S. Di Saverio, G. Tugnoli, F. Catena, L. Ansaloni and N. Naidoo (eds.)Trauma Surgery2014Volume 1: Trauma Management, Trauma Critical Care, Orthopaedic Trauma and Neuro-Trauma10.1007/978-88-470-5403-5_12
© Springer-Verlag Italia 2014
12. Acute Traumatic Brain Injuries and Their Management
(1)
Shock and Trauma Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
(2)
Department of Surgery B, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, 169, Hadera, 38100, Israel
(3)
Acute Brain Injury Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
(4)
Department of Neurosurgery, Western Galilee Medical Center, Naharia, Israel
Abstract
Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) represent the leading cause of death and morbidity in western countries. Since motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of significant trauma, TBIs affect mostly young adults with increasing incidence and are responsible for a major social and economic burden. For decades, the mainstay of neurotrauma management has been represented by control of posttraumatic edema and raised intracranial pressure (ICP). With the emergence of a better understanding of the underlying cellular mechanisms responsible for the generation of secondary brain damage, the hope for the “magic bullet” has prompted the development of novel drugs. Encouraged by the promising results of basic research studies, clinical trials were initiated in an increasing number up to the mid-1990s. However, the high expectations raised by convincing laboratory data were not met by deceiving results that made pharmaceutical industry reluctant to support high-cost adventurous research that have repeatedly failed to significantly improve outcome of head-injured patients. Accordingly, the management of neurotrauma has focused back on optimization of neurointensive care and surgical treatment.
Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) represent the leading cause of death and morbidity in western countries. Since motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of significant trauma, TBIs affect mostly young adults with increasing incidence and are responsible for a major social and economic burden. For decades, the mainstay of neurotrauma management has been represented by control of posttraumatic edema and raised intracranial pressure (ICP). With the emergence of a better understanding of the underlying cellular mechanisms responsible for the generation of secondary brain damage, the hope for the “magic bullet” has prompted the development of novel drugs. Encouraged by the promising results of basic research studies, clinical trials were initiated in an increasing number up to the mid-1990s. However, the high expectations raised by convincing laboratory data were not met by deceiving results that made pharmaceutical industry reluctant to support high-cost adventurous research that have repeatedly failed to significantly improve outcome of head-injured patients [1]. Accordingly, the management of neurotrauma has focused back on optimization of neurointensive care and surgical treatment.
12.1 Epidemiology
Although the exact incidence of TBI is difficult to determine as it depends on several criteria such as definition of TBI and the need for hospitalization, a rough estimate is that 1.7 million sustain some form of TBI every year in the USA; of these approximately 1.4 million were treated and released from emergency departments, and 275,000 were hospitalized and discharged alive [2]. Although 75 % of TBIs are concussion or another form of mild brain injury, they are nevertheless responsible for more than 50,000 yearly deaths and one-third of all injury-related death in the USA. TBIs are three times more common in men than in women and occur with the highest incidence in young adults mostly as the result of motor vehicle accidents in western countries and in the elderly as the result of fall [2].
12.2 Biomechanics and Mechanisms of Brain Injuries
Two different types of biomechanical forces can be distinguished: static and dynamic load. These forces, either applied separately or, more commonly, in association, are responsible for contact and inertial types of brain injuries: focal, diffuse, blast, and penetrating.
Contact injuries are created by forces applied to the skull without any associated movement of the head. Since most instances of contact loading to the head will eventually result in some motion, pure form of contact injuries is rare and is characterized by slowly applied forces resulting in focal injuries, either at the impact site or remote from it. According to the energy delivered at the point of impact, the site of the injury in respect to the skull, the size and shape of the stroking object, the direction and magnitude of the stroking force, the extent of the traumatic lesions in terms of severity, and involved structures will vary considerably.
Inertial injuries on the opposite represent the consequence of a dynamic load to the head, either applied without any direct impact to the head (impulsive load) or, more commonly, as a consequence of a fast blow to the head (impact load). In both instances, the head is set in motion, generating acceleration and deceleration forces responsible for strain applied to the brain parenchyma and related vessels, causing functional or structural damage according to the intensity and direction of the applied forces. In this situation, brain damage represents the consequence of differential movements of the brain within the skull on one hand and between different brain structures on the other. Differential movements of the brain within the skull are due to the presence of a physiological subarachnoid compartment around the brain allowing some movement causing surface lesions to neural tissue and cerebral vessels at points of particular susceptibility such as the frontal and temporal regions, either at the point of impact (coup) or on the opposite side (contrecoup). Strain within the brain parenchyma, on the other hand, generates shearing forces responsible for widespread tissue damage involving mostly axons particularly vulnerable to strain and tensile forces [3].
12.3 Pathophysiology of Traumatic Brain Injury
12.3.1 Brain Swelling and Cerebral Edema
Swelling of the brain is a frequent adverse of TBI and represents a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in severely head-injured patients [4]. Swelling most often represents the macroscopic correlate for cerebral edema although may uncommonly develop as a consequence of cerebral hyperemia.
Cerebral edema is defined by an increased water content of the brain, which may be affect the extracellular space, vasogenic edema, or be the consequence of alterations of cellular homeostasis leading to cytotoxic edema. Vasogenic edema, often considered as the most common form of posttraumatic edema, represents the consequence of structural and functional alterations of the blood-brain barrier leading to a shift of fluid from cerebral vessels into the extracellular space. Cytotoxic edema develops shortly after the injury as the consequence of membrane depolarization leading to a generalized release of glutamate causing the activation of N-methyl-d-aspartate and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor receptors and the subsequent influx of calcium, sodium, and water within the cells [5]. Intracellular calcium accumulation, along with associated noxious signals such as ischemia and oxidative stress, results in progressive mitochondrial damage and energy crisis. As intracellular ATP availability is compromised, energy-dependent ionic pumps fail, and water and accumulating ions cannot be expelled back in the extracellular space.
Cerebral hyperemia is an uncommon situation characterized by impairment of cerebral autoregulation with sudden onset of cerebral blood flow increased mediated by vasodilation leading to cerebral congestion. This condition may be responsible for a fast increase in ICP and occurs mostly in children and young adults. Accurate diagnosis of this relatively rare condition is essential for it requires specific therapeutic measures that may be even detrimental in the presence of cerebral edema.
12.3.2 Cerebral Blood Flow
Impairment of cerebral blood flow (CBF) following severe TBI has been repeatedly reported [6, 7], particularly in the early posttraumatic period. Oligemia due to increased intracranial pressure and impaired autoregulation has been shown to be associated with unfavorable functional outcome, and signs of ischemia can be found in most instances of lethal TBI. Patients with subdural hematoma and diffuse cerebral swelling are more likely to suffer from cerebral ischemia. Furthermore, CBF may be further compromised throughout the course of illness as the consequence of developing brain swelling and cerebral vasospasm mediated by traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage [8].
12.3.3 Cerebral Metabolism
Depressed cerebral metabolism has been identified as an important physiologic hallmark of TBI, and oxidative metabolism rates as low as half the value found under normal conditions have been reported in several studies [9]. Energy crisis has been commonly attributed to compromised oxygen delivery induced by cerebral ischemia, although spreading cortical depression in comatose and sedated patients is another advocated hypothesis. Recent studies, however, have emphasized the pivotal role played by mitochondrial damage mediated by a vast array of noxious stimuli integrated and amplified within the mitochondrion, in failure of ATP production [10]. Furthermore, recent clinical studies have shown that the level of metabolic depression correlated with the level of consciousness, whereas animal studies showed that mitochondrial protection was associated with both improved metabolism and ICP relief [11].
12.4 Critical Care Management
12.4.1 Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Control
Elevated ICP has been reported to be an independent predictor of increased mortality and is associated with poor functional outcome. Although ICP levels as low as 15 mmHg may be sufficient to prompt cerebral herniation at particular location, a threshold of 20–25 mmHg is currently considered to justify implementation of therapeutic measures [12]. Accordingly, ICP monitoring should be performed in all severe TBI patients. Absence or delay of ICP monitoring has been recently shown to be associated with increased mortality and worse outcome [13].
12.4.2 Mechanical Ventilation, Analgesics, and Sedations
Mechanical ventilation is commonly initiated at prehospital stage or on admission to the emergency room for airway control in patients with severe TBI. Further, mechanical ventilation is often necessary in patients with impaired consciousness in order to prevent superimposed hypoxemic insults and ICP elevation caused by hypercarbia. Hyperventilation should not be used unless CBF measurements can be obtained and the effect of hypocarbia on cerebral perfusion assessed, especially during the first 24 h of injury and in the presence of cerebral contusions [14, 15]. In severe TBI patients, mechanical ventilation as well as general ICU and nursing procedures may be occasionally painful and generate transient and harmful ICP elevations. For this reason, sedation and analgesics should be liberally implemented in patients’ general care, using drugs that can be easily titrated and characterized by rapid onset and offset. Propofol is currently the sedative of choice as its effect can be reversed within a short time whenever indicated and is anticonvulsant as well. Propofol is also an efficient drug for ICP control. Midazolam may be used alternatively, providing a potent anticonvulsive effect with lesser cardiovascular depression. Muscle relaxants should not be used on a routine basis though may be recommended in the presence of refractory intracranial hypertension [16].
12.4.3 Hyperosmolar Therapy
Mannitol is the most commonly used hypo-osmotic agent for reduction of ICP. Its effect is produced by osmotic reduction of the cerebral water content and presumably by a beneficial rheologic effect due to hematocrit reduction and plasma volume increase. The use of mannitol is recommended only in the presence of elevated ICP. Prophylactic use of mannitol is not recommended unless clinical signs of cerebral herniation develop prior initiation of ICP monitoring. Mannitol is contraindicated in the presence of arterial hypertension, serum osmolarity ≥320 m)sm/l, sepsis, and signs of renal failure.