Positive part of P wave in V2 > 1.5 mm + ÂQRS > + 90° + R/S > 1 in V1
    Kaplan et al. 1994*
49* 100*

*Standards of echocardiography; **standards of cardiovascular magnetic resonance.


Table 9.2 Left atrial enlargement. ECG criteria based on P wave changes with high specificity and lower sensitivity (see text)
























































ECG criteria SE% SP%


  • Morris index (Morris et al. 1964) (P terminal force in V1 mm/sec) (0.04 mm/sec) Munuswamy et al. 1984*
69* 93*
Tsao et al. 2008**

  • NYAC score
    P≥ 120 ms in I or II + Morris index (> 0.04 mm/sec) + ÂP≈0°
37** 88**
Bartell et al. 1978

  • P ≥ 120 ms in lead II + Terminal mode negative of P in V1 > 40 ms
15* 98*
Bosch et al. 1981

  • P ≥ 120 ms in lead II + Morris index (> 0.04 mm/sec)
50* 87*
Lee et al. 2007*

  • Interpeaks of P wave > 40 ms
69%* 49%*
Munuswamy et al. 1984* 15* 100*
Tsao et al. 2008**

  • P± in II, III, VF
8** 99**
Bayés de Luna et al. 1985*

  • ÂP beyond +30°
5* 100*
Tsao et al. 2008**

  • P wave duration in II or III leads ≥ 0.12 sec
8** 90**
Munuswamy et al. 1984* 33%* 88%*
Lee et al. 2007* 69%* 49%*
Tsao et al. 2008** 60%** 35%**

*Standards of echocardiography; **standards of cardiovascular magnetic resonance.


Right atrial enlargement


Associated diseases and the underlying mechanism of ECG changes


The heart diseases most frequently associated with right atrial enlargement (RAE) are congenital heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and valvular heart disease with right ventricular involvement.


It has been observed that when the right atrium enlarges, the P wave increases in voltage and becomes peaked. The duration of the P wave does not increase because although right atrial activation may be prolonged, it never exceeds the duration of left atrial activation (Figure 9.1B).


In COPD, pulmonary hypertension, and pulmonary emphysema, the P loop often points to the right and downward (vertical), although not beyond +90°. This explains why the ÂP is generally deviated to the right (P pulmonale). Thus, the projection of the vertical P loop on the frontal and horizontal plane results in a low‐voltage P wave in lead I and a peaked P wave of high voltage in II, III, and aVF (P ≥ 2.5 mm) (Figures 9.2B and 9.3B).


In some congenital heart diseases, such as Fallot’s tetralogy, the P loop points more to the left and forward. This explains why the ÂP is displaced somewhat to the left, and consequently the P wave voltage in lead III is lower than in leads I and II (P congenitale) (Figures 9.2A and 9.3C). Sometimes the voltage in leads I and II is of high amplitude (> 2 mm and peaked). The projection of this forward‐pointing P loop on the horizontal plane produces a P wave in V1 with a voltage that may be high and positive or present with a ± morphology but with a rapid inscription diphase An illustration of a wave., the opposite to that observed in left atrial enlargement (LAE) An illustration of a wave.. Exceptionally, a An illustration of a wave. pattern or even An illustration of a wave. may appear in V1, but in V2 a predominantly positive morphology is recorded. This pattern in V1 is probably caused by the very enlarged and dilated RA, which adopts a low anterior position, and the electrode of V1 faces the negative part of the P vector. The congenital heart diseases that frequently present with these P wave characteristics in V1–V2 are Ebstein’s disease, severe pulmonary stenosis, and tricuspid atresia. In the case of Ebstein’s disease, the P wave in V1 may present with a large voltage, at times only positive and peaked, while at other times biphasic with a large negative node (P + − − −). Occasionally, the P wave voltage is similar to or even greater than the QRS voltage, with the QRS usually showing an atypical right bundle branch block (RBBB) pattern (Figure 9.4).

Schematic illustration of loops of the P congenitale (A) and P pulmonale (B) waves with the morphologies in each lead.

Figure 9.2 Loops of the P congenitale (A) and P pulmonale (B) waves with the morphologies in each lead. These are determined by whether the loop projection lies on the positive or negative hemisphere of each lead.

Schematic illustration of the examples of P wave morphology and loops in the following cases: (A) normal, (B) P pulmonale, (C) P congenitale, (D) left atrial enlargement.

Figure 9.3 Examples of P wave morphology and loops in the following cases: (A) normal, (B) P pulmonale, (C) P congenitale, (D) left atrial enlargement.

Graphs depict ECG and VCG of a one-year-old girl with Ebstein’s disease.

Figure 9.4 ECG and VCG of a one‐year‐old girl with Ebstein’s disease. Note the long PR, the high‐voltage P wave hidden in the T wave (+ − − − mimicking rS morphology in V1), and the atypical right bundle branch block morphology.


Electrocardiographic diagnostic criteria: imaging correlations (Table 9.1 and 9.2)


Although many diagnostic criteria were described in the past based on anatomic correlations or electrophysiological hypotheses (Sodi‐Pallares 1956), the majority have been studied in the last 40 years based on echocardiography, especially with two‐dimensional measurements (Reeves et al. 1981; Kaplan et al. 1994). Recently, CMR standards have been introduced for this purpose (Tsao et al. 2008). Table 9.1 shows the ECG patterns that demonstrate a very high specificity for RAE based on these studies, although the sensitivity never is ≥ 50%.


QRS criteria (indirect)

These include (Table 9.1):



  • qR (QR) morphology in lead V1 (Figure 9.5). According to Sodi‐Pallares (1956), this morphology is explained by the presence of an enlarged right ventricle that is shifted forward, changing the direction of the septal vector to point forward and somewhat to the left. Consequently, lead V1 faces more toward the tail than the head of the vector and a “q” wave is recorded in V1 (Figure 9.6). In the absence of RBBB, this criterion has a very high specificity (> 95%) (Reeves et al. 1981).
  • An important difference in QRS voltage between V1 (low voltage) and V2 (high voltage) (Figures 9.5, 9.7, and 9.8). This was attributed to a very dilated right atrium located close to V1 that acts as a barrier, thereby reducing QRS voltage in this lead. A voltage of QRS in V1 ≤ 4 mm plus a V2/V1 ratio ≥ 5 has an SP = 93% and an SE = 46% (PV = 86%) for RAE (Reeves et al. 1981).
  • R/S > 1 in V1 in the absence of other causes that may increase the R voltage in V1 (seeTable 10.3). This sign has a high specificity (SP > 95 %) and low sensitivity (SE = 25 %).
    Graphs depict ECG of a 60-year-old woman with mitro-tricuspid valve disease who presented with QRS criteria for RAE and right ÂQRS with rS in V6.

    Figure 9.5 A 60‐year‐old woman with mitro‐tricuspid valve disease who presented with QRS criteria for RAE and right ÂQRS with rS in V6 (right ventricular enlargement).

    Schematic illustration of the more anterior location of the right ventricle and in right ventricular enlargement can explain how the normal first vector is seen as negative in V1.

    Figure 9.6 The more anterior location of the right ventricle that can be seen in right ventricular enlargement can explain how the normal first vector is seen as negative in V1.

    Graphs depict a 52-year-old woman with double mitral and double tricuspid lesions. The difference between the very low QRS voltage in V1 and the high voltage in V2 is striking.

    Figure 9.7 A 52‐year‐old woman with double mitral and double tricuspid lesions. The difference between the very low QRS voltage in V1 and the high voltage in V2 is striking.

    Schematic illustration of a patient with chronic cor pulmonale and an acute respiratory failure.

    Figure 9.8 A patient with chronic cor pulmonale and an acute respiratory failure. A tall, peaked P wave (B) that did not previously exist (A) appeared, disappearing a few days later (C). Observe how the ST‐T negativity in inferior leads and the negativity of the T wave increase in V1 and V2 in the B tracing.


  • ÂQRS90° (RS in lead I) has high SP (> 95%) and a moderate SE (34%).

P wave criteria (direct)

These include (Kaplan et al. 1994; Tsao et al. 2008):



  • P voltage > 2.5 mm in inferior leads has a low sensitivity (< 10%) but it is highly specific (100%).
  • Positive voltage of P in V1 > 1.5 mm has a great specificity (> 95%) with low sensitivity (10%).
  • Positive voltage of P in V2 > 1.5 mm also has a high specificity (100%) with slightly higher sensitivity (SE = 33%).

Combining QRS and P criteria

The combined criteria PV2 > 1.5 mm + ÂQRS > 90° + R/S in V1 > 1 have a correct sensitivity (≈50%) with specificity of 100% (Kaplan et al. 1994).

Graphs depict a 62-year-old woman with double mitral and double tricuspid lesions in congestive heart failure and with a history of at least 10 years of atrial fibrillation.

Figure 9.9 A 62‐year‐old woman with double mitral and double tricuspid lesions in congestive heart failure and with a history of at least 10 years of atrial fibrillation. With this rhythm, “f” waves were not seen in any lead. Unexpectedly, she changed to a sinoatrial rhythm with a PR of 0.26 sec (in atrial fibrillation and a small amount of digitalis, there was also an important AV block). The “P” wave was narrow and only visible in V1 and V2; in the other leads it appeared to be a junctional rhythm. The fact that the P wave is ± in V1 practically eliminated the possibility of ectopic rhythm.

Graphs depict (A) A 45-year-old patient with subacute cor pulmonale. Note the right atrial enlargement (RAE) with the right ÂP. Some days later (B), the ÂP is directed to the left, returning to the right in a third ECG (C) recorded at 15 days. This example shows how atrial aberration may mask the P wave of clear RAE.

Figure 9.10 (A) A 45‐year‐old patient with subacute cor pulmonale. Note the right atrial enlargement (RAE) with the right ÂP. Some days later (B), the ÂP is directed to the left, returning to the right in a third ECG (C) recorded at 15 days. This example shows how atrial aberration may mask the P wave of clear RAE.


False positive and false negative diagnoses of right atrial enlargement


The ECG diagnosis of RAE may be very difficult to reach for the following reasons:



  • The voltage of the P wave is strongly influenced by extracardiac factors, which may result in increases (hypoxia, sympathetic overdrive, etc.) (false positive) (Figure 9.8) or decreases in voltage (emphysema, other barrier factors, atrial fibrosis, etc.), (false negative) (Bayés de Luna et al. 1978a) (Figure 9.9).
  • The presence of associated atrial block may result in the transient or permanent disappearance of the ECG criteria for right atrial enlargement (false negative) (Figure 9.10).
  • On the other hand, a high‐voltage P wave may be seen in patients with exclusively left heart pathology and possible left atrial enlargement (false positive) (pseudo‐P‐pulmonale) (Chou and Helm 1965).

These are some of the reasons why changes in the atriogram are generally not very sensitive (many false negative) for the diagnosis of RAE. Although there are some factors that increase the incidence of false positives, they are usually fewer and therefore the specificity of ECG criteria for RAE is much higher.


Left atrial enlargement (Table 9.2)


Associated diseases and underlying mechanisms of ECG changes


In the past, the most common associated diseases were rheumatic heart diseases, particularly mitral stenosis.In fact, the characteristic bimodal P wave of left atrial enlargement (LAE), seen especially in lead II, has been called “P mitrale.” However, this type of P wave is currently seen in the presence of other causes of LAE, such as cardiomyopathies, especially dilated cardiomyopathy, arterial hypertension, and ischemic heart disease.


The P wave seen in LAE usually has a longer than normal duration due to long distance that the stimulus has to cover as a consequence of the dilated LA more than to the hypertrophy of the LA mass itself (Josephson et al. 1977; Velury and Spodick 1994). The enlarged left atrium first expands toward the back, so the vector of LAE points backward (Figure 9.11). Moreover, because of all that, the P loop is longer and often acquires a figure‐of‐eight shape in the horizontal plane (HP). All that explains that the negative component of P wave is greater than the positive, and therefore, the P wave in lead V1, in case of LA enlargement when the electrode of V1 is well located, usually has a positive–negative morphology with a prominent negative component that exceeds the positive component An illustration of a wave. (Figure 9.12). This is not usually the case in the presence of partial IAB without LA enlargement. However, in cases of bad location of the electrode in V1, too high, a P wave, is recorded with false final negative morphology in the absence of LA enlargement. Finally, if exist associated advanced interatrial block (see later) the P wave is be positive–negative in leads II, III, and VF, and in these cases, LAE is practically always present.


An abrupt dilatation of the left atrium, which occurs in acute pulmonary edema, for example, may cause +/−P wave morphology in V1. This disappears when the clinical situation improves (Heikila and Luomanmaki 1970) (Figure 9.13).

Schematic illustration of P loop of left atrial enlargement and the morphology in various leads, determined by whether the loop projection lies in the respective positive or negative hemifield of each lead.

Figure 9.11 P loop of left atrial enlargement and the morphology in various leads, determined by whether the loop projection lies in the respective positive or negative hemifield of each lead (see text).

Schematic illustration of (A) P wave morphology in V1 and P loop in the case of left atrial enlargement, and (B) is a normal case or in case of isolated partial IAB.

Figure 9.12 (A) P wave morphology in V1 and P loop in the case of left atrial enlargement, and (B) is a normal case or in case of isolated partial IAB.

Schematic illustration of (Above) An example of pulmonary edema in the acute phase of myocardial infarction.

Figure 9.13 Above: An example of pulmonary edema in the acute phase of myocardial infarction (see X‐ray below). Three days and 12 hours later, when the clinical improvement was evident, the ECG showed a reduction of the negative P mode in V1. This can be properly evaluated only when the V1 lead is taken at the same site. In the hospital environment, this can be ensured by marking the electrode site on the patient’s skin.


ECG diagnostic criteria: Imaging correlations (Table 9.2)


Historically, the majority of ECG criteria was based on necropsic or radiological correlations. Today, they are based on the standards of echocardiography and, more recently, CMR. (Josephson et al. 1977; Bartell et al. 1978; Bosch et al. 1981; Miller et al. 1983; Munuswamy et al. 1984; Bayés de Luna et al. 1985; Hazen et al. 1991; Tsao et al. 2008; Troung et al. 2011). Recently, it has been demonstrated by echo‐speckle tracking echo, that this technique may be a surrogate of CMR (Montserrat et al. 2015) to demonstrate the abnormal fibrotic ultrastructure of LA wall, and even the ECG pattern of A‐IAB may also be a surrogate of decrease of LA strain, and that means that the diagnosis of A‐IAB by ECG is an equivalent to the presence of fibrosis in the LA wall (Lacalzada‐Almeida et al. 2019) (Ciuffo et al. 2020).


As we have already commented, the P wave criteria for diagnosis of LAE have low sensitivity. Having this in mind, we will now comment on the ECG criteria of LAE.



  • Criteria based on changes of P wave The imaging–ECG correlations have demonstrated that the best ECG criteria for LAE are the following (see Table 9.2):
  • P wave morphology in V1(P wave indices) (see Chapter 7). A negative mode in V1 with a duration ≥ 40 ms by itself is a sign frequently seen in LAE and has a relatively good SE and high SP, according the paper of Morris (Morris et al. 1964). The Morris index has a better predictive value. This index is obtained from the product of the amplitude of the negative P wave component in V1 (in mm) and the duration of this component (in ms). A Morris index ≥ −40 mm × ms 40 ms is very specific for LAE (Figure 9.14). In practice, this means that the terminal portion of the P wave in V1 has a depth of at least one small box in the recording paper (−1.0 mm = 0.1 mV) and a duration of at least 0.04 sec. This index is very rarely seen in normal populations (SP ≈ 90%) but the SE usually is very low. In Morris paper (1964) the SE was relatively high because all were patients with value heart disease and we are not sure about the location of electrode of V1.

In fact, recently it has been demonstrated (see before) that the morphology of Ptf V1 depends very much on the location of the electrodes of V1 (Rasmussen et al. 2019). If is too high (3rd of 2nd ICS), the morphology of P ± with great negative component is the rule. Also, the P in V1 may present a ± pattern or even all negative in cases of pectus excavatum, and other thoracic abnormalities. This may explain the discordant results obtained as a precursor of stroke. Due to that, as we are doing an observational trial to clarify this problem (Sajeev et al. 2019).



  • The criteria of the NYHAC score (duration of P wave in II ≥ 120 ms + ÂP in FP close to 0° + Morris index ≥ −40 mm × ms) have a high SP (> 95%) but the SE is much lower (< 20%) (Bartell et al. 1978).
  • The combination of P ≥ 120 ms in lead II + negative P mode duration in V1 ≥ 40 ms has a SE of 50% with a good SP (> 85%) (Bosch et al. 1981).
  • The combination of P ≥ 120 ms in lead II plus a Morris index > 0.04 mm/sec has a high SP but a low SE (Lee et al. 2007).
  • The distance between two peaks of P wave > 0.04 sec, with the second mode being taller than the first, is very specific (≈ 100%) but not sensitive (Munuswamy et al. 1984).
  • A positive–negative morphology of the P wave in leads II, III, and VF (±) with a duration ≥ than 0.12 sec, the key criteria for advanced interatrial block with retrograde activation of the left atrium (see later), is a very specific criterion for LAE > 90% globally and 100% in valvular heart disease and cardiomyopathies, but has a very low sensitivity (< 5%) (Bayés de Luna et al. 1985) (Figures 9.16, 9.18 and 9.19). If present, it is a clear marker of AF in the future (Bayés de Luna et al. 1988) and even of stroke (Escobar‐Robledo et al. 2018). However, as commented, its sensitivity for LAE is low (5%) (Table 9.2).
    Diagram contrasting normal and abnormal negative components of the P wave in V1. When the value calculated using the width in seconds and the height in millimeters of the negative mode exceeds 40 mm × ms, it is considered abnormal.

    Figure 9.14 Diagram contrasting normal and abnormal negative components of the P wave in V1. When the value calculated using the width in seconds and the height in millimeters of the negative mode exceeds 40 mm × ms, it is considered abnormal.


  • The P wave duration (P wave index) in leads I, II, and/or III in LA enlargement is ≥ 0.12 sec, and is generally bimodal. In some echocardiographic correlations, this criterion is very specific (88%) for LA enlargement, but the sensitivity is 33% (Munuswamy et al. 1984). In contrast, Lee et al. (2007) used two‐dimensional echocardiography measurements to show different results (higher SE = 69%, lower SP = 49%) that were similar to those found by Tsao et al. (2008) using the CMR correlation (high SE = 60% and low SP = 35%). This is probably associated with the type of population used in the different studies. In the series studied by Tsao et al. (2008) (CMR), the patients probably present with isolated interatrial blocks more frequently, which decreases the specificity and increases the sensitivity of this criterion. The same is found in the series presented by Lee et al. (2007) (2D echo). The frequent presence of partial interatrial block without LA enlargement may explain this low SP (< 50%). However, since isolated partial interatrial bloc usually does not present with an important negative mode of the P wave in V1 (Figure 9.12), when we consider the association of P duration ≥ 120 ms + Morris index, or the Morris index alone, as criterion for LAE, we obtain much higher specificity (see Table 9.2). However, the value of Morris index is questionable (see other parts of this chapter).
Oct 9, 2021 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Atrial Abnormalities

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access