after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair are equivalent between genders despite anatomic differences in women


Outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair are equivalent between genders despite anatomic differences in women


Dubois L, Novick TV, Harris JR, et al (London Health Sciences Centre and Western Univ, Ontario, Canada) J Vasc Surg 57:382-389.e1, 2013§



B.W. Starnes, MD



Evidence Ranking


B



Expert Rating


2



Abstract





Results


Women were older (75.5 ± 7.0 vs 72.8 ± 8.1; P = .0003) and had smaller aneurysms (57.8 ± 9.5 vs 60.6 ± 11.9 mm; P = .01). Women’s infrarenal aortic necks were of narrower diameter (21.8 ± 3.4 vs 24.0 ± 3.5 mm; P < .0001), shorter length (24.3 ± 11.8 vs 27.3 ± 12.4 mm; P = .009), and greater angulation (37.7 ± 26.2° vs 29.4 ± 23.3°; P = .0002). More women had an infrarenal neck angle > 60° (19.2% vs 9.1%; P = .001). Technical success was achieved in equal numbers of women and men (97.7% vs 99.2%; P = .10). On completion angiography, the incidence of any endoleak (21.5% vs 15.4%; P = .08) and type I endoleak (1.5% vs 1.1%; P = .60) did not differ between genders. At the 1-month follow-up, there were no differences between women and men with respect to endograft occlusion (2.5% vs 1.9%; P = .70), and differences observed in any endoleak (17.2% vs 11.4%; P = .08) and type I endoleaks (3.3% vs 1.2%; P = .08) did not reach statistical significance. Freedom from major adverse events was similar for women and men at 30 days (98.5% vs 95.8%; P = .23) and 1 year (85% vs 89.8%; P = .40). Survival at 30 days (100% vs 98.6%) and 1 year (92.5% vs 91.6%; P = .99) was similar for women and men.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 3, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair are equivalent between genders despite anatomic differences in women

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access