Aortic valve disease and aortic valve surgery



Introduction


One of the two semilunar valves of the heart, the aortic valve lies between the aorta and the left ventricle, at the end of the left ventricular outflow tract. Efficient functioning of the aortic valve plays a vital role in maintaining adequate cardiac function. This chapter explores the anatomy and physiology of the aortic valve, as well as describing the pathological processes responsible for diseases of the aortic valve. Investigations and treatment of aortic valve disease are subsequently discussed, to provide the reader with a broad overview of the management of aortic valve disease.


Surgical anatomy of the aortic valve


The aortic valve sits at the level of the opening of the left ventricle into the ascending aorta. The valve consists of three cusps, referred to as leaflets, which are semilunar in shape and attach to the annulus of the valve. At the central part of the valve, where the leaflets meet (coapt), the edges of the leaflets are slightly thickened. There is a nodule on the tip of each leaflet, known as the Nodule of Arantius.


While the normal aortic valve consists of three leaflets (known as tricuspid), a small proportion of the population (around 1–2%) have a bicuspid aortic valve, which is made up of only two cusps. Between the leaflets and the wall of the ascending aorta are three distinct pocketlike dilatations, known as the sinuses of Valsalva. The leaflets of the aortic valve are attached to the annulus, just under these sinuses. The left and right coronary arteries arise from two of the sinuses; the three sinuses of Valsalva are therefore individually known as the left, right and non-coronary sinuses. Accordingly, the three leaflets of the aortic valve are also referred to as the left, right and non-coronary cusps, depending on their relationship with their respective sinuses of Valsalva (Hinton & Yutzey 2011; Moorjani, Viola & Ohri 2011).


There are some significant structures that lie near the aortic valve and it is important to be aware of these structures during aortic valve surgery. The anterior leaflet of the mitral valve lies beneath the left and non-coronary cusps of the aortic valve. Within the atrial septum, lying beneath the commissure of the non-coronary and right coronary cusps, is the atrioventricular node, a crucial part of the conduction system of the heart. The thin, membranous part of the ventricular septum also lies beneath the right and non-coronary cusps (Drake, Vogl & Mitchell 2015).


Aetiology and pathogenesis


Aortic stenosis


Aortic stenosis is the most common heart valve disease in adults, and the third most common cause of cardiovascular disease in adults after hypertension and coronary artery disease. The three most common causes of aortic stenosis are calcific degeneration of a tricuspid valve, calcific degeneration of a congenitally abnormal valve (unicuspid or bicuspid) and rheumatic valve disease. There are several other less common causes of aortic stenosis, including Lupus, Paget’s disease and hyperuricemia (Olszowska 2011).


While calcification of the aortic valve is predominantly seen as a degenerative condition which progresses with advanced age, there are multiple other risk factors for the development of aortic valve stenosis. These include hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, smoking, male gender and diabetes mellitus. A genetic component has also been postulated, following the discovery of associations between aortic stenosis and certain specific chromosomes. As these risk factors broadly resemble the risk factors for atherosclerosis, aortic stenosis is also recognised as an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality.


Calcific aortic valve disease manifests as thickening of the aortic valve leaflets and subsequent narrowing of the valve orifice. While previously thought to represent two separate entities, aortic valvular sclerosis and aortic valve stenosis are now recognised as being individual stages of the overall spectrum of calcific aortic valve disease. Initial calcific degeneration of the aortic valve is labelled as aortic valve sclerosis and is characterised by microscopic calcium deposits and leaflet thickening with no macroscopic evidence of disease and no change to the function of the valve leaflets (Thaden, Nkomo & Enriquez-Sarano 2014).


There are three simultaneously occurring pathological processes responsible for ongoing degeneration of the already sclerosed aortic valve. Mechanical stress and subsequent endothelial dysfunction lead to lipid accumulation, inflammation and calcification (due to alteration of the extracellular matrix). As the valve becomes increasingly diseased, the leaflets become less functional and the central orifice is further narrowed.


The degenerative aetiology in aortic stenosis is by far the most common, making up almost 90% of cases. Around 80–85% are tricuspid valves and the remaining 5–10% are the congenitally abnormal (predominantly bicuspid) valves (Roberts 1970, 1992). Bicuspid aortic valve is found in 1–2% of the general population and is most commonly caused by a congenital fusion of the left and right leaflets (Shabana 2014).


Rheumatic aortic valve disease is responsible for around 10% of all aortic stenosis and is more common in the developing world (Lung & Vahanian 2014). The primary pathology in rheumatic aortic valve disease is adhesion and fusion of the commissures between the leaflets, leading to a narrowed central orifice. As the aortic valve becomes more narrowed, there is increased obstruction to left ventricular emptying. Under normal circumstances the pressure in the left ventricle is greater than the pressure in the aorta during ventricular ejection. This means that the gradient across the aortic valve is usually very low. However, as the degree of aortic stenosis (and hence valve orifice narrowing) progresses, the gradient across the valve increases, as the left ventricle (LV) works harder to overcome the increased resistance encountered at the aortic valve. This obstruction to the outflow of the left ventricle causes pressure overload within the ventricle.


The ventricular response to pressure overload is compensatory hypertrophy of the muscle of the LV wall. This aims to preserve systolic function by maintaining normal wall stress. However, over time, the LV will become less compliant. Myocardial oxygen demand will increase, while coronary perfusion decreases; eventually the ventricle will fail, leading to the clinical manifestation of heart failure.


Aortic regurgitation


Aortic regurgitation is caused by the leaflets of the aortic valve failing to coapt appropriately. This lack of apposition of the valve leaflets causes the valve to become incompetent, allowing blood to regurgitate back into the left ventricular cavity. The underlying cause of the regurgitation can be either a primary leaflet abnormality, or abnormality of the aortic root and/or ascending aorta (Moorjani, Viola & Ohri 2011).


The most common causes of leaflet abnormalities resulting in aortic regurgitation include senile calcification, bicuspid aortic valve, rheumatic fever and infective endocarditis. Causes of aortic regurgitation due to aortic pathology include aortic dissection, syphilis, connective tissue disorders and annulo-aortic ectasia, which is defined as idiopathic root dilatation (Maurer 2006). In the western world, degenerative AR (either bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valve) is the most commonly encountered cause of aortic regurgitation, accounting for around two-thirds of all cases. As the aortic annulus dilates, the leaflets fail to coapt and can also begin to prolapse. In bicuspid aortic valves, which comprise approximately 15% of aortic regurgitation cases, it is the fused cusp which begins to prolapse. This combination of leaflet prolapses, and annular dilatation leads to significant regurgitation (Robicsek et al. 2004).


The development of aortic regurgitation can either be acute or chronic. In acute aortic regurgitation (which usually occurs secondary to infective endocarditis or acute aortic dissection), there is a sudden increase in end-diastolic pressure secondary to volume overload. This increased pressure leads to a decrease in cardiac output.


Chronic aortic regurgitation allows the heart to deploy compensatory mechanisms to cope with the increased volume of blood in the left ventricle. As the end-diastolic volume increases, the mitral valve will close earlier, to limit the amount of blood flowing forwards into the left ventricle. However, this manoeuvre will increase the volume of blood in the left atrium and over time this will lead to increased pulmonary pressures and subsequent pulmonary oedema. To reduce the end-diastolic pressure, the LV cavity will gradually dilate, maintaining compliance. The increased volume of the cavity will increase the LV stroke volume, compensating for the regurgitant blood and maintaining the cardiac output. The increased heart rate will also reduce ventricular filling time and limit the amount of time available for blood to regurgitate back into the LV, in an attempt to reduce the end-diastolic volume and pressure. However, over time as the regurgitation worsens, the LV will eventually decompensate, leading to the clinical manifestation of heart failure (Maurer 2006).


Symptoms and diagnosis


Aortic stenosis


Patients with aortic stenosis may remain asymptomatic for many years despite continuing subclinical deterioration of the valve, although the duration of this asymptomatic phase varies. During this period, there is a risk of sudden cardiac death of only about 1% per year (Taniguchi et al. 2018). However, in symptomatic patients with AS, the incidence of sudden death is very high (Taniguchi et al. 2018). As the state of the valve continues to deteriorate, patients begin to develop symptoms. The principal symptoms of aortic stenosis are related to cerebral ischaemia, myocardial ischaemia and failure of the LV.


Cerebral ischaemia due to aortic stenosis manifests as dizziness or light-headedness, classified as pre-syncopal episodes. In severe cases true syncope is observed and it is well recognised as a poor prognostic factor. As myocardial hypertrophy continues, and coronary perfusion of the myocardium worsens, myocardial demand outstrips supply, leading to myocardial ischaemia and classical symptoms of angina pectoris. As the left ventricle starts to fail, the patient eventually develops exertional dyspnoea. The development of symptoms in aortic stenosis correlates with a reduced life expectancy. The average life expectancy of a symptomatic patient with severe aortic stenosis is around two to three years (Baumgartner et al. 2017).


Clinical examination will reveal an ejection systolic murmur, best heard at the level of the 2nd intercostal space, at the right parasternal edge with radiation of the murmur to the carotid arteries. A small volume and slow rising pulse (pulsus parvus et tardus) may be felt when assessing peripheral and central pulses.


Any clinical suspicion of valvular pathology must be investigated with a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). Once the diagnosis of aortic stenosis has been established, the echocardiogram will estimate the peak and mean gradients across the valve (measured in mmHg), the forward velocity across the valve (measured in m/s) and the valve orifice area (measured in cm2). This allows the degree of aortic stenosis to be classified as mild, moderate or severe. Assessment of the ventricular function and the dimensions of the aortic root and ascending aorta should also be part of the TTE study. If the TTE fails to provide definitive results, additional forms of imaging such as transoesophageal echocardiogram or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scanning should be considered (Baumgartner et al. 2017).


Coronary angiography prior to aortic valve surgery should also be undertaken in the following scenarios (class I evidence) (Baumgartner et al. 2017):


Any history of cardiovascular disease


Any risk factors for cardiovascular disease


Suspected myocardial ischaemia


LV systolic dysfunction


Men over 40 years of age


Post-menopausal women.


The criteria for diagnosing severe aortic stenosis are listed in Table 7.1 (Moorjani, Viola & Ohri 2011).


Table 7.1: Criteria for diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis















Echocardiographic parameter Value
Aortic valve area <1cm2
Mean pressure gradient >40mmHg
Peak velocity >4m/s

Aortic regurgitation


Due to the compensatory mechanisms outlined above, patients with chronic aortic regurgitation often remain asymptomatic for many years. As the LV starts to decompensate and the end-diastolic pressure rises, symptoms of exertional dyspnoea develop. Decreased aortic diastolic pressure (due to regurgitation) leads to decreased coronary perfusion in the presence of increased oxygen demand, due to myocardial wall hypertrophy. This manifests clinically as angina pectoris. In the case of acute aortic regurgitation, the sudden onset of high end-diastolic pressure in a non-dilated and non-compliant ventricle leads swiftly to pulmonary oedema and significant dyspnoea (Maurer 2006; Baumgartner et al. 2017).


Clinical examination will reveal a diastolic murmur, best heard at the level of the 4th intercostal space, at the left parasternal edge. The increased forward stroke volume and diastolic flow reversal leads to several clinical signs that can be elicited on examination (Maurer 2006; Moorjani, Viola & Ohri 2011). These include:


Corrigan’s pulse (collapsing pulse): high amplitude and abruptly collapsing pulse


Widened pulse pressure


Corrigan’s sign: visible pulsation of the carotid arteries


De Musset’s sign: visible head bobbing with each heartbeat


Quincke’s sign: pulsation of the capillary nail beds


Duroziez’s sign: femoral artery bruit.


Any clinical suspicion of valvular pathology must be investigated with a transthoracic echocardiogram. Once the diagnosis of aortic regurgitation has been established, the echocardiogram will estimate the size and appearances of the regurgitant jet across the valve, as well as the regurgitant volume (measured in ml) and the regurgitant fraction (measured as a percentage of the stroke volume). This allows the degree of aortic regurgitation to be classified as mild, moderate or severe. Left ventricular dimensions, both end-diastolic and end-systolic diameter should be measured. Assessment of the ventricular function and the dimensions of the aortic root and ascending aorta should also be part of the TTE study. If the TTE fails to provide equivocal results, additional forms of imaging such as transoesophageal echocardiogram or cardiac MRI scanning should be considered (Baumgartner et al. 2017).


Coronary angiography prior to aortic valve surgery should also be undertaken in the following scenarios (class I evidence) (Baumgartner et al. 2017):


Any history of cardiovascular disease


Any risk factors for cardiovascular disease


Suspected myocardial ischaemia


LV systolic dysfunction


Men over 40 years of age


Post-menopausal women.


Criteria for diagnosis of severe aortic regurgitation are listed in Table 7.2 below (Moorjani, Viola & Ohri 2011):


Table 7.2: Criteria for diagnosis of severe aortic regurgitation
























Echocardiographic parameter Value
Vena contracta >0.6cm
Pressure half time <200ms
Regurgitant volume >60ml/Beat
Regurgitant fraction >50%
Effective regurgitant orifice area >0.3cm2
Jet width (LVOT diameter) >65%

Indications for surgery


According to the 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease, there is evidence for intervention for aortic valve disease in the following scenarios (Baumgartner et al. 2017).


In aortic stenosis:


Symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (class I)


Asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular ejection fraction <50% not due to another cause (class I)


Asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing additional cardiac surgery (class I)


Asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and an abnormal exercise test clearly related to aortic stenosis (class I)


Asymptomatic patients with moderate aortic stenosis undergoing additional cardiac surgery (class IIa)


Asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and an abnormal exercise test demonstrating a decrease in baseline blood pressure (class IIa)


Asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis, preserved LVEF and a normal exercise test should be considered if the surgical risk is low and one of the following additional factors is present (class IIa):


Peak velocity >5.5m/s


Peak velocity progression >0.3m/s/year in the presence of severe valve calcification


Markedly elevated BNP levels (>3 times corrected normal range)


Severe pulmonary hypertension (systolic pulmonary artery pressure >60mmHg).


In aortic regurgitation:


Symptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation (class I)


Asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% not due to another cause (class I)


Asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation undergoing additional cardiac surgery (class I)


Asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >50% with severe LV dilatation (left ventricular end-diastolic diameter >70mm or left ventricular end-systolic diameters >50mm) (class IIa).


Surgical approaches and considerations


Selection of prosthetic valve


Most aortic valve surgery currently undertaken in the United Kingdom is replacement of the aortic valve. A small number of centres perform aortic valve repair surgery, which avoids the need for any form of prosthetic valve but this is a specialised technique only suitable in cases where both the anatomy and pathology of the aortic valve disease are favourable. Hence aortic valve repair is reserved for cases where the surgeon is confident that a durable and high-quality repair can be performed. Early failure of aortic valve repair often leads to redo cardiac surgery, negating any initial benefit.


Prior to aortic valve surgery, the surgeon and patient should engage in shared decision-making regarding the most appropriate type of prosthetic valve. The main factors when considering valve choice are the durability of the prosthesis and the need for anticoagulation. The two main types of valve currently available are bioprosthetic (tissue) or mechanical.


Bioprosthetic or biological valves are derived from animal tissues, such as porcine (pig), bovine (cow) and equine (horse) models, and then fixed in a preserving solution that may be mounted on a flexible frame to assist in deployment during surgery (Harris, Croce & Cao 2015a). A bioprosthetic valve has leaflets constructed from bovine pericardium or porcine aortic valves. Porcine valves are made of pig aortic valves that have been treated in a preservation liquid and mounted on flexible frames. The frame is designed to be flexible at the opening as well as where the leaflets come together, thus replicating the native aortic valve. The main advantage of bioprosthetic valves is that there is no need for anticoagulation therapy to reduce the risk of clot formation. However, they have limited durability and their lifespan does not normally exceed 15–20 years. For all these reasons, a bioprosthetic valve is the valve of choice for most patients over the age of 65, with excellent long-term outcomes (Jaffer & Whitlock 2016).


A mechanical valve has a much longer lifespan and can therefore be implanted into younger patients with minimal risk of additional surgery being required later in life. However, to minimise the risk of significant clot formation on the leaflets of the valve, lifelong anticoagulation therapy is required. Poor compliance with this anticoagulation therapy can lead to greater risks of thrombosis or haemorrhage.


Lifestyle is affected by anticoagulation therapy, due to the need to abstain from contact sports and avoid certain foodstuffs and excessive alcohol intake. Anticoagulants are also teratogenic. This means that women of childbearing age who wish to become pregnant cannot safely be given a mechanical valve. They must either opt for a bioprosthesis (accepting the need for redo surgery) or receive a mechanical valve and agree to comply with anticoagulation, accepting that they will no longer be able to conceive a child (Jaffer & Whitlock 2016; Vause et al. 2016).


Operative techniques


Traditional aortic valve surgery is performed through a median sternotomy. Once the pericardium has been incised and total body heparin has been given, the heart is cannulated, and cardiopulmonary bypass is commenced. Cardioplegia cannulas are then inserted so that the heart can be adequately arrested and protected once the cross-clamp has been applied. Cardioplegia strategy depends on surgeon preference, anatomy, surgical access and the specific pathology of the individual patient’s aortic valve disease.


Following application of the cross-clamp, initial cardioplegia is delivered through the antegrade cannula into the aortic root. If the predominant pathology of the aortic valve is regurgitation, a significant proportion of the cardioplegia will regurgitate into the heart, causing LV distension. The amount of cardioplegia directed down the coronary ostia will therefore also be reduced. To adequately arrest and protect the heart in this situation, retrograde cardioplegia can be given, delivered through a cannula inserted into the coronary sinus. Alternatively, an aortotomy can be performed, allowing for direct cannulation of the individual coronary ostia and selective delivery of cardioplegia down the left and right ostia as required.


The insertion of a vent is also performed in certain cases, again depending on surgical access and surgeon preference. This is an additional cannula, inserted into the heart to reduce the amount of blood in the left ventricle, thus ensuring a totally bloodless field and non-distended ventricle. Common sites of insertion for the LV vent include the right superior pulmonary vein and the pulmonary artery.


Once the heart is adequately arrested, protected and vented, the aortic valve can be properly exposed, usually by using stay sutures and hand-held retractors as required. The native valve is excised, and the annulus thoroughly decalcified. The surgeon is then able to estimate the size of the annulus using specific valve sizers. Having settled on the correct size, the prosthetic valve can be opened and prepared by the scrub practitioner.


Sutures will then be taken through the annulus. While this can be a semi-continuous suture, especially if the annulus is of particularly good quality, the usual choice is multiple interrupted sutures (see Figure 7.1). Surgeon preference and the quality of the annulus will determine whether any, some or all the sutures are pledgeted. Once they have been passed through the annulus, the sutures are also passed through the valve, which is then deployed down into position within the aorta (see Figure 7.2). While taking sutures through the aortic annulus, particular care must be taken to avoid causing damage to any of the surrounding structures. After the sutures are tied and cut, and the valve is fixed in place, it is important to ensure that both coronary ostia have been visualised and have not been occluded or obstructed by the presence of the prosthetic valve (see Figure 7.3).


The aortotomy is then closed as the patient is rewarmed. De-airing manoeuvres are then performed and the cross-clamp removed. Ventricular and atrial epicardial pacing wires are attached in order to overcome any significant rhythm disturbances. Once the patient has been weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass, intra-operative transoesophageal echo (TOE) is used to assess the valve to ensure that there is no significant paravalvular leak. The TOE is also used to check for any residual air within the chambers of the heart. Once appearances are satisfactory, the heparin is reversed with protamine, haemostasis secured and the patient closed in layers, with stainless steel wires used for approximation of the sternum.


Minimal access aortic valve surgery


More recently, some aortic valve surgery has been performed using a minimal access approach, either completely or partially avoiding division of the sternum. In select cases the approach can be via a right anterior thoracotomy, but more usually a minimal access aortic valve replacement is performed via mini sternotomy. This is where the sternum is only partially divided, usually up to the level of the 3rd or 4th intercostal space, with either an inverted T- or J-shaped incision in order to allow the sternum to be spread. The visible pericardium is then divided in the usual fashion in order to gain access to the aorta.


While access to the aorta is preserved, it can be more difficult to access other structures within the chest and so the operative technique must be modified. Aortic cannulation is performed as normal but direct cannulation of the right atrium is often very difficult and hence insertion of a peripheral venous cannula through the common femoral vein is frequently used as an alternative. Additional venous cannulation techniques include direct superior vena cava (SVC) cannulation.


Due to the limited space, it is not possible to insert a retrograde cardioplegia cannula so cardioplegia is delivered through the root or directly down the coronary ostia. During delivery of the initial dose of cardioplegia it is important to ensure that the anaesthetist is using the TOE to assess for evidence of ventricular distension. Excision of the native valve and implantation of the prosthetic valve is performed in the same way as for traditional aortic valve replacement, but the use of specialised minimal access instruments may be required, due to the restricted access.



image


Figure 7.1: The mechanical valve in-situ with interrupted sutures
A: Interrupted valve sutures B: Prolene stay suture C: Exposed aorta with stay sutures D: Mechanical aortic valve in situ

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 2, 2021 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Aortic valve disease and aortic valve surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access