Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Octogenarians (from a Drug-Eluting stent for LefT main Artery Registry Substudy)




Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents is an accepted alternative to surgery for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease, but the long-term outcome in elderly patients is unclear. Aim of our study was to compare the clinical outcomes of octogenarians with ULMCA disease treated either with PCI with drug-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The primary study end point was the composite of death, cerebrovascular accident, and myocardial infarction at follow-up. A total of 304 consecutive patients with ULMCA stenosis treated with PCI or CABG and aged ≥80 years were selected and analyzed in a large multinational registry. Two hundred eighteen were treated with PCI and 86 with CABG. During the hospitalization, a trend toward a higher mortality rate was reported in PCI-treated patients (3.5% vs 7.3%, p = 0.32). At a median follow-up of 1,088 days, the incidence of the primary end point was similar in the 2 groups (32.6% vs 30.2%, p = 0.69). Incidence of target vessel revascularization at follow-up was higher in PCI-treated patients (10% vs 4.2%, p = 0.05). At multivariate analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction was the only independent predictor of the primary end point (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 0.98, p = 0.001). After adjustment with propensity score, the revascularization strategy was not significantly correlated to the incidence of the primary end point (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 1.71, p = 0.95). In octogenarians, no difference was observed in the occurrence of the primary end point after PCI or CABG for the treatment of ULMCA disease. However, the rate of target vessel revascularization was higher in the PCI group.


The incidence of left main disease increases with age, but elderly patients are commonly underrepresented in studies comparing outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). To date, only few registries have specifically evaluated risks and benefits of PCI and CABG in patients >70 years with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease, and only 1 study was conducted in octogenarians. This high-risk population could obtain a large benefit from less invasive procedures as very elderly patients often have several co-morbidities and an increased surgical risk. Not surprisingly, although mortality rate of CABG surgery in elderly patients has decreased in the last 2 decades, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score and the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II still include age as an incremental risk factor. Given the limited evidence of PCI and CABG outcomes in older patients, we investigated the short- and long-term outcomes of PCI versus CABG for ULMCA disease in patients aged >80 years who participated in the Drug-Eluting stent for LefT main Artery (DELTA) registry.


Methods


The study population consisted of 304 “all-comer” patients aged >80 years with ULMCA stenosis treated with PCI and first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES; sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents) implantation or CABG from April 2002 to April 2006 in 14 international centers, within the 2,775 patients of the DELTA registry. In all institutions, the revascularization strategy was determined by both interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons, on the basis of (1) hemodynamic conditions, (2) lesion characteristics, (3) vessel size, (4) presence of co-morbidities, (5) quality of arterial and/or venous conduits for grafting, and (6) patient and/or referring physician preferences. In all cases, the selected revascularization approach seemed suitable to guarantee complete revascularization. All data related to hospital admissions, procedures, and outcomes were collected in each center with the hospital recording network. Information with regard to the clinical status at the latest clinical follow-up available was collected by clinical visits, telephone interviews, and referring physicians. Dual antiplatelet therapy (i.e., aspirin 100 mg/day and clopidogrel 75 mg/day or ticlopidine 250 mg twice daily) was administered for at least 12 months in patients treated with PCI. In the Korean center, cilostazol was also prescribed. Detailed information on adherence as well as reasons and date for discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy were obtained in all patients. Angiographic follow-up was scheduled according to hospital practice or if a noninvasive evaluation or clinical presentation suggested ischemia. Data analysis was performed with the approval of the institutional ethics committees of the hospitals and/or universities involved.


In this report, the following events were analyzed cumulatively at latest clinical follow-up available: cardiac and overall death, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The occurrence of stent thrombosis (ST) was defined on the basis of the Academic Research Consortium definitions in the PCI group. ST was defined as acute, subacute, late, and very late if the event occurred within 24 hours, 30 days, <1 year, or >1 year, respectively, after the procedure. Deaths were classified as either cardiac or noncardiac. Cardiac death was defined as any death due to a cardiac cause (e.g., MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), procedure-related deaths, and death of unknown cause; TVR was defined as any repeat intervention of any segment of the target vessel, defined as the entire major coronary vessel proximal and distal to the target lesion, including upstream and downstream branches and the target lesion itself. CVA were defined as stroke, transient ischemic attacks, and reversible ischemic neurologic deficits adjudicated by a neurologist and confirmed by computed tomography scanning.


In-hospital non–Q-wave MI was defined as the elevation of the serum creatine kinase (CK) isoenzyme myocardial band that was 3 times the upper limit of normal in the PCI group and 5 times the upper limit of normal in the CABG group, in the absence of new pathologic Q waves. In this analysis, cumulative MI included (1) all Q-wave MI that occurred during hospital stay and follow-up and (2) all spontaneous MI occurring after hospital discharge.


Q-wave MI was defined as the development of new pathologic Q waves in ≥2 contiguous leads with or without CK or CK-myocardial band levels elevated above normal. Spontaneous MI was defined as the occurrence after hospital discharge of any value of troponin and/or CK-myocardial band greater than the upper limit of normal if associated with clinical and/or electrocardiographic change. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) was defined as the composite end point of death, CVA, MI, and TVR. The EuroSCORE, which is based on patient-, cardiac-, and operation-related factors, was used to stratify the risk of death at 30 days.


Diagnostic angiograms were scored according to the SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score algorithm at the site laboratory.


The primary study end point was the composite of death (overall and cardiac), CVA, and MI at longest available follow-up. The secondary study end points were the occurrence of death (overall and cardiac), TVR, and MACCE.


Data are presented as percentage and mean ± SD. In general, differences in proportions were tested with chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, and differences in continuous variables were tested with a Student t test. Cumulative event curves were generated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test.


Independent predictors of events at follow-up were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model including all variables listed in Tables 1 and 2 with a p <0.10. Because of the nonrandomized nature of the study, for each patient a propensity score indicating the likelihood of having CABG rather than PCI was calculated using multivariate logistic regression analysis including all variables listed in Tables 1 and 2 with a p <0.10. Accuracy of the model was tested with the C statistic (resulting was 0.78), while calibration with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test being not significant (p value was 0.26). To minimize any selection bias, a second multivariate analysis was performed using the propensity score as a covariate. Results are presented as hazard ratios (HR) for Cox analysis with 95% confidence intervals. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York).



Table 1

Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics


















































































































Variable PCI (n = 218) CABG (n = 86) P
Men 141 (64.7%) 47 (54.7%) 0.11
Age (years) 83.6 ± 3.2 83 ± 2.9 0.13
Hypertension 167 (76.6%) 64 (74.1%) 0.69
Hypercholesterolemia 131 (60%) 55 (63.9%) 0.53
Smoker (Current/Former) 64 (29.4%) 25 (29.1%) 0.96
Diabetes mellitus 57 (26.1%) 20 (23.2%) 0.6
Stable angina pectoris/inducible ischemia 100 (45.9%) 32 (37.2%) 0.17
Unstable angina pectoris 76 (34.9%) 37 (43%) 0.19
NSTEMI 35 (16.1%) 17 (19.8%) 0.44
STEMI 7 (3.2%) 0 0.19
Urgent procedure 60 (27.5%) 25 (29.1%) 0.79
Left ventricular ejection fraction 49.8 ± 14.3 53.3 ± 11.4 0.008
Renal failure 24 (11%) 6 (7%) 0.29
Previous coronary by pass 24 (11%) 3 (3.5%) 0.04
Previous PCI 38 (17.4%) 7 (8.1%) 0.04
Multivessel coronary disease 179 (82.1%) 76 (88.4%) 0.18
RCA disease 79 (36.2%) 52 (72.2%) 0.0001
LM distal narrowing 144 (66.1%) 47 (54.6%) 0.03
Coronary vessels treated 1.7 ± 0.9 2.2 ± 0.9 0.006
EuroSCORE 9.1 ± 4.3 8.3 ± 2.7 0.06
Syntax (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery) score 32 ± 12.5 35 ± 9.5 0.22

LM = left main; NSTEMI = non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; RCA = right coronary artery; STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg or previous pharmacologic treatment.


Total cholesterol >190 mg/dl or previous pharmacologic treatment.



Table 2

In hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events

















































PCI (n = 218) CABG (n = 86) p
Hospital death 16 (7.3%) 3 (3.5%) 0.32
Hospital cardiac death 12 (5.5%) 1 (1.2%) 0.15
Hospital MI 13 (6%) 6 (7%) 0.74
Hospital rePCI/reCABG 2 (0.9%) 0 0.54
Hospital CABG 0 0
Hospital cerebrovascular event 0 0
Infections 0 12 (14%) 0.0001
Hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events 28 (12.8%) 9 (10.5%) 0.57

Data are presented as absolute number and percentages. CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting. MI = myocardial infarction; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.




Results


Three hundred four patients aged >80 years were included: 218 underwent PCI with implantation of “first-generation” DES and 86 underwent CABG. Baseline clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1 . Compared with the CABG subgroup, patients who underwent PCI had lower ejection fraction (49.8 vs 53.3, p = 0.008), more frequently a previous CABG (11% vs 3.5%, p = 0.04) or PCI (17.4% vs 8.1%, p = 0.04), and showed a trend toward higher EuroSCORE (9.1 vs 8.3 p = 0.06). CABG-treated patients had more frequently a right coronary artery involvement (36.2% vs 72.2%, p = 0.0001). Distal left main lesion location was present in 66.1% of the patients treated with PCI and in 54.6% of the patients treated with CABG (p = 0.03). A 2-stent technique was used in 27.5% of the distal lesions.


The incidence of in-hospital mortality in the PCI and CABG subgroups was 7.3% and 3.5%, respectively (p = 0.32), whereas the incidence of MI was 6% and 7%, respectively (p = 0.74). In-hospital MACCE incidence was not significantly different in PCI-treated patients and CABG-treated patients (12.8% vs 10.5%, p = 0.57; Table 2 ).


At a median of 1,088 days (interquartile range 420 to 1,458) of clinical follow-up, no difference in the primary composite end point of death, CVA, and MI was observed (32.6% PCI vs 30.2% CABG, p = 0.69). Furthermore, no significant differences were found in all-cause mortality (29% PCI vs 22.1% CABG, p = 0.23), cardiac death (13.8% PCI vs 14% CABG, p = 0.96), and noncardiac death (15.2% PCI vs 6.1% CABG, p = 0.1). MI occurred in 10 patients (4.6%) in the PCI group and 3 (3.5%) in the CABG group (p = 0.67). Seven patients (3.2%) in the PCI group and 4 (4.7%) in the CABG group suffered a CVA. TVR was performed in 22 patients (10.1%) treated with PCI versus 47 (4.7%) with CABG (p = 0.059). Definite and/or probable ST occurred in 4 patients (1.8%; Table 3 ).



Table 3

Cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at follow-up
































































Variable PCI (n = 218) CABG (n = 86) p
Death 63 ( 29%) 19 ( 22.1%) 0.23
Cardiac death 30 ( 13.8%) 12 ( 14.0%) 0.96
Non cardiac death 33 ( 15.2%) 7 ( 6.1%) 0.1
Myocardial infarction 10 ( 4.6%) 3 (3.5 % ) 0.67
CABG 3 ( 1.4%) 1 ( 1.2%) 0.88
RePCI 23 (10.5 % ) 4 (4.7 % ) 0.1
Target vessel revascularization 22 ( 10%) 3 ( 4.2%) 0.05
Cerebrovascular event 7 ( 3.2%) 4 ( 4.7%) 0.36
Definite/probable stent thrombosis 4 ( 1.8%) 0 0.57
Primary composite endpoint (death, MI, CVA) 71 ( 32.6%) 26 ( 30.2%) 0.69
MACCE 85 ( 39%) 28 ( 32.6%) 0.3

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 1, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Octogenarians (from a Drug-Eluting stent for LefT main Artery Registry Substudy)

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access