Summary
Background
The adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) protein plays an important role in the first step of the reverse cholesterol transport system.
Aims
We studied the association of four polymorphisms in the ABCA1 gene (G1051A, G2706A, G2868A and –565C/T) with lipid profile and coronary artery disease.
Methods
Overall, 316 Tunisian patients underwent coronary angiography. Genotyping was performed using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Lipid and apolipoprotein concentrations were measured.
Results
Only carriers of the G2706A allele were associated with a decreased risk of significant stenosis (odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22–0.92, p = 0.029), without pronounced effects on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. This protective effect was significant in smokers and diabetes. Carriers of the G1051A allele were associated only with increased concentrations of HDL cholesterol ( p = 0.032). G2868A and –565C/T did not show any association with lipids or risk of significant stenosis. When ABCA1 polymorphisms were combined in haplotypes possessing G1051A, G2706A, G2868A and –565C/T, (AAGC) seemed to be most protective against significant stenosis (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.29–0.96, p = 0.048) whereas (GGAT) was probably the most atherogenic (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03–1.56, p = 0.025).
Conclusion
Only the G2706A allele seems to be associated with a reduced risk of significant stenosis without important modification of HDL-cholesterol concentration, and appears to be more protective for smokers and diabetic patients. We found that (AAGC) seems to be a protective haplotype whereas (GGAT) has an atherogenic effect in a Tunisian population.
Résumé
Contexte
Le transporteur adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette A1 (ABCA1) joue un rôle important dans le transport inverse du cholestérol.
Objectifs
Étude de l’association de quatre polymorphismes (G1051A, G2706A, G2868A, –565C/T) au niveau du gène ABCA1 avec le profil lipidique et la sténose coronaire dans notre population d’étude.
Méthodes
Nous avons recruté 316 patients, documentés par coronarographie. Le génotypage a été réalisé par polymérisation en chaîne suivie de digestion par enzymes de restriction. Les paramètres lipidiques et apolipoprotéiques ont été dosés.
Résultats
Seulement l’allèle G2706A a été associé à une diminution du risque coronarien (OR 0,658, 95 %IC 0,22–0,92, p = 0,029), sans effets prononcés sur HDL-C. Cet effet protecteur a été surtout significatif chez les fumeurs et les diabétiques. Les polymorphismes G2868A et –565C/T n’ont montré aucune association avec le profil lipidique ou avec la sténose coronaire. L’allèle G1051A a été seulement associé à une augmentation de HDL-C ( p = 0,032). En combinant les polymorphismes ABCA1 (G1051A, G2706A, G2868A, –565C/T) en haplotypes (AAGC), semble être l’haplotype le plus protecteur contre la SCS (OR 0,5, 95 %IC 0,29–0,96 ; p = 0,048) tandis que (GGAT) serait le plus athérogène (OR 1,26, 95 %IC 1,03–1,56, p = 0,025).
Conclusion
L’allèle G2706A semble être associé au risque réduit de sténose coronaire sans modification importante de HDL-C. Cet effet protecteur est plus prononcé chez les fumeurs et les diabétiques. Parmi, les AAGC semblent être protecteur et (GGAT) serait athérogène dans notre population d’étude.
Background
Low concentrations of plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) are associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic complications . An important mechanism underlying the antiatherogenic properties of high-density lipoprotein is its role in reverse cholesterol transport, the pathway that facilitates the transfer of cholesterol from peripheral tissues back to the liver . The adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) has been identified as the mediator of the initial step of reverse cholesterol transport because it facilitates the efflux of phospholipids and cholesterol from peripheral cells to lipid-free apolipoprotein AI (ApoAI), creating nascent high-density lipoprotein particles . The human gene for ABCA1 is composed of 50 exons spanning 149 kb of genomic sequence. It has been mapped to the region q31 of chromosome 9 and encodes a 2261 amino acid protein with a predicted molecular weight of 220 kDa. Human ABCA1 is primarily expressed in placenta, liver, lung, adrenal glands and foetal tissues .
Although HDL-C concentration is strongly influenced by environmental factors , research has been focused increasingly on genetic causes leading to reduced HDL-C. Deficiency of ABCA1 has been identified as the molecular cause of Tangier disease, a rare condition with very low concentrations of HDL-C, excessive accumulation of cholesteryl esters in tissue macrophages and the reticuloendothelial system, with an increased risk of premature coronary disease . Many common genetic variations of ABCA1 have been reported to be associated with variations in serum lipid concentrations (particularly HDL-C) and may also be associated with coronary artery disease risk, but this association is still controversial among several populations .
To our knowledge, there are no published data on the screening of the ABCA1 gene or on its association with significant coronary stenosis (SCS) among the Tunisian population.
In this study, four variants identified in ABCA1 gene (G1051A [rs2230806], G2706A [rs2066718], G2868A [rs4149312] and –565C/T [rs2422493]) were screened in a Tunisian population.
Materials and methods
Study population
Sampling procedures for this study have been described previously in detail . Briefly, the study comprised 316 patients who underwent coronary angiography because of myocardial infarction ( n = 113), angina ( n = 169), thoracic pain ( n = 18) or heart failure ( n = 16) in the Cardiology Department at Sahloul University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia. Patients were subdivided into two groups: those with SCS and those without SCS. SCS patients were those who had significant coronary artery stenosis, which was defined as a luminal narrowing of ≥ 50% in at least one major coronary artery. Patients without SCS were those without any significant coronary artery stenosis (< 50%).
Data on lifestyle factors were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire, which included questions about personal history, presence of disease, drug intake (if any), cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption. Patients taking lipid-lowering drugs were excluded. Diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting glucose > 7 mmol/L or currently receiving antidiabetic medication. The smoking status of an individual was assigned ‘yes’ if they were smoking currently or had given up < 3 months previously. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure > 140/90 mmHg or currently on antihypertensive medication. Dyslipidaemia was defined as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration ≥ 4.1 mmol/L and/or HDL-C concentration ≤ 1 mmol/L and/or triglyceride concentration ≥ 1.71 mmol/L. Informed consent was taken from all the participants. The study was approved by the local medical ethics committee.
Measurement of serum lipids and apolipoproteins
After overnight fasting and before coronary angiography, blood was collected from each subject. Serum total cholesterol, triglyceride and HDL-C concentrations were determined by a standard method using the Synchrom CX7 Clinical System (Beckman, Fullerton, CA, USA). LDL-C concentration was calculated using the Friedewald formula when the triglyceride concentration was < 4 mmol/L; otherwise, LDL-C concentration was measured directly using the Synchrom CX7 Clinical System (Beckman, Fullerton, CA, USA). Serum ApoAI and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) concentrations were determined using the IMMAGE Immunochemistry System (Beckman, Fullerton, CA, USA), based on immunonephelometric quantitation. ApoB/ApoAI and total cholesterol/HDL-C ratios were calculated. We considered elevation of these atherogenicity ratios as > 0.86 and > 4.5, respectively, and hypoApoAI as ≤ 0.9 g/L.
DNA extraction and ABCA1 genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-treated whole blood samples using a salting-out method . The genotypes for each ABCA1 polymorphism (G1051A [R219K], G2706A [V771M], G2868A [V825I] and –565C/T [–477C/T]) were determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. The G1051A and –565C/T polymorphisms were genotyped following Assmann and Nofer ; the G2706A and G2868A polymorphisms were genotyped as described by Miller and Miller . The polymerase chain reaction was carried out using a deoxyribonucleic acid thermal cycler (LP×2 Thermal Cycler, Thermo Electron Corporation, Milford, NE, USA). After initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, the polymerase chain reaction was carried out for 35 cycles, each cycle comprising a denaturation at 95 °C for 45 s, an annealing temperature as described previously [1,2] for 45 s and 72 °C for 45 s, with a final extension time of 7 min at 72 °C. Shortly, each polymerase chain reaction product of G1051A, G2706A, G2868A and –565C/T polymorphisms was digested using StyI (2U), BsaAI (2U), BsaI (3U) and AciI (2U), respectively. Polymerase chain reaction products and the digested products were resolved by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 16.0 for Windows. The biological variables were compared by one-way analysis of variance then by Student’s t -test or Fisher’s exact test and their values were reported as means ± standard deviations. A chi-square analysis was performed to determine the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium of the polymorphism studied in both groups with one degree of freedom. Genotype and allele frequencies were compared by a chi-square test. Pairwise linkage disequilibrium coefficients were expressed as D’, which is the ratio of unstandardized coefficient to its minimal/maximal value, and estimated using a single nucleotide polymorphism analyser programme . Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated as a measure of the association of the each ABCA1 genotype with the phenotype. For each OR, two-tailed p values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated; p was considered to be significant when it was < 0.05. Adjusted ORs for potential confounders were determined using logistic regression analysis and corresponding p values were reported.
Results
Population characteristics
Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study population are given in Table 1 . Patients with SCS had significantly lower HDL-C ( p = 0.040) and ApoAI (p = 0.009) concentrations, significantly higher triglyceride concentrations ( p = 0.022) and a higher ApoB/ApoAI ratio ( p = 0.036) than patients without SCS. All variables with a p value < 0.25 between the two studied groups were considered as confounding factors for further OR adjustment.
Characteristic | With SCS ( n = 212) | Without SCS ( n = 104) | p |
---|---|---|---|
Sex ratio (men/women) | 1.97 | 1.26 | 0.010 |
Age (years) | 60.6 ± 10.6 | 59.4 ± 11.9 | 0.38 |
Smoker | 120 (56.6) | 47 (45.2) | 0.013 |
Diabetic | 73 (34.4) | 23 (22.1) | 0.001 |
Hypertension | 97 (45.7) | 46 (44.2) | 0.35 |
History of myocardial infarction | 91 (42.9) | 13 (12.5) | < 0.001 |
Dyslipidaemia | 33 (15.6) | 9 (8.6) | 0.027 |
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.029 ± 1.192 | 5.025 ± 1.087 | 0.970 |
Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.614 ± 1.117 | 1.340 ± 0.647 | 0.022 |
HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.961 ± 0.283 | 1.030 ± 0.276 | 0.040 |
LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.440 ± 1.167 | 3.330 ± 1.039 | 0.37 |
ApoAI (g/L) | 1.160 ± 0.379 | 1.290 ± 0.437 | 0.009 |
ApoB (g/L) | 1.153 ± 0.376 | 1.110 ± 0.413 | 0.46 |
ApoB/ApoAI | 1.057 ± 0.493 | 0.920 ± 0.290 | 0.036 |
Total cholesterol/HDL-C | 5.630 ± 2.040 | 5.410 ± 1.890 | 0.43 |
ABCA1 genotypes
The prevalence of the four ABCA1 polymorphisms (G1051A, G2706A, G2868A and –565C/T) was evaluated in 316 subjects. Each of these polymorphisms was found to be in the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Genotype and allele frequencies are shown in Table 2 . The prevalence of homozygous individuals for the G2706 allele was significantly higher ( p = 0.009) in the SCS group. No mutated genotype for this polymorphism was found in the group without SCS. No significant difference was observed in genotype frequencies between the two groups for the other three polymorphisms. No allele frequency difference was observed between patients with versus without SCS for any polymorphism.
ABCA1 SNPs | With SCS ( n = 212) | Without SCS ( n = 104) | p | With SCS | Without SCS | p | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G1051A | GG | GA | AA | GG | GA | AA | 0.68 | A-allele frequency | 0.95 | |
% | 40 | 47.7 | 12.3 | 35.6 | 50.9 | 13.5 | 0.64 | 0.61 | ||
G2706A | GG | GA | AA | GG | GA | AA | 0.009 | A-allele frequency | 0.89 | |
% | 91 | 8.5 | 0.5 | 80 | 20 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.1 | ||
G2868A | GG | GA | AA | GG | GA | AA | 0.77 | A-allele frequency | 0.98 | |
% | 76.9 | 22.6 | 0.5 | 79.8 | 19.2 | 1 | 0.12 | 0.11 | ||
–565C\T | CC | CT | TT | CC | CT | TT | 0.60 | T-allele frequency | 0.95 | |
% | 24.5 | 52.9 | 22.6 | 27.9 | 54.8 | 17.3 | 0.49 | 0.45 |