Abstract
Objective
The evaluation of patency rates of intraluminal versus subintimal endovascular revascularization of long femoropopliteal (FP) lesions.
Background
Chronic total occlusions (CTO) of the FP artery in peripheral interventions are crossed either with a support catheter-guidewire based technique or subintimal dissection and re-entry device assisted approach. Both techniques have a high procedural success rate, but their long term patency is not well studied. There is also lack of comparative data addressing the patency of long non-CTO vs. CTO occlusions.
Methods
We performed a single center retrospective analysis, studying the patency rates in 215 patients (254 limbs) with TASC C and D FP lesions treated with stents. There were 3 patient groups: without CTO (non-CTO); CTO crossed using support catheter and guide-wire (CTO-SW) and CTO crossed with a re-entry device (CTO-RE).
Results
There were 155 limbs in CTO-SW group; 50 in CTO-RE group and 49 in non-CTO. Lesion length (mean ± SD) was 251.81 ± 7.48 mm in CTO-SW group; 280 ± 13.18 mm in CTO-RE group and 248.77 ± 13.31 in non-CTO group (p = non-significant).
In-stent restenosis (ISR) at a mean follow-up of 19.26 ± 16.14 months did not differ between groups occurring in 23 (47%) limbs in non-CTO; 66 (42%) in CTO-SW; and 24 (48%) in CTO-RE. Smoking and stent fracture were predictors of ISR by multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
In patients with long FP lesions, ISR rates were similar between patients with and without CTO. In the CTO group mid-term vessel patency was not affected by the crossing technique utilized.
Highlights
- •
The long-term patency of intraluminal vs. subintimal crossing of femoropopliteal CTOs is evaluated.
- •
In TASC C & D FP lesions, we observed similar ISR rates between patients with & without CTOs.
- •
Mid-term vessel patency was not affected by whether CTO was crossed using a support-catheter wire technique or re-entry device.
1
Introduction
The burden of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) continues to increase with estimates of more than 8 million people affected in the United States alone . Symptomatic patients are typically the elderly, with the prevalence of intermittent claudication increasing more than 15-fold in men aged over 65 (prevalence of 6 per 1000) compared to those 35–45 years of age (0.4 per 1000) as noted in the Framingham study . A similar trend is also noted in women, albeit with a lower prevalence in younger age groups. Of the patients presenting for endovascular therapy, chronic total occlusions (CTO) constitute up to 50% of lesions and tend to be far more technically challenging . Superficial femoral artery (SFA) CTOs are more common, likely due to mechanical factors, such as vessel compression, torsion and elongation that are unique to the femoropopliteal (FP) vascular bed, resulting in accelerated atherosclerosis . Endovascular therapy has emerged as the preferred alternative to bypass surgery in most patients given the increasing age of presentation, higher surgical risks and improved techniques.
The ability to cross FP CTOs depends on lesion characteristics (lesion length, complexity and calcification) and operator experience . The traditional approach has involved the use of a support catheter and guide wire but the development of specialized CTO crossing and re-entry devices have significantly improved the success rate of endovascular revascularization. Current clinical practice is based largely on operator experience and limited single-arm studies of devices, with a paucity of data on the efficacy of device based re-entry upon long term follow-up.
The most common reasons for failure are the inability to cross the CTO with a guidewire and balloon or subintimal dissection and an inability to re-enter the true lumen distally. There are several wire and device based techniques available for crossing CTOs. These can be divided broadly into intraluminal (IL) and subintimal (SI) approaches. In the intraluminal approach, the guidewire or a device is used to cross the lesion from true lumen to true lumen. The subintimal (SI) approach involves forming a track between the intima and media of the vessel thereby in effect bypassing the occlusion. Re-entry into the distal true lumen is then achieved via wire based or device based strategies .
While both these approaches have similar technical success rates and can be used as complementary rather than competitive techniques , the long term patency rates associated with these techniques are varied and direct comparisons have seldom been made .
In addition, there is a lack of comparative data addressing the patency rates of the long non-CTO vs. CTO occlusions. We therefore sought to assess the long-term patency associated with each technique in our study.
2
Methods
We performed a single center retrospective study of patients referred for treatment of obstructive FP disease treated with Nitinol self-expanding stents at our laboratory from May 2008 to May 2013. Our objective was to compare patients undergoing revascularization of long FP CTOs using a support-catheter and wire based crossing approach versus re-entry device assisted endovascular approach, specifically looking at the mid-term primary patency rates of the treated vessel. Based on lesion length of the treated segments of FP CTOs, we also studied a control group of treated patients without CTOs with comparable lesion length. We identified 215 patients (254 limbs) with TASC C and D FP disease, referred for endovascular treatment and considered to be poor surgical candidates or who declined surgery for their PAD. Patients eligible for the study were symptomatic with life style limiting claudication – (Rutherford Class III) despite exercise and medical therapy or with critical limb ischemia (Rutherford Class IV and higher). Data were gathered on demographics, baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, angiographic and treatment characteristics and clinical success rate through review of records and angiographic films. We included patients with de-novo lesions, that were crossed using an antegrade approach and stented with nitinol self-expanding stents (type of the stent used at operator discretion, Table 2 ).
2.1
Study groups
The study population was divided into three groups: 1) Support catheter and wire based CTO group (CTO-SW): This was defined as successful proximal to distal lumen crossing of chronic total occlusion using a variety of wires and support catheters. 2) Re-entry device based CTO group (CTO-RE): This was defined as successful re-entry into the distal true lumen using re-entry devices such as the Outback or Pioneer catheters. 3) Non-CTO group (non-CTO): This group of patients did not have a CTO but had severe obstructive lesions. Given that the CTO groups had very long lesions only patients with TASC C lesions were enrolled into the non-CTO group.
2.2
Procedural details
All procedures were performed through a contralateral femoral approach. Interventions were performed after therapeutic dose of heparin was given to maintain an APTT greater than 200 throughout the procedure. The initial approach to cross most CTOs was with the use of the support catheter and wire (choice of devices was at operator discretion). Specialized crossing devices (Frontrunner, Truepath, etc.) were used in less than 5% of CTO cases as per operator discretion. The re-entry device strategy typically involves blunt dissection using a formed knuckle with a hydrophilic wire with a support catheter. The dissection was extended all the way down to the vessel distal to the CTO and re-entry was achieved using either a Pioneer (Volcano Corporation, San Diego, CA) or an Outback (Cordis Corp., Miami, FL) catheter. In non-CTO lesions, the lesion was typically crossed with a wire followed by balloon angioplasty and stenting. The lesions were first prepared with aggressive 1:1 balloon dilatation, followed by implantation of a variety of self-expanding stents that were sized 1 mm larger than the reference vessel diameter. Post dilation was performed with a balloon that was sized 1:1 to the reference vessel diameter. The type of stent used was at the discretion of the operator, typically to optimize the treatment of the lesion after suboptimal balloon angioplasty or in the event of flow limiting dissections.
2.3
Follow up
Within the first year, all patients underwent clinical follow-up in conjunction with ankle–brachial index (ABI)/pulse-volume recording (PVR) study at least every 3 months, and then every 6 months thereafter (or sooner if symptoms occurred). In-stent restenosis (ISR) was suspected if one or a combination of the following findings were observed: ABI drop of ≥0.15 from immediate post-procedure baseline and/or if the patient became symptomatic with claudication or limb ischemia. These findings led to further confirmatory testing using non-invasive imaging (arterial duplex – PSV ratio > 4; computed tomography angiography – stenosis of >60%) or invasive angiography with angiographic restenosis- defined as >60% reduction of the vessel diameter by visual estimation. The diagnosis of obstructive ISR established by the above-mentioned tests was an endpoint for the study.
Patients who presented for ISR revascularization procedures underwent fluoroscopy/CINE imaging using at least two different orthogonal views for detection of stent fracture (SF). Stent fracture was defined as clear interruption of stent struts (>1 mm) identified by fluoroscopy/CINE with resulting kink or misalignment along the axial length of the stent.
In addition, we also analyzed several demographic, procedural characteristics, and laboratory parameters that have been reported in the literature as potential predictors of ISR, including age, weight, medications, creatinine levels, calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), white blood cell count (WBC), blood pressure, lipid level, random blood sugar, history of diabetes and chronic kidney disease, lesion length, and run-off score.
2.4
Statistical analysis
All covariates were tested for normality by visual inspection using frequency distribution curves and Q-Q plots. Normal variables are presented as mean and standard deviation (SD), and variables with skewed distribution as median and interquartile ranges. Categorical variables, such as the prevalence of various metabolic syndrome definitions, are presented as percentages. Confounding variables were identified by a literature search. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were performed . Two-tailed P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical procedures were performed using Statistical Analysis Systems version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) statistical software package.
2
Methods
We performed a single center retrospective study of patients referred for treatment of obstructive FP disease treated with Nitinol self-expanding stents at our laboratory from May 2008 to May 2013. Our objective was to compare patients undergoing revascularization of long FP CTOs using a support-catheter and wire based crossing approach versus re-entry device assisted endovascular approach, specifically looking at the mid-term primary patency rates of the treated vessel. Based on lesion length of the treated segments of FP CTOs, we also studied a control group of treated patients without CTOs with comparable lesion length. We identified 215 patients (254 limbs) with TASC C and D FP disease, referred for endovascular treatment and considered to be poor surgical candidates or who declined surgery for their PAD. Patients eligible for the study were symptomatic with life style limiting claudication – (Rutherford Class III) despite exercise and medical therapy or with critical limb ischemia (Rutherford Class IV and higher). Data were gathered on demographics, baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, angiographic and treatment characteristics and clinical success rate through review of records and angiographic films. We included patients with de-novo lesions, that were crossed using an antegrade approach and stented with nitinol self-expanding stents (type of the stent used at operator discretion, Table 2 ).
2.1
Study groups
The study population was divided into three groups: 1) Support catheter and wire based CTO group (CTO-SW): This was defined as successful proximal to distal lumen crossing of chronic total occlusion using a variety of wires and support catheters. 2) Re-entry device based CTO group (CTO-RE): This was defined as successful re-entry into the distal true lumen using re-entry devices such as the Outback or Pioneer catheters. 3) Non-CTO group (non-CTO): This group of patients did not have a CTO but had severe obstructive lesions. Given that the CTO groups had very long lesions only patients with TASC C lesions were enrolled into the non-CTO group.
2.2
Procedural details
All procedures were performed through a contralateral femoral approach. Interventions were performed after therapeutic dose of heparin was given to maintain an APTT greater than 200 throughout the procedure. The initial approach to cross most CTOs was with the use of the support catheter and wire (choice of devices was at operator discretion). Specialized crossing devices (Frontrunner, Truepath, etc.) were used in less than 5% of CTO cases as per operator discretion. The re-entry device strategy typically involves blunt dissection using a formed knuckle with a hydrophilic wire with a support catheter. The dissection was extended all the way down to the vessel distal to the CTO and re-entry was achieved using either a Pioneer (Volcano Corporation, San Diego, CA) or an Outback (Cordis Corp., Miami, FL) catheter. In non-CTO lesions, the lesion was typically crossed with a wire followed by balloon angioplasty and stenting. The lesions were first prepared with aggressive 1:1 balloon dilatation, followed by implantation of a variety of self-expanding stents that were sized 1 mm larger than the reference vessel diameter. Post dilation was performed with a balloon that was sized 1:1 to the reference vessel diameter. The type of stent used was at the discretion of the operator, typically to optimize the treatment of the lesion after suboptimal balloon angioplasty or in the event of flow limiting dissections.
2.3
Follow up
Within the first year, all patients underwent clinical follow-up in conjunction with ankle–brachial index (ABI)/pulse-volume recording (PVR) study at least every 3 months, and then every 6 months thereafter (or sooner if symptoms occurred). In-stent restenosis (ISR) was suspected if one or a combination of the following findings were observed: ABI drop of ≥0.15 from immediate post-procedure baseline and/or if the patient became symptomatic with claudication or limb ischemia. These findings led to further confirmatory testing using non-invasive imaging (arterial duplex – PSV ratio > 4; computed tomography angiography – stenosis of >60%) or invasive angiography with angiographic restenosis- defined as >60% reduction of the vessel diameter by visual estimation. The diagnosis of obstructive ISR established by the above-mentioned tests was an endpoint for the study.
Patients who presented for ISR revascularization procedures underwent fluoroscopy/CINE imaging using at least two different orthogonal views for detection of stent fracture (SF). Stent fracture was defined as clear interruption of stent struts (>1 mm) identified by fluoroscopy/CINE with resulting kink or misalignment along the axial length of the stent.
In addition, we also analyzed several demographic, procedural characteristics, and laboratory parameters that have been reported in the literature as potential predictors of ISR, including age, weight, medications, creatinine levels, calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), white blood cell count (WBC), blood pressure, lipid level, random blood sugar, history of diabetes and chronic kidney disease, lesion length, and run-off score.
2.4
Statistical analysis
All covariates were tested for normality by visual inspection using frequency distribution curves and Q-Q plots. Normal variables are presented as mean and standard deviation (SD), and variables with skewed distribution as median and interquartile ranges. Categorical variables, such as the prevalence of various metabolic syndrome definitions, are presented as percentages. Confounding variables were identified by a literature search. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were performed . Two-tailed P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical procedures were performed using Statistical Analysis Systems version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) statistical software package.
3
Results
The CTO-RE group had a total of 50 limbs (45 patients), the CTO-SW group had 155 limbs (124 patients) and the non-CTO group included 49 limbs (46 patients) with obstructive stenosis. The mean follow-up period was 19.26 ± 16.14 months.
Our study population included 60.87% men with a mean age of 72.73 years. Baseline characteristics of the studied groups are presented in Table 1 . A large number of patients were either current or past smokers (62.75%) with the prevalence of active smokers comparable in all 3 groups (21.43% in CTO-SW; 28.26% in CTO-RE and 17.02% in non-CTO groups). The demographic characteristics were in general well balanced between the groups with a few exceptions. The CTO-RE group was older compared to the CTO-SW group (74.94 vs. 71.94 years, p value =0.043), but not different from the non-CTO group. The non-CTO group had a higher prevalence of diabetes in comparison to the CTO-RE group (69% vs. 50%, p value =0.049), but not different from the CTO-SW. The below knee run off score was significantly worse in the non-CTO group (5.07) as compared to the CTO-SW (3.91 p value =0.011) and the CTO-RE groups (3.97, p value =0.047). Prior to index revascularization, Cilostazol use was more common in the CTO-RE group (36%) when compared to the CTO-SW (20%) [p = 0.026] and non-CTO (16%) groups [p = 0.021]. However, there was no significant difference between the CTO-SW and non-CTO groups in this regard [p = 0.568]. Over 90% of patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy (p = not significant between the 3 groups).
Variables | CTO-SW (n = 155) | CTO-RE (n = 50) | Non-CTO (n = 49) | P value (overall) | CTO-SW vs. CTO-RE | CTO-SW vs. non-CTO | CTO-RE vs. non-CTO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient characteristics | |||||||
Age in years [mean (SD)] | 71.94 (0.73) | 74.94 (1.29) | 73.02 (1.30) | 0.126 | 0.043 ⁎ | 0.467 | 0.295 |
Sex (female %) | 38.06 | 34 | 47.92 | 0.335 | 0.604 | 0.24 | 0.217 |
Body mass index in kg/m2 [mean (SD)] | 28.32 (0.39) | 29.28 (0.69) | 28.03 (0.70) | 0.389 | 0.216 | 0.707 | 0.267 |
Co-morbidities | |||||||
Current smoker (%) | 21.43 | 28.26 | 17.02 | 0.695 | 0.326 | 0.679 | 0.222 |
Diabetes (%) | 58.71 | 50 | 69.39 | 0.144 | 0.279 | 0.181 | 0.049 ⁎ |
Hypertension (%) | 96.77 | 94 | 91.84 | 0.326 | 0.381 | 0.143 | 0.678 |
Hyperlipidemia (%) | 95.48 | 92 | 95.92 | 0.583 | 0.344 | 0.897 | 0.419 |
Coronary artery disease (%) | 83.12 | 88 | 87.76 | 0.585 | 0.412 | 0.44 | 0.971 |
Chronic kidney disease (%) | 15.48 | 24 | 20.83 | 0.345 | 0.17 | 0.388 | 0.711 |
Indication | |||||||
CLI (%) | 22.73 | 32 | 32.65 | 0.239 | 0.193 | 0.187 | 0.99 |
Claudicants – Rutherford Class III (%) | 77.27 | 68 | 67.35 | “ | “ | “ | “ |
Lesion/Procedural characteristics | |||||||
Stent length in mm [mean (SD)] | 251.81 (7.48) | 280 (13.18) | 248.77 (13.31) | 0.144 | 0.064 | 0.842 | 0.096 |
Stent width in mm [mean (SD)] | 6.295 (0.05) | 6.30 (0.08) | 6.19 (0.08) | 0.467 | 0.962 | 0.236 | 0.316 |
Number of stents | 2.30 (0.07) | 2.32 (0.12) | 2.45 (0.12) | 0.555 | 0.868 | 0.28 | 0.456 |
Run off score | 3.91 (2.81) | 3.97 (2.87) | 5.07 (2.55) | 0.036 ⁎ | 0.901 | 0.011 | 0.047 ⁎ |
Stent fracture (%) | 8.39 | 14 | 12.24 | 0.457 | 0.244 | 0.418 | 0.796 |
Re-entry device | |||||||
Pioneer catheter (%) | NA | 36.3 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Outback catheter (%) | NA | 63.7 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Laboratory | |||||||
LDL in mg/dl [mean (SD)] | 94.14 (4.07) | 85.97 (6.93) | 94.67 (7.43) | 0.568 | 0.296 | 0.953 | 0.383 |
Glomerular filtration rate in ml/min [mean (SD)] | 61.99 (1.70) | 58.79 (2.99) | 53.08 (3.06) | 0.039 | 0.352 | 0.011 | 0.199 |
WBC count in 1000/mcL [mean (SD)] | 8.46 (0.38) | 7.45 (0.67) | 7.39 (0.68) | 0.238 | 0.233 | 0.209 | 0.895 |
Medications | |||||||
Statin (%) | 95 (61%) | 36 (72%) | 32 (65%) | 0.382 | 0.472 | 0.17 | 0.613 |
Aspirin (%) | 142 (92%) | 45 (90%) | 44 (90%) | 0.897 | 0.973 | 0.726 | 0.695 |
Clopidogrel (%) | 145 (94%) | 44 (88%) | 43 (88%) | 0.292 | 0.97 | 0.188 | 0.203 |
Cilostazol (%) | 31 (20%) | 18 (36%) | 18 (16%) | 0.032 | 0.026 ⁎ | 0.568 | 0.021 ⁎ |

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Full access? Get Clinical Tree


